Abstract
Although criteria have been established to assess the quality of sputum specimens, no criteria for assessing the quality of endotracheal suction aspirates (ETSA) exist. Therefore, we compared the Gram stain (GS) and culture results for 504 consecutive ETSA specimens. Results recorded for GS included the numbers of squamous epithelial cells (SEC) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PML) per low-power field (LPF) (magnification, x100) as well as the quantities and types of organisms per high-power field (HPF) (magnification, x1,000). Culture results were quantitated by organism. Only 15% of ETSA specimens tested by GS contained > 10 SEC per LPF, and 21, 20, and 59% had < or = 10, 11 to 24, and > or = 25 PML per LPF, respectively. For 40% of ETSA specimens, no organisms were visible by GS. Of these specimens, 40% were sterile, 48% grew normal oropharyngeal flora (NF) only, 5% grew 1+ NF (i.e., > 10 colonies in the first quadrant) and 1+ gram-negative rods (GNR), and 7% grew < or = 1+ GNR either alone or in mixed culture. The mean numbers of organisms recovered from ETSA with < or = 10 SEC per LPF and > 10 SEC per LPF were 2.35 and 4.05, respectively. We therefore recommend that ETSA specimens that show no organisms by GS be rejected, in addition to those with > 10 SEC per LPF. Application of these rejection criteria enabled us to reject 847 (41%) of 2,068 ETSA specimens over a 6-month period. This represents a saving of approximately $66,000/year in unnecessary laboratory charges to patients.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Craven D. E., Driks M. R. Nosocomial pneumonia in the intubated patient. Semin Respir Infect. 1987 Mar;2(1):20–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geckler R. W., Gremillion D. H., McAllister C. K., Ellenbogen C. Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396–399. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.396-399.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heineman H. S., Radano R. R. Acceptability and cost savings of selective sputum microbiology in a community teaching hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):567–573. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.567-573.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johanson W. G., Pierce A. K., Sanford J. P. Changing pharyngeal bacterial flora of hospitalized patients. Emergence of gram-negative bacilli. N Engl J Med. 1969 Nov 20;281(21):1137–1140. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196911202812101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin R. S., Sumarah R. K., Robart E. M. Assessment of expectorated sputum for bacteriological analysis based on polymorphs and squamous epithelial cells: six-month study. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):635–637. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.635-637.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Washington J. A. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Scoy R. E. Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Jan;52(1):39–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]