Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Jun 25;16(16):7832–7837. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.035

Studies on the Antifungal Properties of N-Thiolated β-Lactams

Marci O’Driscoll a, Kerriann Greenhalgh a, Ashley Young a, Edward Turos a,*, Sonja Dickey b, Daniel V Lim b
PMCID: PMC2617728  NIHMSID: NIHMS67948  PMID: 18672374

Abstract

N-Thiolated β-lactams have previously been shown to have antibacterial activity against a narrow selection of pathogenic bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus anthracis, as well as apoptotic-inducing activity in a variety of human cancer cell lines. We now have found that these lactams also possess antifungal activity against Candida and other fungi by exerting powerful cytostatic effects that disrupt the structural integrity of cytoplasmic membranes. The mode of action and structure-activity trends of these lactams as antifungals parallels that previously seen in our antibacterial studies

Keywords: N-thiolated β-lactams, antifungal activity, Candida albicans

1. Introduction

The rising incidence and prevalence of invasive fungal infections has become an increasing concern. Candida species are the most frequently isolated human fungal pathogens.1 Usually harmless, these microorganisms help constitute the healthy human microflora of the mouth and gastrointestinal tract2. However, in a state of altered homeostasis such as during treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics or immunosuppression, Candida species are potent opportunistic pathogens3 capable of producing infections at almost any site, varying in intensity from acute localized infections to serious invasive infections.4 The incidence of invasive candidiasis and candidemia has risen rapidly over the past 20 years and has become a significant problem.5 Candida is now the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections in the US, surpassing Gram negative bacilli in frequency.6 Candida infections account for 8% of all septicemias.7 The patient population at risk for infection by Candida has also grown to include those undergoing solid organ and stem cell transplants, those being treated for cancer, immunosuppressive therapy, AIDS, and those from premature birth, with advanced age and recovering from major surgery.5 The tremendous impact of these infections is apparent in terms of cost, morbidity and mortality. Most strikingly, the attributable mortality to disseminated Candida infection is almost 50%.8

The etiology of Candida infections has also changed over the past twenty years. Candida albicans has long been and continues to be the leading etiologic agent of Candida infections. However, more recently there has been a growth in the number of cases of non-albicans Candida infections.9 Non-albicans species now account for greater than fifty percent of infections.10 The increased use of azoles such as fluconazole have positively selected for such less sensitive or resistant species as Candida krusei, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida glabrata.11 Candida glabrata is now the second most frequent causative agent of candidemia in the US,12 and has been associated with a digestive or urinary point of entry, especially with catheters.13 Candida krusei has been found in patients with solid tumors or leukemia.13 Candida lusitaniae is associated with urinary and respiratory infections as well as those arising from intravenous catheters and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.13 Both C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis have been associated with use of intravenous catheters, contamination of the infusate, and colonization of health care workers.13 C. tropicalis most frequently appears in patients with cancer or leukemia, and C. parapsilosis often occurs with long term parenteral alimentation.13 Interestingly, in other parts of the world, specifically in Latin American countries, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis usurp C. glabrata as the second most common agent of candidemia.14 The reasons for this are not well known.

Apparently, the genus Candida and the infections that result include a rather disparate group of organisms that grow as yeasts, but are not all that closely related15, evidenced by the variation of risk factors and even geographical differences in etiology. This presents a challenge in treatment since even the best currently available drugs are plagued by intrinsic and acquired resistance. The search for new cellular targets in fungi and the development of novel antifungal drugs is ongoing.

Recent publications from our laboratory have described our investigations of N-thiolated β-lactams, a new family of antimicrobial compounds having high selectivity for Staphylococcus and Bacillus species.1622 Their mechanism of action involves the inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis in microbes expressing high levels of coenzyme A.23 The compounds also exhibit moderate apoptosis-inducing properties in a variety of human cancer cell lines without discernible toxicity in healthy dermal fibroblasts.2427 Consequently, we were interested in investigating whether these compounds could have antifungal properties given the documented observation that Candida has high intracellular levels of free thiol which includes coenzyme A.28 For these investigations, a selection of representative N-alkylthio β-lactam compounds were evaluated for in vitro antifungal activity.

2. Results and Discussion

The structures of the N-thiolated β-lactams evaluated for antifungal activities in this study are shown in Figure 1Figure 3.29 Several types of structural dependencies were evaluated: (1) effect of mono-halogenation and multi-halogenation of the C-4 aryl ring; (2) influence of unsaturation within the C-4 side chain; (3) deviations due to the S-alkyl and C3- substituents; and (4) dependency of the absolute stereochemistry of the molecule. (Figure 1Figure 3)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

N-Thiolated β-lactams 1–12 bearing a mono-halogenated C4 aryl ring.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

N-Thiolated β-lactams 18–23 bearing C4 alkenyl and alkyl substituents.

Initial antifungal testing was performed for all 25 compounds by Kirby-Bauer agar disk diffusion30,31 to assess their relative bioactivities against a variety of Candida species, including Candida albicans (ATCC 2091), Candida glabrata (ATCC 15126), Candida tropicalis (clinical isolate), Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), Candida krusei (ATCC 14243), Candida lusitaniae (ATCC 34449), Candida kefyr (ATCC 20409), and Candida utilis (ATCC 29950). The results are provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Kirby-Bauer assays of N-thiolated β-lactams 1–25 against Candida

Cpd C. albicans C. tropicalis C. glabrata C. kefyr C. krusei C. lusitaniae C. parapsilosis C. utilis
1 15 0 0 15 0 0 19 14
2 14 0 0 13 0 0 22 16
3 16 0 0 - 0 0 21 -
4 23 21 25 17 0 20 33 22
5 23 20 21 13 0 13 28 19
6 0 0 0 10 0 14 0 0
7 25 21 17 13 0 19 40 25
8 20 18 17 14 0 15 18 14
9 25 20 19 17 0 17 23 17
10 16 15 20 15 0 17 22 15
11 14 14 19 15 0 19 22 15
12 16 12 22 19 0 20 25 20
13 18 24 11 15 0 17 22 16
14 25 19 18 17 0 25 34 29
15 25 20 14 16 0 14 22 14
16 27 23 32 28 0 22 31 21
17 23 22 31 30 0 23 26 19
18 27 14 16 14 0 14 13 19
19 0 0 14 12 0 0 0 13
20 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
21 34 17 20 24 0 15 14 28
22 0 0 15 13 0 0 0 0
23 25 19 18 19 0 14 14 21
24 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
(+)-25 14 15 0 9 0 15 0 16
(−)-25 14 11 0 0 0 10 0 16

The numerical values are the average diameters in mm (for triplicate runs) of the growth inhibition zones appearing around the drug-loaded disk impregnated with 50 ug of substance after 24 hours of incubation (37°C). The following ATCC strains were used: Candida albicans (ATCC 2091), Candida glabrata (ATCC 15126), Candida tropicalis (isolate), Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), Candida krusei (ATCC 14243), Candida lusitaniae (ATCC 34449), Candida kefyr (ATCC 20409), and Candida utilis (ATCC 29950).

For the assays, 50 ug of each sample in 10 uL of CH2Cl2 was used. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, the growth inhibition zone sizes appearing as clear areas around the cellulose disk were measured and reported as the average of triplicate experiments. Not all of the compounds were active against the seven species of Candida, and in fact, C. krusei was resistant to all of the compounds. Of those lactams (1–12) having mono-halogenation within the C4 aryl ring, the fluoro-containing analogues possess the weakest antifungal activity.18 In fact, as found in our earlier antibacterial studies, it does not appear to be as important which halogen is on the C-4 phenyl ring, but rather where they are positioned.20 Thus, fluoro- or chloro- substituents at the para position have less biological activity than the meta or ortho-substituted compounds. However, this trend is not observed for the iodophenyl and bromophenyl substituents. On the other hand, the presence of multiple fluoro- or chloro- substituents on the aryl ring (compounds 13–17, Figure 2) enhances activity. Unsaturation in the C4 side chain (comparing compounds 18–23, Figure 3) generally seems to decrease activity.19 Replacing the C3 methoxy substituent of either compound 18 or 21 for acetoxy or phenoxy also reduced the in vitro activity. Finally, replacement of the N-methylthio group of the most active compound, lactam 4, for sec-butylthio (compound 24) resulted in a marked decrease in antifungal activity against six of the eight Candida species examined. This contrasts with the observed activity against Staphylococcus aureus, in which the sec-butylthio compound 24 showed better in vitro activity than the methylthio analogue 4.21 However, for anti-fungal activity, compound 21 displayed the most potent in vitro activity (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

N-Thiolated β-lactams 13–17 bearing a multi-halogenated C4 aryl ring.

graphic file with name nihms67948f5.jpg

Finally, we also observe that absolute stereochemistry of these lactams has little if any influence on bioactivity, which is evident from the fact that both the (+) and (−) antipodes of lactam 25 have very similar growth inhibition zone sizes against all the Candida species examined. This is parallel to what we have observed before for the antibacterial properties.21

graphic file with name nihms67948f6.jpg

The structure-antifungal activity profiles of these compounds closely mirrors that previously found for Staphylococcus and Bacillus bacteria, in which differences in the biological activity of different lactams may be more closely related to their ability to diffuse through the cellular membrane than to any specific interactions with a biological target.

In follow-up to the Kirby-Bauer studies, we then evaluated in vitro activity of the most active lactam, compound 4, by measuring minimum inhibitory concentration values by broth dilution.3234 The results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of N-methylthio β-lactam 4 determined by agar broth dilution

Microbe MIC 24 hrs MIC 48 hrs
C. albicans <5 ug/ml <5 ug/ml
C. tropicalis 10–15 ug/ml 30–35 ug/ml
C. glabrata 10–15 ug/ml 10–15 ug/ml
C. kefyr 10–15 ug/ml 35–40 ug/ml
C. lusitaniae 10–15 ug/ml 15–20 ug/ml
C. parapsilosis <5 ug/ml <5 ug/ml
C. utilis 10–15 ug/ml 15–20 ug/ml

These values are averages (of triplicate trials) of the minimal concentration of test compound needed to completely inhibit fungal growth in agar broth.

The MIC was significantly higher at 48 hours than at 24 hours, suggesting fungistatic behavior in which the fungi overcome the diminishing concentration of active compound. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined against Candida albicans to be around 8 ug/mL, slightly higher than the clinical agent clotrimazole which displayed an MIC of 2 ug/mL in our assays.

The fungistatic behavior of the lactams was further verified by trypan blue exclusion assay of the MIC culture in broth after exposure to the antibiotics.35 The fungal cells treated with 16, 8 and 4 ug/mL of lactam all excluded the dye, indicating that the cells were still viable after exposure. Cells heat-killed for a control culture readily took up the dye, indicating that the cell were non-viable.

Additional in vitro testing of lactam 4 was performed against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus niger using an agar dilution MIC methodology and indicated similar levels of antifungal activity being 32 ug/mL for S. cerevisiae (YM agar) and 16 ug/mL for A. niger (potato dextrose agar). Thus, antifungal activity for lactam 4 spans beyond Candida.

A broth study was next conducted to determine the fate of the lactam in the presence of Candida. Lactam 4 was added to a broth culture of C. albicans. After 24 hours, the media was extracted with ethyl acetate, and upon evaporation, the organic-soluble residue was examined by proton NMR. We observed that all of the N-methylthio lactam 4 was converted cleanly to the N-protio lactam indicating the complete removal of the N-alkylthio residue from the β-lactam ring. The N-protio lactam, meanwhile, was innocuous and induced no further antifungal effect even after prolonged exposure. Thus, it is the N-thio moiety not the β-lactam ring that is essential for antifungal activity.

We also investigated the effects of lactam 4 on C. albicans cells by transmission electron microscopy.36,37 The images shown in Figure 4 compares a normal, healthy cell not exposed to drug (image a) versus a cell treated with lactam 4 at its minimum inhibitory concentration (image b). The severe structural damage to organelles in the treated cells occurs as a consequence of lactam-induced degradation of intracellular membranes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the effects of N-methylthio lactam 4 on C. albicans cells. In image (a), a healthy untreated cell showing intact cytoplasm, internal organelles, and cellular membranes (N=nucleus; M=mitochondria; V=vacuole); in image (b), a cell treated with lactam 4 in which the compartmentalized organelles are not found, there is obvious disorganization of the cytoplasm, and the cytoplasmic membrane is severely damaged (arrows). No visible changes are seen in the size or shape of the cell wall.

Damage to the membranes, including mitochondrial and cellular membranes, was observed in the majority of treated fungal cells analyzed, as was disorganization of the cytoplasm, rendering a visible “scrambling” of its contents. Numerous membrane invaginations were observed for these cells, indicating extensive damage was caused by the lactam treatment. However, it was not determined whether this damage was irreversible through the TEM analysis. There also appeared to be a shrinking of the protoplast in the treated cells which is most likely due to an obstruction in cell maturation. This was also observed for prokaryotic cells previously analyzed, where a lack of cell dividing was observed for the cells, indicating an obstruction in cell maturation and replication processes. The untreated fungal cells (image a) displayed intact cellular components, including intact mitochondria, vacuoles, protoplasts, nucleus, and cell wall and cell membrane.

3. Conclusions

This study has determined that N-thiolated β-lactams previously investigated in our laboratory as antibacterial and anticancer compounds also display moderate anti-fungal activity. This is a most unusual finding, in that until now only a very limited number of β-lactam compounds have ever been observed to act on fungal growth.32 The time study we conducted over 24 hours versus 48 hours suggests that the effects of the N-thiolated lactams on Candida cells are fungistatic. Given the observed structure-activity relationship and the products of the drug’s interaction with the cell, it is postulated that the mode of action of these antifungals is similar to that previously observed in Staphylococcus bacteria. We postulate that these lactams pass through the bacterial cell membrane, and interact covalently with a biological target such as coenzyme A that results in the transfer of the sulfur side chain. This mechanism is primarily supported by the NMR spectra of the product isolated from the cultured media which shows that the lactam ring is intact and the sulfur side chain is missing. This is further corroborated by the structure-activity effect in that the sulfur side chain is required for antifungal activity, with S-methyl being preferred to S-sec-butyl, while groups at C3 and C4 can be altered without completely destroying the fungistatic behavior. Further definition of the details or the immediate biochemical consequences of this thio transfer event is not yet available. However, the subtle structure-activity differences seen in fungi versus bacteria suggest that the cellular target of these compounds is likely evolutionarily conserved, such as a common metabolic enzyme having a slightly different structure in bacteria and fungi. These N-thiolated β-lactams may thus represent a new therapeutic approach for treating Candida and other fungal infections.

4. Experimental

4.1 General Methods

Lactams 1–25 were prepared and purified as previously described.1622

4.2. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Antifungal activities of the lactams were determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion on agar plates and by minimum inhibitory concentration measurements in liquid broth. Yeast nitrogen base agar was used for Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assays, and yeast nitrogen broth was used for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations for the Candida strains. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus niger MIC values were determined using YM agar and potato dextrose agar respectively in an agar dilution assay. These agar assays were performed in compliance with the NCCLS guidelines and standards described in NCCLS protocol M7-A2.34

4.2.1. Kirby-Bauer Agar Diffusion Assays.30,31

A suspension of the test microbe equivalent to McFarland standard 0.5 was made in 5 mL of sterile saline solution and swabbed across fresh yeast nitrogen base agar plates and allowed to dry. Cellulose disks (6 mm in diameter) were impregnated with 10 µL of a 5 mg/mL stock solution of the test lactam dissolved in CH2Cl2 by pipet, allowed to air dry leaving only the lactam compound on the disk, and the disks were then placed onto the agar surface (three disks per plate). The plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated for 24 or 48 hours at 26°C or 37°C (depending on the Candida strain) and the antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by measuring the cleared zones of growth inhibition around each disc.

4.2.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assays.3234

Yeast nitrogen broth was prepared following manufacturer’s instructions then titrated into test tubes and a 1mg/mL solution of lactam in DMSO was added to the first tube then serially diluted through the test tubes down to 0.125ug/mL of lactam in broth. Each tube was then inoculated with 1uL of a standardized solution of 106 CFU/mL of fungi suspended in sterile NaCl solution. After 24 or 48 hours of incubation at 26°C or 37°C (depending on the Candida strain), the MICs were determined by examining the tubes for growth using optical density of the solutions. The lowest concentration of drug inhibiting all fungal growth was determined as the MIC.

4.2.3. Metabolism Studies

To a fresh 106 cfu/ml suspension of C. albicans in 9 mL of sterile saline was added 1 mL of a 400 µM solution of lactam 4 in DMSO. After 1 hr, 10 mL of deionized H2O was added and the solution was extracted 3 times with 5 mL of ethyl acetate. The organic layers were combined, dried with magnesium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 500 µL of CDCl3 and the chemical structure was elucidated by 1H NMR.

4.2.4. Trypan Blue Staining.35

A 4% Trypan Blue solution (w/v) was prepared and filtered through Fisherbrand filter paper, qualitative P8 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA). Four tubes of cell suspensions from the MIC assay were used in the procedure: a control tube containing C. albicans in Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) broth (Difco) and three tubes containing C. albicans in YNB broth with 16 ug/ml, 8 ug/ml, and 4 ug/ml of the N-thiolated B-lactam PR-02-131. Equal volumes of the Trypan Blue solution and the cell suspensions were mixed in microcentrifuge tubes and left at room temperature. For comparison purposes, controls were also performed using live C. albicans cells in phosphate-buffered saline and cells that were heat-killed by boiling for 5 minutes. After an exposure time of 4 minutes, each sample was loaded into a Cellometer (Nexcelom Bioscience) and cells were observed using bright field optics with an Olympus BX60 epifluorescencce microscope (Olympus America, Inc., Center Valley, PA).

4.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Experiments

A concentration of 107 cfu/mL of C. albicans in TSB was treated for 4 hours with lactam 4 at the MIC concentration dissolved in DMSO and then centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 5 minutes. The pellet was washed twice with PBS, then resuspended in 5mL of PBS and fixed with 5mL of 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 hours at 4°C. The fixed cells were centrifuged at 10,000xg for 5 minutes and then resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.1 M sucrose. The cells were then washed twice with PBS then centrifuged again at 10,000 x g for 5 minutes and the pellet was embedded in agar for easier handling. The agar blocks were then washed with PBS and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour at room temperature. The cells were then washed twice with PBS then once with 0.9% saline and stained with 1.5% uranyl acetate. The cell-containing agar blocks were then carried through a series of dehydrations using graded ethanol. The cells were infiltrated and embedded in Spurr’s Plastic and ultrathin sections were cut using a Sorvall MT-2B ultramicrotome and placed on copper mesh grids. Sections were post-stained using lead citrate for heightened cellular contrast. The grids were then examined on the FEI Morgagni 268D TEM for intracellular makeup.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the expert assistance of Professor Diane TeStrake and Ms. Betty Loraam (Biology Department) for experimental aspects of this work. We thank the NIH for supporting these studies through research grant R01 AI51351.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Perea S, Patterson TF. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2002;1:1073–1080. doi: 10.1086/344058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sobel JD, Ohmit SE, Schuman P, et al. J. Inf. Dis. 2001;183:286–293. doi: 10.1086/317936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richardson MD. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005;56:5–11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wenzel RP. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 1994;3:56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nucci M, Marr KA. Emerg. Inf. 2005;41:521–525. doi: 10.1086/432060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gudlaugsson O, Gillespie S, Lee K, et al. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2003;37:1172–1177. doi: 10.1086/378745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Jones RN, Doern GV, Brandt ME, Hajjeh RA. Diag. Micro. Infect. Dis. 1999;33:121–129. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00160-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wey SB, Mori M, Pfaller MA, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988;148:2642–2645. doi: 10.1001/archinte.148.12.2642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colerman DC, Rinaldi MG, Haynes KA, Rex JH, Summerbell RC, Anaisse EJ. Med. Mycol. 1998;36:156–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pappas PG, Rex JH, Lee J, et al. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2003;37:634–643. doi: 10.1086/376906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Trick WE, Fridkin SK, Edwards JR, Hajjeh RA, Gaynes RP. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2002;35:627–630. doi: 10.1086/342300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pfaller MA, Dickema DJ. Clin. Microbiol. Inf. 2004;10:11–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.t01-1-00844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dupont B. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 1994;3:S78–S82. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Colombo AL, Nucci M, Salomao R, et al. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999;34:281–286. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Calderone RA, editor. Candida and candidiasis. Washington: ASM Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Turos E, Konaklieva MI, Ren R, Shi H, Gonzalez J, Dickey S, Lim DV. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:5571–5578. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Turos E, Long TE, Konaklieva MI, Coates C, Shim J-Y, Dickey S, Lim DV, Cannons A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:2229–2231. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Long TE, Turos E, Konaklieva MI, Blum AL, Amry A, Baker EA, Suwandi LS, McCain MD, Rahman MF, Dickey S, Lim DV. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003;11:1859–1863. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(03)00037-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coates C, Long TE, Turos E, Dickey S, Lim DV. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003;11:193–196. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00383-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turos E, Coates C, Shim JY, Wang Y, Leslie JM, Long TE, Reddy GSK, Ortiz A, Culbreath M, Dickey S, Lim DV, Alonso E, Gonzalez J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005;13:6289–6308. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Heldreth B, Long TE, Jang S, Guntireddygari SKR, Turos E, Dickey S, Lim DV. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:3775–3784. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Turos E, Long TE, Heldreth B, Leslie JM, Guntireddygari SKR, Wang Y, Coates C, Konaklieva M, Dickey S, Lim DV, Alonso E, Gonzalez J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;16:2084–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Revell KD, Heldreth B, Long TE, Jang S, Turos E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007;15:2453–2467. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith DM, Kazi A, Smith L, Long TE, Heldreth B, Turos E, Dou QP. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002;61:1348–1358. doi: 10.1124/mol.61.6.1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kazi A, Hill R, Long TE, Kuhn DJ, Turos E, Dou QP. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004;67:365–374. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuhn D, Coates C, Daniel K, Chen D, Bhuiyan M, Turos E, Dou QP. Front. Bioscience. 2004;9:2605–2617. doi: 10.2741/1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuhn D, Wang Y, Minic V, Coates C, Reddy GSK, Daniel KG, Shim J-Y, Chen D, Landis-Piwowar KR, Miller FR, Turos E, Dou QP. Front. Bioscience. 2005;10:1183–1190. doi: 10.2741/1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Newton GL, Arnold K, Price MS, Sherrill C, Delcardayre SB, Aharonowitz A, Cohen G, Davies J, Fahey RC, Davis C. J. Bacteriol. 1996;178:1990–1995. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.7.1990-1995.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.This study was based on the M.S. thesis work of Marci Culbreath, University of South Florida, 2005.
  • 30.Ingroff-Espinel A. Clin. Microbiol. News. 1996;18:161–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method for Antifungal Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Guideline NCCLS document M44-A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gottstein WJ, Eachus AH, Misco PF, Cheney LC, Misiek M, Price KE. J. Med. Chem. 1971;14:770–772. doi: 10.1021/jm00290a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, approved standard. NCCLS document M27A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. NCCLS document M7-A2. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaur R, Castano I, Cormack BP. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1600–1613. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1600-1613.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bergsson G, Arnfinnsson J, Steingrimsson O, Thormar H. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45:3209–3212. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3209-3212.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wright R. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2000;51:496–510. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20001215)51:6<496::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES