Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1986 Oct;54(1):228–232. doi: 10.1128/iai.54.1.228-232.1986

Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a crystal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki.

M Huber-Lukac, F Jaquet, P Luethy, R Huetter, D G Braun
PMCID: PMC260141  PMID: 3759236

Abstract

Ten monoclonal antibodies were produced against a k-1-type crystal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. Eight of the antibodies belong to the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) subclass, with pI values ranging from 5.5 to 8.6, one could be assigned to the IgG2b subclass, and one could be assigned to the IgM class. Competitive antibody-binding assays and analysis of antibody specificity indicated that the 10 antibodies recognized at least nine distinct antigenic determinants. Eight antibodies bound to both protoxin and toxin, whereas the other two interacted with protoxin only. One antibody completely inhibited the biological activity of the delta-endotoxin, five antibodies reduced it by 15 to 82%, and four antibodies did not affect it at all. Based on cross-reaction studies, homologies and differences in the crystal protein structures of different B. thuringiensis subspecies were revealed. All of the monoclonal antibodies strongly cross-reacted with crystal proteins from strains of B. thuringiensis subsp. tolworthi, B. thuringiensis subsp. galleriae, B. thuringiensis subsp. dendrolimus, B. thuringiensis subsp. sotto, and B. thuringiensis subsp. subtoxicus. Some antibodies interacted only weakly with crystal proteins from strains of B. thuringiensis subsp. morrisoni and B. thuringiensis subsp. entomocidus, and some of these did not interact with B. thuringiensis subsp. kenyae and B. thuringiensis subsp. darmstadiensis. No cross-reaction was found with the parasporal inclusion protein of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Studies with the monoclonal antibodies also disclosed that crystal proteins from strains of the same subspecies can exhibit substantial differences in antigenic structure. In particular, striking strain-specific differences in the protoxins of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis subsp. thuringiensis were observed.

Full text

PDF
228

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berzofsky J. A. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in protein antigenic structure. Science. 1985 Sep 6;229(4717):932–940. doi: 10.1126/science.2410982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delafield F. P., Somerville H. J., Rittenberg S. C. Immunological homology between crystal and spore protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Bacteriol. 1968 Sep;96(3):713–720. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.3.713-720.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galfre G., Howe S. C., Milstein C., Butcher G. W., Howard J. C. Antibodies to major histocompatibility antigens produced by hybrid cell lines. Nature. 1977 Apr 7;266(5602):550–552. doi: 10.1038/266550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huber-Lukac M., Lüthy P., Braun D. G. Specificities of monoclonal antibodies against the activated delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis. Infect Immun. 1983 May;40(2):608–612. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.2.608-612.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krywienczyk J., Dulmage H. T., Fast P. G. Occurrence of two serologically distinct groups within Bacillus thuringiensis serotype 3 ab var. kurstaki. J Invertebr Pathol. 1978 May;31(3):372–375. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(78)90232-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Köhler G., Hengartner H., Shulman M. J. Immunoglobulin production by lymphocyte hybridomas. Eur J Immunol. 1978 Feb;8(2):82–88. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830080203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shulman M., Wilde C. D., Köhler G. A better cell line for making hybridomas secreting specific antibodies. Nature. 1978 Nov 16;276(5685):269–270. doi: 10.1038/276269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tyrell D. J., Bulla L. A., Jr, Andrews R. E., Jr, Kramer K. J., Davidson L. I., Nordin P. Comparative biochemistry of entomocidal parasporal crystals of selected Bacillus thuringiensis strains. J Bacteriol. 1981 Feb;145(2):1052–1062. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.1052-1062.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yewdell J. W., Gerhard W. Antigenic characterization of viruses by monoclonal antibodies. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981;35:185–206. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.35.100181.001153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yousten A. A., Rogoff M. H. Metabolism of Bacillus thuringiensis in relation to spore and crystal formation. J Bacteriol. 1969 Dec;100(3):1229–1236. doi: 10.1128/jb.100.3.1229-1236.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES