Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15012–15017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15012

A synthetic cryIC gene, encoding a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin, confers Spodoptera resistance in alfalfa and tobacco

Nicolai Strizhov *,, Menachem Keller , Jaideep Mathur *, Zsuzsanna Koncz-Kálmán *, Dirk Bosch §, Evgenia Prudovsky , Jeff Schell *, Baruch Sneh , Csaba Koncz *, Aviah Zilberstein
PMCID: PMC26347  PMID: 8986755

Abstract

Spodoptera species, representing widespread polyphagous insect pests, are resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins used thus far as insecticides in transgenic plants. Here we describe the chemical synthesis of a cryIC gene by a novel template directed ligation–PCR method. This simple and economical method to construct large synthetic genes can be used when routine resynthesis of genes is required. Chemically phosphorylated adjacent oligonucleotides of the gene to be synthesized are assembled and ligated on a single-stranded, partially homologous template derived from a wild-type gene (cryIC in our case) by a thermostable Pfu DNA ligase using repeated cycles of melting, annealing, and ligation. The resulting synthetic DNA strands are selectively amplified by PCR with short specific flanking primers that are complementary only to the new synthetic DNA. Optimized expression of the synthetic cryIC gene in alfalfa and tobacco results in the production of 0.01–0.2% of total soluble proteins as CryIC toxin and provides protection against the Egyptian cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) and the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). To facilitate selection and breeding of Spodoptera-resistant plants, the cryIC gene was linked to a pat gene, conferring resistance to the herbicide BASTA.

Keywords: armyworms, CryIC δ-endotoxin, gene synthesis, transgenic alfalfa


Insecticidal Cry proteins, produced as protoxins (65–140 kDa) in parasporal crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), are active as selective entomocidal agents. The crystalline Bt protoxins are solubilized and activated in the midgut of insects by proteolysis. The activated toxins (60–70 kDa) bind to the membrane of midgut columnar cells and form ion channels, inducing osmotic lysis of the epithelium (13). Engineering of insect resistance in maize, rice, cotton, tomato, potato, and tobacco shows that a significant modification of the bacterial cry coding sequences is essential to express these Bt toxin genes in plants (411). Efficient transcription of recombinant cry genes in plant cell nuclei was achieved by the removal of A+T-rich sequences that may cause mRNA instability (811) or aberrant splicing (12), and the translation of cry mRNAs is enhanced by modification of their codon usage to make it more similar to that of the host plant (8). Expression of bacterial cry genes in chloroplasts may overcome these technological demands; however, to date chloroplast transformation is only available in tobacco (13).

The insecticidal spectrum of Bt toxins thus far expressed in transgenic plants is limited. Therefore, the engineering of Bt toxins with novel specificity is essential for the biological control of recalcitrant plague insects, such as Spodoptera. Members of the Spodoptera genus (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) feed on over 40 different plant families world-wide, including at least 87 species of economic importance (14). Studies of Spodoptera-specific Bt isolates indicated that many of them synthesize CryIC δ-endotoxins that are much more effective against these insects than other CryI proteins (15). Here we describe the chemical synthesis of a gene coding for a truncated CryIC protoxin of 630 amino acids and demonstrate that its expression in alfalfa and tobacco provides resistance to the Egyptian cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) and the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of a Synthetic cryIC Gene.

Oligonucleotides were synthesized with an Applied Biosystems 380B DNA synthesizer, using a 1000 Å controlled pore glass support (Millipore). Except for primers located at the 5′ termini of template directed ligation (TDL)-PCR sequence blocks (see below), the 5′ ends of oligonucleotides were chemically phosphorylated with 5′-Phosphate-ON phosphoramidite (CLONTECH) in the final step of DNA synthesis. The synthesis products were deprotected with ammonium hydroxide, desalted on NAP25 (Pharmacia) columns, and used for TDL-PCR without additional purification. Design of the synthetic cryIC gene was based on the sequence of the corresponding wild-type gene (cry1Ca5; GenBank accession no. X96682X96682) (16). In fact, the cry1Ca5 sequence represents a consensus of all known cryIC genes and is identical in three Bt strains, K26-21, MR1-37, and ssp. aizawai 7.29 (16). Modifications of the synthetic cryIC gene (s-cryIC) sequence did not alter the amino acid sequence of the minimal toxic fragment of the CryIC protoxin. The designed DNA sequence of the s-cryIC gene (see Fig. 1; GenBank accession no. X99103X99103) was divided into three blocks separated by HincII and BglII cleavage sites. The BamHI–HincII block I was constructed from eight, the HincII–BglII block II from five, and the BglII–BamHI block III from seven oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotides were assembled on a single-stranded DNA template of phagemid pR1, carrying the 630 N-terminal codons of the wild-type Bt cryIC gene (see Figs. 1 and 2). Terminal oligonucleotides in each TDL-PCR block carried unique sequences on their 5′ and 3′ ends, which were not complementary with the template but were matched to short PCR primers for selective amplification of the synthetic DNA strand. These PCR primers contained unique restriction enzyme cleavage sites used for cloning of the amplified double-stranded DNA fragments into pBluescript. The TDL-PCR block I was PCR-amplified by a 5′ primer (5′-AAGAGGATCCACCATGGAGGAGAAC-3′) carrying a BamHI site, and a 3′ primer (5′-ATGATCTAGATGCAGTAGCG-3′). The 3′ primer was complementary to an oligonucleotide (5′-GTCAACTAACAAGGGAAGTTTATACGGACCCACGCTACTGCATCTAGATCAT-3′) at the 3′ end of block I that carried cryIC sequences with the HincII site and unrelated overhang sequences with an XbaI site. The oligonucleotide at the 5′ end of block II (5′-GATAACTCGAGCGAGCCTAAACTATGACAATAGGAGATATCCAATTCAGCCAGTTG-3′) added unique DNA sequences with an XhoI site to the cryIC sequences upstream of the HincII site and matched a PCR primer (5′-GATAACTCGAGCGAGCCTA-3′). The 3′-terminal oligonucleotide in block II carried cryIC sequences extending to the BglII site and downstream overhang sequences with an XbaI site that were complementary to a PCR primer (5′-CCTGACTCTAGAAGATC-3′). In the oligonucleotide located at the 5′ end of block III, an EcoRI site was added upstream of the BglII site of cryIC gene, fitting to a PCR primer (5′-CTGTCTGAATTCAAAGATC-3′). The oligonucleotide at the 3′ end of block III carried a BamHI site, following the position of TAG stop codon in the pR1 phagemid, as well as adjacent unique sequences with a NotI site that were complementary to a PCR primer (5′-AGCATGCGGCCGCGGATCC-3′).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nucleotide sequence of the synthetic cryIC gene (s-cryIC). Nucleotides of the bacterial cryIC sequence (b-cryIC) exchanged in the synthetic gene are shown in the upper lanes. The nucleotide sequence of the s-cryIC region coding for 630 codons starts with an ATG codon in a sequence context fitting the eukaryotic consensus (26) and terminates at a TAG stop codon. Arrowheads above the s-cryIC sequence indicate the boundaries of adjacent synthetic oligonucleotides used for TDL-PCR gene synthesis. HincII and BglII cleavage sites used for the assembly of three TDL-PCR blocks are indicated by boxes above the sequences.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gene synthesis by TDL–PCR. Chemically phosphorylated synthetic oligonucleotides, corresponding to adjacent segments of the s-cryIC gene, are annealed with a single-stranded template DNA, carrying partially complementary sequences of the bacterial b-cryIC gene. The oligonucleotides are ligated on the template by a thermostable Pfu ligase using repeated TDL cycles of melting, annealing, and ligation. The synthetic DNA strand is selectively amplified by short PCR end primers that represent unique terminal sequences of s-cryIC oligonucleotides located at the 5′ and 3′ termini of TDL-PCR sequence blocks (labeled by asterisks). These PCR end primers contain suitable restriction cleavage sites for cloning of the synthetic double-stranded DNA fragments.

TDL reactions were carried out at a template/oligonucleotide ratio of 1:200 (a total of 0.05 pM of template versus 10 pM of each oligonucleotide) in a final volume of 50 μl, using a reaction buffer (20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5/20 mM KCl/10 mM MgCl2/0.1% Nonidet P-40/0.5 mM rATP/1 mM DTT) and 4 units of Pfu DNA ligase (Stratagene). Thirty cycles of TDL were performed at 92°C for 1 min followed by 52°C for 3 min. To increase the number of TDL cycles to 60, a new portion of rATP (0.5 mM) and 4 units of Pfu ligase was added. Five microliters from the TDL reaction mix served as template for PCR amplification with 100 pM of primers, 250 μM dNTP, and 2.5 units of Ampli-Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin–Elmer) in 100 μl of buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 9.0/50 mM KCl/0.1% Triton X-100), using of 30 cycles at 92°C for 1 min, 45°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1.5 min. The amplified DNA fragments were gel-purified, digested with BamHI–XbaI (block I), XhoI–XbaI (block II), and EcoRI–NotI (block III), then cloned in pBluescript SK(+) to verify their DNA sequences. The errors (three small deletions, one transversion, and one transition) found in the TDL-PCR products were corrected by site-directed mutagenesis using a USE kit (Pharmacia) or by assembly of nonmutated restriction fragments.

Plant Gene Expression Constructs and Transformation of Alfalfa and Tobacco.

The plant expression vector pPCV91 was constructed by modification of pPCV720 (17). A NotI site in the RK2-domain was eliminated by filling in with DNA polymerase Klenow fragment, and a cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (18) with four repeats of the enhancer domain (−90 to −418) was introduced into the HindIII site of pPCV720. Upstream of a BamHI cloning site, this cassette contained 20 bp from the 3′ end of the untranslated Ω leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA (19), whereas downstream of the BamHI site, it carried a polyadenylylation signal sequence derived from the CaMV 35S RNA gene. A BamHI site present in the mannopine synthase promoter (pmas) of pPCV720 was replaced by a NotI site using a Sau3A–NotI adaptor (5′-GATCTGCGGCCGCA-3′). The resulting vector, pPCV91, carried three plant gene expression cassettes with unique BamHI, NotI, and SalI cloning sites. To construct pNS6, the synthetic cryIC gene was cloned as a BamHI fragment downstream of the CaMV 35S promoter (see Fig. 3A). In pNS7, a synthetic pat gene, encoding a phosphinothricine acetyltransferase (20), and a chiAII gene from Serratia marcescens (21) were inserted into the SalI and NotI sites located downstream of the mas 1′ and 2′ promoters, respectively. A bacterial cryIC gene from Bt ssp. aizawai 7.29 (GenBank accession no. X96682X96682), carrying the 756 N-terminal codons of cryIC, was cloned in pGIF1, in which it replaced the synthetic cryIC gene of pNS7. Vectors pNS6, pNS7, and pGIF1 were conjugated to Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101(pMP90RK) (17) and used for transformation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. var. Regen S clone RA3) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum SR1) as described (17, 22). To select for transformed explants, alfalfa and tobacco tissue culture media contained, respectively, 40 μg/ml and 15 μg/ml hygromycin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression of cryIC genes in E. coli, Arabidopsis, alfalfa and tobacco. (A) Schematic map of plant transformation vectors. The s-cryIC gene was cloned in an optimized gene expression cassette in pNS6 between promoter (pCaMV35S) and polyadenylylation sequences (pA35S) from the 35S RNA gene of CaMV. The CaMV 35S promoter (18) contains four repeats of the upstream enhancer region (−90 to −418; marked by open boxes). The same CaMV 35S expression cassette is carried by pAEN4, a vector used for transient expression of b-cryIC and s-cryIC genes in Arabidopsis protoplasts. In addition to s-cryIC, vector pNS7 contains a phosphinothricine acetyltransferase gene (pat) under the control of a mannopine synthase (mas) 1′ promoter, and a chitinase AII (chiAII) gene driven by the mas 2′ promoter. The s-cryIC gene of pNS7 was exchanged for the bacterial b-cryIC gene in pGIF1. The structure of pGIF1 is otherwise identical with that of pNS7. oriT and oriV, Conjugational transfer and vegetative replication origins of plasmid RK2; LB and RB, the left and right 25 bp border repeats of the T-DNA, respectively; oripBR, replication origin of pBR322; ApR, bacterial ampicillin resistance gene; pg5, promoter of gene 5; pnos, nopaline synthase promoter; hpt, hygromycin phosphotransferase gene; pA4 and pA7, polyadenylylation signal sequences from the T-DNA encoded genes 4 and 7, respectively; pAocs, polyadenylylation signal sequence of the octopine synthase gene. Open arrowheads label plant promoters, and filled boxes mark plant polyadenylylation signal sequences. (B) Expression of b-cryIC and s-cryIC genes in E. coli and Arabidopsis. (Left) The b-cryIC and s-cryIC genes were cloned, respectively, in vectors pET-11a and pET-11d (24), and their expression in E. coli was monitored by immunoblotting with (+) or without (−) isopropyl β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction, using a polyclonal anti-CryIC antibody. The lanes contain equal amounts of protein samples (15 μg) from E. coli extracts separated by SDS/PAGE. (Right) Arabidopsis protoplasts were transformed by polyethylene glycol-mediated DNA uptake with pAEN4 (1), and pAEN4-derived vectors carrying the b-cryIC (2) and s-cryIC (3) genes. After transient expression for 48 hr, samples containing 25 μg of soluble protein extract from protoplasts were separated by SDS/PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting. To estimate the amount of CryIC toxin in plant samples, purified CryIC protein of 86 kDa (carrying amino acid residues 1–756) was used as a standard (2 and 20 ng). (C) Screening for CryIC expression in alfalfa calli, carrying the transferred DNA of plant transformation vectors pNS6 and pNS7. Each lane contains 25 μg of soluble proteins from calli. For comparison, Arabidopsis protoplast extract (A.th), shown in lane 3 of B, was loaded as a standard, in addition to control protein extracts prepared from callus tissues of wild-type (wt) nontransformed alfalfa. (D) Screening for CryIC accumulation in leaf tissues of transgenic alfalfa and tobacco plants. Soluble proteins (50 μg) were prepared from NS6 (lanes 1 and 3–6) and NS7 (lane 2) alfalfa transformants, as well as from transgenic tobaccos carrying the NS7 s-cryIC gene construct (lower lanes 1–6). (E) Screening for transcripts of transgenes in leaves of soil-grown alfalfa plants carrying the transferred DNA of pGIF1, pNS6, and pNS7 vectors (three lanes each for NS6 and NS7 reflect three independent transgenic plants). Each lane in the three identical blots contains 20 μg of total RNA. The blots were hybridized, respectively, with s-cryIC, b-cryIC, and chiAII probes labeled to similar specific activity. Although several GIF1 transgenic plants expressing the chiAII gene were found during this screening (data not shown), no expression of the b-cryIC gene was detected in any of the GIF1 transformants. (The positive hybridizations with the b-cryIC probe are due to the partial homology between the synthetic and natural cryIC genes and the difference in the intensity of hybridizations with the s-cryIC and b-cryIC probes reflects differences between these cryIC sequences.)

Monitoring the Expression of CryIC in Transgenic Plants.

Bacterial and synthetic cryIC genes, coding for the 630 N-terminal amino acids of the CryIC toxin (see Fig. 1), were cloned into the BamHI site of a pAEN4 vector carrying the CaMV 35S gene expression cassette of pPCV91. Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts were isolated from root cultures and transformed by polyethylene glycol-mediated DNA uptake (23), using 1.5 × 106 protoplasts and 35 μg of plasmid DNA in each experiment. The protoplasts were harvested 48 hr after DNA uptake and lysed in SDS sample buffer to separate proteins on SDS/10% polyacrylamide gels before immunoblotting. An antibody used for immunoblotting was raised against a truncated CryIC δ-endotoxin carrying 756 N-terminal amino acids. Expression of CryIC in Escherichia coli strains, carrying bacterial or synthetic cryIC genes, respectively, in pET-11a or pET-11d (24), was monitored by a second alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody. Immunoblot analysis of proteins synthesized in plant cells was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham).

RNA (20 μg) samples isolated from leaves and petioles of alfalfa plants were separated on agarose-formaldehyde gels (25). BamHI fragments (1.9 kb), carrying either synthetic or bacterial cryIC sequences (see Fig. 1), and a NotI fragment with the chiAII gene (1.8 kb) were labeled by random priming and used as hybridization probes.

Insect Bioassays.

Leaf bioassays were performed with the Egyptian cotton leafworm (S. littoralis) and the beet armyworm (S. exigua) using neonate, second to third, third to fourth, and fourth to sixth instar larvae. Ten larvae of a selected developmental stage were placed on a moistened filter disc in Petri dishes with detached leaves from greenhouse grown plants. The assays were repeated two to three times for each plant. The mortality of neonate larvae was scored after 3 days, whereas the mortality of larvae from second to fourth and from fourth to sixth instar stages were evaluated, respectively, after 5 and 7 days. For the insect assays with whole plants, transgenic greenhouse-grown alfalfa lines producing 0.02–0.1% of total soluble protein as CryIC and S. exigua larvae of the third to fourth instar stage were used. Three NS7 and three NS6 transgenic, as well as wild-type, plants were infested with 15–20 larvae each. In “free-choice” experiments, 25 larvae were placed in a Petri dish located between transgenic NS6 or NS7 and nontransgenic alfalfa plants in the greenhouse. Leaf damage was evaluated after 6 days.

RESULTS

Synthesis of a cryIC Gene Using TDL.

A synthetic cryIC gene coding for an N-terminal protoxin fragment of 630 amino acids was designed (Fig. 1) by exchanging 286 bp of the bacterial cryIC sequence (GenBank accession no. X96682X96682; 1890 bp) such that 249 out of 630 codons were modified according to preferential codon usage in dicotyledonous plants. These exchanges removed 21 potential plant polyadenylylation signals (27), 12 ATTTA motifs, 68 sequence blocks with 6 or more consecutive A/Ts, and all motifs containing five or more G+C or A+T nucleotides. Sequences around the translation initiation site were changed to conform to the eukaryotic consensus sequence (26), and a TAG stop codon was introduced downstream of amino acid codon 630. The G+C content of the cryIC gene was thus increased from 36.6% to 44.8%. The s-cryIC gene was synthesized from oligonucleotides of 70–130 bases that were chemically phosphorylated at their 5′ ends. Because chemical phosphorylation is performed as the last step of automated DNA synthesis, only full-length oligonucleotides contain the 5′ phosphate group. Bacterial cryIC sequences coding for the 630 N-terminal codons were cloned in a pBluescript vector to generate a single-stranded DNA template for ordered annealing of five to eight synthetic oligonucleotides by partial base pairing. The adjacent oligonucleotides were assembled and ligated on this single-stranded template by a thermostable Pfu ligase using 30–60 cycles of repeated melting, annealing, and ligation. In combination with chemical phosphorylation, this TDL method (Fig. 2) provided a sequence-specific selection for phosphorylated full-length oligonucleotides from a complex mixture of nonphosphorylated failure synthesis products, and yielded a linear amplification of single-stranded synthetic cryIC DNA segments generated by ligation. Therefore, except for desalting, no additional purifications of a crude oligonucleotide mixture after chemical DNA synthesis were necessary. The TDL at high temperatures also circumvented potential problems of erroneous annealing. The synthetic cryIC sequences were converted to double-stranded DNA fragments and specifically amplified by PCR using short end-primers that did not anneal to the bacterial cryIC template carried by the pBluescript vector. The s-cryIC gene was thus synthesized from three sequence blocks that were combined by ligation of HincII- and BglII-digested DNA fragments and cloned in pBluescript (see Materials and Methods).

Expression of the Synthetic cryIC Gene in E. coli, Arabidopsis, Tobacco, and Alfalfa.

Bacterial and synthetic cryIC genes were cloned, respectively, in vectors pET-11a and pET-11d (24) and expressed in E. coli. Synthesis of the CryIC protein was monitored by immunoblotting. In comparison with cells harboring the bacterial cryIC gene, the expression of the synthetic gene in E. coli yielded a significantly lower toxin level (Fig. 3B).

The native and synthetic cryIC genes were inserted between promoter and polyadenylylation signal sequences of the CaMV 35S RNA gene in the plant gene vector pAEN4. In pAEN4, the 5′ ends of cryIC genes were fused to the untranslated Ω leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus (19) to enhance the translation of mRNAs, whereas the upstream CaMV 35S promoter was supplemented with four repeats of the enhancer domain (−90 to −418) to stimulate the transcription of chimeric genes in plants (18). The cryIC genes were introduced by polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation into Arabidopsis protoplasts for transient expression (23), and the accumulation of CryIC toxin was monitored by immunoblotting (Fig. 3B). In protoplasts carrying the bacterial gene (b-cryIC), no toxin was detectable, whereas cells transformed with the synthetic gene (s-cryIC) accumulated significant amounts of CryIC protein (Fig. 3B).

The cryIC genes were transferred into pPCV91, a transferred DNA-based transformation vector carrying a selectable hygromycin resistance (hpt) gene. In the dual gene expression cassette of pPCV91 (Fig. 3A), a synthetic phosphinothricine acetyltransferase (pat) gene (20) was cloned downstream of the mannopine synthase (mas) 1′ promoter, to link the cryIC genes to a genetic marker allowing field-selection of transgenic plants by the herbicide BASTA. A chitinase AII (chiAII) gene from Serratia marcescens (21) was inserted downstream of the mas 2′ promoter, because previous studies (data not shown) indicated that chitinases may enhance the insecticidal activity of Bt toxins by destroying the chitinous peritrophic membrane of the insect midgut. The pPCV91 constructs, carrying the native, or synthetic, cryIC genes, either alone or in combination with the pat and chiAII genes, were introduced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation into alfalfa and tobacco. From tobacco calli and somatic embryos of alfalfa selected on hygromycin, transformed shoots were regenerated. Transgenic plants derived from each transformation were assayed for the synthesis of CryIC toxin in leaves by immunoblotting and for cryIC gene expression using RNA hybridization. In calli or in plants carrying the bacterial cryIC gene (confirmed by DNA hybridization; data not shown), neither stable steady-state cryIC mRNA (Fig. 3E) nor toxin could be detected (data not shown). In contrast, transformed calli (Fig. 3C) as well as shoots carrying the synthetic gene (Fig. 3D), synthesized the CryIC toxin and accumulated significant amounts of steady-state cryIC mRNA (Fig. 3E). Shoots producing detectable amounts of CryIC toxin (0.01–0.2% of soluble leaf proteins) were vegetatively propagated and, if they carried the pat and chiAII genes, were further exposed to BASTA selection in the greenhouse and tested by RNA hybridization (Fig. 3E) using the corresponding genes as probes.

Transgenic Plants Expressing the cryIC Gene Are Resistant to the Egyptian Cotton Leafworm and Beet Armyworm.

Transgenic alfalfa plants obtained by transformation with the pNS6 and pNS7 constructs (Fig. 3A) were tested for insect tolerance by feeding leaves to neonate larvae of the Egyptian cotton leafworm (S. littoralis). Fifteen of 27 NS6 transformants and 14 of 32 NS7 transformants produced 100% mortality of larvae (Fig. 4A and Table 1). Immunoblotting of leaf protein extracts showed that these plants produced 0.01–0.1% of total soluble protein as CryIC toxin in leaves (Fig. 3D). Leaves from these plants used in the diet of beet armyworms (S. exigua) also caused 100% mortality of larvae throughout their development (Fig. 4 C and D and Table 2). Screening of the NS7 transgenic alfalfa demonstrated that 15 out of 32 plants tested (47%) exhibited a high level of CryIC production (0.02–0.1% of total soluble protein), 2 plants (6%) had low toxin levels (less than 0.02%), and in 15 plants (47%) CryIC levels were below the detection limit of immunoblotting with 50 μg of soluble protein. NS6 transgenics consisted of 5/15 (33%) of high level, 7/15 (47%) low level, and 3/15 (20%) undetectable CryIC expressors.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Screening for Spodoptera resistance of transgenic plants. (A) Insecticidal assay with neonate larvae of S. littoralis reared for 2 days on leaves from nontransformed alfalfa (M. sativa, Upper) and NS7 transgenic (Lower) plants. (B) Free choice bioassays with leaves from wild-type and transgenic alfalfa plants. In the plate to the left, 10 larvae of S. exigua (third instar) were placed on the red line located between leaves of wild-type (Left) and NS7 transgenic (Right) alfalfa plants. In the plate to the right, the larvae were placed between leaves from wild-type (Left) and NS6 (Right; Fig. 3D, lane 6) transgenic alfalfas. For 5 days, the larvae failed to colonize leaves from the transgenic plants in both assays. (C and D) Leaves from tobacco (C) and alfalfa (D) plants were used for feeding of five fifth instar larvae of S. exigua for 10 hr. Petri dishes to the left in C and D contained leaves from nontransformed plants. Leaves shown in Petri dishes to the right in C and D were collected from a NS7 tobacco transgenic line producing 0.2% of soluble proteins as CryIC toxin (Fig. 3D, lane 2) and from a NS6 alfalfa transformant producing 0.1% of leaf proteins as CryIC toxin, respectively. (E) Transgenic NS7 (Left; Fig. 3D, lane 2) and nontransformed alfalfa (Right) plants were infested with 15 larvae of S. exigua (third to fourth instar stage) for 6 days.

Table 1.

Control of S. littoralis (Egyptian cotton leafworm) by transgenic alfalfa plants

Construct Mortality of neonate larvae
95–100%* 30–90%* <30%*
NS6 15/27 (55.5%) 5/27 (18.5%) 7/27 (33.3%)
NS7 14/32 (43.8%) 5/32 (15.6%) 13/32 (40.6%)

From 60 NS7 transgenic alfalfa plants, 14 lines were found to be resistant to 0.1–0.2% BASTA. From these plants, nine lines displayed high levels (0.02–0.1%) of CryIC toxin production in leaves and caused 100% mortality of both S. littoralis and S. exigua larvae. 

*

The figures show the ratio between the numbers exhibiting the corresponding mortality rate to the total number of transgenic plants tested; in parenthesis, this fraction is expressed as a percentage. 

Table 2.

Control of S. exigua (beet armyworm) by transgenic alfalfa plants

Instar Mortality of larvae fed on leaves of plants with 0.02–0.1% CryIC toxin level
Time of scoring, days
NS6* NS7*
1 100% (1) 100% (3) 3
2–3 100% (5) 100% (7) 5
3–4 100% (2) 100% (3) 5
4–5–6 100% (3) 100% (2) 7
*

The number of plants tested is in parentheses. 

Of 63 NS7 tobacco transformants, 42 (66.6%) were found to be resistant to 1.0% BASTA. Proper Mendelian segregation of BASTA and hygromycin resistance markers was confirmed after selfing 11 transgenic tobacco lines. Ten BASTA resistant plant stocks were assayed by immunoblotting and found to produce 0.1–0.2% of leaf soluble proteins as CryIC toxin (Fig. 3D). Three from these lines were used in bioassays with S. exigua and found to cause 100% mortality of larvae from different developmental stages.

To imitate field conditions, CryIC-expressing plants were infested with 15–20 larvae of the third to fourth instar stage in the greenhouse. After 6 days, no viable insect escapes were detected, and the transgenic plants suffered barely detectable leaf damage; on average, less than 1% of the leaf area was affected (Fig. 4E). Infestation of a mixed population of wild-type and transgenic plants carrying the s-cryIC gene resulted in the devastation of wild-type plants, but yielded no apparent colonization by worms of the CryIC toxin-expressing plants in the population. Similar results were obtained by infesting detached leaves from these plants with larvae of S. exigua (Fig. 4B).

DISCUSSION

Spodoptera species are polyphagous cutworms and armyworms that may amplify to enormous numbers and devastate large agricultural areas (14). The widespread beet armyworm attacks rice, sugarbeet, alfalfa, cotton, corn, tobacco, tomato, potato, onions, peas, citrus, sunflower, and many grasses. The Egyptian cotton leafworm, a major pest in African and Mediterranean countries, favors fodder crops but also feeds on vegetables, industrial crops, medical plants, ornamentals, and trees. Young Spodoptera larvae may be controlled by pyrethroids, DDT, chlorinated hydrocarbons and organophosphorous insecticides (14, 28). However, because the eggs are laid on grassland, the efficiency of chemical insecticides, including methomyl and Pirate (AC303630), is rather limited (28). During the past few decades a considerable effort was therefore invested into the development of alternative insecticides to control armyworms.

From the numerous insecticidal crystal proteins of Bt, CryIC was found to be the most active against Spodoptera (15). Other Bt toxins, such as CryIA(c), affect the beet armyworm only when produced in extraordinary high amounts in transgenic plants (7, 13) but do not provide protection (28). The engineering of CryIA toxin-producing crops prompted new research aiming to construct Spodoptera-specific CryIA toxins using recombinant cryIA-cryIC genes (29). As was done previously, we also attempted to express the bacterial cryIC gene in plants, using an optimized sequence context for enhancing its transcription and translation. Our failure to detect stable mRNA synthesized from the bacterial cryIC gene in transgenic plants supports the view that insect resistance cannot be achieved by expression of bacterial cryI sequences in plant cell nuclei.

Therefore, we developed a simple and economical gene synthesis method to construct large synthetic genes by ligation of oligonucleotide modules, using partial annealing with a single-stranded DNA template derived from a wild-type gene. The TDL-PCR method requires the synthesis of oligonucleotides comprising only one strand, in contrast to other technologies. This approach is free from the drawbacks of previous strategies for assembly of synthetic oligonucleotides, drawbacks such as multiple steps, a sensitivity to the secondary structure of oligonucleotides, complex effects of mispriming events, and polymerase fidelity problems with the increasing number of PCR steps. The gene assembly by ligation of oligonucleotides is preferable to assembly by the PCR approach, because no new errors are introduced to the assembled DNA. However, the ligation at conventional temperatures renders it very sensitive to secondary structures in DNA. Application of thermostable ligases may circumvent this problem (9). We used thermostable Pfu DNA ligase to perform thermal cycling for assembly, selection (“purification”), and ligation of full-length oligonucleotides as well as for linear amplification of the TDL product. Using the TDL-PCR method, it is not necessary to purify full-length oligonucleotides that may only represent 5–10% of the synthesis products with large linking numbers (e.g., over 80 nucleotides). Because of chemical phosphorylation, only full-length adjacent oligonucleotides, annealed in a sequence-specific order on the template, can be ligated, because only they carry a 5′ phosphate. Thus, TDL by Pfu ligase automatically selects for and amplifies the designed synthetic gene segments. Avoidance of laborious procedures for the purification of long oligonucleotides gives the TDL-PCR method a significant advantage over other methods for gene synthesis. In a single TDL reaction, 5–8 oligonucleotides of 80–130 bases can be ligated and then converted to large double-stranded DNA segments by selective PCR amplification. In our method, PCR is used only in the final step, thus avoiding the assembly of oligonucleotides, in contrast to PCR-based methods for gene synthesis. Analysis of the observed errors showed that these originate from chemical oligonucleotide synthesis, a common problem with any gene synthesis technology, and that PCR did not introduce additional errors.

The TDL-PCR gene synthesis method allowed us to easily modify about 15% of the cryIC sequence and to remove cryptic polyadenylylation sites (27), potential splicing sequences, and other sequence motifs causing RNA instability, as well as to change the codon usage to fit plant codon preference and to optimize the translation initiation site according to the eukaryotic consensus (26). Comparison of the expression of native and synthetic cryIC genes in E. coli and Arabidopsis demonstrated the anticipated correlation between codon usage and translation. To ensure the production of CryIC toxin in plants, the synthetic cryIC sequence was placed in an optimized gene expression cassette to enhance its transcription by repeats of the enhancer elements of the CaMV 35S promoter (18) and to stimulate translation by linking it to an upstream untranslated leader of a plant RNA virus (19). Plant cells, expressing the synthetic gene transiently or stably, accumulated significant levels of s-cryIC mRNA and derived toxin protein, allowing the “molecular breeding” of Spodoptera-resistant plants that passed rigorous screening with insecticidal assays, immunoblotting, and RNA hybridizations. To facilitate the transfer of the s-cryIC gene to other alfalfa and tobacco cultivars by genetic crosses, the synthetic gene was combined with a BASTA herbicide resistance marker, allowing field selection of transgenic stocks. A chiAII gene was also expressed in the transgenic plants to test potential synergism between Bt toxin and chitinase. Insecticidal assays in vitro, as well as heavy infestations of greenhouse plants, showed that the expression of CryIC toxin in alfalfa and tobacco plants confers resistance to two Spodoptera species, the beet armyworm and the Egyptian cotton leafworm. A synergistic effect between chitinase AII and the CryIC toxin could have escaped our detection because toxin levels as low as 0.01% of total leaf protein were sufficient to give 100% mortality of the larvae used in our assays. The data described above suggest that it is worth to challenge the characterized tobacco and alfalfa plants with natural Spodoptera invasions in the field, as well as to introduce the synthetic cryIC gene constructs into other plants of economical importance.

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Eckes (AgrEvo, Frankfurt, Germany) for kindly providing the synthetic pat gene, V. Strizhova for her help in the insect bioassays, D. Dudits (Biological Research Center, Szeged, Hungary) for supplying the alfalfa stock, M. Kalda for the photographic work, as well as A. Lossow, B. Grunenberg, Heiner Meier z.A., and E. Czerny for their excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by German-Israeli Foundation Grant 0223–146.12/91.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis; TDL, template directed ligation; CaMV, cauliflower mosaic virus.

Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank data base (accession no. X99103X99103).

References

  • 1.Schnepf E H. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1995;6:305–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knowles B H. Adv Insect Physiol. 1994;24:275–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grochulski P, Masson L, Borisova S, Pusztai-Carey M, Schwartz J-L, Brousseau R, Cygler M. J Mol Biol. 1995;254:447–464. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koziel M G, Beland G L, Bowman C, Carozzi N B, Crenshaw R, Crossland L, Dawson J, Desai N, Hill M, Kadwell S, Launis K, Lewis K, Maddox D, McPherson K, Meghij M R, Merlin E, Rhodes R, Warren G W, Wright M, Evola S V. Bio/Technology. 1993;11:194–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fujimoto H, Itoh K, Yamamoto M, Kyozuka J, Shimamoto K. Bio/Technology. 1993;11:1151–1155. doi: 10.1038/nbt1093-1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wünn J, Klöti A, Burkhardt P K, Biswas G C G, Launis K, Iglesias V A, Potrykus I. Bio/Technology. 1996;14:171–176. doi: 10.1038/nbt0296-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perlak F J, Deaton R W, Armstrong T A, Fuchs R L, Sims S R, Greeplate J T, Fischhoff D A. Bio/Technology. 1990;8:939–943. doi: 10.1038/nbt1090-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Perlak F J, Fuchs R L, Dean D A, McPherson S A, Fischhoff D A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:3324–3328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sutton D W, Havstad P K, Kemp J D. Transgenic Res. 1992;1:228–236. doi: 10.1007/BF02524753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adang M J, Brody M S, Cardineau G, Eagan N, Roush R T, Shewmaker C K, Jones A, Oakes J V, McBridge K E. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;21:1131–1145. doi: 10.1007/BF00023609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Perlak F J, Stone T B, Muskopf Y M, Peterson L J, Parker G B, McPherson S A, Wyman J, Love S, Reed G, Biever D, Fischhoff D A. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;22:313–321. doi: 10.1007/BF00014938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van Aarssen R, Soetaert P, Stam M, Doeckx J, Gosselé V, Reynaerts A, Cornelissen M. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;28:513–524. doi: 10.1007/BF00020398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McBride K E, Svab Z, Schaaf D E, Hogan P S, Stalker D M, Maliga P. Bio/Technology. 1995;13:362–365. doi: 10.1038/nbt0495-362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hill D S. Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and Their Control. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yamamoto T, Powell G. In: Advanced Engineered Pesticides. Kim L, editor. New York: Dekker; 1993. pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strizhov, N., Keller, M., Koncz-Kálmán, Z., Regev, A., Sneh, B., Schell, J., Koncz, C., & Zilberstein, A. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Koncz C, Martini N, Szabados L, Hrouda M, Bachmair A, Schell J. In: Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Gevin S B, Schilperoort R A, editors. B2. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1994. pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fang R-X, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S, Chua N-H. Plant Cell. 1989;1:141–150. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gallie D R, Kado C I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:129–132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Strauch, E., Arnold, W., Alljah, R., Wohlleben, W., Pühler, A., Eckes, P., Donn, G., Ulmann, E., Hein, F. & Wengenmayer, F. (1988) Eur. Patent EP 275957B1.
  • 21.Shapira R, Ordentlich A, Chet I, Oppenheim A. Phytopathology. 1989;79:1246–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.D’Halluin K, Botterman J, De Greef W. Crop Sci. 1990;30:866–871. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mathur J, Koncz C, Szabados L. Plant Cell Rep. 1995;14:221–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00233637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Studier W, Rosenberg A, Dunn J, Dubendorff J. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kozak M. Cell. 1986;44:283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dean C, Tamaki S, Dunsmuir P, Favreau M, Katayama C, Dooner H, Bedbrook J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:2229–2240. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.5.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Burris E, Graves J B, Leonard B R, White C A. Fla Entomol. 1994;77:454–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van der Salm T, Bosch D, Honée G, Feng L, Musterman E, Bakker P, Stiekema W J, Visser B. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;26:51–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00039519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES