Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2008 Nov 21;75(3):837–841. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01299-08

Structural and Molecular Basis of the Role of Starch and Sucrose in Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Development

M I Klein 1, S Duarte 1,, J Xiao 1, S Mitra 3, T H Foster 3, H Koo 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC2632160  PMID: 19028906

Abstract

The interaction of sucrose and starch with bacterial glucosyltransferases and human salivary amylase may enhance the pathogenic potential of Streptococcus mutans within biofilms by influencing the structural organization of the extracellular matrix and modulating the expression of genes involved in exopolysaccharide synthesis and specific sugar transport and two-component systems.


Oral diseases related to biofilms, such as dental caries, affect the majority of the world's population (27, 34). Dental caries results from the interaction of specific bacteria and salivary constituents with dietary carbohydrates in the oral cavity; the appearance of biofilms on the tooth surface is the first clinical evidence of the diet-bacterium interaction. Sucrose is considered the “arch criminal” from the dietary standpoint because it is fermentable and also serves as a substrate for synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) in dental biofilm (2, 28). Starches are an important source of fermentable carbohydrate and are usually consumed simultaneously with sucrose in modern societies. The combination of starch and sucrose is highly cariogenic in vivo (1, 10, 33) and may enhance the pathogenicity of biofilms in humans (30).

Streptococcus mutans is a key contributor to the formation of cariogenic biofilms; this bacterium (i) synthesizes large amounts of extracellular glucans and fructans from sucrose using several glucosyltransferases (Gtfs) and a fructosyltransferase, (ii) adheres tenaciously to glucan-coated surfaces, and (iii) is highly acidogenic and acid tolerant, which are critical virulence properties in the pathogenesis of dental caries (2, 29, 31). Glucans provide specific binding sites for bacterial colonization on the tooth surface and bulk and structural integrity to the extracellular matrix; thus, they are essential for the formation and accumulation of dental biofilms (2). In addition, starches can be digested by α-amylases to maltose, maltodextrins, and other oligosaccharides, some of which can be acceptors during glucan synthesis by Gtfs (11, 12, 35). Starch hydrolysates produced by salivary α-amylases bound to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (sHA) increased, in the presence of sucrose, the synthesis of structurally distinctive glucans by surface-adsorbed GtfB (35). Moreover, maltose and maltodextrins resulting from starch hydrolysis can be catabolized in acids by S. mutans (4).

(This paper was previously presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Dental Research, Dallas, TX, 3 to 5 April 2008, where M. I. Klein was awarded second prize in the postdoctoral category in the Edward H. Hatton Awards Competition.)

In this study, we investigated whether biochemical reactions involving interactions between specific host (α-amylase) and bacterium-derived (Gtfs) enzymes and dietary carbohydrates (starch and sucrose) influence (i) the biochemical and structural properties of the EPS matrix and (ii) trigger specific adaptive responses by S. mutans at the transcriptional level, resulting in a biofilm with enhanced virulence.

Biofilms of S. mutans UA159 (= ATCC 700610) were formed using our amylase-active sHA disk model (18). Biofilms were grown in buffered tryptone yeast extract broth (pH 7.0) containing (i) 1% (wt/vol) starch (soluble starch [80% amylopectin and 20% amylose]; Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO), (ii) 1% sucrose, (iii) 1% starch plus 1% sucrose, (iv) 1% starch plus 0.5% glucose plus 0.5% fructose, or (v) 1% sucrose plus 1% glucose. The structural organization of the biofilms was examined by laser scanning confocal fluorescence imaging using a Leica TCS SP1 microscope (Leica Lasertechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) with a 40×, 0.8-numerical-aperture water immersion objective. The bacterial cells were labeled by using 2.5 μM SYTO 9 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain (480/500 nm; Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR). The polysaccharides were labeled with 2.5 μM Alexa Fluor 647-dextran conjugate (molecular weight, 10,000; maximum absorbance wavelength, 647 nm; maximum fluorescence emission wavelength, 668 nm; Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR). Fluorescently labeled dextran serves as a primer for Gtfs and can be simultaneously incorporated during EPS matrix synthesis over the course of biofilm development (37). Figure 1 shows that Alexa Fluor 647-dextran was incorporated into the glucans by GtfB but did not stain the bacterial cells at the concentrations used in this study. The biofilm structure was quantified and visualized using COMSTAT (16) and Amira 4.1.1 software (Mercury Computer Systems Inc., Chelmsford, MA). The amount and structure of the EPS were determined by colorimetric assays (20) and linkage analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (15).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(A) Water-insoluble glucans synthesized by S. mutans GtfB labeled with Alexa Fluor 647-dextran conjugate with a maximum absorbance wavelength of 647 nm and a maximum fluorescence emission wavelength of 668 nm. (Panel A-1) Phase-contrast image of glucans before excitation with a laser at 633 nm (20× oil objective; numerical aperture, 0.7). (Panel A-2) Fluorescence image of glucans. (B) S. mutans cells grown in culture medium containing 2.5 μM Alexa Fluor 647-dextran conjugate. (Panel B-1) Differential contrast image of bacterial cells. (Panel B-2) Bacterial cells with laser excitation at 633 nm for Alexa Fluor 647-dextran detection. (Panel B-3) Bacterial cells with laser excitation at 488 nm for SYTO 9 detection.

S. mutans growing in the presence of sucrose and starch formed a distinctive three-dimensional biofilm structure on the surface of amylase-active sHA (Table 1 and Fig. 2); the presence of starch alone or in combination with glucose plus fructose resulted in negligible biofilm formation. Measurements of the biovolume obtained by using COMSTAT revealed that biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose plus starch contained more EPS and had higher EPS-to-bacterium biovolume ratios than biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose or in the presence of sucrose plus glucose (Table 1) (P < 0.05), especially in the deeper and outer layers of the biofilm (>90 μm from the substratum) (Fig. 2A, panel A-1, and 2B, panel B-1). Rendered three-dimensional images revealed that almost all bacteria in the outer layers of biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose plus starch were associated with or were in contact with EPS (Fig. 2, panel A-2, and 2B, panel B-2). Biochemical analyses showed that the EPS matrix in biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose plus starch contained larger amounts of highly branched insoluble glucans (branch points, 3,4-, 3,6-, and 3,4,6-linked glucose) and consequently had more biomass than biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose or in the presence of sucrose plus glucose (data not shown). The synthesis of the modified polysaccharide could be partially explained by previous observations that the presence of oligosaccharides resulting from starch digestion by surface-adsorbed amylase increased the synthesis of 3-linked branched insoluble glucans by GtfB bound to an sHA surface (21, 35). Furthermore, the architectural and structural differences of the biofilms might also be related to environmental changes (e.g., the availability of oligosaccharides) which could trigger S. mutans responses at the transcriptional level, including modulation of the expression of genes associated with EPS formation.

TABLE 1.

Biovolume and average thickness of S. mutans UA159 biofilms determined by COMSTAT analysisa

Carbohydrate(s) Biofilm component Biovolume (μm3/μm2) Avg thickness (μm)
Sucrose + starch EPS 53.1 (8.5) a 119.1 (33.5) a
Bacteria 29.9 (6.4) A 91.2 (37.8) A
Sucrose EPS 33.4 (8.2) b 74.0 (27.4) b
Bacteria 38.1 (8.5) B 73.5 (25.2) AB
Sucrose + glucose EPS 23.1 (6.6) c 45.0 (16.5) c
Bacteria 37.5 (9.9) B 57.1 (18.2) B
a

Growing cells with starch and with starch plus fructose plus glucose resulted in minimal biofilm formation. The values in parentheses are standard deviations (n = 15). Values for each parameter (biovolume or average thickness) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, as determined by an analysis of variance for all pairs using Tukey's test).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(A) Biofilm formation in the presence of sucrose plus starch. (Panel A-1) Distribution of bacteria and EPS in the biofilms. (Panel A-2) Representative three-dimensional images of the structural organization of the biofilms: rendered images of the outer layers of biofilms. Green, bacteria; red, EPS. (B) Biofilm formation in the presence of sucrose. (Panel B-1) Distribution of bacteria and EPS in the biofilms. (Panel B-2) Representative three-dimensional images of the structural organization of the biofilms: rendered images of the outer layers of biofilms. Green, bacteria; red, EPS.

Thus, the expression of genes encoding the synthesis (gtfB, gtfC, gtfD) (38) and degradation (dexA) (13) of glucans by S. mutans within biofilms was determined by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. At selected time points (48, 72, 96, and 120 h), the RNA were extracted from the biofilms and purified as described previously (6). The reverse transcriptase PCR real-time amplification conditions and the gene-specific primers were similar to those described previously by Koo et al. (19); relative expression was calculated by normalizing each gene of interest to the 16S rRNA (19). As shown in Fig. 3, biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose plus starch expressed higher levels of gtfB mRNA than biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose during the entire biofilm developmental process, especially between 48 and 96 h (P < 0.05); the Gtf encoded by gtfB synthesizes mostly water-insoluble α(1,3)-linked glucans (38). The increased availability of metabolizable carbohydrates (such as maltose and maltotriose) and consequently the enhanced acidification of the biofilms may influence the expression of gtf genes (25). However, we and other workers have shown that addition of excess glucose or other simple sugars actually reduces the synthesis of EPS (8, 9, 14), which may involve downregulation of the expression of gtf genes (32). Thus, it is conceivable that the presence of additional acceptors sensed by S. mutans resulted in increased gtfB expression since the starch hydrolysates could act as primers for glucan synthesis (35). In contrast, the dexA mRNA levels in biofilms formed in the presence of sucrose plus starch were less than the dexA mRNA levels in biofilms formed in the presence sucrose at 120 h (P < 0.05). The dextranase encoded by dexA is upregulated when biofilm formation reaches a steady state after a certain amount of glucans is produced. Thus, it is apparent that glucan degradation/remodeling initiates at earlier stages in biofilms grown in the presence of sucrose than in biofilms grown in the presence of sucrose plus starch, which suggests that the latter biofilms may be more persistent and metabolically active for prolonged periods. Furthermore, our initial transcriptome analysis of the biofilms also revealed that in the presence of starch and sucrose, (i) the expression of specific genes related to sugar transport systems (e.g., multiple sugar metabolism; msm genes) was enhanced and (ii) two-component systems (TCS), such as comE and covR/sncR, were downregulated (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for a complete list of genes and microarray procedures).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Real-time PCR analysis of gtfB, gtfC, gtfD and dexA gene expression by S. mutans growing in the presence of sucrose or sucrose plus starch. The mRNA level of each gene in each sample was normalized to that of 16S rRNA. The values were then compared to those for sucrose-grown biofilms (which were assigned an arbitrary value of 1) to determine the change (fold) in gtf gene expression. The data are the means ± standard deviations for triplicate determinations in at least three separate experiments. An asterisk indicates that a value is significantly different from the value for the sucrose-grown biofilms (P < 0.05, Tukey's test).

Overall, the results of this study revealed that the interaction of salivary α-amylase and streptococcal Gtfs with dietary carbohydrates influenced the development and virulence of S. mutans biofilms in at least two interconnected ways: (i) by changing the structural organization of the EPS matrix and (ii) by triggering specific transcriptome responses by S. mutans. Elevated amounts of highly branched insoluble glucans occupying most of the biovolume across the depth of a biofilm that formed in the presence of starch plus sucrose and enmeshing the bacterial cells could (i) increase the physical integrity or stability of the biofilm (5), (ii) influence the diffusion properties (7), and (iii) provide increased protection to inimical influences of antimicrobials and other environmental assaults (22, 24). Moreover, the structural differences between glucan made with starch hydrolysates and glucan made without starch hydrolysates may also provide distinct bacterial binding sites (35). The induction of expression of gtfB mRNA may play a critical role in altering the biofilm structure. GtfB secreted by S. mutans binds not only to the apatitic surface but also on the bacterial membrane in an active form (36). The insoluble glucans synthesized in situ could contribute to the overall increase in the polysaccharide content and explain the higher EPS/bacterium ratio across the biofilm depth. The overproduction of GtfB could be advantageous to the organism for persistent colonization of tooth surfaces (3, 31). Furthermore, mutant strains of S. mutans defective in gtfB are far less cariogenic than parent strains in vivo (38); a higher level of insoluble EPS in the matrix is associated with increased cariogenicity of biofilms in humans (17). Thus, the combination of starch and sucrose would result in a more virulent and more adherent biofilm. From a global perspective, the effects on sugar uptake systems, including upregulation of the multiple sugar metabolism system, may explain the increased acidogenicity of biofilms formed in the presence of starch plus sucrose (8). The comE and covR/sncR genes are response regulators of TCS-13 and TCS-3 in S. mutans UA159, which are associated with biofilm formation and morphology, development of genetic competence, and acid tolerance (23, 26). Inactivation of comE affected both the formation and the architecture of S. mutans biofilms (26). It is apparent that the presence of starch, sucrose, and salivary amylase modulates the expression of specific genes that may enhance the fitness of, competence of, and biofilm formation by S. mutans.

In summary, our data provide insight into how starch and sucrose in combination are potentially more cariogenic than either compound alone in vivo (1, 10, 30) and also show that the composition of diet in association with specific host-pathogen interactions can modulate the development of biofilms by S. mutans with enhanced virulence. Further in vitro and in vivo studies using both parental strains of S. mutans and mutant strains of S. mutans (defective in gtfB or TCS) in the presence of microorganisms that bind amylase (e.g., Streptococcus gordonii) should elucidate in more detail the structural and molecular mechanisms in a multispecies system.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to William Bowen for his critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Linda Callahan and David Pasternack of the Pathology/Morphology Imaging Core at the University of Rochester. Arne Heydorn of the Technical University of Denmark and José Lemos and Jacqueline Abranches of the Center for Oral Biology assisted with biofilm image analysis using LSCFM/COMSTAT and with interpretation of the microarray data.

This research was supported in part by NIH grant CA68409 (to S.M. and T.H.F.) and by the Department of Energy-funded (grant DE-FG09-93ER-20097) Center for Plant and Microbial Complex Carbohydrates.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 21 November 2008.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bowen, W. H., S. M. Amsbaugh, S. Monell-Torrens, J. Brunelle, H. Kuzmiak-Jones, and M. F. Cole. 1980. A method to assess cariogenic potential of foodstuffs. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 100:677-681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bowen, W. H. 2002. Do we need to be concerned about dental caries in the coming millennium? J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 133:1405-1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burne, R. A., B. Rubinfeld, W. H. Bowen, and R. E. Yasbin. 1986. Tight genetic linkage of a glucosyltransferase and dextranase of Streptococcus mutans GS-5. J. Dent. Res. 65:1392-1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clarkson, C. H., D. Krell, J. S. Wefel, J. Crall, and F. F. Feagin. 1987. In vitro caries-like lesion production by Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus using sucrose and starch. J. Dent. Res. 66:795-798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cross, S. E., J. Kreth, L. Zhu, R. Sullivan, W. Shi, F. Qi, and J. K. Gimzewski. 2007. Nanomechanical properties of glucans and associated cell-surface adhesion of Streptococcus mutans probed by atomic force microscopy under in situ conditions. Microbiology 153:3124-3132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cury, J. A., and H. Koo. 2007. Extraction and purification of total RNA from Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Anal. Biochem. 365:208-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dibdin, G. H., and R. P. Shellis. 1988. Physical and biochemical studies of Streptococcus mutans sediments suggest new factors linking the cariogenicity of plaque with its extracellular polysaccharide content. J. Dent. Res. 67:890-895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duarte, S., M. I. Klein, C. P. Aires, J. A. Cury, W. H. Bowen, and H. Koo. 2008. Influences of starch and sucrose on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23:206-212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ellwood, D. C., P. J. Phipps, and I. R. Hamilton. 1979. Effect of growth rate and glucose concentration on the activity of the phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system in Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt grown in continuous culture. Infect. Immun. 23:224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Firestone, A. R., R. Shmid, and H. R. Muhlemann. 1982. Cariogenic effects of cooked wheat starch alone or with sucrose and frequency-controlled feedings in rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 27:759-763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fu, D. T., and J. F. Robyt. 1991. Maltodextrin acceptor reactions of Streptococcus mutans 6715 glucosyltransferases. Carbohydr. Res. 217:201-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fukui, K., and T. Moriyama. 1983. Effect of maltose on glucan synthesis by glucosyltransferases of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Immunol. 27:917-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guggenheim, B., and J. J. Burckhardt. 1974. Isolation and properties of a dextranase from Streptococcus mutans OMZ 176. Helv. Odontol. Acta 18:101-113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamilton, I. R., P. J. Phipps, and D. C. Ellwood. 1979. Effect of growth rate and glucose concentration on the biochemical properties of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt in continuous culture. Infect. Immun. 26:861-869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hayacibara, M. F., H. Koo, A. M. Vacca-Smith, L. K. Kopec, K. Scott-Anne, J. A. Cury, and W. H. Bowen. 2004. The influence of mutanase and dextranase on the production and structure of glucans synthesized by streptococcal glucosyltransferases. Carbohydr. Res. 339:2127-2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heydorn, A., A. T. Nielsen, M. Hentzer, C. Sternberg, M. Givskov, B. K. Ersbøll, and S. Molin. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395-2407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hotz, P., B. Guggenheim, and R. Schmid. 1972. Carbohydrates in pooled dental plaque. Caries Res. 6:103-121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koo, H., B. D. Schobel, K. Scott-Anne, G. Watson, W. H. Bowen., J. A. Cury, P. L. Rosalen, and Y. K. Park. 2005. Apigenin and tt-farnesol with fluoride effects on S. mutans biofilms and dental caries. J. Dent. Res. 84:1016-1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koo, H., J. Seils, J. Abranches, R. A. Burne, W. H. Bowen, and R. G. Quivey, Jr. 2006. Influence of apigenin on gtf gene expression in Streptococcus mutans UA159. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:542-546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Koo, H., M. F. Hayacibara, B. D. Schobel, J. A. Cury, P. L. Rosalen, Y. K. Park, A. M. Vacca-Smith, and W. H. Bowen. 2003. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:782-789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kopec, L. K., A. M. Vacca-Smith, and W. H. Bowen. 1997. Structural aspects of glucans formed in solution and on the surface of hydroxyapatite. Glycobiology 7:929-934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kreth, J., L. Zhu, J. Merritt, W. Shi, and F. Qi. 2008. Role of sucrose in the fitness of Streptococcus mutans. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23:213-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lévesque, C. M., R. W. Mair, J. A. Perry, P. C. Lau, Y. H. Li, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2007. Systemic inactivation and phenotypic characterization of two-component systems in expression of Streptococcus mutans virulence properties. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45:398-404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lewis, K. 2001. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:999-1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li, Y., and R. A. Burne. 2001. Regulation of the gtfBC and ftf genes of Streptococcus mutans in biofilms in response to pH and carbohydrate. Microbiology 147:2841-2848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li, Y. H., P. C. Lau, N. Tang, G. Svensater, R. P. Ellen, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2002. Novel two-component regulatory system involved in biofilm formation and acid resistance in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 184:6333-6342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marsh, P. D. 2003. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology 149:279-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Paes Leme, A. F., H. Koo, C. M. Bellato, G. Bedi, and J. A. Cury. 2006. The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation—new insight. J. Dent. Res. 85:878-887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Quivey, R. G., W. L. Kuhnert, and K. Hahn. 2001. Genetics of acid adaptation in oral streptococci. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 12:301-314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ribeiro, C. C., C. P. Tabchoury, A. A. Del Bel Cury, L. M. Tenuta, P. L. Rosalen, and J. A. Cury. 2005. Effect of starch on the cariogenic potential of sucrose. Br. J. Nutr. 94:44-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schilling, K. M., and W. H. Bowen. 1992. Glucans synthesized in situ in experimental salivary pellicle function as specific binding sites for Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 60:284-295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shemesh, M., A. Tam, and D. Steinberg. 2007. Differential gene expression profiling of Streptococcus mutans cultured under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Microbiology. 153:1307-1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Thurnheer, T., E. Giertsen, R. Gmür, and B. Guggenheim. 2008. Cariogenicity of soluble starch in oral in vitro biofilm and experimental rat caries studies: a comparison. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:829-836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Center for Health Statistics. 2007. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. Vital Health Statistics, series 11, number 248. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. [PubMed]
  • 35.Vacca-Smith, A. M., A. R. Venkitaraman, R. G. Quivey, Jr., and W. H. Bowen. 1996. Interactions of streptococcal glucosyltransferases with alpha-amylase and starch on the surface of saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Arch. Oral Biol. 41:291-298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vacca-Smith, A. M., and W. H. Bowen. 1998. Binding properties of streptococcal glucosyltransferases for hydroxyapatite, saliva-coated hydroxyapatite, and bacterial surfaces. Arch. Oral Biol. 3:103-110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Venkitaraman, A. R., A. M. Vacca-Smith, L. K. Kopec, and W. H. Bowen. 1995. Characterization of glucosyltransferases B, GtfC, and GtfD in solution and on the surface of hydroxyapatite. J. Dent. Res. 74:1695-1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yamashita, Y., W. H. Bowen, R. A. Burne, and H. K. Kuramitsu. 1993. Role of the Streptococcus mutans gtf genes in caries induction in the specific-pathogen-free rat model. Infect. Immun. 61:3811-3817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES