Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1987 Jul;55(7):1552–1557. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.7.1552-1557.1987

Role of sialic acid in the kinetics of Streptococcus sanguis adhesion to artificial pellicle.

M M Cowan, K G Taylor, R J Doyle
PMCID: PMC260557  PMID: 3596799

Abstract

Evaluation of the kinetics of adhesion of Streptococcus sanguis 10556 to saliva-coated hydroxylapatite revealed that sialic acid played a role in the formation of a stable cell-substratum complex. In a previous paper (M. M. Cowan, K. G. Taylor, and R. J. Doyle, J. Dent. Res. 65:1278-1283, 1986) the adhesion was found to take place in two distinct stages: a reversible equilibrium, probably governed by long-range forces, followed by a transition to higher-affinity binding. In the present study, artificial pellicle was treated with neuraminidase, and kinetic adsorption and desorption experiments with S. sanguis were conducted. The depletion of sialic acid from pellicle decreased the initial adsorption rate constant only slightly. The rate constant describing the initial desorption was unaffected. However, no transition to the second (high-affinity) association occurred. While S. sanguis desorption from control pellicles exhibited two sequential rates, with the second rate being approximately 10 times slower than the first, all desorption from sialo-deficient pellicles occurred at one rate that was equivalent to the initial rate constant for control desorption. The cells did not reach an equilibrium with the sialo-deficient pellicle, even after 6 h. Competing sialic acid did not decrease the rate or extent of adsorption, but desorption occurred to a greater extent when cells had adsorbed in the presence of sialic acid. These data suggest that sialic acid plays little role in the initial association of cell and pellicle but that it is necessary for the transition to high-affinity binding and the concomitant decreased propensity to desorb.

Full text

PDF
1552

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Busscher H. J., Uyen M. H., van Pelt A. W., Weerkamp A. H., Arends J. Kinetics of adhesion of the oral bacterium Streptococcus sanguis CH3 to polymers with different surface free energies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):910–914. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.5.910-914.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cowan M. M., Taylor K. G., Doyle R. J. Kinetic analysis of Streptococcus sanguis adhesion to artificial pellicle. J Dent Res. 1986 Oct;65(10):1278–1283. doi: 10.1177/00220345860650101501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elder B. L., Fives-Taylor P. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for adhesion: isolation of an adhesin of Streptococcus sanguis FW213. Infect Immun. 1986 Nov;54(2):421–427. doi: 10.1128/iai.54.2.421-427.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fives-Taylor P. M., Thompson D. W. Surface properties of Streptococcus sanguis FW213 mutants nonadherent to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun. 1985 Mar;47(3):752–759. doi: 10.1128/iai.47.3.752-759.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbons R. J. Adherent interactions which may affect microbial ecology in the mouth. J Dent Res. 1984 Mar;63(3):378–385. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630030401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbons R. J., Etherden I. Enzymatic modification of bacterial receptors on saliva-treated hydroxyapatite surfaces. Infect Immun. 1982 Apr;36(1):52–58. doi: 10.1128/iai.36.1.52-58.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbons R. J., Etherden I., Moreno E. C. Association of neuraminidase-sensitive receptors and putative hydrophobic interactions with high-affinity binding sites for Streptococcus sanguis C5 in salivary pellicles. Infect Immun. 1983 Dec;42(3):1006–1012. doi: 10.1128/iai.42.3.1006-1012.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay D. I. The adsorption of salivary proteins by hydroxyapatite and enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1967 Aug;12(8):937–946. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90088-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogg S. D., Embery G. Blood-group-reactive glycoprotein from human saliva interacts with lipoteichoic acid on the surface of Streptococcus sanguis cells. Arch Oral Biol. 1982;27(3):261–268. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jenkinson H. F. Cell-surface proteins of Streptococcus sanguis associated with cell hydrophobicity and coaggregation properties. J Gen Microbiol. 1986 Jun;132(6):1575–1589. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-6-1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levine M. J., Herzberg M. C., Levine M. S., Ellison S. A., Stinson M. W., Li H. C., van Dyke T. Specificity of salivary-bacterial interactions: role of terminal sialic acid residues in the interaction of salivary glycoproteins with Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 1978 Jan;19(1):107–115. doi: 10.1128/iai.19.1.107-115.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McBride B. C., Gisslow M. T. Role of sialic acid in saliva-induced aggregation of Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun. 1977 Oct;18(1):35–40. doi: 10.1128/iai.18.1.35-40.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray P. A., Levine M. J., Reddy M. S., Tabak L. A., Bergey E. J. Preparation of a sialic acid-binding protein from Streptococcus mitis KS32AR. Infect Immun. 1986 Aug;53(2):359–365. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.2.359-365.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray P. A., Levine M. J., Tabak L. A., Reddy M. S. Specificity of salivary-bacterial interactions: II. Evidence for a lectin on Streptococcus sanguis with specificity for a NeuAc alpha 2, 3Ga1 beta 1, 3Ga1NAc sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 May 31;106(2):390–396. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(82)91122-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nesbitt W. E., Doyle R. J., Taylor K. G. Hydrophobic interactions and the adherence of Streptococcus sanguis to hydroxylapatite. Infect Immun. 1982 Nov;38(2):637–644. doi: 10.1128/iai.38.2.637-644.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stinson M. W., Levine M. J., Cavese J. M., Prakobphol A., Murray P. A., Tabak L. A., Reddy M. S. Adherence of Streptococcus sanguis to salivary mucin bound to glass. J Dent Res. 1982 Dec;61(12):1390–1393. doi: 10.1177/00220345820610120101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WARREN L. The thiobarbituric acid assay of sialic acids. J Biol Chem. 1959 Aug;234(8):1971–1975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES