Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Nov 24;105(48):E100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809681105

Reply to Storey et al.: More DNA and dating studies needed for ancient El Arenal-1 chickens

Jaime Gongora a,1, Nicolas J Rawlence b, Victor A Mobegi c, Han Jianlin c,d, Jose A Alcalde e, Jose T Matus e, Olivier Hanotte c, Chris Moran a, Jeremy J Austin b, Sean Ulm f, Atholl J Anderson g, Greger Larson h,i, Alan Cooper b
PMCID: PMC2596257

In their letter, Storey et al. (1) concede that there is no direct genetic support for Polynesian–South American contact. However, they claim that linguistic, archaeological, and ethnohistoric evidence supports Polynesia as the most likely source of the El Arenal-1 chickens. We disagree on two grounds. First, such indirect evidence is conjectural, documents no eastward expansion to South America, and says nothing about the prehistoric availability of particular mtDNA haplotypes. Second, our central point was that analyses of all available ancient (2) and modern chicken mtDNA data reveal that the El Arenal-1 chicken carries a worldwide genetic signature potentially available to any of the possible introduction routes via Europe, Asia, and Polynesia (3). In contrast, none of the unusual genetic signatures from Easter Island chickens have been reported from South America (3).

The argument rests entirely on the radiocarbon dates. Current isotopic data indicate a fully terrestrial dietary signature (1). However, contrary to Storey et al. (1), El Arenal-1 is indeed a midden where chicken bones were found associated with marine organisms (4), and there are no local isotopic standards available to confirm the relationship between diet and isotopic signatures. Any marine input for the two new dates (1) would be consistent with a post-Columbian chronology. A region-specific set of isotopic standards and radiocarbon and stable isotope determinations for a large number of specimens of several species at the site are required as a matter of priority including dating additional chicken bones in independent laboratories to ensure reliable radiocarbon measurements (5).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Storey A, et al. Pre-Columbian chickens, dates, isotopes, and mtDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:E99. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807625105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Storey AA, et al. Radiocarbon and DNA evidence for a pre-Columbian introduction of Polynesian chickens to Chile. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10335–10339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703993104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gongora J, et al. Indo-European and Asian origins for Chilean and Pacific chickens revealed by mtDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10308–10313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801991105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Contreras L, Quiroz D, Sanchez M, Caballero C. Actas del XVI Congreso Nacional de Arqueologia Chilena. Concepcion, Chile: Museo de Historia Natural de Concepcion, Direccion de Bibliotecas, Archivos y Museos, Sociedad Chilena de Arqueologia; 2005. pp. 357–367. Ceramios, maices y ranas… un campamento El Vergel en las costas de Arauco. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilmshurst JM, Anderson AJ, Higham TFG, Worthy TH. Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;104:7676–7680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801507105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES