Skip to main content
Journal of Nematology logoLink to Journal of Nematology
. 2000 Mar;32(1):52–61.

Population Dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita, M. arenaria,and Other Nematodes and Crop Yields in Rotations of Cotton, Peanut, and Wheat Under Minimum Tillage

A W Johnson, C C Dowler, Z A Handoo
PMCID: PMC2620434  PMID: 19270949

Abstract

Wheat, cotton, and peanut were arranged in three cropping sequences to determine the effects of fenamiphos (6.7 kg a.i./ha) and cropping sequence on nematode population densities and crop yields under conservation tillage and irrigation for 6 years. The cropping sequences included a wheat winter cover crop each year and summer crops of cotton every year, peanut every year, or cotton rotated every other year with peanut. The population densities of Meloidogyne spp. and Helicotylenchus dihystera were determined monthly during the experiment. Numbers of M. incognita increased on cotton and decreased on peanut, whereas M. arenaria increased on peanut, and decreased on cotton; both nematode species remained in moderate to high numbers in plots of wheat. Root damage was more severe on cotton than peanut and was not affected by fenamiphos treatment. The H. dihystera population densities were highest in plots with cotton every summer, intermediate in the cotton-peanut rotation, and lowest in plots with peanut every summer. Over all years and cropping sequences, yield increases in fenamiphos treatment over untreated control were 9% for wheat, 8% for cotton, and 0% for peanut. Peanut yields following cotton were generally higher than yields following peanut. These results show that nematode problems may be manageable in cotton and peanut production under conservation tillage and irrigation in the southeastern United States.

Keywords: Arachis hypogaea, cotton, crop rotation, Gossypium hirsutum, Helicotylenchus dihystera, management, Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, nematicide, nematode, peanut, root-knot nematode, spiral nematode, Ttriticum aestivum, wheat

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (269.5 KB).


Articles from Journal of Nematology are provided here courtesy of Society of Nematologists

RESOURCES