Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J AOAC Int. 2006;89(1):22–34.

Determination of Campesterol, Stigmasterol, and beta-Sitosterol in Saw Palmetto Raw Materials and Dietary Supplements by Gas Chromatography: Single-Laboratory Validation

Wendy R Sorenson 1, Darryl Sullivan 1
PMCID: PMC2602963  NIHMSID: NIHMS77646  PMID: 16512224

Abstract

In conjunction with an AOAC Presidential Task Force on Dietary Supplements, a method was validated for measurement of 3 plant sterols (phytosterols) in saw palmetto raw materials, extracts, and dietary supplements. AOAC Official Method 994.10, “Cholesterol in Foods,” was modified for purposes of this validation. Test samples were saponified at high temperature with ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution. The unsaponifiable fraction containing phytosterols (campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol) was extracted with toluene. Phytosterols were derivatized to trimethylsilyl ethers and then quantified by gas Chromatography with a hydrogen flame ionization detector. The presence of the phytosterols was detected at concentrations greater than or equal to 1.00 mg/100 g based on 2–3 g of sample. The standard curve range for this assay was 0.00250 to 0.200 mg/mL. The calibration curves for all phytosterols had correlation coefficients greater than or equal to 0.995. Precision studies produced relative standard deviation values of 1.52 to 7.27% for campesterol, 1.62 to 6.48% for stigmasterol, and 1.39 to 10.5% for beta-sitosterol. Recoveries for samples fortified at 100% of the inherent values averaged 98.5 to 105% for campesterol, 95.0 to 108% for stigmasterol, and 85.0 to 103% for beta-sitosterol.


Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) is a native plant of North America, most commonly found in Florida. The berries of the saw palmetto plant have been used for medicinal purposes for centuries. Both berry raw material and extract are found in dietary supplements and are most commonly used to treat symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In conjunction with an AOAC Task Force on Dietary Supplements, a method was validated for measurement of 3 plant sterols (phytosterols) in saw palmetto raw materials, extracts, and dietary supplements. AOAC Official Method 994.10, “Cholesterol in Foods,” was modified for purposes of this validation. The phytosterols campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol are chemically very similar to cholesterol. They extract and chromatograph very comparably to cholesterol. Due to the similarities of these compounds, a number of laboratories have successfully extended AOAC Official Method 994.10 to measure not only cholesterol, but these phytosterols as well. The following test materials were used in this validation: powdered saw palmetto berry, saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dried fruit CO2 extracts, saw palmetto 45% powdered extract, ProstActive® Once Daily, Prostasan™ Prostrate Capsules, Liquid Herbal Extract: saw palmetto, alcohol-free saw palmetto, ProstActive Plus saw palmetto combined with nettle root extract, pygeum and saw palmetto standardized herbal extracts, and saw palmetto pygeum lycopene complex tablets.

Experimental

Apparatus

  1. Centrifuge tubes.—Pyrex No. 13, 15 mL, silanized. Tubes were silanized using a commercial silinizing reagent (Surfasil™ Siliconizing Fluid, No. 42801, Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). Manufacturer’s instructions were followed for silanization. Before each reuse, tubes were cleaned with water, ethanol, hexane, and acetone and oven-dried at 100°C.

  2. Plastic stoppers.

  3. Gas Chromatography (GC).—With 2-ramp oven temperature programming (Hewlett Packard Model 5890A is suitable) and hydrogen flame ionization detector (FID; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).

  4. Column.—Capillary, split-mode, 25 m × 0.32 mm × 0.17 μm film thickness, cross-linked 5% phenyl-methyl silicone or methyl silicone gum (e.g., Hewlett Packard No. HP-5, Ultra 2, or HP-1; Agilent Technologies).

  5. Deactivated split inlet liner filled with glass wool.

  6. Rotary evaporator.—With glass condenser flask between the concentration flask and metal shaft.

  7. Magnetic stirrer-hot plate.—With variable speed and heat controls; Model PC320, Corning (Corning, NY).

  8. Micropipets.—Delivering 100 and 200 μL.

  9. Vortex mixer.—Model M37615, Type 37600 Mixer: Thermolyne (Dubuque, IA).

  10. Balance.—Analytical, weighing to 0.0001 g.

  11. Centrifuge.—Model K; International Equipment Co. (Needham Heights, MA).

(Note: Equivalent apparatus may be substituted. All glassware is class A.)

Reagents

  1. Dimethylformamide (DMF).—Spectrophotometry grade; J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ).

  2. Hexamethyldisilane (HMDS).—Derivatization grade, No. 3-3011; Supelco (Bellefonte, PA).

  3. Potassium hydroxide solutions.—50% KOH (w/w), 1 M KOH, and 0.5 M KOH. (1) 50% KOH (w/w).—500 g KOH (Certified A.C.S. Pellets; Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ) was dissolved in 500 g water; (2) 1 M KOH.—56 g KOH was dissolved in ca 800 mL water with cooling and diluted to the mark in a 1 L volumetric flask; (3) 0.5 M KOH.—One part of 1 M KOH solution was diluted with 1 part water.

  4. Trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS).—No. 88530; Pierce Chemical Co.

  5. Toluene.—Distilled in glass, HPLC grade (Fisher Scientific).

  6. Sodium sulfate.—Anhydrous, certified A.C.S. grade (Fisher Scientific).

  7. Glass wool.—Fiberglass, 8 micron (Corning).

  8. Acetone.—HPLC grade (Fisher Scientific).

  9. 95% Ethanol.—Remet Alcohol Division (La Mirada, CA).

  10. n-Heptane.—HPLC grade, No. 34873-4L: Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO).

  11. Water.—Prepared with a Milli-Q® purification system; Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA).

(Note: Equivalent reagents may be substituted.)

Reference Standards

  1. 5α-Cholestane internal standard (IS) solution.—No. C-8003; Sigma-Aldrich Co.

  2. Campesterol (CAS No. 474-62-4).—No. 03072-641, >95% pure; Chromadex (Santa Ana, CA).

  3. Stigmasterol (CASNo. 83-48-7).—No. S-2424, >95% pure; Sigma-Aldrich Co.

  4. beta-Sitosterol (CAS No. 83-46-5).—No. S-9889, >98% pure; Sigma-Aldrich Co.

(Note: Equivalent reference materials may be substituted.)

Preparation of Standards

(a) IS

Ca 0.0100 g 5α-cholestane was weighed into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to mark with n-heptane to make a solution with a concentration of 0.100 mg/mL. Solutions were stored protected from light at room temperature when not in use and prepared fresh as needed.

(b) GC calibration standards

In a 100 mL volumetric flask, campesterol, Stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol were accurately weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg so that the concentration was ca 0.200 mg/mL after dilution to volume with DMF. The solution was mixed by inverting the flask numerous times. Then the standard was diluted as necessary to obtain 5 additional standards ranging in concentration from ca 0.00250 to 0.200 mg/mL. Solutions were stored protected from light at room temperature when not in use. Standards were shown to be stable for at least 1 year.

(c) Mixed standards

Prepared by appropriate dilution to the concentrations listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Preparation of mixed standards

Standard No. Intermediate volume, mL Final volume, mL Concentration, mg/mL
1 NAa 50 0.200
2 25 50 0.100
3 25 50 0.0500
4 10 50 0.0100
5 25 50 0.00500
6 25 50 0.00250
a

NA = Not applicable.

Preparation of Samples

(a) Saponification

An appropriate amount of homogenous product was weighed (2.00 to 3.00 g to nearest 0.01 g) into a 250 or 300 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Amagnetic stir bar was placed into the flask, and 40 mL of 95% ethanol and 8 mL of 50% KOH solution were added to the flask.

The flask was placed on a magnetic stirrer hot plate with a condenser attached, and the contents were refluxed for 80 ± 10 min. To ensure complete saponification, test portions were occasionally visually checked, and any clumps were dispersed with a glass rod or by adding KOH solution to the test portion while stirring.

After refluxing, the heat was turned off and 60 mL of 95% ethanol was added through the top of the condenser while stirring the solution. The 95% ethanol was added carefully to avoid splashing of alcohol from the top of the condenser. After being stirred for ca 15 min, the flask was removed from the condenser and closed with a stopper, and the solution was cooled to room temperature. Test solution was stable for up to 1 week if tightly sealed.

(b) Extraction

100 mL toluene (V1) was added to the saponified test portion while stirring on a magnetic stirrer. The solution was poured into a 500 mL separatory funnel without rinsing, and 110 mL of 1 M KOH solution was added and shaken vigorously for at least 20 s. The layers were allowed to separate and the aqueous lower layer, which was turbid, was discarded. KOH solution (40 mL of 0.5 M) was added to the separatory funnel. The funnel was inverted, and the contents were gently swirled for at least 10 s. The aqueous lower layer was discarded.

The toluene layer was washed with 40 mL water by gently rotating the separatory funnel. The layers were allowed to separate, and the aqueous phase was discarded. The water wash was repeated at least 3 times, shaken more vigorously each time. If emulsification occurred, a small amount of 95% ethanol was added, the contents of funnel were swirled, the layers were allowed to separate, and the water washes were continued. After the final wash, the toluene layer was crystal clear.

The toluene layer was poured from the top of the separatory funnel through a glass funnel containing a plug of glass wool and ca 20 g Na2SO4 into a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing ca 2 g Na2SO4. The flask was stoppered, and the contents were swirled. The mixture was allowed to stand for at least 15 min. Test solutions were held up to 24 h if tightly sealed.

The toluene extract (V2; 25 mL) was pipetted into a 125 mL flat-bottom boiling flask, and the contents were evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator set at 55°C. Ca 3 mL acetone was added, and the contents were evaporated to dryness again. The residue was dissolved in 3.0 mL DMF (V3). The final concentration of campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol in DMF needed to be within range of working standard solutions. If, after quantification by GC, the test portion concentration fell outside of the standard curve, the amount of V2 evaporated was changed so that the final concentration of campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol in DMF fell within the range of the standards.

(c) Derivatization

Aliquots (1.0 mL) of working standard solutions and test solution were pipetted into separate 15 mL centrifuge tubes. To each tube, 0.2 mL HMDS and 0.1 mL TMCS were added. The tubes were stoppered and shaken vigorously on a Vortex mixer for 30 s. The solution was allowed to stand undisturbed for 15 min. To each tube, 1.0 mL 5α-cholestane IS solution and 10 mL water were added. The tubes were stoppered, shaken vigorously for 30 s, and centrifuged for ca 2 min.

A sufficient portion of heptane (upper) layer was transferred to an injection vial, with ensurance that no aqueous layer was transferred. Derivatized standards and test solutions were analyzed within 24 h.

Determination

Standards and samples were analyzed using the instrumental conditions shown in Table 2. At least one set of GC calibration standards was injected at the beginning of the run and one at the end of the run. A standard was run in between each sample to avoid possible analyte carryover. When using standards that had carryover in the standard curve, standard peaks were integrated from valley to valley.

Table 2.

Gas chromatography conditions

Column Capillary column, split mode (25 m × 0.32 mm) cross-linked 5% phenyl-methyl silicone or methyl silicone gum
Film thickness 0.17 μm
Detector Hydrogen flame ionization detector (FID)

Temperatures
Column 190°C, hold 2 min; increase 20°/min to 230°C, hold 3 min; increase 40°/min to 255°C, hold 25 min
Injector 250°C
Detector 300°C

Flow rates
Carrier 2 mL/min, split vent ca 30 mL/min, purge vent ca 3 mL/min helium
Makeup 20 mL/min helium
Hydrogen 35 mL/min
Air 280 mL/min
Injection volume 1 μL

Calculations

A standard calibration curve was generated by using the ratio of the analyte peak area versus the area of the internal standard peak for each concentration level. A calibration curve was produced for each analyte. High-level test solutions were diluted to fall within the standard range. Weighting (1/x) was necessary to obtain acceptable linearity at lower standard concentrations:

y=mx+b

where y = relative peak area (area of analyte/area of IS), m = slope of the line generated by a standard curve, x = concentration of analyte found (mg/mL), and b = y-intercept of the line generated by the standard curve.

Grams of test portion/mL derivatized was calculated as follows:

Testportionderivatized,g/mL=(W1/V1)×(V2/V3)

where W1 = weight of test portion (g), V1 = volume of toluene used in extraction (mL), V2 = aliquot of extract taken to dryness (mL), and V3 = volume of DMF used to dissolve residue (mL).

The content of each phytosterol component in test portions was calculated as follows:

mgPhytosterol/100gtestportion=concentrationofanalytefound,mg/mLtestportionderivatized,g/mL×100

Results and Discussion

The limit of quantification (LOQ) for this method was found to be 1.00 mg/100 g. Calibration curves were generated with each data set, on each day during the course of this validation. The calibration range encompassed the expected concentration of each extracted and diluted test material range. Calibration standards (consisting of 6 concentration levels ranging from 0.00250 to 0.200 mg/mL) were analyzed at a minimum before and after each sample set with another set interspersed throughout the run. Each test sample was placed between the interspersed standards to avoid possible carryover. The response ratio of the analyte (peak area of analyte/peak area of IS) versus concentration was used to construct the calibration curve using a 1/x weighted linear regression method. The calibration curves had correlation coefficients (r) of greater than or equal to 0.995.

Precision of the method was evaluated by having 6 replicates of each test material analyzed by the same analyst on 2 separate days. If the initial sample extract fell above the highest standard of the curve, as indicated above, the extract was diluted to fit on the curve. For the majority of the precision results, the RSDrS were either below or within the target RSDr ranges with a few exceeding this range. The HorRat values were calculated, and all precision results (Day 1, Day 2, and Days 1 and 2 combined) for all test materials had values below 0.3 or between 0.3 and 1.3. Based on the acceptable HorRat values for this single laboratory validation (SLV), the collaborative study should be successful. The target RSDr and HorRat values were calculated as follows (1):

TargetRSDr=acceptableintralaboratoryprecision(0.500to0.667)PRSDR
PRSDR=2C0.15
C=Meanconcentrationexpressedasamassfraction
HorRatvalue=RSDr/PRSDR

Precision results are presented in Table 3. Example chromatograms of a mixed standard and test materials with varying amounts of campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol are presented in Figures 1 through 4.

Table 3.

Precision data

Day 1 precision mg/100 g
Day 2 precision mg/100 g
Days 1 and 2 precision combined, mg/100 g
Test material identification/replicates Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol
Saw palmetto 45% powdered extract
1 34.9 16.8 114 34.8 17.4 105
2 35.2 16.7 116 34.5 16.9 101
3 34.5 16.8 115 35.2 17.5 103
4 36.7 17.2 116 34.7 17.6 102
5 34.8 16.5 115 35.3 17.4 103
6 34.6 16.7 114 34.7 16.8 102
 Mean 35.1 16.8 115 34.9 17.3 103 35.0 17.0 109
 SDa 0.813 0.232 0.894 0.314 0.333 1.37 0.602 0.372 6.53
 RSDr, %b 2.32 1.38 0.777 0.900 1.92 1.33 1.72 2.19 5.99
 Target RSDr lowb 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
 Target RSDr highc 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
 PRSDRc 6.60 7.37 5.52 6.60 7.33 5.61 6.60 7.35 5.56
 HorRatd 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0

Alcohol-free saw palmetto
1 2.50 1.13 7.34 2.37 1.27 6.06
2 2.52 1.19 7.67 2.50 1.35 6.37
3 2.57 1.23 7.61 2.51 1.35 6.39
4 2.61 1.24 7.81 2.44 1.34 6.28
5 2.60 1.22 7.70 2.37 1.26 6.10
6 2.52 1.20 7.53 2.50 1.33 6.26
 Mean 2.55 1.20 7.61 2.45 1.32 6.24 2.50 1.26 6.93
 SD 0.0463 0.0397 0.162 0.0655 0.0408 0.137 0.0770 0.0713 0.728
 RSDr, % 1.82 3.31 2.13 2.67 3.09 2.20 3.08 5.66 10.5
 Target RSDr low 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4
 Target RSDr high 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 6
 PRSDR 9.77 10.9 8.30 9.83 10.8 8.55 9.80 10.9 8.41
 HorRat 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0

Liquid Herbal Extract: saw palmetto
1 1.98 1.34 7.17 1.85 1.47 7.50
2 2.04 1.34 7.37 1.83 1.52 7.84
3 1.98 1.35 7.23 1.82 1.57 8.00
4 1.95 1.33 7.11 1.88 1.44 7.77
5 1.97 1.40 7.33 1.87 1.50 7.80
6 2.29 1.54 7.78 1.84 1.49 7.90
 Mean 2.04 1.38 7.33 1.85 1.50 7.80 1.94 1.44 7.57
 SD 0.128 0.0807 0.240 0.0232 0.0445 0.169 0.131 0.0864 0.315
 RSDr, % 6.27 5.85 3.27 1.25 2.97 2.17 6.75 6.00 4.16
 Target RSDr low 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4
 Target RSDr high 7 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 6
 PRSDR 10.1 10.7 8.34 10.3 10.6 8.26 10.2 10.6 8.30
 HorRat 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.03 0.7 0.6 0.5

Powdered saw palmetto berry
1 5.28 3.93 30.9 5.01 3.95 33.4
2 6.12 3.90 30.3 4.99 3.91 33.6
3 5.30 3.82 30.4 5.01 4.05 33.9
4 5.89 4.50 31.8 4.97 3.82 33.3
5 5.67 4.28 30.4 5.33 4.18 34.3
6 5.63 4.01 30.9 5.05 3.93 33.6
 Mean 5.65 4.07 30.8 5.06 3.97 33.7 5.35 4.02 32.2
 SD 0.328 0.262 0.564 0.135 0.125 0.366 0.389 0.203 1.58
 RSDr, % 5.81 6.44 1.83 2.67 3.15 1.09 7.27 5.05 4.91
 Target RSDr low 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3
 Target RSDr high 6 6 4 6 6 4 6 6 4
 PRSDR 8.67 9.11 6.73 8.82 9.15 6.64 8.75 9.13 6.68
 HorRat 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.7

ProstActive Once Daily
1 38.3 19.9 117 35.6 18.0 101
2 35.3 18.5 109 35.0 18.1 100
3 36.7 19.9 115 36.6 19.5 103
4 34.8 18.6 108 36.3 19.2 102
5 39.6 22.6 119 36.2 19.3 102
6 35.3 18.2 109 36.0 19.3 100
 Mean 36.7 19.6 113 36.0 18.9 101 36.3 19.3 107
 SD 1.92 1.63 4.75 0.572 0.666 1.21 1.40 1.25 6.86
 RSDr, % 5.23 8.32 4.20 1.59 3.52 1.20 3.86 6.48 6.41
 Target RSDr low 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
 Target RSDr high 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
 PRSDR 6.55 7.20 5.53 6.57 7.24 5.63 6.56 7.21 5.58
 HorRat 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.0

ProstActive Plus saw palmetto combined with nettle root extract
1 31.8 10.4 129 34.4 9.42 117
2 31.5 9.25 128 36.0 10.2 119
3 32.0 10.1 130 35.6 10.1 119
4 31.3 9.17 121 34.5 9.90 116
5 30.3 9.37 119 36.5 10.5 120
6 32.3 10.5 126 34.1 10.0 115
 Mean 31.5 9.80 126 35.2 10.0 118 33.4 9.91 1.22
 SD 0.700 0.604 4.51 0.983 0.359 1.97 2.07 0.488 5.26
 RSDr, % 2.22 6.16 3.58 2.79 3.59 1.67 6.20 4.92 4.31
 Target RSDr low 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
 Target RSDr high 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
 PRSDR 6.70 7.99 5.44 6.59 7.96 5.50 6.64 7.97 5.47
 HorRat 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.8

Prostasan Prostrate Capsules
1 39.8 20.2 116 40.4 20.7 108
2 39.6 19.3 117 40.2 20.8 108
3 37.8 19.6 113 40.1 20.4 110
4 38.6 19.6 117 39.6 20.3 107
5 37.7 19.4 115 41.5 20.4 108
6 39.2 19.9 118 39.8 20.8 108
 Mean 38.8 19.7 116 40.3 20.6 108 39.5 20.1 112
 SD 0.900 0.333 1.79 0.668 0.225 0.983 1.08 0.542 4.32
 RSDr, % 2.32 1.69 1.54 1.66 1.09 0.910 2.73 2.7 3.86
 Target RSDr low 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
 Target RSDr high 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
 PRSDR 6.50 7.19 5.51 6.46 7.14 5.57 6.48 7.17 5.54
 HorRat 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7

Pygeum and saw palmetto standardized herbal extracts
1 21.5 8.07 264 22.3 8.26 278
2 21.8 8.91 266 22.9 8.68 277
3 23.3 9.76 281 21.8 8.47 274
4 22.5 9.13 269 22.9 8.53 278
5 21.9 8.91 270 22.1 8.35 273
6 22.2 8.32 267 22.0 8.39 276
 Mean 22.2 8.85 270 22.3 8.45 276 22.3 8.65 273
 SD 0.639 0.600 6.02 0.468 0.148 2.10 0.538 0.467 5.48
 RSDr, % 2.88 6.78 2.23 2.10 1.75 0.761 2.41 5.40 2.01
 Target RSDr low 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 2
 Target RSDr high 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 3
 PRSDR 7.06 8.11 4.86 7.06 8.17 4.84 7.06 8.14 4.85
 HorRat 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.4

Saw palmetto pygeum lycopene complex tablets
1 112 100 268 114 102 269
2 113 101 268 129 115 300
3 114 101 268 115 102 271
4 116 103 274 117 103 274
5 109 98.1 263 121 107 280
6 118 104 279 125 112 293
 Mean 114 101 270 120 107 281 117 104 276
 SD 3.14 2.11 5.62 5.95 5.56 12.6 5.66 4.98 11.0
 RSDr, % 2.75 2.09 2.08 4.96 5.20 4.48 4.84 4.79 3.99
 Target RSDr low 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2
 Target RSDr high 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3
 PRSDR 5.53 5.63 4.86 5.48 5.58 4.83 5.51 5.60 4.84
 HorRat 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8

Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dried fruit CO2 extracts
1 55.5 28.7 176 56.6 28.9 174
2 55.1 29.1 178 55.5 28.7 172
3 55.6 28.7 178 55.9 28.3 175
4 55.4 29.1 176 55.9 28.6 173
5 53.8 27.8 171 56.3 28.7 174
6 53.9 27.6 171 55.1 28.5 173
 Mean 54.9 28.5 175 55.9 28.6 174 55.4 28.6 1.74
 SD 0.818 0.648 3.22 0.538 0.204 1.05 0.842 0.462 2.42
 RSDr, % 1.49 2.27 1.84 0.962 0.713 0.603 1.52 1.62 1.39
 Target RSDr low 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
 Target RSDr high 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3
 PRSDR 6.17 6.80 5.18 6.15 6.80 5.19 6.16 6.80 5.19
 HorRat 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
a

SD = Standard deviation.

b

RSDr = Intralaboratory relative standard deviation.

c

PRSDR = 2 C−0.15, where C is the mean concentration expressed as a mass fraction.

d

HorRat = RSD/PRSDR.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

An example chromatogram of a mixed standard, 0.100 mg/mL.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

An example chromatogram for saw palmetto pygeum lycopene complex tablets.

For this SLV, a negative control was not used. In order to determine accuracy, the powdered saw palmetto sample was fortified 7 times with the mixed reference standard at 0.5, 1, and 2 times the amount detected, or at 3 levels that bracketed the amounts detected. In addition, a single midpoint fortification was conducted on the remaining 9 test materials in replicates of 6. Recovery was conducted on 2 separate days. The Days 1 and 2 combined averages recovery for each phytosterol was within 80–120%. On each individual day, average recoveries also met this criteria except for beta-sitosterol in 2 test materials. Furthermore, beta-sitosterol appears to have a lower recovery than the other phytosterol components. Accuracy results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Accuracy data (percent)

Day 1 accuracy
Day 2 accuracy
Days 1 and 2 accuracy combined
Test material identification/replicates Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol

Spiking level 1X 1X 1X
Saw palmetto 45% powdered extract
1 82.9 89.7 85.2 103 98.4 101
2 100 101 107 103 101 102
3 100 95.7 101 103 99.9 102
4 112 101 113 104 103 101
5 98.0 104 94.2 102 102 99.1
6 105 103 109 101 102 98.6
 Mean 99.7 99.1 102 103 101 101 101 100 101
 SDa 9.64 5.41 10.4 1.03 1.67 1.45 6.72 3.96 7.08
 RSDr, %b 9.67 5.46 10.2 1.00 1.65 1.44 6.65 3.96 7.01

Alcohol-free saw palmetto
1 101 107 113 99.8 101 100
2 98.0 102 109 101 96.2 103
3 99.4 111 108 101 93.8 102
4 96.9 101 101 99.9 7.34c 101
5 94.9 106 95.0 100 101 101
6 97.3 102 101 102 102 100
 Mean 97.9 105 105 101 98.8 101 99.3 102 103
 SD 2.11 3.87 6.63 0.868 3.59 1.17 2.09 4.75 4.86
 RSDr, % 2.16 3.69 6.31 0.859 3.63 1.16 2.10 4.66 4.72

Liquid Herbal Extract: saw palmetto
1 99.9 101 96.1 101 100 100
2 98.8 100 93.9 101 101 101
3 99.8 101 98.3 102 104 101
4 99.5 95.5 97.5 101 102 102
5 101 113 103 101 101 97.5
6 98.4 114 102 101 100 97.5
 Mean 99.6 104 98.5 101 101 99.8 100 103 99.2
 SD 0.914 7.58 3.48 0.408 1.51 1.91 1.07 5.40 2.77
 RSDr, % 0.918 7.29 3.53 0.404 1.50 1.91 1.07 5.24 2.79

ProstActive Once Daily
1 129 143 120 100 95.6 93.3
2 105 86.7 97.4 103 98.2 99.7
3 110 116 110 102 95.7 98.2
4 103 98.8 96.8 100 96.2 96.5
5 107 94.5 104 99.4 95.7 95.6
6 109 113 104 98.3 94.8 94.6
 Mean 111 109 105 100 96.0 96.3 105 102 101
 SD 9.42 20.2 8.67 1.73 1.15 2.35 8.32 15.1 7.68
 RSDr, % 8.49 18.5 8.26 1.73 1.20 2.44 7.92 14.8 7.60

ProstActive plus saw palmetto combined with nettle root extract
1 105 103 104 104 103 94.5
2 106 99.1 105 105 99.5 89.3
3 99.9 99.7 105 107 104 94.7
4 101 96.0 97.2 94.9 99.7 77.5
5 103 98.6 106 102 103 85.7
6 101 104 99.8 104 104 97.2
 Mean 103 100 103 103 102 89.8 103 101 96.3
 SD 2.44 2.96 3.51 4.20 2.06 7.34 3.28 2.68 8.73
 RSDr, % 2.37 2.96 3.41 4.08 2.02 8.17 3.18 2.65 9.07

Prostasan Prostrate Capsules
1 108 99.5 108 100 99.3 97.3
2 98.6 95.2 105 98.5 95.4 92.8
3 95.2 92.3 101 97.0 93.9 92.6
4 106 95.8 108 97.7 94.8 93.5
5 88.5 87.3 93.4 99.2 95.7 94.3
6 103 94.8 107 99.3 95.9 96.1
 Mean 99.9 94.2 104 98.6 95.8 94.4 99.3 95.0 99.1
 SD 7.30 4.08 5.71 1.11 1.85 1.89 5.02 3.14 6.33
 RSDr, % 7.31 4.33 5.49 1.13 1.93 2.00 5.06 3.31 6.39

Pygeum and saw palmetto standardized herbal extracts
1 91.2 89.6 78.7 101 103 77.9
2 115 84.7 104 106 103 81.7
3 118 83.6 95.5 104 102 84.2
4 112 100 84.8 90.4 102 73.9
5 96.5 111 85.4 103 108 86.5
6 119 85.5 97.1 104 103 73.1
 Mean 109 92.4 90.9 101 104 79.6 105 98.0 85.2
 SD 11.8 10.9 9.46 5.63 2.26 5.49 9.60 9.49 9.47
 RSDr, % 10.8 11.8 10.4 5.57 2.17 6.90 9.14 9.68 11.1

Saw palmetto pygeum lycopene complex tablets
1 92.1 94.3 91.5 100 98.4 94.7
2 94.9 95.8 93.4 106 105 107
3 105 106 104 104 102 102
4 75.6 80.5 72.7 107 103 106
5 111 107 106 98.4 96.8 89.9
6 99.8 103 101 88.1 87.5 77.7
 Mean 96.4 97.8 94.8 101 98.8 96.2 98.5 98.3 95.5
 SD 12.3 9.94 12.2 6.97 6.30 11.2 9.76 7.95 11.2
 RSDr, % 12.8 10.2 12.9 6.90 6.38 11.6 9.91 8.09 11.7

Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dried fruit CO2 extracts
1 110 106 103 99.6 99.7 106
2 110 102 97.7 97.7 99.7 100
3 104 93.4 93.5 96.2 97.0 94.4
4 113 104 102 98.9 97.4 99.4
5 108 103 101 99.7 97.6 101
6 109 105 99.5 91.7 93.9 91.2
 Mean 109 102 99.5 97.3 97.6 98.7 103 99.9 99.1
 SD 2.97 4.55 3.46 3.04 2.14 5.21 6.75 4.18 4.24
 RSDr, % 2.72 4.46 3.48 3.12 2.19 5.28 6.55 4.18 4.28
Spiking level 1X 1/2X 2X

Powdered saw palmetto berry (Day 1 accuracy)
1 104 96.1 89.6 108 89.3 77.8 108 97.8 102
2 97.5 113 79.5 90.6 68.1 43.7 102 96.8 98.3
3 108 110 91.7 116 110 82.4 105 100 100
4 103 81.0 86.6 100 89.9 66.7 104 103 102
5 103 125 84.7 100 100 69.1 104 93.6 103
6 105 101 90.9 104 68.9 68.7 106 95.1 98.3
7 96.1 75.4 78.9 116 110 60.4 108 98.7 101
 Mean 102 100 86.0 105 90.9 67.0 105 97.9 101
 SD 4.19 17.7 5.23 9.21 17.4 12.6 2.21 3.13 1.86
 RSDr, % 4.11 17.7 6.08 8.77 19.1 18.8 2.10 3.20 1.84

Powdered saw palmetto berry (Day 2 accuracy)
1 102 106 88.9 114 99.2 96.1 107 104 105
2 102 116 85.8 118 97.6 97.7 96.1 97.7 101
3 103 101 85.6 113 99.1 98.0 101 98.7 101
4 99.5 96.5 78.8 115 80.3 88.9 98.3 98.0 104
5 103 106 89.5 103 91.3 91.9 104 97.7 103
6 89.8 171 81.6 118 95.5 92.7 99.3 98.9 103
7 95.3 117 78.2 120 92.3 99.6 104 102 108
 Mean 99.2 116 84.1 114 93.6 95.0 101 99.6 104
 SD 4.97 25.3 4.59 5.62 6.65 3.89 3.81 2.46 2.44
 RSDr, % 5.01 21.8 5.46 4.93 7.10 4.09 3.77 2.47 2.35

Powdered saw palmetto berry (Days 1 and 2 accuracy combined)
 Mean 101 108 85.0 110 92.3 81.0 103 98.7 102
 SD 4.71 22.5 4.83 8.83 12.7 17.1 3.61 2.84 2.57
 RSDr, % 4.66 20.8 5.68 8.03 13.8 21.1 3.50 2.88 2.52
a

SD = Standard deviation.

b

RSDr = Intralaboratory relative standard deviation.

c

Rejected based on the Dixon Test.

To demonstrate ruggedness relative to the reference method, the following were investigated as part of the SLV: change in operating conditions, second analyst, and expansion of saponified solution stability. The operating conditions in the reference method were modified in this SLV; however, it appeared that other conditions caused more chromatographic carryover between sample injections in certain test materials. Additional method ruggedness tests included using a different analyst to conduct precision over 2 days for at least 2 test materials. Furthermore, a second analyst conducted some of the fortification recovery accuracy results. Table 5 presents the second analyst’s precision data. These data showed good precision (the RSDrs are mostly within or below the target RSDr ranges), and the HorRat values were all below 0.3 or between 0.3 and 1.3. The saponified solution stability was tested and proved to be stable at room temperature up to 7 days. This was achieved by comparison to freshly saponified sample solutions. Table 6 presents the saponified solution stability results.

Table 5.

Second analyst precision (ruggedness test)

Day 1 precision, mg/100 g
Day 2 precision, mg/100 g
Days 1 and 2 precision combined, mg/100 g
Test material identification/replicates Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol
Saw palmetto pygeum lycopene complex tablets
1 117 108 316 122 119 328
2 122 112 329 131 121 348
3 132 121 351 122 117 329
4 116 108 315 125 117 335
5 124 116 324 119 109 320
6 122 115 328 125 118 337
 Mean 122 113 327 124 117 333 123 115 330
 SDa 5.74 5.05 13.1 4.10 4.12 9.54 4.85 4.76 11.3
 RSDr, %b 4.70 4.47 4.01 3.31 3.52 2.86 3.94 4.14 3.42
 Target RSDr lowb 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2
 Target RSDr highb 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3
 PRSDRc 5.47 5.53 4.72 5.46 5.51 4.71 5.46 5.52 4.71
 HorRatd 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7

Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) dried fruit CO2 extracts
1 40.4 22.7 145 43.2 25.6 157
2 42.0 26.6 151 42.6 24.0 152
3 42.7 25.5 153 43.1 24.7 155
4 42.8 25.8 154 43.9 25.2 159
5 42.6 24.9 153 44.3 25.1 159
6 44.0 25.9 157 40.3 25.5 145
 Mean 42.4 25.2 152 42.9 25.0 155 42.7 25.1 153
 SD 1.18 1.36 4.02 1.41 0.591 5.36 1.27 1.01 4.68
 RSDr, % 2.78 5.40 2.64 3.29 2.36 3.46 2.97 4.02 3.06
 Target RSDr low 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
 Target RSDr high 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
 PRSDR 6.41 6.93 5.29 6.40 6.94 5.28 6.40 6.94 5.29
 HorRat 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6
a

SD = Standard deviation.

b

RSDr = Intralaboratory relative standard deviation.

c

PRSDR= 2 C−0.15, where C is the mean concentration expressed as a mass fraction.

d

HorRat = RSDr/PRSDR.

Table 6.

Saponified solution stability (ruggedness test)

Campesterol Stigmasterol beta-Sitosterol

Timepoints mg/100g
Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens)
dried fruit CO2 extracts
Day 1a 42.4 25.2 152
Day 3 40.4 24.1 146
Day 7 42.4 23.6 151
Mean 41.7 24.3 150
SDb 1.15 0.819 3.21
RSD, %c 2.76 3.37 2.14
a

Mean from 2nd analyst Day 1 precision.

b

SD = Standard deviation.

c

RSD = Relative standard deviation.

Conclusions

The validation process showed the precision and accuracy required for determination of campesterol, stigmasterol, and beta-sitosterol in saw palmetto raw materials and dietary supplements. The collaborative study protocol for the method has been approved by AOAC INTERNATIONAL, and a collaborative study is currently in progress.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

An example chromatogram for saw palmetto 45% powered extract.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

An example chromatogram for alcohol-free saw palmetto.

References

  • 1.Horwitz W. AOAC Requirements for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical Methods for Dietary Supplements. 2002 Draft §3.4.1. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES