Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2006 Nov-Dec;1(6):287–289. doi: 10.4161/psb.1.6.3585

Ethylene-Stimulated Nutations Do Not Require ETR1 Receptor Histidine Kinase Activity

Brad M Binder ✉
PMCID: PMC2634241  PMID: 19704568

Abstract

Ethylene influences the growth and development of plants through the action of receptors that have homology to bacterial two-component receptors. In bacteria these receptors function via autophosphorylation of a His residue in the kinase domain followed by phosphotransfer to a conserved Asp residue in a response regulator protein. In Arabidopsis, two of the five receptor isoforms are capable of His kinase activity. However, the role of His kinase activity and phosphotransfer is unclear in ethylene signaling. A previous study showed that ethylene stimulates nutations of the hypocotyl in etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings that are dependent on the ETR1 receptor isoform. The ETR1 receptor is the only isoform in Arabidopsis that contains both a functional His kinase domain and a receiver domain for phosphotransfer. Therefore, we examined the role that ETR1 His kinase activity and phosphotransfer plays in ethylene-stimulated nutations.

Key Words: ethylene, nutations, signal transduction, receptors, histidine kinase, phosphotransfer, two component signalling

The gaseous plant hormone ethylene has a role in a variety of physiological events in higher plants such as seed germination, abscission, senescence, fruit ripening, and growth regulation.1 In etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings, ethylene causes reduced growth of the hypocotyl and root, increased radial expansion of the hypocotyl, and increased tightening of the apical hook.2,3

Previous studies have identified components in the ethylene signaling pathway and led to an inverse-agonist model for signal transduction.4,5 According to this model, responses to ethylene are mediated by a family of five receptors (ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, EIN4, ERS2) in Arabidopsis that have homology to bacterial two-component receptors.6–9 In bacterial systems, two-component receptors transduce signal via the autophosphorylation of a His residue in the kinase domain, followed by the transfer of phosphate to a conserved Asp residue in the receiver domain of a response regulator protein.10 The ethylene receptors of plants can be divided into two subfamilies based on sequence homology in the ethylene-binding domains.11 ETR1 and ERS1 belong to subfamily I, contain all amino acid residues needed for His kinase activity,6,12 and show His kinase activity in vitro.13,14 ETR2, EIN4, and ERS2 belong to subfamily II, contain degenerate His kinase domains7,9 and have Ser/Thr kinase activity in vitro.14 ERS1 shows both His and Ser/Thr kinase activities in vitro depending on the assay conditions used.14 While the kinase domain of ETR1 appears to be required for signaling,15 kinase activity is not.15–17 It is unclear whether or not histidine kinase activity is involved in ethylene signaling, although, this activity might be involved in growth recovery after ethylene removal.17

Recently, high-resolution, time-lapse imaging revealed that prolonged treatment with ethylene stimulates nutational bending of etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls.18 Nutations are oscillatory bending movements caused by localized differential growth19 that were originally termed “circumnutations”.20 Nutations have been posited to be important for seedlings to penetrate through the soil20 and thus could be critical for seedling survival. In support of this hypothesis, nutations of rice roots have been reported to increase soil penetration.21

Mutational analysis revealed that many of the known ethylene signaling components including CTR1, EIN2, EIN3 and EIL1 are involved in signaling leading to ethylene-stimulated nutations.18 Surprisingly, loss-of-function mutations in ETR1 eliminated ethylene-stimulated nutations while combinatorial loss-of-function mutations in the other four receptor isoforms led to constitutive nutations in air.18 These results support a model where all the receptors are involved in ethylene-stimulated nutations but the ETR1 receptor is required for and has a contrasting role from the other receptor isoforms in this nutation phenotype. Since the ETR1 receptor is the only receptor isoform that contains both a functional His-kinase domain and a receiver domain,6,13,14 the roles of His kinase activity and phosphorelay in the nutation phenotype were examined in the current study.

Previous work showed that the nutation phenotype in etr1-7 loss-of-function mutants could be rescued with a wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.18 Etr1-7 mutants transformed with a kinase-inactivated genomic ETR1 transgene (gETR1 (G2)) where the two conserved glycines in the G2 box of the histidine kinase domain (G545, G547) were changed to alanines were examined to determine if ETR1 His kinase activity is required for ethylene-stimulated nutations. This construct lacks histidine autophosphorylation in vitro.22 Figure 1 shows that ethylene stimulates nutations in etr1-7 gETR1(G2) seedlings. The period of these nutations was 4.7 ± 1.5 h which is similar to values obtained previously for wild-type seedlings (4.7 ± 1h) and somewhat longer than etr1-7 seedlings transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 (3.2 ± 0.6 h). However, the amplitude of these nutations (3.7 ± 1.0°) was approximately half that of nutations previously observed in wild-type seedlings (9.1 ± 6.0°) as well as etr1-7 seedlings transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 (8.2 ± 3.6°). This suggests that ETR1 histidine kinase activity is not required for ethylene-stimulated nutations but might have a role in modulating nutation amplitudes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Ethylene stimulates nutations of etr1-7 seedlings transformed with a kinase-inactivated ETR1 transgene. The hypocotyl angles for four etr1-7 mutants transformed with a kinase-inactivated genomic ETR1 transgene (gETR1(G2)) are shown. Transformants were obtained from Eric Schaller and have been described previously.22 In this and the following figure, etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings were imaged from the side at 15 min intervals while growing along a vertically orientated agar plate and the hypocotyl angle measured as described previously.18 Black and gray lines are used to help distinguish the movements of individual seedlings. All seedlings were grown in the presence of 5 µM AVG to block biosynthesis of ethylene by the seedlings. Seedlings were grown in air for 2 h prior to treatment with 10 µL L−1 ethylene (graphic file with name psb0106_0287_fig003.jpg).

To determine whether phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1 is required for the nutation phenotype, seedlings deficient in ethylene receptor isoforms containing a receiver domain (ETR1, ETR2, EIN4) were transformed with a mutant ETR1 transgene lacking the conserved Asp659 required for phosphotransfer (getr1-[D]). Previous work showed that etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple loss-of-function mutant seedlings failed to nutate and this nutation phenotype could be rescued when these mutants were transformed with wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.18 Similarly, transformation of the etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple mutants with getr1-[D] rescued the nutation phenotype in most seedlings observed (Fig. 2). However, some seedlings (four of the eleven observed) failed to nutate. The reason for this variable rescue is unclear but could reflect differences in expression levels of the mutant transgene in individual plants. Alternatively, this variable rescue could reflect functional differences between the mutant and wild-type transgene suggesting a modulating role for phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1. Two independent lines were observed with similar results. Of those that did nutate, the period of nutations was 5.0 ± 1.2 h and the amplitude 7.6 ± 3.8° which is similar to values obtained previously for wild-type plants as well as plants transformed with a wild-type, genomic ETR1 transgene.18

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Ethylene stimulates nutations of etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 seedlings transformed with an ETR1 transgene mutated at Asp659. The hypocotyl angles from seven etr1-6 etr2-3 ein4-4 triple mutants transformed with an ETR1 transgene mutated at Asp659 (getr1[D]) are shown in two panels. One seedling in (A) (black) had no measurable nutations while one in (B) (black) had very small nutations.

Conclusions from this and the previous study are that the ETR1 receptor has a unique role in ethylene-stimulated nutations. However, this role does not require either histidine kinase activity or phosphotransfer through the receiver domain of ETR1.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Eric Schaller for sharing the etr1-7 gETR1(G2) mutant lines. Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation.

Addendum to: Ethylene Stimulates Nutations That Are Dependent on the ETR1 Receptor. Binder BM, O'Malley RC, Wang W, Zutz TC, Bleecker AB. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1690–1700. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087858.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/abstract.php?id=3585

References

  • 1.Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME., Jr . Ethylene in Plant Biology. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bleecker AB, Estelle MA, Somerville C, Kende H. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 1988;241:1086–1089. doi: 10.1126/science.241.4869.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guzmán P, Ecker JR. Exploiting the triple response of Arabídopsís to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell. 1990;2:513–523. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo H, Ecker JR. The ethylene signaling pathway: New insights. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen YF, Etheridge N, Schaller GE. Ethylene signal transduction. Ann Bot. 2005;95:901–915. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang C, Kwok SF, Bleecker AB, Meyerowitz EM. Arabidopsis Ethylene-response gene ETR1: Similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science. 1993;262:539–543. doi: 10.1126/science.8211181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hua J, Sakai H, Nourizadeh S, Chen QG, Bleecker AB, Ecker JR, Meyerowitz EM. EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10:1321–1332. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.8.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hua J, Meyerowitz EM. Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 1998;94:261–271. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81425-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sakai H, Hua J, Chen QG, Chang C, Medrano LJ, Bleecker AB, Meyerowitz EM. ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:5812–5817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.West AH, Stock AM. Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26:369–376. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01852-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang W, Esch JE, Shiu SH, Agula H, Binder BM, Chang C, Patterson SE, Bleecker AB. Identification of important regions for ethylene binding and signaling in the transmembrane domain of the ETR1 ethylene receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044537. (In Press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hua J, Chang C, Sun Q, Meyerowitz EM. Ethylene insensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science. 1995;269:1712–1714. doi: 10.1126/science.7569898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gamble RL, Coonfield ML, Schaller GE. Histidine kinase activity of the ETR1 ethylene receptor from Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7825–7829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moussatche P, Klee H. Autophosphorylation activity of the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor multigene family. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48734–48741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qu X, Schaller GE. Requirement of the histidine kinase domain for signal transduction by the ethylene receptor ETR1. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2961–2970. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.047126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang W, Hall AE, O'Malley R, Bleecker AB. Canonical histidine kinase activity of the transmitter domain of the ETR1 ethylene receptor from Arabidopsis is not required for signal transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:352–357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237085100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Binder BM, O'Malley RC, Wang W, Moore JM, Parks BM, Spalding EP, Bleecker AB. Arabidopsis seedling growth response and recovery to ethylene: A kinetic analysis. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2913–2920. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.050369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Binder BM, O'Malley RC, Wang W, Zutz TC, Bleecker AB. Ethylene stimulates nutations that are dependent on the ETR1 receptor. Plant Physiol. 2006 doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087858. (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berg AR, Peacock K. Growth patterns in nutating and nonnutating sunflower (Helianthus annuus) hypocotyls. Am J Botany. 1992;79:77–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Darwin C, Darwin F. The Power of Movement in Plants. London: John Murray; 1880. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Inoue N, Arase T, Hagiwara M, Manao T, Hyashi T, Ikeda R. Ecological significance of root tip rotation for seedling establishment of Oryza sativa L. Ecol Res. 1999;14:31–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gamble RL, Qu X, Schaller GE. Mutational analysis of the ethylene receptor ETR1: Role of the histidine kinase domain in dominant ethylene insensitivity. Plant Physiol. 2002;128:1428–1438. doi: 10.1104/pp.010777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES