Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 1999 Sep-Oct;5(5):603–606. doi: 10.3201/eid0505.990501

Using a spatial filter and a geographic information system to improve rabies surveillance data.

A Curtis 1
PMCID: PMC2627727  PMID: 10511516

Abstract

The design and coordination of antirabies measures (e.g., oral vaccine and disease awareness campaigns) often depend on surveillance data. In Kentucky, health officials are concerned that the raccoon rabies epizootic that has spread throughout the east coast since the late 1970s could enter the state. The quality of surveillance data from Kentucky's 120 counties, however, may not be consistent. This article presents a geographic model that can be used with a geographic information system (GIS) to assess whether a county has a lower number of animals submitted for rabies testing than surrounding counties. This technique can be used as a first step in identifying areas needing improvement in their surveillance scheme. This model is a variant of a spatial filter that uses points within an area of analysis (usually a circle) to estimate the value of a central point. The spatial filter is an easy-to-use method of identifying point patterns, such as clusters or holes, at various geographic scales (county, intraurban), by using the traditional circle as an area of analysis or a GIS to incorporate a political shape (county boundary).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (938.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beck A. M., Felser S. R., Glickman L. T. An epizootic of rabies in Maryland, 1982-84. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jan;77(1):42–44. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigler W. J., McLean R. G., Trevino H. A. Epizootiologic aspects of raccoon rabies in Florida. Am J Epidemiol. 1973 Nov;98(5):326–335. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heidt G. A., Ferguson D. V., Lammers J. A profile of reported skunk rabies in Arkansas: 1977-1979. J Wildl Dis. 1982 Jul;18(3):269–277. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-18.3.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hubbard D. R. A descriptive epidemiological study of raccoon rabies in a rural environment. J Wildl Dis. 1985 Apr;21(2):105–110. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-21.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jenkins S. R., Winkler W. G. Descriptive epidemiology from an epizootic of raccoon rabies in the Middle Atlantic States, 1982-1983. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep;126(3):429–437. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Krebs J. W., Strine T. W., Smith J. S., Rupprecht C. E., Childs J. E. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1994. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Dec 15;207(12):1562–1575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilson M. L., Bretsky P. M., Cooper G. H., Jr, Egbertson S. H., Van Kruiningen H. J., Cartter M. L. Emergence of raccoon rabies in Connecticut, 1991-1994: spatial and temporal characteristics of animal infection and human contact. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Oct;57(4):457–463. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES