Abstract
Background
Melasma is a common condition of Latina women that detracts from their quality of life. The prevalence and impact of melasma in Latino men is not well characterized.
Purpose
We assess the prevalence of melasma and its association with quality of life among Latino men from Mexico and Central America working in the U.S.
Methods
The prevalence of melasma was assessed in three studies of Latino men; by direct examination in a study of 25 Latino poultry workers, by direct examination in a study of 54 Latino farmworkers, and by examination of store-and-forward teledermatology images in a study of 300 Latino farmworkers. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with a Spanish version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).
Results
The prevalence of melasma was 36.0%, 7.4%, and 14.0% in the three studies. Prevalence of melasma was greatest among those aged 31 years and older, who were from Guatemala, and who spoke an indigenous language. Presence of melasma was associated with higher DLQI scores, indicating worse life quality, in the poultry worker population.
Conclusions
Melasma is a common condition in Latino men associated with poor quality of life in some affected individuals. Clinicians should be aware that melasma may be a concern for their male Latino patients. Research on the association of skin conditions with quality of life among minority men is needed.
Keywords: Health services research, epidemiology, pigmentation, quality of life, minority health
Introduction
Melasma is a common skin condition characterized by irregular light brown to dark brown patches of hypermelanosis of the face 1;2. The etiology of melasma has not been clearly identified. Factors associated with melasma include exposure to ultraviolet light, genetic influences, hormones associated with pregnancy, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, thyroid autoimmunity, cosmetic ingredients, and phototoxic drugs, with ultraviolet light exposure and genetic factors being the strongest predictors 3;4. Melasma is a cosmetic condition; and women with melasma report that their appearance affects their social life, emotional well-being, and leisure activities 5–8.
Most studies reporting the prevalence of melasma are based on clinical rather than population samples 9;10. However, melasma is generally recognized to be more common among women than men and more common among Latinos, Blacks, and Asians than among Whites 2;6;11–15. It is more common in persons with Fitzpatrick skin types IV through VI than it is in those with fairer skin 2;6. An estimated 50% to 70% of pregnant women in the US develop melasma 3. Estimates of prevalence among pregnant Latina women are between 50% and 80%, and one third continue to have melasma for the rest of their lives 3;9;13;16–19. Overall prevalence in Latino females varies from 1.5% to 33.3%. A recent study reported a prevalence of 8.8%.10
Melasma in men has not been well documented, and we have found no study that has focused on melasma prevalence among Latino males. In clinic-based samples, approximately 10% of White melasma patients are men 2;13;20, and 26% of Indian melasma patients are men 21. The prevalence in such samples is likely to be subject to selection bias based on how bothersome the condition is in men versus women. The purpose of this paper is to document the prevalence of melasma and its impact on quality of life among Latino men in non-clinical samples.
Methods
Sampling and Data Collection
Data are from three studies of Latino men. The first study included a sample of 25 male Latino employees of a poultry processing plant in western North Carolina in 2005. Data collection included both a physical dermatological examination by a board-certified dermatologist and an interviewer administered questionnaire. Methods for this study have been described by Quandt et al. 22. The second study used a cross-sectional design and recruited 55 male Latino farmworkers from two camps in eastern North Carolina in 2004. Data collection included a physical dermatological examination by a board-certified dermatologist and an interviewer administered questionnaire. Methods for this study have been described by Krejci-Manwaring et al. 23. The third study used a longitudinal surveillance design to collect information on the prevalence of skin ailments and risk factors from 300 male Latino farmworkers during the 2005 agricultural season. Data were collected at baseline and at four follow-up assessments, each approximately three weeks apart (May to October). Data collection included a frontal and 2 lateral digital images of each participant’s face and an interviewer administered questionnaire. Standard store and forward teledermatology methods were used for the digital images 24. Digital images were reviewed and dermatological diagnoses were identified and recorded by a board-certified dermatologist. Methods for this study have been described by Arcury et al. 25.
Questionnaires for all three studies included questions on personal characteristics, as well as items to measure quality of life. Protocols for all three studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
Measures
Diagnosis of melasma for the poultry worker and cross-sectional farmworker studies was made by direct examination by a board-certified dermatologist. For the longitudinal surveillance farmworker study, a single board-certified dermatologist viewed and rated each photo set for each participant, recording the presence of melasma; a diagnosis of melasma was made based on its appearance in the photo set from the baseline or any of the follow-up assessments.
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 26 was used to measure quality of life. The DLQI was originally developed in English and has been translated and validated in multiple languages. A Mexican Spanish version of the DLQI, which was translated using methods approved by Dr. Finlay, was used. Total DLQI was computed as recommended 26. The total scale score has a range of 0 to 30. A score of 0–1 is generally recognized as demonstrating that the patient has experienced no effect on quality of life due to skin conditions. A score of 2–5 represents a small effect, 6–10 a moderate effect, 11–20 a very large effect, and 21–30 an extremely large effect 22;27.
Participant personal characteristics included age, grouped into the categories 18 to 24 years, 25 to 30 years, 31 years and older (maximum age was 70); nationality, with the values Mexican, Guatemalan, or other; and language spoken, with the values Spanish only or indigenous language. Data on language spoken were not collected for the cross-sectional farmworker study. Speaking an indigenous language indicates a greater likelihood of Native American heritage.
Analysis
The personal characteristics and the prevalence of melasma in each study were described with counts and frequencies. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the differences in the mean DLQI score between those with and without melasma within each sample. The F ratio with the alpha value set at 0.05 was used to test whether the differences in the mean DLQI scores were significant with equal variances assumed. The analyses used SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc.; Cary, NC).
Results
About half of participants in all three studies were age 30 or younger (Table 1). The majority of participants in the poultry worker study were Guatemalan (92.0%), and the majority of participants from the cross-sectional and the longitudinal farmworker studies, 96.3% and 98.7%, respectively, were Mexican. Two (8.0%) of the participants in the poultry worker study spoke only Spanish and the remainder (92.0%) spoke an indigenous language. The majority of participants in the longitudinal farmworker study spoke only Spanish (87.3%), while 12.7% spoke an indigenous language.
Table 1.
Personal Characteristics | Poultry Worker Study (N=25) | Cross-sectional Farmworker Study (N= 54) | Longitudinal Farmworker Study (N=300) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Age | ||||||
18–24 years | 6 | 24.0 | 23 | 42.6 | 77 | 25.7 |
25–30 years | 9 | 36.0 | 14 | 25.9 | 69 | 23.0 |
31 years and older* | 10 | 40.0 | 17 | 31.5 | 154 | 51.3 |
Nationality | ||||||
Mexican | 1 | 4.0 | 52 | 96.3 | 296 | 98.7 |
Guatemalan | 23 | 92.0 | - | - | 4 | 1.3 |
Other | 1 | 4.0 | 2 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 |
Language spoken | ||||||
Spanish only | 2 | 8.0 | - | - | 262 | 87.3 |
Indigenous language | 23 | 92.0 | - | - | 38 | 12.7 |
The oldest participant is 51 for the poultry worker study, 55 for the cross-sectional study, and 70 years old for the longitudinal study.
Across all three populations, the prevalence of melasma was 14.5% (55 of 379 participants). Melasma prevalence in the poultry worker study was 36.0% (Table 2). The 31 and older age group had the highest melasma prevalence (70.0%). Melasma was not present in the youngest age group (18–24 years); it was present in 22.0% of those aged 25–30 years. Melasma was diagnosed only among the Guatemalan participants. All of the poultry workers who were diagnosed with melasma spoke an indigenous language.
Table 2.
Melasma Prevalence | Poultry Worker Study (N=25) | Cross-sectional Farmworker Study (N= 54) | Longitudinal Farmworker Study (N=300) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Total | 9 | 36.0 | 4 | 7.4 | 42 | 14.0 |
Age group | ||||||
18–24 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.3 | 8 | 10.4 |
25–30 | 2 | 22.0 | 1 | 7.1 | 9 | 13.0 |
31 and older* | 7 | 70.0 | 2 | 11.8 | 25 | 16.2 |
Nationality | ||||||
Mexican | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 7.4 | 40 | 13.5 |
Guatemalan | 9 | 39.1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Language spoken | ||||||
Spanish | 0 | 0.0 | - | - | 34 | 13.0 |
Indigenous language | 9 | 39.1 | - | - | 8 | 21.1 |
The oldest case is 51 for the poultry worker study, 35 for the cross-sectional study, and 51 years old for the longitudinal study.
Melasma was present in 7.4% of participants of the cross-sectional farmworker study. Prevalence was higher (11.8%) among those aged 31 years and older, than among those aged 18–24 years (4.3%) and among those aged 25–30 years (7.1%). It was diagnosed only in Mexican participants.
The overall prevalence of melasma was 14.0% among the longitudinal farmworker participants. Prevalence among those aged 18–24 years (10.4%) and those aged 25–30 years (13.0%) was lower than among those aged 31 years and older (16.2%). Melasma prevalence was higher among Guatemalans (50.0%) than among Mexicans (13.5%). Those who spoke an indigenous language had a higher prevalence (21.1%) compared to those who spoke only Spanish (13.0%).
There was a statistically significant difference between total DLQI among those with melasma and those without melasma in the poultry worker study. Those with melasma had higher DLQI score (7.5 versus 2.8), indicating poorer quality of life (Table 3). The difference between DLQI scores for those with and without melasma was not significant in either of the farmworker studies.
Table 3.
Study | Mean Total DLQI
|
F Test Statistic | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Melasma | No Melasma | |||
Poultry Worker Study (N=25) | 7.5 | 2.8 | 6.27 | 0.02 |
Cross-Sectional Farmworker Study (N= 54) | 3.5 | 4 | 0.05 | 0.82 |
Longitudinal Farmworker Study (N=300) | 1.12 | 1.09 | 0.011 | 0.92 |
Discussion
These studies indicate that melasma is common in Latino men. The overall rate of 14.5% is somewhat higher than a recently published prevalence of 8.8% in Latina women.10 Among the male population with the highest prevalence of melasma, we observed a moderate association with quality of life. Latinos associate melasma with ill health and poor nutrition, and melasma is considered disfiguring.3
Melasma is more common in older men compared to younger men. The oldest age group (31 years and older) in each of the three studies had a higher prevalence of melasma than the younger two age groups (18–24 years and 25–30 years). These results are consistent with previous studies among Latino women 13, and Southeast Asian women and men28. Nevertheless, it is interesting that melasma was present even in the youngest farmworkers, likely indicative of the high level of sunlight to which they are exposed at work.
The majority of participants in the poultry worker study were Guatemalan (92.0%). In contrast, the majority of participants from the farmworker studies, 96.3% and 98.7%, respectively, were Mexican. In the poultry worker study, melasma was diagnosed only in the Guatemalan participants. In the cross-sectional farmworker study, melasma was present only in Mexican participants, but the sample for this study did not include Guatemalan participants. In the longitudinal farmworker study, melasma prevalence was higher among Guatemalans (50.0%) than among Mexicans (13.5%). These results suggest that the Guatemalan population may have a higher predisposition for melasma, which may be influenced by their indigenous heritage. In both the poultry worker study and the longitudinal farmworker study, the prevalence of melasma was higher among those who spoke an indigenous language (39.1% and 21.1%, respectively) than in those who spoke Spanish only (0.0% and 13.0%, respectively).
One limitation of this study is the use of the DLQI to assess the impact of melasma on quality of life. It is possible that the DLQI scores of participants in these studies may have been affected by other skin conditions. Further, the version of the DLQI used was developed for Mexican Spanish, and this version may not be completely appropriate for those who speak Guatemalan Spanish or whose primary language is an indigenous language. Despite these limitations, we found a significant impact of melasma in the poultry worker sample.
Several options are available for treating melasma. A simple and effective option for women is a cosmetic camouflage make up. This effective treatment for melasma improves QOL in women 29. For men who are bothered by melasma, this approach is generally not practical. Other options include sun protection and topical treatments. Sun protective hats and sunscreen should be encouraged, but strict protection from the sun may be difficult for the farmworker population and others who work outdoors 30. Hydroquinone preparations can be used. A combination formula of tretinoin, hydroquinone, and a mild steroid for the skin has greater effect in treating melasma on the face than do combinations of two of the above treatments or a single treatment alone 31;32. Azelaic acid 20% alone or in combination with tretinoin 0.05% or 15–20% glycolic acid may produce lightening. Kojic acid may be effective in the treatment of melasma. A combination of 2% kojic acid and 5% glycolic acid works as well as low concentration hydroquinone. There are many additional therapies including superficial and medium-deep chemical peels 33;34, dermabrasion and laser therapy 16;17. These treatments are expensive and only temporarily improve the condition. Such treatments may not be within the financial limits of farmworkers and poultry workers in the U.S., who tend to make little more than minimum wage.
Melasma is a common condition in Latino men associated with quality of life. Clinicians should be aware that melasma may be a concern for their male patients. Research on the association of skin conditions with quality of life among minority men is needed.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant No. R01-ES012358 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Dr. Feldman has received research, consulting and speaking support from Galderma Laboratories, L.P. (maker of Triluma for melasma).
Reference List
- 1.Moin A, Jabery Z, Fallah N. Prevalence and awareness of melasma during pregnancy. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:285–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pandya AG, Guevara IL. Disorders of hyperpigmentation. Dermatol Clin. 2000;18:91–8. ix. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70150-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rendon MI. Utilizing combination therapy to optimize melasma outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2004;3:S27–S34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goh CL, Dlova CN. A retrospective study on the clinical presentation and treatment outcome of melasma in a tertiary dermatological referral centre in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 1999;40:455–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pawaskar MD, Parikh P, Markowski T, McMichael AJ, Feldman SR, Balkrishnan R. Melasma and its impact on health-related quality of life in Hispanic women. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18:5–9. doi: 10.1080/09546630601028778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grimes PE. Melasma. Etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:1453–1457. doi: 10.1001/archderm.131.12.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Hu JY, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Camacho FT, et al. Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:572–577. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Taylor SC. Epidemiology of skin diseases in ethnic populations. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:601–607. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Werlinger KD, Guevara IL, Gonzalez CM, et al. Prevalence of self-diagnosed melasma among premenopausal Latino women in Dallas and Fort Worth, Tex. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:424–425. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.3.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sanchez NP, Pathak MA, Sato S, Fitzpatrick TB, Sanchez JL, Mihm MC., Jr Melasma: a clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunofluorescence study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;4:698–710. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(81)70071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grimes PE, Stockton T. Pigmentary disorders in blacks. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:271–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sanchez MR. Cutaneous diseases in Latinos. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:689–697. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00087-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee CS, Lim HW. Cutaneous diseases in Asians. Dermatol Clin. 2003;21:669–677. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hexsel D, Arellano I, Rendon M. Ethnic considerations in the treatment of Hispanic and Latin-American patients with hyperpigmentation. Br J Dermatol. 2006;156(Suppl 1):7–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Rapini R. Dermatology. Mosby; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Trout CR, Levine N, Chang MW. Disorders of hyperpigmentation. 1. Mosby; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Draelos ZD. Melasma: Introduction and Disease background. In: Flucinolone Acetonide, Hydroquinone and Tretinoin: Unique and Effective Combination Treatment for Melasma. 2001 Virtual Symposium CD-ROM. Ref Type: Generic. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arenas R. Dermatologia: atlas, diagnostico y tratamiento. Mexico City, Mexico: Interamericana-McGraw Hill; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vazquez M, Madlonado H, Benaman C, Sanchez JL. Melasma in men: a clinical and histological study. Int J Dermatol. 1988;27:25–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1988.tb02329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sarkar R, Jain RK, Puri P. Melasma in Indian males. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Quandt SA, Schulz MR, Feldman SR, et al. Dermatological illnesses and injuries among immigrant poultry processing workers in North Carolina. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health. 2005;60:165–169. doi: 10.3200/AEOH.60.3.165-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Krejci-Manwaring J, Schulz MR, Feldman SR, et al. Skin disease among Latino farmworkers in North Carolina. J Agric Saf Health. 2006;12:155–163. doi: 10.13031/2013.20387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krupinski EA, LeSueur B, Ellsworth L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J. 1999;5:257–263. doi: 10.1089/107830299312005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Arcury T, Feldman S, Vallejos Q, et al. Diagnosed skin diseases among migrant farmworkers in North Carolina: prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. doi: 10.13031/2013.23926. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Finlay AY. The dermatology life quality index. Initial experience of a simple practical measure. In: Care Management of Skin Diseases: Life Quality and Economic Impact. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quandt SA, Schulz MR, Vallejos QM. Skin-related quality of life among migrant farmworkers. J Cutan Med Surg. doi: 10.2310/7750.2007.00041. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sivayathorn A. Melasma in Orientals. Clin Drug Invest. 1995;10(suppl 2):34–40. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Hu JY, et al. Corrective cosmetics are effective for women with facial pigmentary disorders. Cutis. 2005;75:181–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Salas R, Mayer JA, Hoerster KD. Sun-protective behaviors of California farm workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:1244–1249. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000177080.58808.3b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Torok HM. A comprehensive review of the long-term and short-term treatment of melasma with a triple combination cream. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2006;7:223–230. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200607040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferreira CT, Hassun K, Sittart A, de LV. A comparison of triple combination cream and hydroquinone 4% cream for the treatment of moderate to severe facial melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:36–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Soliman MM, Ramadan SA, Bassiouny DA, Abdelmalek MM. Combined trichloroacetic acid peel and topical ascorbic acid versus trichloroacetic acid peel alone in the treatment of melasma: a comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:89–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erbil H, Sezer E, Tastan B, Arca E, Kurumlu Z. Efficacy and safety of serial glycolic acid peels and a topical regimen in the treatment of recalcitrant melasma. J Dermatol. 2007;34:25–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]