Abstract
CtBP (C-terminal binding protein) is an evolutionarily conserved NAD(H)-dependent transcriptional corepressor, whose activity has been shown to be regulated by the NAD/NADH ratio. Although recent studies have provided significant new insights into mechanisms by which CtBP regulates transcription, the biological function of CtBP remains incompletely understood. Here, we report that genetic inactivation of the Caenorhabditis elegans homolog, ctbp-1, results in life span extension, which is suppressed by reintroduction of the ctbp-1 genomic DNA encoding wild-type but not NAD(H)-binding defective CTBP-1 protein. We show that CTBP-1 possibly modulates aging through the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway, dependent on the forkhead transcription factor DAF-16, but independent of the NAD-dependent histone deacetylase SIR-2.1. Genome-wide microarray analysis identifies >200 potential CTBP-1 target genes. Importantly, RNAi inhibition of a putative triacylglycerol lipase gene lips-7(C09E8.2) but not another lipase suppresses the life span extension phenotype. Consistently, metabolic analysis shows that the triacylglycerol level is reduced in the ctbp-1 deletion mutant, which is restored to the wild-type level by RNAi inhibition of lips-7. Taken together, our data suggest that CTBP-1 controls life span probably through the regulation of lipid metabolism.
Keywords: aging, CtBP, transcription corepressor
CtBP is a transcriptional corepressor that is evolutionarily conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to human (1). CtBP shares sequence homology with the NAD/NADH-dependent 2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenases (2-Hacid_DH) (2), and has been shown to exhibit dehydrogenase activity in vitro (3–5), although the physiological substrates and functional significance of this enzymatic activity remain unclear. CtBP binds NAD and NADH, and the NAD/NADH ratio appears to regulate the interactions of CtBP with DNA-binding transcription factors (6, 7), suggesting a potential role for CtBP as a sensor of cellular redox states. CtBP represses transcription by recruiting multiple histone modifying enzymes including the histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase G9a/HMTase1 and the histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) demethylase LSD1 (3, 8). Previous studies suggest a role for CtBP in mouse development, apoptosis, and hypoxia-induced tumor migration (9–12). However, by and large, the biology of CtBP is still incompletely understood.
Aging is a complex process regulated by an interacting network of factors. The insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling pathway, the JNK anti-stress pathway and the mitochondria respiratory chain, have all been shown to regulate the aging process (13). Besides genetic factors, environmental conditions including stress and nutrient availability, have also been demonstrated to influence longevity (13–15). Transcription factors including DAF-16 and the NAD-dependent histone deacetylase SIR2 are at the converging points to integrate these different signals and regulate longevity through modulating gene transcription (13, 15). Similar to SIR2, CtBP is also an NAD(H) dependent transcriptional corepressor, prompting us to examine whether CtBP might play a role in regulating longevity.
We investigated CtBP function in C. elegans through the analysis of a worm CtBP (ctbp-1, F49E10.5) deletion mutant and by RNAi inhibition of ctbp-1 expression. Significantly, we find that loss of ctbp-1 expression leads to an extended adult life span and increased resistance to stress. Furthermore, genetic complementation experiments show that the NAD(H) binding motif is important for the ability of ctbp-1 to regulate life span. Our epistasis analyses suggest that CTBP-1 functions in the insulin-like pathway, upstream of DAF-16 and likely downstream of the NAD dependent histone deacetylase SIR-2.1. Genome-wide expression profiling studies identify a wide range of CTBP-1 target genes. Strikingly, RNAi inhibition of a CTBP-1 target gene, a putative triacylglycerol (TAG) lipase gene lips-7 suppresses the life span phenotype associated with the loss of CTBP-1, whereas inhibition of another TAG lipase K08B12.1 has no such effect. Depletion of the TAG lipase also results in the increase of TAG, which is down-regulated in the ctbp-1 mutant. Taken together, our findings suggest that the evolutionarily conserved NAD(H)-dependent transcription corepressor CtBP controls life span by regulating transcription of gene(s) important for lipid metabolism.
Results and Discussion
Worm CTBP-1 has been shown to be the homologue of human CtBP and it has the characteristic NAD(H)-dependent 2-Hacid_DH domain and represses transcription (16). The C. elegans ctbp-1(ok498) mutant lacks the NAD(H)-binding domain and most of the dehydrogenase catalytic domain [Wormbase, F49E10.5 (www.wormbase.org) and Fig. 1A]. ctbp-1(ok498) was backcrossed with N2 4 times and yielded 3 independent lines, namely A26, D22 and D51. These 3 lines behaved identically, i.e., they showed no overt phenotypes in morphology, developmental rate, fecundity or formation of a diapause state known as dauer (supporting information (SI) Fig. S1 and data not shown). However, compared with the wild-type worms, all 3 lines showed a significant increase in mean adult life span (≈20%) and maximal life span (≈10–20%) (Fig. 1B and Table S1). A similar life span extension by ctbp-1(ok498) was also observed at a lower temperature of 20 °C (Fig. 2B and D). This ≈20% change in life span is in line with the recent reports of a number of genes whose de-regulation also resulted in a similar increase of life spans (17, 18).
Fig. 1.
CTBP-1 regulates life span in C. elegans. (A) A schematic presentation of the ctbp-1(ok498) mutant. (B) All 3 independent lines derived from ctbp-1(ok498) had similar increase in life span compared with N2. Mean adult life span of each strain is (mean ± SEM): N2, 13.8 ± 0.4 days; A26, 16.9 ± 0.4 days (P < 0.0001); D22,16.4 ± 0.4 days (P < 0.0001); D51, 16.5 ± 0.4 days (P < 0.0001). P values were calculated against N2. The maximal life span of each is N2, 22 days; A26, 24 days; D22, 25 days; D51, 27 days. Statistical data are summarized in Table S1. (C) ctbp-1 RNAi increases worm life span. Control RNAi: 14.5 ± 0.3 days; ctbp-1 RNAi: 16.0 ± 0.3 days (P = 0.0002). (D) RNAi depletion of a possible ctbp-1 homologue phgdh failed to alter life span in N2 or ctbp-1(ok498). (E) ctbp-1(ok498) worms are more resistant to oxidative stress. N2 and ctbp-1(ok498) were exposed to 150 mM papraquat and the survival time for N2 and ctbp-1(ok498) are 6.1 ± 0.4 h and 7.8 ± 0.6 h, respectively (P = 0.006). (F) ctbp-1(ok498) is more resistant to heat stress. Worms were exposed to 32 °C on the first day of adult. Mean survival time for N2 was 54.0 ± 0.9 h and 61.6 ± 0.9 for ctbp-1(ok498) (P < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in 3 independent experiments for paraquat and heat resistance assay.
Fig. 2.
ctbp-1 interaction with the insulin-like and the sir-2.1 pathways. (A) Extension of life span in ctbp-1(ok498) depends on daf-16. Mean life span of each strain is: N2, 14.3 ± 0.4 days; ctbp-1(ok498), 17.2 ± 0.5 days; daf-16(mgDf47), 11.9 ± 0.3 days; daf-16(mgDf47);ctbp-1(ok498), 11.6 ± 0.3 days [P = 0.63 compared with daf-16(mgDf47)]. The experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. (B) ctbp-1(ok498) was crossed into the daf-2(e1368) mutant. N2, 17.7 ± 0.3 days; ctbp-1(ok498), 21.6 ± 0.3; daf-2(e1368), 31.6 ± 0.4; daf-2(e1368);ctbp-1(ok498), 31.9 ± 0.4 [P = 0.96 compared with daf-2(e1368)]. (C) ctbp-1(ok498) was crossed into sir-2.1(ok434). N2, 14.1 ± 0.2 days; ctbp-1(ok498), 16.8 ± 0.2 days; sir-2.1(ok434), 12.2 ± 0.3 days (P < 0.0001 compared with N2); sir-2.1(ok434);ctbp-1(ok498): 16.6 ± 0.3 days [P = 0.4 compared with ctbp-1(ok498)]. (D) ctbp-1(ok498) was crossed into the sir-2.1 overexpression line NL3909 and its control line NL3908. N2, 18.8 ± 0.3 days; ctbp-1(ok498), 22.3 ± 0.3 days; NL3908, 19.1 ± 0.3 days; NL3909, 26.7 ± 0.4 days; NL3908;ctbp-1(ok498), 22.5 ± 0.3 days (P < 0.0001 compared with NL3908); NL3909;ctbp-1(ok498), 26.9 ± 0.4 days (P = 0.71 compared with NL3909). The data were pooled from 3 independent experiments. The life span assays in B and D were carried out at 20 °C. The full statistical analyses of the data are listed in Table S1.
Several lines of evidence further support the notion that the life span extension phenotype is caused by the loss of ctbp-1. First, depletion of ctbp-1 by RNAi (Fig. S2A) in worms resulted in a comparable life span extension (Fig. 1C and Table S1). The slightly lower degree of life span extension of the RNAi treated animals is probably due to an incomplete knockdown of the endogenous ctbp-1. As an important specificity control, we also RNAi depleted C31C9.2 (Fig. S2B), a phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), which is the only other C. elegans ORF that is potentially related to CtBP (Wormbase), and found no effects on the life span of either N2 or ctbp-1(ok498) (Fig. 1D). Second, reintroduction of the genomic DNA encompassing the ctbp-1 gene rescued the life span phenotype (Table 1), indicating that the expended life span is caused by the loss of CTBP-1 function. Taken together, these results show that CTBP-1 regulates life span in C. elegans without affecting development or fertility.
Table 1.
CTBP-1 and CTBP-1(H467A) but not CTBP-1(G332/334V) rescue the extended life span phenotype in ctbp-1(ok498)
| Strain | Adult life span, mean ± SEM | N | Percentage v. N2 | P v. N2 | P v.ctbp1(ok498);pRF4 | Maximal adult life span |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N2 | 13.6 ± 0.2 | 212 | 21 | |||
| ctbp-1(ok498) | 16.3 ± 0.3 | 196 | 20.0 | <0.0001 | 23 | |
| ctbp-1(ok498); pRF4 | 16.7 ± 0.2 | 198 | 22.9 | <0.0001 | 25 | |
| ctbp-1 transgenic lines | ||||||
| ctbp-1(ok498); Ex122 | 13.8 ± 0.3 | 126 | 1.6 | 0.75 | <0.0001 | 21 |
| ctbp-1(ok498); Ex256 | 14.4 ± 0.2 | 213 | 6.1 | 0.005 | <0.0001 | 21 |
| ctbp-1(G332/334V) transgenic lines | ||||||
| ctbp-1(ok498); ExN337 | 16.2 ± 0.3 | 177 | 18.9 | <0.0001 | 0.29 | 23 |
| ctbp-1(ok498); ExN373 | 16.4 ± 0.2 | 207 | 20.4 | <0.0001 | 0.40 | 24 |
| ctbp-1(ok498); ExN3118 | 16.8 ± 0.2 | 206 | 23.0 | <0.0001 | 0.82 | 25 |
| ctbp-1(H467A) transgenic lines | ||||||
| ctbp-1(ok498); ExH23 | 14.3 ± 0.3 | 181 | 6.3 | 0.02 | <0.0001 | 23 |
| ctbp-1(ok498); ExH235 | 12.7 ± 0.3 | 106 | −7.0 | 0.05 | <0.0001 | 24 |
Life span of ctbp-1(ok498) rescued with wild-type and mutated ctbp-1 genomic DNA. The life span of transgenic animals was compared to that of N2 and ctbp-1(ok498); pRF4. Life span data are pooled from 3 independent trials. The life span graphs can be found in Fig. S4A.
To further establish the role of CTBP-1 in life span regulation, we investigated the ability of ctbp-1(ok498) to respond to stress, given that increased stress resistance is a common feature of many long-lived worms (19). As shown in Fig. 1 E and F, we found that, compared with the N2, ctbp-1(ok498) displayed increased resistance to oxidative (induced by paraquat) and heat stress, but not to DNA (UV) damage, starvation and pathogen stress (Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14) (Fig. S3). This increased resistance to oxidative and heat stress is consistent with the life span extension phenotype associated with abrogation of the ctbp-1 gene in worms.
CtBP has been shown to bind NAD(H) and possess dehydrogenase activity in vitro (3–5), although the physiological substrate and the biological significance of this activity have remained elusive. Previous studies further suggested that NAD(H) binding regulates CtBP function by influencing the interactions between CtBP and its partners (6, 7). To investigate the functional relevance of NAD(H) binding and the putative dehydrogenase activity of CTBP-1, we carried out genetic complementation experiments in ctbp-1(ok498). Point mutations predicted to compromise the dehydrogenase activity (H467A) or NAD(H) binding (G332/334V) were introduced into CTBP-1 (4). As shown in Table 1 and Fig. S4A, whereas the genomic fragment encoding wild type or the dehydrogenase-defective CTBP-1 fully suppressed the life span phenotype associated with ctbp-1(ok498), the NAD(H) binding mutant CTBP-1(G332/334V) failed to do so. This observation is consistent with the earlier report demonstrating that the putative dehydrogenase activity was not required for mammalian CtBP proteins to mediate transcriptional repression (12). The failure of ctbp-1(G332/334V) to rescue the mutant was not due to lower protein level as CTBP-1(G332/334) was expressed at a level comparable to those of the wild type and CTBP-1(H467A) in the transgenic worms (Fig. S4B). However, when they were fused to G4DBD and tested in transcription assay, CTBP-1(G332/334V) had a much weaker transcription repression activity than wild-type and CTBP-1(H467A) (Fig. S4C), although all 3 G4 fusion proteins were again comparably expressed (data not shown). Taken together, these findings suggest that CTBP-1 regulates life span in C. elegans, and, whereas the dehydrogenase activity appears dispensable, its ability to bind NAD(H) seems important for this function.
In C. elegans, Drosophila and mammals, one of the well studied pathways that control life span is the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, which involves the insulin/IGF-1 receptor DAF-2 and the forkhead transcriptional regulator DAF-16 in worms (20). Mutations that reduce the activity of the insulin-like pathway extend life span, whereas deletion of daf-16 inhibits this phenotype. To determine the relationship, if any, between ctbp-1 and the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway, we first investigated the genetic relationship between ctbp-1 and daf-16 in life span regulation. When crossed into the daf-16(mgDf47) null mutant (21), ctbp-1(ok498) failed to extend its life span (Fig. 2A and Table S1), demonstrating that daf-16 is required for ctbp-1 regulation of life span. To further determine whether CTBP-1 operates in the insulin-like signaling pathway, ctbp-1(ok498) was crossed into the long-lived daf-2 hypomorphic mutant daf-2(e1368) (22). We found no increase of life span of the double mutant versus the single daf-2(e1368) mutant (Fig. 2B and Table S1). Because the daf-2 allele is not null, the epistasis between daf-2 and ctbp-1 cannot be determined unequivocally. However, taken together, our data suggest that ctbp-1 functions in the insulin-like pathway to regulate life span.
Over-expression of Sir2 has been shown to increase life span in yeast, C. elegans, Drosophila and zebra fish (23). However, loss of sir-2.1 reduces life span in C. elegans (24). Previous studies suggest that SIR-2.1 functions in the insulin-like pathway (25), possibly upstream of DAF-2 (26). We therefore examined whether there is any genetic interaction between sir-2.1 and ctbp-1 in life span regulation. When crossed into the sir-2.1 null mutant sir-2.1(ok434) (24), ctbp-1(ok498) had no reduction in life span in the absence of sir-2.1 (Fig. 2C and Table S1), suggesting that CTBP-1 acts either downstream of SIR-2.1 or in a parallel pathway. Next we tested whether loss of ctbp-1 and over-expression of sir-2.1 has any additive or synergistic effects on extending life span. We crossed ctbp-1(ok498) into the sir-2.1 over-expression line NL3909 pkls1642 [unc-119 sir-2.1] and found that NL3909;ctbp-1(ok498) had similar life span as that of NL3909, whereas, as expected, loss of ctbp-1 extended the life span of the control strain NL3908 pkls1641 [unc-119] (Fig. 2D and Table S1). Taken together, these data suggest that ctbp-1 may function in the same pathway as sir-2.1, likely downstream of sir-2.1.
Interestingly, previous studies show that a reduction in CtBP binding to the transcription repressor HIC-1 [hypermethylated in cancer (27)] results in an up-regulation of the human Sir2 homologue SIRT1 expression in primary fibroblasts (28), suggesting that SIRT1 may be a downstream target of CtBP. However, the expression of C. elegans sir-2.1 and other possible Sir2 homologues (sir-2.2, sir-2.3 and sir-2.4) was unaltered in the absence of a functional CTBP-1 in our study (Fig. S5 and data not shown). The reason for this lack of regulation remains unclear, and could be because there is no close C. elegans homologues of HIC-1, which was shown to be required for the transcription regulation of SIRT1 by CtBP (28). Together with the epistatic analysis, our results suggest that CTBP-1 does not regulate life span through up-regulation of SIR-2.1.
To gain insights into the physiological processes regulated by CTBP-1 that may be potentially relevant to life span regulation in worms, we carried out a genome-wide expression microarray to identify downstream targets of CTBP-1, using young adult worms. Among ≈22,000 genes represented on the microarray, transcription of a total of 243 genes was changed by 2-fold or greater (P < 0.05) comparing ctbp-1(ok498) to N2 (Table S2). Approximately 90% (213) of these putative CTBP-1 target genes were up-regulated in ctbp-1(ok498) (Table S2), consistent with the idea that CTBP-1 functions primarily as a transcriptional corepressor. To confirm the microarray results, we compared the expression of these putative CTBP-1 target genes between N2 and the ctbp-1(ok498) by RT-PCR. We selected 20 genes that covered both up- and down-regulated ones (≈2- to 4.5-fold changes by microarray analysis), 19 displayed expression profiles consistent with the microarray data, which suggests that the microarray data are ≈95% reliable (Fig. 3 and data not shown).
Fig. 3.
RT-PCR verification of both up-regulated and down-regulated genes from the microarray analysis. rsp-5 was used as a loading control. The complete gene list is in Table S2.
We find that the up-regulated genes include those involved in metabolism, stress response and cell signaling, among others (Table S2). We used a gene ontology (GO) annotation tool DAVID (database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery) to analyze gene families and functional groups that are enriched in the microarray list (29). Genes with GO terms of ion transport, cuticle and collagen and lipases, among others, are significantly over-represented (Table S3). To determine which of these genes (and biological pathways) were important for CTBP-1 to regulate life span, we carried out a small scale genetic suppression experiments by using RNAi to inhibit a subset of CTBP-1 target genes in ctbp-1(ok498). Previous studies showed that genes associated with metabolism and stress response affect longevity (13, 30). Thus, in the suppression experiments, we focused on a small group of CTBP-1 target genes that may play a role in these processes. lips-7 is predicted to encode a putative TAG lipase. It has the highly conserved GXSXG pentapeptide and the catalytic triad Ser:Asp:His, which are important for catalysis and are conserved among TAG lipases in different species (31, 32). The bacterial homolog of LIPS-7, LipA, has been demonstrated to have TAG lipase activity (33). Significantly, RNAi inhibition of lips-7 (Fig. S2C) resulted in a complete suppression of life span extension associated with ctbp-1(ok498) (Table 2 and Fig. S6). This suppression was not due to sickness because inhibition of lips-7 alone in N2 had no overt problems and worms had normal life span (Table 2 and Fig. S6). Knockdown of another TAG lipase K08B12.1 (Fig. S2C) that was also up-regulated in ctbp-1(ok498) (Fig. 3 and Table S2) had no significant effect on the life span of either N2 or ctbp-1(ok498) (Table 2), suggesting that the contribution of LIPS-7 to CTBP-1-mediated life span regulation is specific. Knockdown of F10D11.6 (Fig. S2C), a bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, resulted in developmental defects and very early death (Table 2), precluding evaluation of its role in CTBP-1 life span regulation. RNAi of the remaining 4 CTBP-1 targets, which represent genes in metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response and anti-bacteria response (Table 2) showed small or no suppression of the life span phenotype associated with ctbp-1(ok498). Although RNAi appeared to have significantly knocked down the expression of target genes (Fig. S2C), we could not exclude the possibility that the inhibition was still not sufficient enough to cause suppression. Alternatively, functional redundancy could also contribute to the apparent lack of suppression.
Table 2.
Suppressor screens
| Gene | Brief description | N2,mean ± SEM (N) | ctbp-1(ok498),mean ± SEM (N) | P value | No. of trials |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 15.1 ± 0.1 (870) | 18.2 ± 0.1 (832) | <0.0001* | 11 | |
| AC3.3 | Induced by blockage of the UPR in the ER | 15.2 ± 0.3 (266) | 18.0 ± 0.3 (261) | <0.0001*, 0.87† | 3 |
| C06E8.5 | Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein | 15.3 ± 0.2 (295) | 18.4 ± 0.2 (223) | <0.0001*, 0.63† | 3 |
| lips-7 | Triacylglycerol lipase | 15.5 ± 0.3 (154) | 15.0 ± 0.3 (151) | 0.28*, <0.0001† | 3 |
| F28F8.2 | Long chain fatty acid acyl-CoA ligase | 15.2 ± 0.3 (258) | 18.6 ± 0.2 (258) | <0.0001*, 0.05† | 3 |
| F47G4.3 | Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 14.0 ± 0.2 (343) | 16.1 ± 0.3 (331) | <0.0001*, 0.009† | 4 |
| K08B12.1 | Triacylglycerol lipase | 15.3 ± 0.2 (283) | 18.5 ± 0.3 (263) | <0.0001*, 0.03† | 3 |
| F10D11.6‡ | Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein | — | — | — | — |
Knock down of CTBP-1 target genes to examine their roles in life span regulation. Life span results represent pooled data from individual experiments. UPR, unfolded protein response.
*Comparing ctbp-1(ok498) with N2 treated with the same specific RNAi.
†Comparing ctbp-1(ok498) treated with the specific RNAi with that treated with control RNAi.
‡These worms were sick and died very early.
TAG lipases mediate triacylglycerol uptake, distribution and usage in mammals (34). Therefore, we investigated whether loss of CTBP-1 had any effects on the TAG level and whether lips-7 depletion reversed these effects. Consistent with the increase in the level of the putative TAG lipase lips-7, ctbp-1(ok498) worms had a 16.8% decrease in the TAG level compared with N2 (Fig. 4A). When this gene was knocked down by RNAi, the level of TAG in ctbp-1(ok498) was increased to that of N2 (Fig. 4A). We obtained similar results by Nile Red staining, which visualizes the lipid contents (Fig. 4B). These data suggest that LIPS-7 is likely a functional TAG lipase, and that TAG levels play an important role in extending the life span of ctbp-1(ok498). However, RNAi inhibition of lips-7 in N2, which led to a higher level of TAG, did not alter life span, suggesting that TAG increase alone is not sufficient to reduce life span in N2. Because TAG is the main form of fat storage, suppression of the life span phenotype seen upon inhibition of LIPS-7 suggests a potential link between fat metabolism and longevity that appears to be critical for CTBP-1-mediated life span extension.
Fig. 4.
TAG lipase is important for CTBP-1-mediated-life span regulation and its regulation by CTBP-1 depends on its NAD(H) binding motif. (A) Knock-down of lips-7 increased TAG level which was decreased in ctbp-1(ok498). The TAG levels of N2 and ctbp-1(ok498) treated with lips-7 RNAi or control RNAi were measured from 3 independent groups. *, P < 0.05, Student's paired 2 tailed t test. (B) Lipid storage was visualized with Nile Red. Shown are representative images from 8 worms examined in each group. (C) lips-7 expression was reduced in ctbp-1(ok498) rescued with wild-type ctbp-1 and ctbp-1(H467A) but not ctbp-1(G332/334V) DNA.
We next investigated whether the regulation of lips-7 expression by CTBP-1 depends on its NAD(H) binding ability. Although up-regulation of lips-7 transcription in ctbp-1(ok498) was suppressed by either CTBP-1 or CTBP-1(H467A), CTBP-1(G332/334V) failed to do so (Fig. 4C). These data demonstrate that CTBP-1 regulation of LIPS-7 depends on the NAD(H) binding motif, suggesting that CTBP-1 may regulate transcription and metabolism in response to the redox states of the organism.
We note that regulation of the TAG level through LIPS-7 is a significant contributor to life span regulation by CTBP-1 but this may not be the only factor. Our microarray analysis identified other genes downstream of CTBP-1 that may contribute to the regulation of longevity. In fact, some of the CTBP-1 target genes have already been shown to affect the aging process in other studies. For instance, we identified up-regulation of genes such as ABU (activated in blocked unfolded protein response) and PQN (prion-like Q/N proteins) involved in the ER stress response (35). The ER stress response is important to maintain protein homeostasis and has been implicated in different forms of stress response (36, 37). Interestingly, ABU and PQN proteins have been associated with resveratrol-induced life span extension (38). Thus, the increased expression of these proteins may contribute to the increased life span and stress resistance of ctbp-1(ok498). Our result that RNAi inhibition of AC3.3 (abu-1/pqn-1) did not suppress the extended life span in ctbp-1(ok498) may be due to insufficient knockdown or functional redundancy of these proteins because several other highly similar ABU/PQN proteins were also up-regulated (Table S2). In addition to the ABU/PQN proteins, the insulin-like peptide and peptidase genes are also up-regulated in ctbp-1(ok498) and could conceivably contribute to the extended life span by regulating the insulin-like signaling pathway (Table S2). The relationship of these proteins with the CTBP-1-mediated longevity, if any, is unclear and warrants further investigation.
Our suppression and metabolism analyses identified a potential link between fat metabolism and life span regulation mediated by CTBP-1. Increased fat storage has been associated with extended life span in worms (39–41); however, in other long-lived worm mutants, fat storage has been uncoupled from life span regulation (42). Furthermore, RNAi inhibition of an enzyme in the triacylglycerol synthesis pathway has been shown to extend life span in worms (43). In other organisms including mouse, the opposite correlation between fat storage and life span was also observed (44). The up-regulation of a TAG lipase and consequently down-regulation of TAG in ctbp-1(ok498) may reflect a possible change in energy utilization, which was implicated in caloric restriction animals and long-lived Snell dwarf mouse (45, 46). Thus, the increased expression of LIPS-7 in the ctbp-1 mutant may contribute to life span extension by directly impacting energy metabolism and/or by changing lipid composition, membrane fluidity and signaling pathways.
Recent studies have identified roles for CtBP in mouse development, apoptosis, and hypoxia-induced tumor migration (9–12). Our study unveils a role for CtBP in regulating longevity in coordination with the insulin/IGF-1 pathway. We have also demonstrated that the life span regulation function of CtBP is likely to depended on its NAD(H) sensing ability, implicating that CTBP-1 may regulate transcription in response to nutrient availability and stress. This raises the possibility that CtBP may play an important role in sensing metabolic alterations and directly relaying this information to transcriptional regulation. Our data also show that lipid metabolism is important in CTBP-1 regulation of life span. Consistent with our demonstration of CTBP-1's involvement in lipid regulation, recent publications have documented a role for mammalian CtBP in regulating lipid storage and adipogenesis in mammalian cells and mice (47–49) while this manuscript was under review. Accumulation of lipid has been associated with aging-related diseases such as obesity, type II diabetes, insulin resistance and cancer (50, 51). Together, these findings suggest an important association between metabolism, aging-related diseases and longevity connected by the NAD(H) dependent transcription corepressor CtBP. Thus, CtBP, together with Sir2, represent an important group of energy-sensing transcriptional regulators that provide a direct link between transcription and metabolism, which impacts life span.
Materials and Methods
Strains and Routine Worm Culture.
ctbp-1(ok498) was obtained from CGC. Routine maintenance of worms were performed as described in ref. 52.
Life Span Analysis.
Life span analyses were carried out as prescribed (53) at 23.5 °C unless otherwise indicated. For daf-2 mutant and sir-2.1 overexpression line, 20 °C was used to prevent worms going into dauer and bagging. In that case, the whole assay were performed at 20 °C. Young adult worms (day 0 for life span) were plated on experimental plates, transferred to fresh plates approximately every 2 days during the reproductive period to eliminate progenies and transferred when necessary thereafter. Animals were scored every day and considered as dead when they did not respond to repeated tapping with the pick. All statistics were done with JMP software and P values were determined using log-rank statistics. For RNAi experiments, bacteria strains expressing gene specific dsRNA were grown on plates containing IPTG. Worms were left on the same plates for no more than 10 days to ensure the efficiency of RNAi.
Lipid Analysis.
Age-matching young adult worms treated with RNAi were collected, washed multiple times with water and snap-frozen with liquid N2. The TAG levels were analyzed as described in ref. 54. Nile Red staining was performed on age-matching young adult worms as described in ref. 41.
Further details are in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank David Sinclair, Keith Blackwell, Marcia Haigis, and the Y.S. laboratory members for helpful discussion and comments on the manuscript. We thank Caenorhabditis Genetics Center for the ctbp-1(ok498) strain, Leonard Guarente (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) for providing strain information on NL3908 and NL3909, Marc Vidal (Harvard Medical School, Boston) for the RNAi clones, Piali Sengupta (Brandeis University, Waltham, MA) for the dauer-inducing pheromone, and Deyu Fang (University of Missouri, Columbia, MO) and Frederick Ausubel (Harvard Medical School, Boston) for the P. aeruginosa PA14 strain and Christian Daly and Peter Boag for technical help. This work was supported by Ruth L. Kirschstein National Service Award GM 70095 (to J.R.W.), a grant from the Paul F. Glenn Labs for the Molecular Biology of Aging Pilot Project Grant Program (to Y.S.), and National Institutes of Health Grant GM 071004 (to Y.S.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0802674106/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Chinnadurai G. CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol Cell. 2002;9:213–224. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00443-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schaeper U, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10467–10471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shi Y, et al. Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature. 2003;422:735–738. doi: 10.1038/nature01550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar V, et al. Transcription corepressor CtBP is an NAD(+)-regulated dehydrogenase. Mol Cell. 2002;10:857–869. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balasubramanian P, Zhao LJ, Chinnadurai G. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide stimulates oligomerization, interaction with adenovirus E1A and an intrinsic dehydrogenase activity of CtBP. FEBS Lett. 2003;537:157–160. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang Q, Piston DW, Goodman RH. Regulation of corepressor function by nuclear NADH. Science. 2002;295:1895–1897. doi: 10.1126/science.1069300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim JH, Cho EJ, Kim ST, Youn HD. CtBP represses p300-mediated transcriptional activation by direct association with its bromodomain. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:423–428. doi: 10.1038/nsmb924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shi Y, et al. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell. 2004;119:941–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hildebrand JD, Soriano P. Overlapping and unique roles for C-terminal binding protein 1 (CtBP1) and CtBP2 during mouse development. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5296–5307. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.15.5296-5307.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Q, et al. Redox sensor CtBP mediates hypoxia-induced tumor cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9029–9033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603269103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang Q, Yoshimatsu Y, Hildebrand J, Frisch SM, Goodman RH. Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 promotes apoptosis by downregulating the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. Cell. 2003;115:177–186. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00802-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grooteclaes M, et al. C-terminal-binding protein corepresses epithelial and proapoptotic gene expression programs. PNAS. 2003;100:4568–4573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830998100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kenyon C. The plasticity of aging: Insights from long-lived mutants. Cell. 2005;120:449–460. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hekimi S, Guarente L. Genetics and the specificity of the aging process. Science. 2003;299:1351–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.1082358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bordone L, Guarente L. Calorie restriction, SIRT1 and metabolism: Understanding longevity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:298–305. doi: 10.1038/nrm1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nicholas HR, Lowry JA, Wu T, Crossley M. The Caenorhabditis elegans protein CTBP-1 defines a new group of THAP domain-containing CtBP corepressors. J Mol Biol. 2008;375:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li W, Gao B, Lee SM, Bennett K, Fang D. RLE-1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates C. elegans aging by catalyzing DAF-16 polyubiquitination. Dev Cell. 2007;12:235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lehtinen MK, et al. A conserved MST-FOXO signaling pathway mediates oxidative-stress responses and extends life span. Cell. 2006;125:987–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Johnson TE, et al. Longevity genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans also mediate increased resistance to stress and prevent disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2002;25:197–206. doi: 10.1023/a:1015677828407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tatar M, Bartke A, Antebi A. The endocrine regulation of aging by insulin-like signals. Science. 2003;299:1346–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1081447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ogg S, et al. The Fork head transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans. Nature. 1997;389:994–999. doi: 10.1038/40194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gems D, et al. Two pleiotropic classes of daf-2 mutation affect larval arrest, adult behavior, reproduction and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1998;150:129–155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Longo VD, Kennedy BK. Sirtuins in aging and age-related disease. Cell. 2006;126:257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Y, Tissenbaum HA. Overlapping and distinct functions for a Caenorhabditis elegans SIR2 and DAF-16/FOXO. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2005.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;410:227–230. doi: 10.1038/35065638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Berdichevsky A, Viswanathan M, Horvitz HR, Guarente L. C. elegans SIR-2.1 interacts with 14–3-3 proteins to activate DAF-16 and extend life span. Cell. 2006;125:1165–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wales MM, et al. p53 activates expression of HIC-1, a new candidate tumour suppressor gene on 17p13.3. Nat Med. 1995;1:570–577. doi: 10.1038/nm0695-570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Q, et al. Metabolic regulation of SIRT1 transcription via a HIC1:CtBP corepressor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:829–833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610590104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Dennis G, Jr, et al. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Murphy CT, et al. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003;424:277–283. doi: 10.1038/nature01789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jaeger KE, Dijkstra BW, Reetz MT. Bacterial biocatalysts: Molecular biology, three-dimensional structures, and biotechnological applications of lipases. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:315–351. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mead JR, Irvine SA, Ramji DP. Lipoprotein lipase: Structure, function, regulation, and role in disease. J Mol Med. 2002;80:753–769. doi: 10.1007/s00109-002-0384-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lesuisse E, Schanck K, Colson C. Purification and preliminary characterization of the extracellular lipase of Bacillus subtilis 168, an extremely basic pH-tolerant enzyme. Eur J Biochem. 1993;216:155–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wong H, Schotz MC. The lipase gene family. J Lipid Res. 2002;43:993–999. doi: 10.1194/jlr.r200007-jlr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Urano F, et al. A survival pathway for Caenorhabditis elegans with a blocked unfolded protein response. J Cell Biol. 2002;158:639–646. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200203086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park BJ, et al. Calreticulin, a calcium-binding molecular chaperone, is required for stress response and fertility in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:2835–2845. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.9.2835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kaufman RJ. Stress signaling from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum: Coordination of gene transcriptional and translational controls. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1211–1233. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.10.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Viswanathan M, Kim SK, Berdichevsky A, Guarente L. A role for SIR-2.1 regulation of ER stress response genes in determining C. elegans life span. Dev Cell. 2005;9:605–615. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kimura KD, Tissenbaum HA, Liu Y, Ruvkun G. daf-2, an insulin receptor-like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1997;277:942–946. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993;366:461–464. doi: 10.1038/366461a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ashrafi K, et al. Genome-wide RNAi analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans fat regulatory genes. Nature. 2003;421:268–272. doi: 10.1038/nature01279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mukhopadhyay A, Deplancke B, Walhout AJ, Tissenbaum HA. C. elegans tubby regulates life span and fat storage by two independent mechanisms. Cell Metab. 2005;2:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee SS, et al. A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nat Genet. 2003;33:40–48. doi: 10.1038/ng1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bluher M, Kahn BB, Kahn CR. Extended longevity in mice lacking the insulin receptor in adipose tissue. Science. 2003;299:572–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1078223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee CK, Allison DB, Brand J, Weindruch R, Prolla TA. Transcriptional profiles associated with aging and middle age-onset caloric restriction in mouse hearts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:14988–14993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232308999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boylston WH, et al. Altered cholesterologenic and lipogenic transcriptional profile in livers of aging Snell dwarf (Pit1dw/dwJ) mice. Aging Cell. 2004;3:283–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bartz R, et al. Evidence that mono-ADP-ribosylation of CtBP1/BARS regulates lipid storage. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:3015–3025. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kajimura S, et al. Regulation of the brown and white fat gene programs through a PRDM16/CtBP transcriptional complex. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1397–1409. doi: 10.1101/gad.1666108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sue N, et al. Targeted disruption of the basic Kruppel-like factor gene (Klf3) reveals a role in adipogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3967–3978. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01942-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gabriely I, Barzilai N. The role of fat cell derived peptides in age-related metabolic alterations. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122:1565–1576. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00287-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wolk A, et al. A prospective study of obesity and cancer risk (Sweden) Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:13–21. doi: 10.1023/a:1008995217664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hsin H, Kenyon C. Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans. Nature. 1999;399:362–366. doi: 10.1038/20694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hanover JA, et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans model of insulin resistance: Altered macronutrient storage and dauer formation in an OGT-1 knockout. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:11266–11271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408771102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




