Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2007 Nov 17;16(5):2657–2664. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.11.035

Synthesis, Nitric Oxide Release, and Anti-Leukemic Activity of Glutathione-Activated Nitric Oxide Prodrugs: Structural Analogues of PABA/NO, an Anti-Cancer Lead Compound

Harinath Chakrapani a,*, Thomas C Wilde a, Michael L Citro b, Michael M Goodblatt a, Larry K Keefer a, Joseph E Saavedra b,*
PMCID: PMC2631658  NIHMSID: NIHMS44781  PMID: 18060792

Abstract

Diazeniumdiolate anions and their prodrug forms are reliable sources of nitric oxide (NO) that have generated interest as promising therapeutic agents. A number of structural analogues of O2-(2,4-dinitro-5-(4-(N-methylamino)benzoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (PABA/NO), an anti-cancer lead compound that is designed to release NO upon activation by glutathione, were prepared. The nitric oxide release patterns of these O2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) diazeniumdiolates in the presence of glutathione were tested and it was found that in the absence of competing pathways, these compounds release nearly quantitative amounts of NO. The ability of PABA/NO and its structural analogues to inhibit human leukemia cell proliferation was determined and it was found that compounds releasing elevated amounts of NO displayed superior cytotoxic effects.

1. Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO) prodrugs of the ionic diazeniumdiolate class (1, Scheme 1) that spontaneously dissociate at definitive rates to form NO are not only widely used in biological studies but are also of interest as possible therapeutic agents in the treatment of several disease states, notably cancer.16 Due to the involvement of NO in diverse physiological processes, site-directed delivery of therapeutic nitric oxide is essential to avoid any undesirable side-effects. Derivatization of the O2-position of the diazeniumdiolate ion with protective groups, converting them into substrates for specific enzymes in a metabolic pathway, is one frequently used strategy.711 The inactive prodrug circulates freely until it encounters the specific protein, which then acts as a trigger, cleaving the protective group, resulting in selective accumulation of NO in that tissue. A successful example of such an approach is the development of O2-arylated diazeniumdiolates targeting the detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase (GST), often over-expressed in cancer tissue.1214 The general mechanism of action of such prodrugs involves nucleophilic aromatic substitution15 by glutathione (GSH), generating the nitric oxide-releasing diazeniumdiolate ion 1 (Scheme 1).16

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Mechanism of nitric oxide release from O2-arylated diazeniumdiolates that are metabolized by glutathione S-transferase.

Of the several isoforms of GST, GSTπ is over-expressed in many tumors, which makes it an attractive molecular target for site-directed delivery of tumoristatic agents.1720 Molecular modeling studies of the Meisenheimer complex (Scheme 1) were used as a guide in the design of GSTπ-selective 2,4-dinitroaryl derivatives of DMA/NO (Structure 2, Scheme 2).1214

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Original synthesis of PABA/NO (3).

One such compound, PABA/NO (Structure 3, Scheme 2), has shown tumoristatic activity against A2780 human ovarian cancer xenografts in female SCID mice with a potency comparable to that of cisplatin.14 This and other in vitro and in vivo activities established PABA/NO to be a promising anti-cancer lead compound.13 In an effort to identify drug candidates with superior anti-cancer activity, we attempted to synthesize and study structural analogues of PABA/NO.

Initially, PABA/NO was prepared in 38% overall yield by the reaction of 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (4) with (N-methyl)-4-aminobenzoic acid (5) to form the fluoride 6, which was then reacted with DMA/NO (Scheme 2).13 The second step of this synthesis produced a mixture of byproducts that rendered isolation of PABA/NO cumbersome. Hence, devising an efficient synthetic route to PABA/NO was desired.

2. Results and discussion

In order to prepare a variety of PABA/NO analogues, two synthetic intermediates, structures 7 and 8, of divergent reactivity were envisaged (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Proposed synthetic intermediates 7 and 8 and their syntheses.

The fluoride 7, which was prepared by treatment of 4 with DMA/NO, is a candidate for reaction with nucleophiles (Scheme 3).12 The phenol 8, which can react with electrophiles, was obtained by hydrolysis of 7 in 83% yield (Scheme 3).13 This design exploits the opposing organic reactivity of compounds 7 and 8 and should permit facile access to diverse PABA/NO analogues.

As predicted, the two compounds 7 and 8 served as convenient divergence points in the synthesis of numerous PABA/NO analogues. PABA/NO and several ester derivatives (9–14) differing in the substitution pattern in the aroate ester functionality were synthesized in moderate to good yields from 7 or 8 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Synthesis of PABA/NO and its structural analogues.

graphic file with name nihms44781t1.jpg

reactant product no W Z yielda
7 3 NHMe CH 79%b
7 9 NMe2 CH 66%b
7 10 NH2 CH 64%b
7 11 NHAc CH 75%b
8 12 H CH 34%c
8 13 H N 44%c
8 14 NO2 CH 71%c
a

isolated yield.

b

prepared using the corresponding benzoic acid.

c

prepared using the corresponding aroyl chloride.

Nitric oxide donors coupled with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are assuming importance as versatile drug candidates.2123 These compounds have shown to minimize the deleterious effects of traditional NSAIDs, while retaining the potent anti-inflammatory activity of the parent NSAIDs.2123 PABA/NO analogues (15–17) of non-sterodial anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen were prepared by treating 8 with the corresponding acid chloride (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of NSAID-based PABA/NO analogues.

In addition, several structurally similar compounds with varying functional groups connecting the two aromatic rings (18–22) were synthesized starting from 4, 7 or 8 (Scheme 5).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of some PABA/NO structural analogues.

The ambident nucleophilic character of 4-aminobenzoic acid is noteworthy. In acetone, it was reported that 4-aminobenzoic acid reacted through the amino group to form 23C=O = 1685 cm−1), in two steps from 4 (Scheme 6).13 However, in the presence of triethylamine, the major product of the reaction of 7 and 4-aminobenzoic acid (Scheme 6) was through the carboxylic acid functionality to form the ester 10C=O = 1742 cm−1).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Reactivity of 4-aminobenzoic acid under different reaction conditions with aryl fluorides.

In a neutral organic solvent such as acetone, presumably the carboxylic acid does not ionize, leaving the nitrogen lone pair as the most nucleophilic species. However, in the presence of a weak base such as triethylamine, it is expected that ionization to the anionic form of 4-aminobenzoic acid occurs. In such a situation, the carboxylate ion is the dominant nucleophile, rationalizing the observed outcome of these reactions of 4-aminobenzoic acid.

PABA/NO and its analogues were independently treated with GSH in 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer and NO release was measured (Table 2). The yields of NO from the ester analogues 9–17 were lower than that of PABA/NO (Table 2). All other analogues, 18–22, were found to release higher amounts of NO (≥ 93%).

Table 2.

Nitric oxide release and anti-leukemic activity for PABA/NO and its structural analogues.

compound % NO released IC50 (µM)
PABA/NO, 3 73 3.9
9 30 >25
10 63 13
11 20 22
12 15 >25
13 4 >25
14 0 >25
15 7 >25
16 0 >25
17 5 >25
18 100 6.8
19 99 1.6
20 100 1.4
21 96 3.9
22 93 2.3
8 0 >25

Under similar conditions but in the absence of GSH, negligible amounts of NO were detected from 9–22. In an earlier study, we reported that upon treatment with a range of nucleophiles, 2,4-dinitroarylated diazeniumdiolates released NO, suggesting that arylated diazeniumdiolates are susceptible to activation with other nucleophiles to release nitric oxide.15

The sub-stoichiometric yield of NO suggests that a pathway other than just nucleophilic aromatic substitution by GSH to release DMA/NO ion is operational. In addition to nitric oxide release, PABA/NO, in the presence of GSH, is reported to undergo ester hydrolysis to form 8 as a byproduct (Scheme 7).13 Such a competitive pathway appears to be pronounced in 9–17, leading to lower yields of NO from these compounds in comparison with that of PABA/NO.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Mechanism of nitric oxide release from PABA/NO.

The compound 8 itself does not release appreciable amounts of nitric oxide (Table 2), probably due to equilibration to its phenolate ion 8a (Scheme 7) that is expected to resist reaction with nucleophilic species such as GSH (pKa of 2,4-dinitrophenol is 4.09).24

From the higher amounts of NO released from 18–22, it is inferred that an amine, amide, sulfonate, or ether linker is less labile to cleavage under these conditions. Future work will focus on preparing analogues with such linkages that are resistant to hydrolysis in the presence of GSH.

Next, PABA/NO and its analogues were tested for their ability to inhibit leukemia cell proliferation and IC50 values were determined (Table 2). It was found that in addition to PABA/NO, the compounds 18–22 were potent inhibitors of cell proliferation. When the % NO released upon treatment with GSH and IC50 values of PABA/NO and its analogues were plotted, a noteworthy trend emerged (Fig. 1). Compounds that released elevated amounts of nitric oxide (> 70 %) were found to display potent anti-proliferative activity (< 10 µM). Furthermore, all compounds in this study that released negligible amounts of NO were found to be moderately active or inactive in the cell proliferation bioassay. Taken together, these observations indicate a role for nitric oxide in the cytotoxic activity of these compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Variation of observed cytotoxic effects with % NO released upon activation by GSH by PABA/NO and its analogues.

In conclusion, we report the synthesis of a number of O2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) diazeniumdiolates that are designed to be activated by glutathione to release nitric oxide using several approaches. The nitric oxide release patterns of these prodrugs in the presence of glutathione were determined; in the absence of competing pathways, nearly quantitative amounts of NO release were observed. Their in vitro anti-leukemic activity indicates that nitric oxide is an important component of cytotoxicity. Finally, this study reveals structural patterns that may assist in future design of improved nitric oxide-based anti-cancer agents.

3. Experimental Section

3.1 General

NO was purchased from Matheson Gas Products (Montgomeryville, PA). Starting materials were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI) unless otherwise indicated. NMR spectra were obtained in chloroform-d, DMSO-d6, or acetone-d6 on a Varian UNITY INOVA spectrometer; chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield from tetramethylsilane. NMR spectra for publication were prepared using the software MestRe Nova (Mestrelab Research, Spain). Quantification of NO after treatment of compounds with glutathione (GSH) was carried out by chemiluminescence with a Thermal Energy Analyzer Model 502A instrument (Thermedics, Inc., Woburn, MA) or a Sievers 280i Nitric Oxide Analyzer (Boulder, CO).12 Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded on an Agilent Model 8453 or a Hewlett-Packard model 8451A diode array spectrophotometer. Infrared spectra were recorded on M500 IR spectrometer (Buck Scientific, East Norwalk, CT). Elemental analyses were performed by Midwest Microlab (Indianapolis, IN). Sodium 1-(N,N-dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DMA/NO, 2) was prepared as described earlier.4 O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-fluorophenyl) 1-(N,N-dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate 7 and O2-(2,4-dinitro-5-hydroxyphenyl) 1-(N,N-dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate 8 were prepared by reported methods.12

3.2 General Synthetic Procedures

Unless otherwise specified, these were the general methods used for the synthesis of PABA/NO analogues.

Method A

Ester Formation. A solution or a partial solution of 1.5 mmol of the aryl carboxylic acid in dichloromethane (65 mL) was treated with triethylamine (2 molar excess) giving a homogeneous solution. To this was added a solution of 7 (420 mg, 1.45 mmol) in dichloromethane (65 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC and after 72 h, the solution was washed with 5% sodium bicarbonate, then with 1 M HCl, dried (sodium sulfate), filtered and evaporated to give a solid that was recrystallized from ethanol or from dichloromethane:ether. Unless otherwise indicated, no chromatography was required.

Method B

Alternate Method for Ester Formation. To a solution of 7 (151 mg, 0.52 mmol) in acetonitrile (6 mL), a solution of 0.53 mmol of the aryl carboxylic acid and a slight molar excess of triethylamine in acetonitrile (4 mL) were added and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature. A precipitate formed within 30 min of reaction and the resulting slurry was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with water, and the yellow precipitate was collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol afforded pure material.

Method C

Acylation Reaction. To a solution of 8 (96 mg, 0.33 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL), triethylamine (56 µL, 0.44 mmol) was added. To this an equimolar amount of the acid chloride in dichloromethane (5 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 min to 2 h while being monitored by TLC. The reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (20 mL), then washed with 1 M HCl and subsequently with 5% sodium bicarbonate. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered through magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give either a powder or a glass. The powder was normally recrystallized from mixtures of ethanol and dichloromethane, while the glassy products were dissolved in ether and allowed to crystallize slowly on standing.

Method D

Arylether Formation. To a partial solution of 7 (50 mg, 0.17 mmol) in tert-butanol (2 mL), an equivalent of the phenol in 0.1 M NaOH (2 mL) was added. The slurry was stirred at room temperature overnight and diluted with water; the resulting yellow precipitate was collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol.

Method E

Amide Formation. To a solution of 1.6 g (11 mmol) of N-substituted benzamide in anhydrous THF, cooled to −80 °C, lithium diisopropyl amide (LDA, 1.5 M in hexane, 8.5 mL, 12.8 mmol) was added. After 1 h, this solution, by syringe, was added to 7 (2.1 g, 10.1 mmol), also dissolved in anhydrous THF, and cooled to −80 °C. After an additional hour, solvents were removed and the remaining solids were extracted with dichloromethane and washed with dilute HCl and brine, then dried (Na2SO4 and MgSO4), filtered, and flash chromatographed (1:1 hexanes:ethyl acetate) to obtain pure material.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(N-methylamino)benzoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (PABA/NO, 3)

Prepared using method A in 79% yield. Its physicochemical properties matched those described previously.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (9)

A solution of 7 in acetonitrile was treated with 4-dimethylaminobenzoic acid and triethylamine according to Method B. The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to give a 66% yield of 9: mp 160-1 °C; UV λmax (ε) 229 nm (29.1 mM−1 cm−1), 320 nm (47.5 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.11 (s, 6H), 3.27 (s, 6H), 6.71 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.55 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 8.90 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 40.1, 41.8, 110.9, 113.4, 124.6, 132.7, 133.4, 135.9, 150.0, 153.9, 154.3, 163.4. Anal. Calcd for C17H18N6O8·0.05EtOH: C, 47.02; H, 4.23; N, 19.24. Found: C, 46.59; H, 4.17; N, 18.85.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(amino)benzoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (10)

A solution of 7 in acetonitrile was treated with aminobenzoic acid and triethylamine according to Method B. The crude product was recrystallized from ethanol to give a 64% yield of 10: mp 160-1 °C; IR (film) 1742 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.27 (s, 6H), 4.30 (broad, 2H), 6.70–6.72 (m, 2H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.98–8.00 (m, 2H), 8.91 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 41.8, 113.4, 113.9, 116.3, 128.6, 133.1, 135.8, 149.8, 152.4, 152.5, 154.0, 163.1. Anal. Calcd for C15H14N6O8: C, 44.34; H, 3.47; N, 20.68. Found: C, 43.90; H, 3.45; N, 20.97.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(N-acetylamino)benzoyloxy)phenyl)1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (11)

This product was obtained in 75% yield from the reaction of 4-acetamidobenzoyl chloride and 8 as described in Method C: mp 151-2 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 292 nm (46.1 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 2.25 (s, 3H), 3.28 (s, 6H), 7.43 (broad, 1H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.17–8.19 (m, 2H), 8.96 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 24.9, 41.8, 113.3, 119.0, 122.7, 124.9, 132.2, 133.9, 135.5, 143.7, 149.3, 154.1, 162.8, 168.5. Anal. Calcd for C17H16N6O9: C, 45.54; H, 3.60; N, 18.74. Found: C, 45.41; H, 3.58; N, 18.45.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(benzoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (12)

A solution of 8 in dichloromethane was treated with benzoyl chloride as described in Method C to give a 34% yield of 12: mp 130-1 °C; UV(ethanol) λmax (ε) 232 nm (16.9 mM−1 cm−1), 293 nm (8.2 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.28 (s, 6H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.57–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.74 (m, 1H), 8.19–8.22 (m, 2H), 8.96 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 41.8, 113.3, 124.9, 127.6, 128.9, 130.7, 133.9, 134.8, 149.3, 154.1, 163.5. Anal. Calcd for C15H13N5O8: C, 46.04; H, 3.35; N, 17.90. Found: C, 45.76; H, 3.34; N, 17.59.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(nicotinoyloxy)phenyl 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (13)

A solution of 8 in dichloromethane was treated with two equivalents of triethylamine followed by acylation with one equivalent of nicotinoyl chloride hydrochloride as described in Method C; recrystallization of the resulting solid from ether afforded 13 (44% yield): mp 123-4 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 264 nm (36.5 mM−1 cm−1), 299 nm (33.7 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.30 (s, 6H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.53–7.56 (m, 1H), 8.46–8.49 (m, 1H), 8.93–8.94 (m, 1H), 8.99 (s, 1H), 9.41 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 41.8, 110.6, 121.1, 121.3, 122.4, 131.6, 132.6, 148.9, 151.6, 152.1, 159.7, 162.4. Anal. Calcd for C14H12N6O8: C, 42.86; H, 3.08; N, 21.42. Found: C, 42.64; H, 3.12; N, 21.11.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(nitrobenzoyl)oxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (14)

This compound was obtained in 71% yield from 8 and p-nitrobenzoyl chloride as described in Method C. The product was recrystallized from ether:dichloromethane: mp 133-4 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 261 nm (35.7 mM−1 cm−1), 299 nm (20.9 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.29 (s, 6H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 8.40 (m, 4H), 8.99 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 41.7, 113.1, 124.0, 125.1, 131.9, 132.9, 134.3, 135.0, 148.5, 151.5, 154.3, 161.9. Anal. Calcd for C15H12N6O10: C, 41.29; H, 2.77; N, 19.26. Found: C, 41.28; H, 2.80; N, 19.09.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(2-acetoxybenzoyl)oxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (15)

A solution of 8 in dichloromethane was acylated with the acid chloride of acetylsalicylic acid containing a slight molar excess of triethylamine according to Method C to give a 66% yield of 15: mp 128-9 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 235 nm (21.8 mM−1 cm−1), 293 nm (11.9 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.30 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 6H), 7.21–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.46 (m, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.71–7.75 (m, 1H), 8.25–8.26 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.95 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 21.0, 41.7, 113.5, 120.7, 124.2, 124.9, 126.4, 132.4, 134.1, 135.4, 135.8, 148.8, 151.7, 154.2, 160.9, 169.5. Anal. Calcd for C17H15N5O10: C, 45.44; H, 3.36; N, 15.59. Found: C, 45.28; H, 3.33; N, 15.29.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propionoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (16)

This adduct was prepared in 85% yield from the reaction of 8 with the acid chloride of 4-isobutyl-α-methyl phenylacetic acid as described in Method C: mp 121-2 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 297 nm (24.4 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.91 (dd, 6H, J = 0.8, 6.7 Hz), 1.67 (d, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.87 (septet, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.48 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.24 (s, 6H), 4.06 (q, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.15–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.20 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.31 (m, 2H), 8.87 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 18.3, 22.4, 30.2, 41.7, 45.0, 45.2, 113.0, 124.8, 127.5, 129.6, 134.1, 135.7, 141.3, 149.0, 154.4, 171.3. Anal. Calcd for C21H25N5O8: C, 53.05; H, 5.30; N, 14.23. Found: C, 52.69; H, 5.20; N, 14.37.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(2-(6-methoxynaphth-2-yl)propionoyloxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (17)

Method C was followed in the synthesis of 17: mp 118-9 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 299 nm (24.4 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.76 (d, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.17 (s, 6H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 4.22 (q, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.15–7.18 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.73–7.77 (m, 3H), 8.87 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 18.2, 41.7, 45.5, 55.4, 77.2, 105.6, 113.0, 119.3, 124.8, 126.2, 126.5, 128.9, 129.3, 133.6, 134.0, 135.4, 149.0, 154.0, 158.0, 171.3; Anal. Calcd for C22H21N5O9·0.25H2O: C, 52.43; H, 4.30; N, 13.90. Found: C, 52.24; H, 4.24; N, 14.06.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl)aminophenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (18)

To a solution of 7 (1.9 g, 6.5 mmol) in 40 mL of THF/acetone (1:1), 0.81 g (6.6 mmol) of 4-aminobenzyl alcohol in acetone (15 mL) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 48 h and progress was monitored by TLC. Solvents were evaporated under vacuum and the resulting solids were taken up in dichloromethane. This solution was was washed with 5% sodium bicarbonate, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated. Recrystallization from ethanol gave a 79% yield of 18: mp 137-140 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 304 nm (26.1 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 3.02 (s, 6H), 4.54 (d, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 5.28 (t, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz), 6.87 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.45 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.91 (s, 1H), 10.16 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 40.9, 62.3, 100.2, 125.7, 126.1, 126.4, 127.3, 127.5, 136.0, 141.7, 147.4, 154.1. Anal. Calcd for C15H16N6O7: C, 45.92; H, 4.11; 21.42. Found: C, 45.95; H, 4.05; N, 21.19.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(N-benzoyl-N-methylamino)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (19)

To a slurry of 2 (1.5 g, 12.0 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL) at 0 °C, 24 (1.3 g, 4.1 mmol) dissolved in anhydrous THF (25 mL) was added. After 1 h, solvents were removed and solids were extracted with dichloromethane and brine. The organic layers were dried and filtered, and solvents were removed. Recrystallization from ethanol gave 19 (640 mg, 1.6 mmol, 39% yield): mp 120-3 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 288 nm (20.8 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.26 (s, 6H), 3.46 (s, 3H), 7.28–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.41 (m, 4H), 8.66 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 38.6, 41.7, 118.0, 124.6, 128.0, 128.3, 131.1, 138.9, 144.3, 151.2, 170.3. Anal. Calcd for C16H16N6O7: C, 47.53; H, 3.99; N, 20.78. Found: C, 47.77; H, 4.10; N, 20.41.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(N-benzoyl-N-ethylamino)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (20)

To a slurry of 2 (1.1 g, 8.8 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) at 0 °C, 25 (0.9 g, 2.8 mmol) dissolved in anhydrous THF (15 mL) was added. After 2 h, solvents were removed and solids were extracted with dichloromethane and brine. The organic layer was dried and filtered, and the solvents were removed. Recrystallization from ethanol gave 20 (670 mg, 1.6 mmol, 57% yield): mp 129-30 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 288 nm (20.8 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 7.1), 3.27 (s, 6H), 3.94 (broad, 2H), 7.29–7.41 (m, 6H), 8.65 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ 13.3, 41.7, 46.4, 118.1, 124.6, 127.8, 128.5, 134.3, 134.4, 139.5, 142.9, 153.0, 170.0. Anal. Calcd for C17H18N6O7: C, 48.81; H, 4.34; N, 20.09. Found: C, 48.75; H, 4.35; N, 19.94.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(N-acetylamino)benzenesulfonyl)oxy)phenyl) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (21)

To a solution of acetylsulfanilyl chloride (145 mg, 0.62 mmol) in acetone (7 mL), a solution of 8 (178 mg, 0.62 mmol) in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (7 mL). The resulting homogeneous solution was stirred at room temperature and gradually became cloudy. After stirring overnight, the product was collected by filtration, washed with water followed by ether, and allowed to dry to form a yellow powder that was recrystallized from acetone:dichloromethane to afford 21 (193 mg, 0.4 mmol, 64%): mp 138-9 °C; UV (ethanol) λmax (ε) 280 nm (28.2 mM−1 cm−1), 338 nm (18.5 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 2.17 (s, 3H), 3.26 (s, 6H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.86–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.95–7.97 (m, 2H), 8.82 (s, 1H), 9.79 (broad, 1H); 13C NMR (acetone-d6) δ 24.5, 41.7, 113.7, 119.7, 119.8, 125.5, 127.6, 131.2, 146.6, 146.9, 154.3, 169.9, 170.0. Anal. Calcd for C16H16N6O10S: C, 39.67; H, 3.33; N, 17.35; S, 6.62. Found: C, 39.42; H, 3.24; N, 16.95; S, 6.97.

O2-(2,4-Dinitro-5-(4-(acetamido)phenoxy)) 1-(N,N-Dimethylamino)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (22)

A solution of 7 in tert-butanol was reacted with 4-acetamidophenol in 0.1 M NaOH according to Method D. The product was recrystallized from ethanol to give a 75% yield of 22: mp 159-60 °C; UV (acetonitrile) λmax (ε) 224 nm (26.6 mM−1 cm−1), 281 nm (18.9 mM−1 cm−1); 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 2.21 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 6H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 7.25–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.86 (s, 1H), 9.35 (broad, 1H); 13C NMR (acetone-d6) δ 23.6, 41.0, 105.7, 121.1, 121.2, 125.6, 131.0, 133.7, 138.3, 149.2, 154.6, 157.2, 168.4. Anal. Calcd for C16H16N6O8·0.5 H2O: C, 44.76; H, 3.99; 19.57. Found: C, 44.57; H, 3.81; N, 19.46.

2,4-Dinitro-1-fluoro-5-(N-benzoyl-N-methylamino)benzene (24)

N-Methylbenzamide was reacted with 4 according to Method E to afford 24 (43% yield): mp 153-6 °C; 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 3.54 (s, 3H), 7.34–7.50 (m, 5H), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 11.5 Hz), 8.72 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C NMR (acetone-d6) δ 38.9, 120.6, 125.0, 128.9, 129.3, 131.6, 135.3, 142.5, 145.5, 157.0, 159.7, 170.5. Anal. Calcd for C14H10FN3O5: C, 52.67; H, 3.16; 13.16. Found: C, 52.52; H, 3.18; N, 13.01.

2,4-Dinitro-1-fluoro-5-(N-benzoyl-N-ethylamino)benzene (25)

N-Ethylbenzamide25 was reacted with 4 according to Method E to afford 25 (29% yield): mp 113-4 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.29 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.96 (q, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.32–7.46 (m, 6H), 8.70 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.5, 46.6, 119.4, 124.5, 127.7, 128.7, 131.2, 134.0, 141.7, 143.6, 156.0, 158.7, 170.2. Anal. Calcd for C15H12FN3O5: C, 54.06; H, 3.63; 12.61. Found: C, 53.94; H, 3.62; N, 12.51.

3.3 Nitric Oxide Release

Chemiluminescence detection and quantification of NO evolving from the reactions of PABA/NO and its analogues were conducted by preparing 10 mM stock solutions of these compounds in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. A pH 7.4 phosphate buffer containing 1 mM GSH was sparged with inert gas until a steady detector response was established. The stock solution of the diazeniumdiolate prodrug was injected into this GSH solution and the NO release profile was followed at 37 °C. The final concentrations of the NO prodrug in such solutions were 100–150 nM. The resulting curve was integrated to quantify the amount of NO released/mol of compound.

3.3 HL-60 Cell Culture and Growth Assay

Human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a 5% CO2-humidified atmosphere. Cells were plated in 96-well plates at a concentration of 10,000 cells in 100 µL. Stock DMSO solutions of each compound were serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before addition to cultures with a final DMSO concentration in the cultures of 0.5%. Agents were added after 24 h of culture initiation. Three days after agent addition, the number of viable cells was determined using the MTS assay (CellTiter 96, Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. IC50 values were calculated by non-linear fitting of the absorbance/concentration data to the following equation,

y=Amin+(AmaxAmin)/(1+10(LogIC50x)*HS)

where Amin is the (background) absorbance observed with no living cells, Amax is the (control) absorbance with no compound added, LogIC50 is the logarithm of the IC50, HS is the Hill slope, and × is the concentration of the compound in the culture medium. Alternatively, the IC50 values were calculated using the fitting program available in Sigma Plot.

Supplementary Material

01

Supplementary data NMR spectra for compounds 10–22. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at [to be inserted later].

Acknowledgment

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, as well as by National Cancer Institute contract N01-CO-12400 to SAIC. The authors thank Ms. Janet R. Fields, NCI, for invaluable support with the biological assay.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.Scatena R, Bottoni P, Martorana GE, Giardina B. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2005;14:835. doi: 10.1517/13543784.14.7.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keefer LK. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005;5:625. doi: 10.2174/1568026054679380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.King SB. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2004;37:735. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keefer LK. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2003;43:585. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.135831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hrabie JA, Keefer LK. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:1135. doi: 10.1021/cr000028t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Keefer LK, Nims RW, Davies KM, Wink DA. Methods Enzymol. 1996;268:281. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)68030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chakrapani H, Showalter BM, Kong L, Keefer LK, Saavedra JE. Org. Lett. 2007;9:3409. doi: 10.1021/ol701419a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Showalter BM, Reynolds MM, Valdez CA, Saavedra JE, Davies KM, Klose JR, Chmurny GN, Citro ML, Barchi JJ, Jr, Merz SI, Meyerhoff ME, Keefer LK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14188. doi: 10.1021/ja054510a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai TB, Lu D, Landerholm M, Wang PG. Org. Lett. 2004;6:4203. doi: 10.1021/ol048397p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saavedra JE, Shami PJ, Wang LY, Davies KM, Booth MN, Citro ML, Keefer LK. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:261. doi: 10.1021/jm9903850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saavedra JE, Billiar TR, Williams DL, Kim YM, Watkins SC, Keefer LK. J. Med. Chem. 1997;40:1947. doi: 10.1021/jm9701031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shami PJ, Saavedra JE, Bonifant CL, Chu J, Udupi V, Malaviya S, Carr BI, Kar S, Wang M, Jia L, Ji X, Keefer LK. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:4356. doi: 10.1021/jm060022h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saavedra JE, Srinivasan A, Buzard GS, Davies KM, Waterhouse DJ, Inami K, Wilde TC, Citro ML, Cuellar M, Deschamps JR, Parrish D, Shami PJ, Findlay VJ, Townsend DM, Tew KD, Singh S, Jia L, Ji X, Keefer LK. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:1157. doi: 10.1021/jm050700k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Findlay VJ, Townsend DM, Saavedra JE, Buzard GS, Citro ML, Keefer LK, Ji X, Tew KD. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004;65:1070. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.5.1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saavedra JE, Srinivasan A, Bonifant CL, Chu J, Shanklin AP, Flippen-Anderson JL, Rice WG, Turpin JA, Davies KM, Keefer LK. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:3090. doi: 10.1021/jo0016529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davies KM, Wink DA, Saavedra JE, Keefer LK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:5473. doi: 10.1021/ja002899q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Armstrong RN. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1991;4:131. doi: 10.1021/tx00020a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armstrong RN. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997;10:2. doi: 10.1021/tx960072x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.O’Brien M, Tew KD. Eur. J. Cancer. 1996;32:967. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.O’Brien ML, Kruh GD, Tew KD. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000;294:480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Velázquez CA, Praveen Rao PN, Citro ML, Keefer LK, Knaus EE. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007;15:4767. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Velázquez CA, Praveen Rao PN, Knaus EE. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:4061. doi: 10.1021/jm050211k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Velázquez CA, Praveen Rao PN, McDonald R, Knaus EE. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005;13:2749. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.D’Aprano A, Fuoss RM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1968;61:1183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.4.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stamm H, Sommer A, Woderer A, Wiessert W, Mall T, Assithianakis P. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:4946. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

Supplementary data NMR spectra for compounds 10–22. Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at [to be inserted later].

RESOURCES