Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1994 Apr;32(4):871–875. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.871-875.1994

Mixed-effect models for predicting microbial interactions in the vaginal ecosystem.

R A Ross 1, M L Lee 1, M L Delaney 1, A B Onderdonk 1
PMCID: PMC263155  PMID: 8027337

Abstract

Three statistical models that predict microbial interactions within the vaginal environment are presented. A large data set was assembled from in vivo studies describing the healthy vaginal environment, and the data set was analyzed to determine whether statistical models which would accurately predict the interactions of the microflora in this environment could be formulated. During assembly of the data set, two new variables were defined and were added to the data set, that is, cycle (sequence of menstrual cycle) and flow stage (subdivision of cycle determined by day of menstrual cycle). Concentrations of total aerobic (includes facultative) bacteria, total anaerobic bacteria, and a Corynebacterium sp. were identified by correlation analysis as variables with significant predictors. By using a regression method with a backward elimination procedure, significant predictors of these outcome variables were identified as the concentrations of Lactobacillus spp., anaerobic Streptococcus spp., and Staphylococcus spp., respectively. For all three outcome variables, pH and flow stage were also identified as significant independent variables. Because some of the data in the data set are repeated measurements for a subject, a mixed-effect model that accounts for the random effects of repeated-measurement data fit best the data set for predicting interactions between various members of the vaginal microflora. The predictive accuracies of the three models were tested by a comparison of model-predicted outcome-variable values with actual mean in vivo outcome-variable values. From these results, we concluded that it is possible to accurately predict vaginal microflora interactions by using a mixed-effect modeling system. The application of this type of modeling strategy and its future use are discussed.

Full text

PDF
871

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartlett J. G., Onderdonk A. B., Drude E., Goldstein C., Anderka M., Alpert S., McCormack W. M. Quantitative bacteriology of the vaginal flora. J Infect Dis. 1977 Aug;136(2):271–277. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.2.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hill G. B., Eschenbach D. A., Holmes K. K. Bacteriology of the vagina. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1984;86:23–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson S. R., Petzold C. R., Galask R. P. Qualitative and quantitative changes of the vaginal microbial flora during the menstrual cycle. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1985 Sep;9(1):1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1985.tb00331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Larsen B., Galask R. P. Vaginal microbial flora: composition and influences of host physiology. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jun;96(6 Pt 2):926–930. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levison M. E., Corman L. C., Carrington E. R., Kaye D. Quantitative microflora of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan 1;127(1):80–85. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90318-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindner J. G., Plantema F. H., Hoogkamp-Korstanje J. A. Quantitative studies of the vaginal flora of healthy women and of obstetric and gynaecological patients. J Med Microbiol. 1978 Aug;11(3):233–241. doi: 10.1099/00222615-11-3-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohm M. J., Galask R. P. Bacterial flora of the cervix from 100 prehysterectomy patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jul 15;122(6):683–687. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Onderdonk A. B., Delaney M. L., Hinkson P. L., DuBois A. M. Quantitative and qualitative effects of douche preparations on vaginal microflora. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):333–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Onderdonk A. B., Polk B. F., Moon N. E., Goren B., Bartlett J. G. Methods for quantitative vaginal flora studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Aug 1;128(7):777–781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90720-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Onderdonk A. B., Zamarchi G. R., Rodriguez M. L., Hirsch M. L., Muñoz A., Kass E. H. Qualitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2779–2784. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2779-2784.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Onderdonk A. B., Zamarchi G. R., Rodriguez M. L., Hirsch M. L., Muñoz A., Kass E. H. Quantitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Dec;53(12):2774–2778. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2774-2778.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Onderdonk A. B., Zamarchi G. R., Walsh J. A., Mellor R. D., Muñoz A., Kass E. H. Methods for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of vaginal microflora during menstruation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):333–339. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.2.333-339.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paavonen J. Physiology and ecology of the vagina. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1983;40:31–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Piot P., Van Dyck E., Totten P. A., Holmes K. K. Identification of Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):19–24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.19-24.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sautter R. L., Brown W. J. Sequential vaginal cultures from normal young women. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):479–484. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.5.479-484.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES