Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Dec 13;130(1):46–48. doi: 10.1021/ja076802c

Enantioselective, Organocatalytic Oxy-Michael Addition to γ/δ-Hydroxy-α,β-enones: Boronate-Amine Complexes as Chiral Hydroxide Synthons

De Run Li 1, Andiappan Murugan 1, J R Falck 1,*
PMCID: PMC2597475  NIHMSID: NIHMS63006  PMID: 18076175

Abstract

An organocatalytic, enantioselective oxy-Michael addition to achiral γ- and δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones was developed. The key transformation is an unprecedented, asymmetric conjugate addition triggered by complexation between an in situ generated boronic acid hemiester and a chiral amine catalyst. Functionally, the intermediate amine-boronate complex acts as a chiral hydroxide surrogate or synthon. The resultant chiral β-hydroxy-ketones are obtained in good to excellent yields and high ee following mild oxidative removal of the cyclic boronate. Natural products (R,12Z,15Z)-2-hydroxy-4-oxohenicosa-12,15-dienyl acetate and (+)-(S)-Streptenol A were synthesized to demonstrate the utility of this reaction.


Structural motif 1 is present in a wide range of natural products and synthetic intermediates.1 While Michael additions of hydroxide or synthetic equivalents to α,β-unsaturated carbonyls represent an attractive approach to this moiety,2 the strong basicity of the former and generally poor nucleophilicity or lability of the latter often render this option problematic. In its place, the intramolecular oxy-Michael addition of hemiacetal/hemiketal-derived alkoxides has emerged as a popular alternative strategy,3 although the resultant cyclic acetals/ketals can be difficult to remove. In some instances, satisfactory diastereoselectivity has been attained via exploitation of adjacent secondary hydroxy or amino stereocenters.4,5 In 2001, Watanabe et al6 introduced an asymmetric version of the oxy-Michael addition utilizing chiral hemiketals derived from D-glucose and D-fructose in the more challenging case of achiral γ/δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones. Herein, we reported an unprecedented organocatalytic, enantioselective oxy-Michael addition to achiral γ/δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones and its use in the preparation of 1 (eq 1).7 The key transformation is the asymmetric conjugate addition triggered by complexation between boronic acid hemiester 3, generated in situ from γ/δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones, and a chiral amine catalyst. Functionally, the intermediate amine-boronate complex acts as a chiral hydroxide surrogate or synthon. Mild, oxidative removal of the boronate moiety from the dioxaborolane (n = 0) or dioxaborinane (n = 1) adduct 2 furnishes 1 in good to excellent overall yield and % ee.

graphic file with name nihms63006f3.jpg

Recently, this8 and other laboratories9 have highlighted the nucleophilic properties of organoboronic acids and the unique stereospecific reactions of their borate complexes. Despite expectations, when model compound (E)-4-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2- buten-1-one (4) was mixed with equimolar phenylboronic acid and activated 4Å molecular sieves in CH2Cl2 (Table 1, entry 1), no intramolecular Michael addition was observed, even though the hemiester (3: R= Ph, n = 0) could be detected by 1H and 13C NMR. Inclusion of some common bases, viz., bicarbonate (entry 2), carbonate (entry 3), and pyridine (entry 4), likewise disappointed. However, a catalytic amount of Et3N (20 mol%, entry 5) gave rise to the desired dioxaborolane 5 from which diol 6 was secured in 42% overall yield (50% recovered 4 after 48 h) following workup with basic H2O2. We attribute this dramatic difference to the in situ formation of a nucleophilic, pyramidized quaternary boronate complex.10,11 DABCO, under otherwise identical conditions, significantly improved the overall conversion (entry 6) whereas diisopropylamine (20 mol%, entry 7) worked even better and delivered 6 in 86% overall yield in just 16 h. The reaction rate for the latter was enhanced even further in toluene (entry 8), but not in DME (entry 9); the yield showed only a modest solvent dependency. DBU (entry 10) and the highly hindered 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidine (entry 11) offered no advantage.

Table 1.

Base catalyzed oxy-Michael of 4a

graphic file with name nihms63006t1.jpg
entry base solvent time(h) yieldb(%)
1 none CH2Cl2 48 0
2 NaHCO3 CH2Cl2 48 0
3 Na2CO3 CH2Cl2 48 0
4 Pyridine CH2Cl2 48 0
5 Et3N CH2Cl2 48 42
6 DABCO CH2Cl2 48 70
7 iPr2NH CH2Cl2 16 86
8 iPr2NH PhCH3 8 87
9 iPr2NH DME 48 70
10 DBU CH2Cl2 48 30
11 PMPc PhCH3 80 82
a

Rxn conditions: (i) PhB(OH)2 (1.2 equiv), base (20 mol%), 4Å MS, rt; (ii) H2O2, Na2CO3, rt, 15 min.

b

Overall for two steps from enone 4 to diol 6.

c

PMP = 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidine.

Inspired by the pronounced success of push/pull-type bifunctional organocatalysts,12 we pursued an asymmetric version of this intramolecular oxy-Michael addition (Figure 1). Coordination of the carbonyl by the thiourea (the pull) and complexation of the tertiary nitrogen to boron (the push) were expected to simultaneously enhance the nucleophilicity of the boronate oxygen as well as envelope the enone in a chiral environment.13 Indeed, Michael addition to 4 in CH2Cl2 mediated by catalyst 712b was complete in 16 h (Table 2, entry 1), > 3 times faster than a similar Et3N catalyzed addition. More significantly, 12 was obtained in 91% yield and 91% ee after basic H2O2 workup.14,15 A comparable reaction in toluene proceeded still faster (8 h), but with significantly reduced enantioselectivity (65% ee), whereas in DME the rate was slower (24 h) and the % ee improved modestly to 94%. The less expensive quinine-based catalyst 812b was virtually equivalent to 7 in all respects (24 h, 95% ee). Notably, catalysts 912b and 1012a in DME (entry 2) provided access to the opposite enantiomeric diol, 13, in synthetically useful yields and enantioselectivities (40 h/89% ee and 48 h/91% ee, respectively). In sharp contrast to the accelerated rate seen with iPr2NH, catalyst 11, which also contains a secondary amine, proved surprisingly sluggish and was not pursued further.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proposed asymmetric catalysis

Table 2.

Asymmetric oxy-Michael of γ-hydroxy-α,β-enones

entry enone diol solvent time(h) Yielda(%) eeb(%)
1 4 graphic file with name nihms63006t2.jpg CH2Cl2c 16 91 91
PhCH3c 8 87 65
DMEc 24 89 94
DMEd 24 90 95
2 4 graphic file with name nihms63006t3.jpg DMEe 40 84 89
DMEf 48 84 91
3 graphic file with name nihms63006t4.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t5.jpg DMEd 14 92 90
4 graphic file with name nihms63006t6.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t7.jpg DMEd 27 85 97
5 graphic file with name nihms63006t8.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t9.jpg DMEd 22 83 97
6 graphic file with name nihms63006t10.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t11.jpg CH2Cl2d 72 78 89
7 graphic file with name nihms63006t12.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t13.jpg CH2Cl2d 72 95 87
8 graphic file with name nihms63006t14.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t15.jpg CH2Cl2d 27 94 92
9 graphic file with name nihms63006t16.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t17.jpg PhCH3d 36 78 98
10 graphic file with name nihms63006t18.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t19.jpg DMEd 28 71 99
a

Isolated yield.

b

Determined by chiral HPLC; absolute configuration assigned in analogy with 12 and 33.

c

Rxn conditions: (i) PhB(OH)2 (1.2 equiv), 7 (10 mol%), 4Å MS, rt; (ii) H2O2, Na2CO3, rt, 15 min.

d

Catalyst 8 (10 mol%) was used.

e

Catalyst 9 (10 mol%) was used.

f

Catalyst 10 (10 mol%) was used.

graphic file with name nihms63006f4.jpg

The scope of the oxy-Michael was further explored using catalyst 8 and a representative sampling of γ-hydroxy-α,β-enones (Table 2). Predictably, arylketones bearing strong electron withdrawing substituents (entry 3) reacted faster than electron rich systems (entries 4 and 5), although the enantioselectivities of the latter were better.

Aliphatic ketones (entries 6 and 7), regardless of steric congestion adjacent to the carbonyl (20 vs. 22), had retarded reaction rates, yet still afforded excellent overall yields. The conversion of 24 into 25 (entry 8) thus appears anomalous for its comparatively rapid rate and may reflect an unanticipated coordination by the terminal oxygen substituent. The survival of the labile silyl (TES) ether also testifies to the mildness of the reaction conditions. Importantly, additional substitution at the olefin (entry 9) or carbinol (entry 10) was well tolerated and adds to the level of structural complexity that can be achieved.

To validate the applicability of the foregoing methodology in natural products total synthesis, acetate 33,16 an extraordinarily potent antifungal/hepatic protective agent isolated from avocado, was prepared by a biomimetic route (Scheme 1). Addition of lithium dimethyl methylphosphonate to methyl linoleate (30) and condensation of the adduct with glycoaldehyde furnished enone 31 which was subjected to oxy-Michael addition catalyzed by 8. The product (R)-diol 32 (90% yield, 91% ee14) was selectively acetylated to give 33.17

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Biomimetic Synthesis of Antifungal/Hepatic Protective Agent from Avocadoa

aReagents and conditions: (a) H3CP(O)(OMe)2, LDA, THF, −78 °C, 2 h, 90%; (b) [HC(O)CH2OH]2, LiCl, DIPEA, rt, CH3CN, 2 h, 51%; (c) (i) PhB(OH)2 (1.2 equiv), 8 (10 mol%), 4Å MS, CH2Cl2, rt, 56 h; (ii) H2O2, Na2CO3, rt, 15 min; (d) AcCl (1.2 equiv), collidine, CH2Cl2, −78°C, 10 h.

With δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones, oxy-Michael addition proceeded quite slowly in all solvents, although toluene was generally the best. Increasing the catalyst loading to 20 mol% and the temperature to 50°C, however, allowed the reaction to proceed at an acceptable rate and enantioselectivity for aromatic enones (Table 3: entries 1–3). For the more recalcitrant aliphatic enones (entries 4–6), these conditions were not sufficient. We, thus, screened a panel of commercial arylboronic acids to identify 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylboronic acid as a more efficacious nucleophilic partner, which furnished aliphatic diols in good to excellent enantioselectivities at suitable rates. Diol 44 was identical in all respects with (+)-(S)-streptenol A, one of four known streptenols produced by Streptomyces luteogriseus that has attracted attention as an immunostimulant as well as an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis and tumor cells.19

Table 3.

Oxy-Michael of δ-hydroxy-α,β-enones

entry enone ArB(OH)2 diol time(h) yielda(%) eeb(%)
1 graphic file with name nihms63006t20.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t21.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t22.jpg 12c 80 91
2 34 graphic file with name nihms63006t23.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t24.jpg 26d 72 83
27e 71 86
3 graphic file with name nihms63006t25.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t26.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t27.jpg 18c 86 87
4 graphic file with name nihms63006t28.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t29.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t30.jpg 24c 73 84
5 graphic file with name nihms63006t31.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t32.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t33.jpg 50c 82 96
6 graphic file with name nihms63006t34.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t35.jpg graphic file with name nihms63006t36.jpg 37c 75 88
a

Isolated yield.

b

Determined by chiral HPLC; absolute configuration assigned in analogy with natural 44 and chemical correlation of 40 with a known intermediate (see reference 18).

c

Rxn conditions: (i) ArB(OH)2 (1.2 equiv), 8 (20 mol%), 4Å MS, toluene, 50 °C; (ii) H2O2, Na2CO3, rt, 15 min.

d

Catalyst 9 (20 mol%) was used.

e

Catalyst 10 (20 mol%) was used.

graphic file with name nihms63006f5.jpg

In contrast to carboxylic acids, boronic acids and their chiral complexes have not been well explored as nucleophilic reagents in organic synthesis. Furthermore, the often idiosyncratic reactivity of boronates offers unique opportunities for stereoselective manipulations. As an illustration, the oxy-Michael adduct formed in situ from 4 and phenylboronic acid under catalysis by 8 acted as a template for the stereoselective addition of allenylboronic acid to the carbonyl, possibly via intermediate 45 (eq 2). Diol 46 was generated, without isolation of intermediates, in good overall yield and diastereoselectivity.20,21 Further developments including diastereoselective and intermolecular oxy-Michael additions are under investigation.

Supplementary Material

1File001. Supporting Information Available.

Synthetic procedures, analytical data, X-ray, and NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

2File003

Acknowledgments

11B NMR measured by Dr. RenSheng Luo (UMSL). X-ray analysis by Radha Akella (UTSW). Financial support provide by the Robert A. Welch Foundation and NIH (GM31278, DK38226).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Recent review: Schetter B, Mahrwald R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006;45:7506–7525. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602780.
  • 2.For examples of asymmetric Michael additions of oxygen-centered nucleophiles, see: Kano T, Tanaka Y, Maruoka K. alcohols. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:8658–8664.; (b) Bertelsen S, Diner P, Johansen RL, Jorgensen KA. oximes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:1536–1537. doi: 10.1021/ja068908y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Vanderwal CD, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:14724–14725. doi: 10.1021/ja045563f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Govender T, Hojabri L, Moghaddam FM, Arvidsson PI. phenols. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2006;17:1763–1767. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chandrasekhar S, Rambabu C, Shyamsunder T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:4683–4685. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Evans DA, Gauchet-Prunet JA. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:2446–2453. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen YK, Yoshida M, MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9328–9329. doi: 10.1021/ja063267s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Watanabe H, Machida K, Itoh D, Nagatsuka H, Kitahara T. Chirality. 2001;13:379–385. doi: 10.1002/chir.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For a review of asymmetric organocatalytic oxy-Michael additions, see: Berkessel A, Groerger H, editors. Asymmetric Organocatalysis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2005. Chapter 4.
  • 8.Falck JR, Bondlela M, Venkataraman SK, Srinivas D. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:7148–7150. doi: 10.1021/jo015838z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Yamaoka Y, Miyabe H, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6686–6687. doi: 10.1021/ja071470x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Oshima K, Aoyama Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:2315–2316. [Google Scholar]; (c) Matteson DS. Pure App. Chem. 2003;75:1249–1253. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Amine-borate complexes are well-known: Gillis EP, Burke MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6716–6717. doi: 10.1021/ja0716204.
  • 11.Rehybridization of the boron center from sp2 to sp3 via coordination with trivalent nitrogen was unambiguously supported by the upfield chemical shift in the 11B NMR as described in Supporting Information section and ref. 9b.
  • 12.(a) Okino T, Hoashi Y, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2003;125:12672–12673. doi: 10.1021/ja036972z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Vakulya B, Varga S, Csámpai A, Soos T. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1967–1969. doi: 10.1021/ol050431s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.The critical role played by thiourea hydrogen bonding in the activation of the enone is evident from a control experiment in which the thiourea catalyst 8 was replaced with 20 mol% O-benzoylquinine ( Shi M, Lei Z-Y, Zhao M-X, Shi J-W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:5743–5746.) Diol 12 was obtained in <5% yield and the majority of starting 4 was recovered unchanged.
  • 14.Enantiomeric ratio measured by chiral HPLC.
  • 15.Absolute configuration assigned by comparison with literature optical rotation data: Ticozzi C, Zanarotti A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:7421–7424.
  • 16.MacLeod JK, Schäffeler L. Synthesis. J. Nat. Prod. 1995;58:1270–1273.Interestingly, the (S)-enantiomer is inactive.
  • 17.Ishihara K, Kurihara H, Yamamoto H. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:3791–3793. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Selective primary silylation of 40 (TBDPSCl, DCM, DMAP, rt, 10 h) followed by p-methoxybenzylation (PMB-O(NH)CCl3) gave compound (i): [α]20D = + 5.9 (c 0.85, CHCl3); lit. [α]20D = + 4.8 (c 1.49, CHCl3). See, Li DR, Zhang D-H, Sun C-Y, Zhang J-W, Yang L, Chen J, Liu B, Su C, Zhou W-S, Lin G-Q. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12:1185–1204. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500892.graphic file with name nihms63006f6.jpg
  • 19.Dollt H, Hammann P, Blechert S. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1999;82:1111–1122. and references cited therein. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.A similar diastereoselective addition of allenylboronic acid to β-hydoxy ketones has been reported: Ikeda N, Omori K, Yamamoto H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:1175–1178.
  • 21.The absolute configuration of 46 was confirmed by x-ray analysis (see Supporting Information section).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1File001. Supporting Information Available.

Synthetic procedures, analytical data, X-ray, and NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

2File003

RESOURCES