Abstract
A series of works have described an important role of chemical signaling compounds in generation of the stress response of plants in both the wounded and distant undamaged plant tissues. However, pure chemical signals are often not considered in the fast (minutes) long-distance signaling (systemic response) because of their slow propagation speed. Physical signals (electrical and hydraulic) or a combination of the physical and chemical signals (hydraulic dispersal of solutes) have been proposed as possible linkers of the local wound and the rapid systemic response. We have recently demonstrated an evidence for involvement of chemical compounds (jasmonic and abscisic acids) in the rapid (within 1 hour) inhibition of photosynthetic rate and stomata conductance in distant undamaged tobacco leaves after local burning. The aim of this addendum is to discuss plausible mechanisms of a rapid long-distance chemical signaling and the putative interactions between the physical and chemical signals leading to the fast systemic response.
Key Words: tobacco, local burning, systemic response, hydraulic surge, electrical signal, abscisic acid, jasmonic acid
Plants have evolved an amazingly complex system of defence-related strategies to protect themselves upon local wounding.1–7 Important characteristics of self-defence responses of plants are their velocity and ubiquity. Indeed, fast (minutes to hours) responses to injurious factors have been detected in the site of injury and in distant regions (systemic response) in various plants.8–11 These findings suggest that a signal generated by an attack to one leaf is transmitted through a whole plant. Several kinds of chemical3,6 and physical12 signals induced by local wounding and even their combination13 have been implicated. However, a little is known about the interactions of these signals and about the mechanisms of initiation of the short-term systemic responses.
We have used a model system—tobacco plants exposed to the local burning—to study the signals involved in rapid wound responses of photosynthetic apparatus.14 Local burning of an upper leaf of a tobacco plant induced rapid changes in surface electrical potential (within seconds) and a pronounced fast decline in the stomatal conductance, CO2 assimilation and transpiration (within minutes) in the basipetal direction (Fig. 1). Moreover, we have detected a fast (within minutes) transient increase in levels of endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) followed by a huge rapid rise in endogenous jasmonic acid (JA) in the leaf below the burned one. ABA and jasmonates are known to be involved in signaling pathways leading to stomatal closure and downregulation of photosynthesis.15,16 Increases in ABA and/or JA levels have only previously been detected in remote untreated tissues several hours after local wounding8,9 suggesting that chemical signals are too slow to induce rapid systemic response. Previous works have reported that fast physical (electrical) signals play an essential role in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses.11,17 However, a several-minutes delayed stomata closing response after the initiation of electrical potential changes has been reported in Mimosa18 and in our case in tobacco14 plants. Therefore, the guard cell deflation is most likely triggered not only by the electrical signal, but also by indirect factors. Based on close correlations, our results now provide a new evidence for the idea that chemical signals (ABA and mainly JA) participate in mediating the short-term systemic photosynthetic responses to local burning in tobacco plants.
Figure 1.

The model of putative signalling pathways leading to the rapid systemic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Hypothetical (dashed lines) local responses, generation of signals and transport processes and detected (full line) systemic responses are demonstrated. For details see the text.
The question is how do the physical (electrical and/or hydraulic) and chemical signals act? They may independently induce specific elements of systemic responses. However, they are more likely to act in a coordinated, interactive fashion. In this scenario (see Fig. 1), within first minutes after the local burning, hydraulic surge transmitted basipetally and acropetally through the xylem would transport chemicals released at the wound site (hydraulic dispersal19) and evoke changes in the ion fluxes in surrounding living cells leading to the local electrical activity.12,13 The hypothesis of hydraulic dispersal is supported by our preliminary experiments with the fluorescent dye Rhodamine B applied on cut petiole of the upper leaf of tobacco plants showing that solutes can be rapidly transported (within minutes) basipetally following wounding.
The rapid kinetics and transient character of ABA accumulation14 suggest that the main transport mechanism is the hydraulic dispersal in xylem. The participation of ABA in the generation of systemic electrical activity and/or vice versa cannot be ruled out.8,20
A rapid hydraulically driven transport of chemicals in the xylem of wounded plant in a reversed (basipetal) direction19,21 to transpiration stream is not generally accepted. Exposing of leaves of undamaged plants to radioactive labelled molecules to determine the speed of chemical signal transport could be misrepresent, because hydraulic signal is not generated in undamaged plants and then the detected transport speed is too slow. Moreover, previous work22 demonstrated that neither the mass flow itself, nor the associated pressure changes induce the systemic response (the proteinase inhibitor activity). Thus, the efficacy of chemical agents in rapid systemic signaling seems to depend on transport by the mass flows associated with hydraulic signals.19
However, hydraulic dispersal acts only for minutes, until all water released at the wound site is exhausted.21 A requirement for hydraulic dispersal of any solute is its presence in the wounded tissue at the time of wounding.19 Detected slower kinetics of JA accumulation than in the case of ABA and the huge rise of JA levels14 indicate a systemic accumulation of JA also by some additional processes.
Does additional JA accumulation result from de-novo synthesis in undamaged leaves as a response to physical signal or does it result from a JA transport from the wounded leaves? In the longer time-frame the phloem transport23 should also be considered. Experiments with tomato plants have shown that de novo JA synthesis in distant leaves is not required for the systemic response and that biosynthesis of JA at the wound site is necessary for the generation of a systemic signal.7 Indeed, a short-term increase in endogenous concentrations of JA has been detected in wounded tissue in Nicotiana sylvestris9 and rice.10
However, a rapid burst in the systemic JA accumulation found in our experiments14 would implicate an ultra-rapid and extreme JA accumulation at the wound site before its transport. The systemic JA accumulation (within 1 hour14) preceded the generation of enzymes involved in the JA biosynthesis in the wounded leaf.
Thus, several processes are suggested to play a role in the ultra-rapid and huge JA accumulation:
initiation of JA accumulation by preexisting enzymes,24
fast release of free JA from its storage pools in cells (e.g., JA-conjugates25),
direct uptake of elicitors (JA) by the phloem of the wounded leaf and exchange between the xylem and phloem as a consequence of severe wounds,26
the mass flow (containing remaining JA) driven mainly acropetally in the xylem by transpiration after damping the hydraulic surge,21
JA accumulation evoked by the fast transmitting physical (electrical or hydraulic) signal that leads to imbalances in ion fluxes,8,12,27
JA accumulation (and subsequent transport) directly in the phloem, where JA biosynthetic enzymes are located (at least in tomato24),
volatile chemical compounds (methylester of JA) spreading in the surrounding air of wounded leaf could serve as signaling molecules and sources of JA.25,28
The relevance of the above mentioned mechanisms should be checked by further research. Complex quantitative and kinetic analysis of JA and ABA content, levels of its biosynthetic derivatives (also volatiles in the surrounding air) and simultaneous physical signal detection in wounded and distant unwounded tissues would fill the remaining void about their role and interactions in the wound signal transduction networks. In addition, a suppression of other signaling pathways with similar transport kinetics (e.g., volatile compounds transmission, systemin and oligosaccharides generation and/or transport, using mutant plants) would be useful.
Substantial similarity between the rapid physical (electrical) signaling in animal nervous system compared with the physical (electrical) signaling in plants has already been reported.29,30 Interaction of chemical and electrical signals is the process well documented for post-synaptic events in animals. Our data now strengthen the role of chemical signals next to the role of physical signals in plants in the rapid systemic wound response; such a role of chemicals in plants was often underestimated up to now.
Acknowledgements
The project was supported by the grant from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic, No. MSM 6198959215. We thank Dr. P. Ilík nad I. Šnyrychavá for the critical reading of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ABA
abscisic acid
- JA
jasmonic acid
Footnotes
Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/abstract.php?id=3616
References
- 1.Pickard BG. Action potentials in higher plants. Bot Rev. 1973;39:172–201. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wildon DC, Thain JF, Minchin PEH, Gubb IR, Reilly AJ, Skipper YD, Doherty HM, O'Donnell PJ, Bowles DJ. Electrical signaling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant. Nature. 1992;360:62–65. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peña-Cortés H, Willmitzer L. The role of hormones in gene activation in response to wounding. In: Davies PJ, editor. Plant hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1995. pp. 314–395. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peña-Cortés H, Fisahn J, Willmitzer L. Signals involved in wound-induced proteinase inhibitor II gene expression in tomato and potato plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:4106–4113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Bruxelles GL, Roberts MR. Signals regulating multiple responses to wounding and herbivores. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2001;20:487–521. [Google Scholar]
- 6.León J, Rojo E, Sánchez-Serrano JJ. Wound signaling in plants. J Exp Bot. 2001;52:1–9. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.354.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schilmiller AL, Howe GA. Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005;8:369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Herde O, Atzorn R, Fisahn J, Wasternack C, Willmitzer L, Peña-Cortés H. Localized wounding by heat initiates the accumulation of proteinase inhibitor II in abscisic acid-deficient plants by triggering jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:853–860. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.2.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baldwin IT, Zhang ZP, Diab N, Ohnmeiss TE, McCloud ES, Lynds GY, Schmelz EA. Quantification, correlations and manipulations of wound-induced changes in jasmonic acid and nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta. 1997;201:397–404. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rakwal R, Tamogami S, Agrawal GK, Iwahashi H. Octadecanoid signaling component “burst“ in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling leaves upon wounding by cut and treatment with fungal elicitor chitosan. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;295:1041–1045. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00779-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Koziolek Ch, Grams TEE, Schreiber U, Matyssek R, Fromm J. Transient knockout of photosynthesis mediated by electrical signals. New Phytol. 2004;161:715–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stankovic B, Witters DL, Zawadzki T, Davies E. Action potentials and variation potentials in sunflower: An analysis of their relationships and distinguishing characteristics. Physiol Plant. 1998;103:51–58. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malone M. Rapid, long-distance signal transmission in higher plants. Adv Bot Res. 1996;22:163–228. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hlavácková V, Krchnák P, Nauš J, Novák O, Špundová M, Strnad M. Electrical and chemical signals involved in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Planta. 2006;225:235–244. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0325-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Raschke K, Hedrich R. Simultaneous and independent effects of abscisic acid on stomata and the photosynthetic apparatus in whole leaves. Planta. 1985;163:105–118. doi: 10.1007/BF00395904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Herde O, Peña-Cortés H, Willmitzer L, Fisahn J. Stomatal responses to jasmonic acid, linolenic acid and abscisic acid in wild-type and ABA-deficient tomato plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:136–141. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lautner S, Grams EE, Matyssek R, Fromm J. Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:2200–2209. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.064196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kaiser H, Grams TEE. Rapid hydropassive opening and subsequent active stomatal closure follow heat-induced electrical signals in Mimosa pudica. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:2087–2092. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Malone M, Alarcon JJ, Palumbo L. An hydraulic interpretation of rapid, long-distance wound signaling in the tomato. Planta. 1994;193:181–185. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fromm J, Eschrich W. Electric signals released from roots of willow (Salix viminalis L.) change transpiration and photosynthesis. J Plant Physiol. 1993;141:673–680. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Malone M. Wound-induced hydraulic signals and stimulus transmission in Mimosa pudica L. New Phytol. 1994;128:49–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Malone M, Palumbo L, Boari F, Monteleone M, Jones HG. The relationship between wound-induced proteinase inhibitors and hydraulic signals in tomato seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 1994;17:81–87. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Baker DA, Milburn JA. Appendix Table X: Speed of assimilate transport in the phloem of plant species analysed by differing techniques. In: Baker DA, Milburn JA, editors. Transport of photoassimilates. Harlow: Longman Sc and Tech; 1989. pp. 354–355. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wasternack C, Stenzel I, Hause B, Hause G, Kutter C, Maucher H, Neumerkel J, Feussner I, Miersch O. The wound response in tomato-Role of jasmonic acid. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schaller F, Schaller A, Stintzi A. Biosynthesis and metabolism of jasmonates. J Plant Growth Reg. 2004;23:179–199. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rhodes JD, Thain JF, Wildon DC. Evidence for physically distinct systemic signaling pathways in the wounded tomato plant. Ann Bot-London. 1999;84:109–116. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Peña-Cortés H. Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: Requirement of Ca2+ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:456–459. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Farmer EE, Ryan CA. Interplant communication - Airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase-inhibitors in plant-leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:7713–7716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D, editors. Communications in plants: Neuronal aspects of plant life. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Volkov AG, editor. Plant Electrophysiology: Theory and Methods. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
