Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2008 Feb;3(2):133–134. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.2.5051

The role of phytosterols in plant adaptation to temperature

Erick J Dufourc 1,
PMCID: PMC2634003  PMID: 19704733

Abstract

Membranes of composition approaching those found in “rafts” of plants, fungi and mammals were investigated by means of solidstate 2H-NMR, using deuterated dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine (2H-DPPC) as a reporter. The dynamics of such membranes was determined through measuring of membrane ordering or disordering properties. The presence of the liquid-ordered, lo, phase, as an indicator of rigid sterol-sphingolipid domains, was detected in all cases. Of great interest, the dynamics of mixtures mimicking rafts in plants showed the lesser temperature sensitivity to thermal shocks. The presence of an additional ethyl group branched on the alkyl chain of major plant sterols (sitosterol and stigmasterol) is proposed as reinforcing the membrane cohesion. The fine tuning of the sterol structure thus appears to be the evolution response for plant adaptation to large temperature variations.

Key words: sitosterol, stigmasterol and glucosylcerebrosides, regulation of membrane dynamics, membrane rafts, deuterium NMR


It is widely recognized that lipids play multiple roles that either individually or collectively influence cell processes. Glycerolipids and sphingolipids through charge and structure are involved in DNA replication, protein translocation, cell recognition, signalling pathways, energetic, signal transduction, and cell trafficking. Together with diacylglycerols their collective properties modulate lipid polymorphism, through phase transitions (lamellar, hexagonal, cubic, micelles), which are involved in enzyme conformational changes, cell division, cell fusion, and apoptosis.1

Sterols, the third lipid class, also regulate biological processes and sustain the domain structure of cell membranes where they are considered as membrane reinforcers.2,3 While cholesterol (CHO) is the major sterol of vertebrates, ergosterol plays a key role in fungi. Plants usually possess more complex sterol compositions. Stigmasterol (STI) and sitosterol (SIT), two 24-ethyl sterols, are major constituents of the sterol profiles of plant species. They are involved in the embryonic growth of plants.4,5 Sterols are critical for the formation of liquid-ordered (lo) lipid domains (lipid rafts) that are supposed to play an important role in fundamental biological processes like signal transduction, cellular sorting, cytoskeleton reorganization and infectious diseases.6,7 In plants, specialized lipid domains are involved in the polarized growth of pollen tube and root hair8 and the asymmetric growth of plant cells is in general due to the asymmetric distribution of membrane components.

We recently documented the effect of sitosterol and stigmasterol, two major plant sterols, on the structure and dynamics of membranes whose composition is representative of domains (rafts) in plants.9 Liposomes of phytosterols associated with glucosylcerebroside (GC) and with deuterium-labelled dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (2H-DPPC) were analysed with deuterium solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (2H-NMR). For comparison, membrane systems representative of raft composition in fungi and mammals were also investigated. 2H-NMR is known to be the best non-invasive technique to analyse membrane dynamics10 because it is non-destructive and because replacement of DPPC protons with their deuterium isotope brings very little membrane perturbation.11,12 Acyl chain deuteration affords analysis of both structure and dynamics of the hydrophobic membrane interior. Spectra such as that shown in Figure 1 insert, allow detection of the lo phase, characteristic of a membrane state half-way between solid-ordered (so) and liquid-disordered (ld) states. The so state, also called “gel”, is found at low temperatures (below 35°C), when membranes are essentially composed of sphingomyelins (SM)13 or GC (Fig. 1). This membrane state allows little biological function because in forbids membrane trafficking due to its very rigid state (order parameter close to 1). In turn, the ld or “fluid” state is found at high temperatures, in the absence of SM, GC and sterols (low order parameter). At the opposite such a high membrane dynamics may lead to excessive membrane passages. Following with 2H-NMR the temperature behaviour of membrane systems containing GC and plant sterols, we found that the so-ld, order-disorder, transition was totally abolished: SIT and STI fluidized the so state and ordered the ld state to produce the lo state where membrane fluctuations vary smoothly with temperature (Fig. 1). This effect was already documented with CHO in mammals1416 but on a much narrower temperature range. The case of the fungus system was found in between that of plants and mammals.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Regulation of temperature-driven membrane dynamics by plant sterols. Central panel: first spectral moment (left y-axis) or order parameter (right y-axis) as a function of temperature; solid line: 2H-DPPC with glucosylcerebroside; open circles: plus stigmasterol; filled circles: plus sitosterol. Insert: 2H-NMR spectrum typical of a liquid-ordered, lo, state. Left panel: schematics of solid-ordered, so (gel), and liquid-disordered, ld (fluid), membrane states. Right panel: schematics of the lo (raft) membrane state together with the structures of cholesterol and sitosterol. Adapted from reference 9.

Summarizing, it appears that plant membranes of “raft” composition are less sensitive to temperature variations than those of animals. This suggests that cell membrane components like sitosterol, stigmasterol and glucosylcere-brosides, which are typical of plants, are produced in order to extend the temperature range in which membrane-associated biological processes can take place. This observation is well in accordance with the fact that plants have to face higher temperature variations than animals, which usually can either regulate their body temperature or change their location in order to avoid extreme heat or coldness.

Compared to cholesterol, the two phytosterols possess additional ethyl groups branched on C-24 (Fig. 1). We proposed that the presence of an additional ethyl group may reinforce the attractive van der Waals interactions leading to more membrane cohesion and therefore less temperature sensitivity. Our results also suggest that domains of smaller size would be promoted in the presence of phytosterols and especially with sitosterol. Such domains may be viewed as dynamic, with sterols laterally exchanging at the microsecond time scale.14 In plant cells, enzymes transfer alkyl groups to the C-24 of sterols. If we suppose that the relative activities of the different branches of the plant sterol biosynthesis are regulated, the concentrations of major sterols in plants, like sitosterol, stigmasterol, and cholesterol could be controlled.4,17 This shows the importance of equilibrated sterol concentrations for plant growth and development. Sterols have been historically considered as membrane reinforcers because they bring order to membranes.2,3

Our works9,15,16,18,19 show that they could better be named as “membrane dynamics regulators”, by maintaining the membrane in a state of microfluidity suitable for cell function on large temperature scales. It thus appears that a fine tuning of the sterol structure, i.e., the presence of branched ethyl groups in plant sterols increasing membrane cohesion through formation of smaller membrane domains, may be the evolution response for plant adaptation to large temperature variations.

Addendum to: Plant sterols in “rafts”: a better way to regulate membrane thermal shocks. Beck JG, Mathieu D, Loudet C, Buchoux S, Dufourc EJ. FASEB J. 2007;21:1714–1723.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/5051

References

  • 1.Dowhan W. Molecular basis for membrane phospholipid diversity: Why are there so many lipids? Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1997;66:199–232. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ribeiro N, Streiff S, Heissler D, Elhabiri M, Albrecht-Gary AM, Atsumi M, Gotoh M, Desaubry L, Nakatani Y, Ourisson G. Reinforcing effect of bi- and tri-cyclopolyprenols on ‘primitive’ membranes made of polyprenyl phosphates. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3395–3407. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schaeffer A, Bronner R, Benveniste P, Schaller H. The ratio of campesterol to sitosterol that modulates growth in Arabidopsis is controlled by STEROL METHYLTRANSFERASE 2;1. Plant J. 2001;25:605–615. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schaller H. New aspects of sterol biosynthesis in growth and development of higher plants. Plant Physiol. 2004;42:465–476. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schrick K, Mayer U, Martin G, Bellini C, Kuhnt C, Schmidt J, Jürgens G. Interactions between sterol biosynthesis genes in embryonic development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;31:61–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Simons K, Ehehalt R. Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:597–603. doi: 10.1172/JCI16390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Simons K, Ikonen E. How cells handle cholesterol. Science. 2000;290:1721–1726. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kost B, Lemichez E, Spielhofer P, Hong Y, Tolias K, Carpenter C, Chua NH. Rac homologues and compartmentalized phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate act in a common pathway to regulate polar pollen tube growth. J Cell Biol. 1999;19:317–330. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.2.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beck JG, Mathieu D, Loudet C, Buchoux S, Dufourc EJ. Plant sterols in “rafts”: A better way to regulate membrane thermal shocks. FASEB J. 2007;21:1714–1723. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7809com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davis JH. The description of membrane lipid conformation, order and dynamics by H-2-Nmr. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;737:117–171. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(83)90015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aussenac F, Laguerre M, Schmitter JM, Dufourc EJ. Detailed structure and dynamics of bicelle phospholipids using selectively and per-deuterated labels: A 2H-NMR and molecular mechanics study. Langmuir. 2003;19:10468–10479. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dufourc EJ. Solid state NMR in biomembranes. In: Larijani B, Woscholski R, Rosser CA, editors. Chemical Biology. London: J Wiley and Sons, Ltd.; 2006. pp. 113–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pott T, Dufourcq J, Dufourc EJ. Fluid or gel phase lipid bilayers to study peptide-membrane interactions? Eur Biophys J. 1996;25:55–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aussenac F, Tavares M, Dufourc EJ. Cholesterol dynamics in membranes of raft composition: A molecular point of view from 2H and 31P solid state NMR. Biochemistry. 2003;42:1383–1390. doi: 10.1021/bi026717b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dufourc EJ, Parish EJ, Chitrakorn S, Smith ICP. Structural and dynamical details of cholesterol-lipid interaction as revealed by deuterium NMR. Biochemistry. 1984;23:6063–6071. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Léonard A, Dufourc EJ. Interactions of cholesterol with the membrane lipid matrix: A solid state NMR approach. Biochimie. 1991;73:1295–1302. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90092-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schaller H. The role of sterol in plant growth and development. Prog Lipid Res. 2003;422:163–175. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(02)00047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Douliez JP, Léonard A, Dufourc EJ. Conformational order of DMPC sn-1 versus sn-2 chains and membrane thickness: An approach to molecular protrusion by solid state 2H-NMR and neutron diffraction. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:18450–18457. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Léonard A, Escrive C, Laguerre M, Pebay-Peyroula E, Néri W, Pott T, Katsaras J, Dufourc EJ. Location of cholesterol in DMPC membranes: A comparative study by neutron diffraction and molecular mechanics simulation. Langmuir. 2001;17:2019–2030. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES