Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2007 Sep-Oct;2(5):386–387. doi: 10.4161/psb.2.5.4262

Blooming Time for Plant Glycine-Rich Proteins

Adriana Flores Fusaro 1,, Gilberto Sachetto-Martins 1,
PMCID: PMC2634221  PMID: 19704608

Abstract

Glycine-rich regions are proposed to be involved in protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions in some mammalian protein families. In plants the occurrence of quasi-repetitive glycine-rich peptides has been reported in different species. They are characterized by having the glycine residues arranged in characteristic repetitive structural motifs, but with distinct primary sequence. The expression of genes encoding glycine-rich proteins (GRP) is developmentally regulated, and also induced, in several plant genera, by physical, chemical and biological factors. The diverse expression pattern of GRP genes, taken together with the distinct sub-cellular localisation of some GRP groups indicate that these proteins are involved in several independent physiological processes. Notwithstanding the absence of a clear definition of the role of GRPs in plant cells, experimental data coming from different research groups have shed some light on the biological function of some GRPs. One of these proteins is AtGRP2, a member of the Cold-Shock Domain protein family in Arabidopsis. AtGRP2 is a nucleo-cytoplasmic protein involved in Arabidopsis development. Expression analysis revealed that the AtGRP2 gene is active in meristematic tissues, being modulated during flower development. Downregulation of AtGRP2 gene using gene silecing techniques resulted in early flowering, altered stamen number and affected seed development.

Key WordS: glycine-rich protein, cold-shock protein, development, flowering, RNA-binding protein


The glycine-rich protein (GRP) super-family corresponds to a large and complex group of plant proteins that share, as common feature, the presence of glycine-rich domains arranged in (Gly)n-X repeats, which are thought to be involved in protein-protein interactions. Initially isolated from plants, GRP genes encoding proteins with characteristic repetitive glycine stretches have been reported in a wide variety of organisms from cyanobacteria to animals.1 More than 150 different GRP genes have been identified after a whole-genome analysis of sugarcane,2 eucalyptus3 and Arabidopsis (Galvão and Sachetto-Martins et al., unpublished results). Despite the extensive number of reports describing the occurrence of these genes in different species, very little is known about their biological role in plants.

Only recently, experimental data has been generated that shed some light on the biological function of some GRPs. Mayfield and Preuss4 demonstrated the involvement of an Arabidopsis oleosin-GRP (AtGRP7/AtOlnB;3/GRP17) in pollen recognition and hydration. GRPs have also been implicated in signal transduction by the characterization of AtGRP3 as the extracellular ligand of the plant receptor kinase WAK1.5 Ueki and Citovsky6 showed that the expression of a cadmium-induced GRP (cdiGRP) enhances callose deposition and is responsible for inhibiting the long-distance movement of Turnip vein clearing tobamovirus (TVCV) in tobacco plants. The involvement of RNA-binding GRPs in plant cold acclimation has also been observed.7,8

The diversity of functions and structural domains, together with the different but highly specific expression patterns and distinct sub-cellular localizations of GRPs, indicate that this complex group of proteins is likely to be implicated in numerous independent physiological processes. This diversity led to the concept that GRPs should not be considered as a family of related proteins but as a wide group of proteins that share a common structural domain.1

Based on their primary structure and functional domains, GRPs can be classified into four major groups.2 GRPs from class I are known as the “classic” GRPs. They may contain a signal peptide followed by a glycine-rich region with GGGX repeats. A structural function is attributed to proteins of this class due to their cell wall localization.9 The class II GRPs contain a glycine-rich region followed by a cysteine-rich region at their C-terminus. For one member of this family, AtGRP-3, this cysteine-rich domain has been shown to interact with WAKs.5 The class III GRPs are proteins with lower glycine content that show a great diversity of structures. The best known proteins from this class are oleosin GRPs, which play a structural role in stabilizing the triacylglycerols of the oil bodies. Previous works demonstrate that several major pollen coat proteins are derived from an endoproteolytic cleavage of oleosin GRPs that originally accumulate within the large cytoplasmic lipid bodies of tapetal cells.10 GRPs from class IV are RNA-binding GRPs. These GRPs may contain, besides the glycine-rich region, several motifs which include the RNA-recognition motif, the cold-shock domain and zinc fingers.

A subgroup of plant RNA-binding GRPs, which is likely to be involved in cold acclimation, features a cold shock domain (CSD) in the N-terminal half and CCHC retroviral-like zinc fingers in its C-terminal region.11 CDS-containing proteins that function as RNA chaperones have been described in bacteria12 and, more recently, in plants.13

In an attempt to further understand the role of CSD/GRP proteins in plants, we have proceeded to the functional characterization of the AtGRP2 gene, which encodes one of the four members of the CSD protein family in Arabidopsis.

We have shown that the AtGRP2 protein binds ssDNA, dsDNA and RNA homopolymers, and that it has a nucleo-cytoplasmic localization. Investigation of the spatial and temporal expression pattern of the AtGRP2 gene under various conditions demonstrated that AtGRP2 is cold-regulated and preferentially expressed in meristematic and developing tissues, with a tissue-specific expression pattern which is significantly modulated during flower development. We could further demonstrate that silencing of AtGRP2 causes anticipation of flowering, altered stamen number and affected seed development.14

At the moment, it is not clear how AtGRP2 might act in the flowering time pathway. One hypothesis puts forward that AtGRP2 controls the expression of flowering time regulators at the post-transcriptional level by affecting mRNA processing, stability, or export from the nucleus. It is possible that in the presence of a reduced level of AtGRP2, transcripts of some flowering time regulators become unstable and are rapidly degraded.

Posttranscriptional gene regulation is a critical tool for the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression during growth and development. Many reports highlight the importance of RNA-binding proteins mediating those processes. A KH motif-containing protein, HEN4, is involved in AGAMOUS pre-mRNA processing.15 HEN4 physically and functionally interacts with HUA1,16 another RNA-binding protein, and directly binds to AGAMOUS pre-mRNA.15 CCR2/AtGRP7, a nuclear RNA-binding protein with an RRM motif is a component of a circadian-regulated negative feedback loop in Arabidopsis.17

The regulation of flowering time by RNA-binding proteins has been observed. FPA, FCA and FLK have been isolated by forward or reverse genetics screenings.1821 Those mutants flower late, indicating that the wild-type alleles promote flowering. AtGRP2 seems to operate in the opposite direction, since its downregulation anticipates flowering. These data are in agreement with results derived from AtGRP2-overexpressed transgenic lines, which show a delay in flowering (Bocca, Ramos and Sachetto-Martins, unpublished results).

Floral repression is likely to be the principal mechanism for maintaining vegetative development since genes promoting vegetative growth act by repressing genes required for flower development. Genes with early-flowering mutant phenotype are considered to be floral repressors that inhibit the floral signaling pathways at various levels.22

It is possible that in the presence of a reduced level of AtGRP2, transcripts of some flowering time regulators become unstable and are rapidly degraded or translated inefficiently. Although additional research is needed in order to gain more insight into the AtGRP2 function, our study demonstrates that AtGRP2 plays an important role during Arabidopsis development with a possible function in cold-response.

Addendum to: Fusaro AF, Bocca SN, Ramos RL, Barrôco RM, Magioli C, Jorge VC, Coutinho TC, Rangel-Lima CM, De Rycke R, Inzé D, Engler G, Sachetto-Martins G. AtGRP2, A Cold-Induced Nucleo-Cytoplasmic RNA-Binding Protein, has a Role in Flower and Seed Development. Planta. 2007;225:1339–1351. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0444-4.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/4262

References

  • 1.Sachetto-Martins G, Franco L, de Oliveira D. Plant glycine-rich proteins: A family or just proteins with a common motif? Bioch Biophys Acta. 2000;1492:1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00064-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fusaro A, Mangeon A, Rocha C, Junqueira R, Coutinho T, Margis R, Sachetto-Martins G. Classification, expression pattern and comparative analysis of sugarcane expressed sequences tags (ESTs) encoding glycine-rich proteins (GRPs) Gen Mol Biol. 2001;24:263–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bocca SN, Magioli C, Mangeon A, Junqueira RM, Cardeal V, Margis R, Sachetto-Martins G. Survey of glycine-rich proteins (GRPs) in the Eucalyptus expressed sequence tag database (ForEST) Gen Mol Biol. 2005;28:608–624. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mayfield JA, Preuss D. Rapid initiation of Arabidopsis pollination requires the oleosin-domain protein GRP17. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:128–130. doi: 10.1038/35000084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park AR, Cho SK, Yun UJ, Jin MY, Lee SH, Sachetto-Martins G, Park OK. Interaction of the Arabidopsis receptor protein kinase wak1 with a glycine-rich protein, AtGRP-3. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26688–26693. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101283200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ueki S, Citovsky V. Identification of an interactor of cadmium ion-induced glycine-rich protein involved in regulation of callose levels in plant vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;34:12089–12094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505927102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim YO, Kim JS, Kang H. Cold-inducible zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein contributes to the enhancement of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005;42:890–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwak KJ, Kim YO, Kang H. Characterization of transgenic Arabidopsis plants over-expressing GR-RBP4 under high salinity, dehydration, or cold stress. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:3007–3016. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cassab GI. Plant cell wall proteins. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49:281–309. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murphy DJ, Hernández-Pinzón I, Patel K. Role of lipid bodies and lipid-body proteins in seeds and other tissues. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158:471–478. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karlson D, Imai R. Conservation of the cold shock domain protein family in plants. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:12–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.014472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang C, Iu B, Singh J. Requirement of a CCGAC cis-acting element for cold induction of the BN115 gene from B. napus. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;30:679–684. doi: 10.1007/BF00049344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Karlson D, Nakaminami K, Toyomasu T, Imai R. A cold-regulated nucleic acid-binding protein of winter wheat shares a domain with bacterial cold-shock proteins. J Biol Chem. 2002;20:35248–35256. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205774200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fusaro AF, Bocca S, Ramos RLB, Barroco RM, Magioli C, Cardeal V, Coutinho TC, Rangel-Lima CM, De Rycke R, Inzé D, Engler G, Sachetto-Martins G. AtGRP2, a cold-induced nucleo-cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein, has a role in flower and seed development. Planta. 2007 doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0444-4. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng Y, Kato N, Wang W, Li J, Chen X. Two RNA binding proteins, HEN4 and HUA1, act in the processing of AGAMOUS pre-mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Cell. 2003;4:53–66. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00399-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li J, Jia D, Chen X. HUA1, a regulator of stamen and carpel identities in Arabidopsis, codes for a nuclear RNA binding protein. Plant Cell. 2001;13:2269–2281. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Staiger D, Zecca L, Kirk DAW, Apel K, Eckstein L. The circadian clock regulated RNA-binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre-mRNA. Plant J. 2003;33:361–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Macknight R, Bancroft I, Page T, Lister C, Schmidt R, Love K, Westphal L, Murphy G, Sherson S, Cobbett C, Dean C. FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-binding domains. Cell. 1997;89:737–745. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80256-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schomburg FM, Patton DA, Meinke DW, Amasino RM. FPA, a gene involved in floral induction in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-recognition motifs. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1427–1436. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.6.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lim MH, Kim J, Kim YS, Chung KS, Seo YH, Lee I, Kim J, Hong CB, Kim HJ, Park CM. A new Arabidopsis gene, FLK, encodes an RNA binding protein with K homology motifs and regulates flowering time via FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant Cell. 2004;16:731–740. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mockler TC, Yu X, Shalitin D, Parikh D, Michael TP, Liou J, Huang J, Smith Z, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Chory J, Lin C. Regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis by K homology domain proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12759–12764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404552101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sung ZR, Chen L, Moon YH, Lertpiriyapong K. Mechanisms of floral repression in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6:29–35. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES