Abstract
Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is effectively treated with imatinib mesylate (IM), a small molecule inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase that is expressed in the entire hematopoietic compartment including stem cells (HSC) and progenitors in CML patients. While IM induces disease remission, it does not appear to eradicate BCR-ABL-positive stem cells. We investigated the residual CML cells in HSC and myeloid progenitors isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting after IM-therapy. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction detecting BCR-ABL transcripts showed that CML progenitors were eradicated within 12 months while the BCR-ABL-positive HSC remained. However, IM-therapy continuation could significantly decrease the ratio of BCR-ABL to BCR also in the HSC population. Our results implicate that the sorted and purified stem cells are useful for more sensitive quantification of BCR-ABL-positive minimal residual disease.
Keywords: CML, Imatinib, Leukemic stem cells, MRD
1 Introduction
The clinical success of the ABL kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (IM) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) serves as a model for molecular targeted therapy of cancer [1–5]. However, despite unprecedented rates of complete cytogenetic response, residual disease remains detectable in the majority of patients [6–8], with disease recurrence upon discontinuation of IM-therapy [9–11]. It has been reported that primitive quiescent, malignant hematopoietic progenitor cells from patients with CML are insensitive to IM [12]. Recently, granulocyte–macrophage progenitors (GMP) with an aberrant potential for self-renewal were detected in CML blast crisis (BC) [7, 13], indicating GMP might also function as leukemia stem cells. Mathematical models of clinical response to IM-therapy have also suggested that CML stem cells may be resistant to this drug, thus accounting for the persistence of minimal residual disease and the development of drug resistance [14]. In this study, we investigated the residual disease in hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and myeloid progenitors from patients with CML chronic phase (CP) after IM-therapy, and show retention but significant reduction of BCR-ABL transcript in HSC.
2 Study design
2.1 Patients and evaluation
Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CML were investigated at indicated points before and after the start of IM-therapy. Bone marrow samples were harvested after written informed consent. Hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses were determined according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations [15]. Briefly, complete hematological response (CHR) was defined as disappearance of signs and symptoms of disease, no splenomegaly, and complete blood counts within institutional normal limits. Complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was defined as 0% Ph metaphases among at least 20 metaphases in the bone marrow. Major molecular response (MMR) was defined either by BCR-ABL transcript levels below 100 copy per microgram of RNA quantified with reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) or transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) [16], or by 3 log reduction from initial levels at diagnosis [17, 18]. Quantification of the BCR-ABL transcripts by TMA method was performed using Amp-CML kit (Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan).
2.2 Separation of HSC and progenitors
For the detection of MRD of HSC or progenitors from CML CP after IM-treatment, the mononuclear cells were freshly prepared within 24 hr after bone marrow harvest. For the detection of BCR-ABL and BCR transcripts of HSC or progenitors from CML CP before IM-treatment, if the fresh bone marrow samples were not available, frozen cells were thawed and subjected to FACS analysis. Mononuclear cells were stained with lineage-associated PE-Cy5.5-conjugated antibodies including CD2, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CD19, CD20 and CD56 from Caltag (South San Francisco, CA). Flow-cytometric analysis and cell sorting were performed as previously published [12, 19]. The cells with the lineage cocktail antibodies were further incubated either with HSC-associated antibodies consisting of APC-conjugated anti-CD34 (HPCA-2; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), biotinylated anti-CD38 (Caltag), FITC-labeled CD47 and phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD90 (Thy-1) followed by staining with streptavidin-Cy7PE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to visualize CD38-biotin-stained cells or with progenitor-associated antibodies consisting of APC-conjugated anti-CD34, biotinylated anti-CD38, streptavidin-Cy7PE, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-IL-3 receptor (9F5; BD Pharmingen) and FITC-conjugated anti-CD45RA (MEM56; Caltag).
Unstained samples and isotype controls were included to assess background fluorescence. After staining, cells were analyzed and sorted by using FACSAria (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). HSC identified as CD34+CD38−Lin−, were separated to Thy-1+ (HSC/Thy-1+) and Thy-1− (HSC/Thy-1−) cells. Common myeloid progenitors (CMP) were identified based on CD34+CD38+ IL-3Rα+CD45RA−Lin− staining, and their progeny including GMP were CD34+CD38+IL-3Rα+CD45RA+Lin−, whereas megakaryocyte/erythroid progenitors (MEP) were identified based on CD34+CD38+IL-3Rα−CD45RA−Lin− staining [20].
2.3 Quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts
RNA was isolated from HSC/Thy-1+, HSC/Thy-1−, CMP, GMP, or MEP using the RNA STAT-60™ (TEL-TEST, INC. Friendswood, TX), and reversely transcribed into cDNA using TaqMan Gold RT-PCR Kit ™ with random hexamers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Primers and probes used in this study were described previously as BCR-ABL [21], and BCR [12]. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the expression of BCR-ABL and BCR was performed with 50 cycles of two-step PCR (15 s at 95°C and 60 s at 60°C) after initial denaturation (95°C for 10 min) using an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems). BCR was used as the control gene and the BCR-ABL levels for each sample were expressed as a ratio of BCR-ABL to BCR.
Quantification standards were prepared by cloning PCR products of BCR-ABL and BCR from CML samples. Each PCR product was cloned into pBluescript sk(−) vector by the TA cloning method, sequenced and ligated into the same vector. The resulting plasmids were digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes and used for stable standards to keep the same copy number of BCR-ABL and BCR.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Analysis of HSC and progenitor profiles
FACS analysis revealed higher levels of the HSC/Thy-1− cells and progenitors (CD34+CD38+Lin− cells) in bone marrow from patients with CML CP than in normal bone marrow although the level of long term HSC (HSC/Thy-1+) in CML CP is similar with normal bone marrow (Fig. 1a). The proportion of HSC/Thy-1− within stem cells (CD34+CD38−Lin−) was expanded in CML CP (Fig. 1b). After the IM-therapy the proportion of progenitor pools (CD34+Lin− cells) within Lin− were remarkably reduced, especially that of HSC/Thy-1− cells and progenitor cells. They are even significantly lower compared with their counterparts in normal bone marrow. This would seem to indicate that imatinib suppresses progenitor pools more than matured pools of hematopoietic cells. With based on the nucleated cell number of bone marrow samples, it was estimated that the absolute number of HSC/Thy-1+ was increased in CML CP, but decreased during IM-therapy (data not shown).
The proportion of MEP was increased and that of GMP was decreased in bone marrow from patients with CML CP as compared with their normal counterparts, which were consistent with previously described results (Fig. 1c) [12, 22]. The reason for the reduced proportion of GMP and the increased proportion of MEP in CML CP is not clear. One hypothesis is a differentiation block of late erythropoietic progenitors and a promoted differentiation of GMP with expansion failure as suggested previously [23, 24]. Another unique characteristic of CML is an increased proliferation of the granulocytic cell lineage with marked basophilia and eosinophilia. The detection of their progenitors has been reported [25, 26] and progenitors of basophil and eosinophil have been identified within GMP, whereas GMP are failed to expand in CML. Analysis of individual progenitors may clear the abnormal proliferation and differentiation destined for basophil and eosinophil in future study.
Expanded HSC/Thy-1− and progenitors were inhibited and the ratio of MEP and GMP was normalized after IM-therapy. Increased population of HSC/Thy-1− within HSC in CML CP was also inhibited after IM-therapy. These data suggested that the progenitor pools of CML are expanded in HSC/Thy-1− population.
3.2 Analysis of BCR-ABL transcripts in each population after IM-therapy
We compared the ABL, BCR or GAPDH genes as internal control for the quantification and evaluation of BCR-ABL mRNA expression in HSC from CML CP before IM-therapy. When we got less number of sorted cells from frozen samples, there were some cases, in which BCR-ABL transcript was positive but ABL transcript was negative. The transcript level of GAPDH was about 20–200 times higher than that of BCR-ABL, so that the BCR-ABL/GAP-DH ratio was significantly affected by the number of sorted cells especially in cases that the sorted cell counts were small. On the other hand, the transcript level of BCR-ABL was within 0.2–2 times of BCR transcript and the ratio of BCR-ABL to BCR was not affected by the sorted cell counts. For these reasons, we believed that the BCR transcript as an internal control is the best for our study. An another advantage to use the BCR is that the level of minimal residual CML cells are able to be estimated as two times of the BCR-ABL/BCR ratio, if we assume that the promoter activities of BCR and BCR-ABL are the same and the mRNA stability of the transcripts are the same.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction detecting BCR-ABL transcripts showed that BCR-ABL-positive progenitors in bone marrow were eradicated within 12-month in 5 patients. BCR-ABL-positive cells, however, remained in the stem cell population (Fig. 2). They were positive even after achieving undetectable levels of BCR-ABL transcript in total RNA isolated from the bone marrow. Differential retention of CML cells in HSC/Thy-1+ or HSC/Thy-1− were observed in case 1, 8 or 3, 4, 7, respectively. MRD in HSC/Thy-1+ was under the detectable level in case 3, 4, 7 although the MRD in HSC/Thy-1− was positive. In those cases, HSC/Thy-1+ population was much smaller than HSC/Thy-1− population as the mean proportion of sorted cell number of HSC/Thy-1+ to that of HSC/Thy-1− was 0.24 (SD = 0.13) (Supplementary Table 1). When MRD in stem cell was small, the detected MRD in stem cell population in patient with MMR was sometimes on border line of our technical sensitivity, so that MRD in HSC/Thy-1+ might become under the detectable level due to the paucity of the sorted cells in these cases.
3.3 Ratio of BCR-ABL/BCR transcripts in each population after IM-therapy (Fig. 2)
The ratio of BCR-ABL and BCR was significantly decreased with the continuation of imatinib, however the retention of BCR-ABL-positive cells was observed in HSC/Thy-1− or HSC/Thy-1+ populations except case 9. In case 6, residual CML was still detected in all populations after 50 months of IM-therapy although the BCR-ABL/BCR ratio was significantly lower. The BCR-ABL/BCR values are known to correlate with the percentage of the Philadelphia chromosome in matched bone marrow samples [9–11]. We also examined ABL transcript as an internal control. However, in the case that we got less number of sorted cells after IM-therapy, we could not detect ABL transcript even if we could detect BCR-ABL transcript (data not shown).
It has been reported that primitive quiescent leukemic progenitor cells of CML patients are insensitive to IM [27], and Ph positive cells are persistent in the bone marrow of CML patients even in complete cytogenetic remission following IM-therapy [7, 13]. Mathematical models of clinical response to IM-therapy have also suggested that CML stem cells may be resistant to this drug [28]. However, there have been no reports investigating the direct quantification of Ph positive stem cells in bone marrow during IM-therapy. We purified individual HSC and progenitors populations using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and quantified the ratio of BCR-ABL/BCR, which correlates closely with the CML cell ratio in the bone marrow. The BCR-ABL-positive cells were always detected in progenitor pools even after the CCR was achieved. When the MMR was achieved, the retention of CML remained in the HSC. The retention in HSC was observed both in Thy-1+ and Thy-1−, or each individual population. Recently, this Thy-1− population in human cord blood was detected as candidate human multipotent progenitors (MPP). However, we could not determine the role of Thy-1 expression in residual CML cells. Importantly, IM-therapy continuation could significantly decrease the ratio of BCR-ABL to BCR also in the HSC population. In this report, we demonstrated the sorted and purified stem cells are useful for more sensitive quantification of BCR-ABL-positive minimal residual disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Ryohei Tanizaki at Nagoya University, and DJ Young at UCSD for their technical assistance. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation
Contributor Information
Akihiro Abe, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan, e-mail: aakihiro@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Yosuke Minami, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan; Division of Hematology–Oncology, Department of Medicine and Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Fumihiko Hayakawa, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Kunio Kitamura, Department of Hematology, Ichinomiya Municipal Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Yuka Nomura, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Makoto Murata, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Akira Katsumi, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Hitoshi Kiyoi, Department of Infectious Disease, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Catriona H. M. Jamieson, Division of Hematology–Oncology, Department of Medicine and Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
Jean Y. J. Wang, Division of Hematology–Oncology, Department of Medicine and Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
Tomoki Naoe, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
References
- 1.Sawyers C. Targeted cancer therapy. Nature. 2004;432:294–7. doi: 10.1038/nature03095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2408–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kantarjian HM, Cortes J. New strategies in chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2006;83:289–93. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.06024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deininger MW. Optimizing therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2007;35:144–54. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Savona M, Talpaz M. Getting to the stem of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:341–50. doi: 10.1038/nrc2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cortes J, O’Brien S, Kantarjian H. Discontinuation of imatinib therapy after achieving a molecular response. Blood. 2004;104:2204–5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Michor F, Hughes TP, Iwasa Y, Branford S, Shah NP, Sawyers CL, et al. Dynamics of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2005;435:1267–70. doi: 10.1038/nature03669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Merante S, Orlandi E, Bernasconi P, Calatroni S, Boni M, Lazzarino M. Outcome of four patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib mesylate discontinuation. Haematologica. 2005;90:979–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Graham SM, Jorgensen HG, Allan E, Pearson C, Alcorn MJ, Richmond L, et al. Primitive, quiescent, Philadelphia-positive stem cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia are insensitive to STI571 in vitro. Blood. 2002;99:319–25. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.1.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang X, Smith C, Eaves A, Eaves C. The challenges of targeting chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2007;7:71–80. doi: 10.3816/clm.2007.s.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pellicano F, Holyoake TL. Stem cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Cancer Biomark. 2007;3:183–91. doi: 10.3233/cbm-2007-34-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jamieson CH, Ailles LE, Dylla SJ, Muijtjens M, Jones C, Zehnder JL, et al. Granulocyte–macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:657–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roeder I, Horn M, Glauche I, Hochhaus A, Mueller MC, Loeffler M. Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications. Nat Med. 2006;12:1181–4. doi: 10.1038/nm1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108:1809–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-005686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Langabeer SE, Gale RE, Harvey RC, Cook RW, Mackinnon S, Linch DC. Transcription-mediated amplification and hybridisation protection assay to determine BCR-ABL transcript levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2002;16:393–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Radich J, Kaeda J, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108:28–37. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-0092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goldman JM. How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era. Blood. 2007;110:2828–37. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-038943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jamieson CH, Gotlib J, Durocher JA, Chao MP, Mariappan MR, Lay M, et al. The JAK2 V617F mutation occurs in hematopoietic stem cells in polycythemia vera and predisposes toward erythroid differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:6224–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601462103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manz MG, Miyamoto T, Akashi K, Weissman IL. Prospective isolation of human clonogenic common myeloid progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:11872–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172384399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ishikawa I, Kato C, Harigae H, Sugawara T, Tomiya Y, Yamada M, et al. Dose modification of imatinib by monitoring the level of BCR-ABL transcript in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006;210:355–63. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Branford S, Hughes TP, Rudzki Z. Monitoring chronic myeloid leukaemia therapy by real-time quantitative PCR in blood is a reliable alternative to bone marrow cytogenetics. Br J Haematol. 1999;107:587–99. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Diaz-Blanco E, Bruns I, Neumann F, Fischer JC, Graef T, Rosskopf M, et al. Molecular signature of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of patients with CML in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2007;21:494–504. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Abnormalities in the erythroid progenitor compartments in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) Exp Hematol. 1979;7(Suppl 5):65–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eaves AC, Barnett MJ, Ponchio L, Cashman JD, Petzer AL, Eaves CJ. Differences between normal and CML stem cells potential targets for clinical exploitation. Stem Cells. 1998;16(Suppl 1):77–83. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530160809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leary AG, Ogawa M. Identification of pure and mixed basophil colonies in culture of human peripheral blood and marrow cells. Blood. 1984;64:78–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Denburg JA, Telizyn S, Messner H, Lim B, Jamal N, Ackerman SJ, et al. Heterogeneity of human peripheral blood eosinophil-type colonies: evidence for a common basophil-eosinophil progenitor. Blood. 1985;66:312–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bhatia R, Holtz M, Niu N, Gray R, Snyder DS, Sawyers CL, et al. Persistence of malignant hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission following imatinib mesylate treatment. Blood. 2003;101:4701–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Majeti R, Park CY, Weissman IL. Identification of a hierarchy of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors in human cord blood. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:635–45. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.