Abstract
Crohn's disease arises from a defective interaction between the highly concentrated mass of bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract and the underlying tissues. It has generally been believed to result from an excessively exuberant inflammatory response or from ‘autoimmunity’. Recent evidence has emerged that the problem is instead a failure of the way in which the body responds to the penetration of bacteria and other bowel contents through the intestinal mucosal barrier. Rather than Crohn's disease being caused by excessive inflammation, the primary mechanism is actually that of an immunodeficiency. Failure of inflammatory mediator production leads to insufficient recruitment of neutrophils, resulting in inadequate removal of bacteria and other debris. This impairment of acute inflammation can be compensated in some circumstances by signalling through NOD2. If not cleared, the foreign material in the bowel wall is taken up within macrophages, eliciting a granulomatous reaction and the local and systemic sequelae so characteristic of Crohn's disease.
Keywords: Crohn's, cytokine, neutrophil, macrophage, bowel
Introduction
Crohn's disease is a condition that manifests with ulceration and chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, accompanied by other systemic abnormalities [1]. In established lesions, there is an infiltration of inflammatory cells focally in the bowel, leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and propagation of the immune response [2]. This resembles the pathology of a number of other conditions, notably certain infections and autoimmune diseases, and for years these processes were believed to cause Crohn's disease. When it was not possible to consistently culture any specific normal bacteria that fulfilled Koch's postulates from these patients, more elaborate techniques were used to demonstrate the presence of cell wall-deficient atypical Mycobacteria paratuberculosis [3], L-form organisms [4], Listeria monocytogenes [5] and measles virus [6]. Although an effort was made to demonstrate their pathogenic relevance, the balance of evidence argues against them playing an important aetiological role [7]. Similarly, although findings of autoreactive T cells [8] and antibodies [9] are documented, these have not been mechanistically linked to disease causation and it is very difficult to determine whether they have arisen as primary or secondary phenomena. The situation is further compounded by the absence of an animal model that accurately reproduces all the features related to Crohn's disease [10].
The relationship between bowel contents and Crohn's lesions
What do we know for certain about Crohn's disease? Pathologically, the intestinal lesions are characterized by a transmural inflammatory infiltrate that is frequently accompanied by granuloma formation. To generate these lesions, there is an absolute requirement for the bowel luminal contents. This has been elegantly demonstrated in a series of studies in Crohn's patients in whom the fecal stream was surgically diverted away from distal bowel into an ileostomy [11]. This induced resolution of lesions in the defunctioned bowel, which recurred only when bowel continuity was restored [12] or effluent from the ileostomy was experimentally reintroduced [13]. It is also well recognized that surgical resection of Crohn's bowel is not curative, and that new lesions have a tendency to arise at the site of re-anastomosis [14]. Similarly, alterations to the bowel flora and antigenic determinants, induced by either antibiotics [15] or use of an elemental diet [16,17], can effect disease remission. Given the failure to find a definite pathological alteration in the bowel contents, it is likely to be the interaction between its constituents and the mucosal immune system that is abnormal.
NOD2 plays a supporting role
With the advent of genetic linkage analyses, a number of susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease have been identified [18]. The most well-defined was the CARD15 gene [19-21], which encodes the NOD2 protein, although other potentially strong candidates include CARD4 [22], TLR4 [23], OCTN1 and OCTN2 [24], IL23R [25] and ATG16L1 [26]. CARD15 polymorphisms are documented largely in Caucasian populations and are not found in Oriental populations [27,28]; they are principally associated with small bowel disease [29]. The presence of a single polymorphism is associated with an up to four-fold increase in the relative risk of developing Crohn's disease, whereas carriage of two variant alleles (homozygosity or compound heterozygosity) raises the odds ratio to 40 [19]. The NOD2 protein is predominantly expressed within mononuclear phagocytes [30], but has also been reported in intestinal epithelial cells [31], Paneth cells [32] and neutrophils [31]. It is a 115 kDa protein consisting of three domains [30]. All the polymorphisms associated with Crohn's disease occur in the region of its leucine-rich repeats (LRRs).
A naturally occurring molecule and derivative of bacterial cell walls, muramyl dipeptide (MDP), has been documented as an agonist of the NOD2 system [33,34]. It was thought that MDP binds directly to the NOD2 LRR, although this seems unlikely as MDP is a tiny molecule of only 493 Da, whereas a similar LRR in ribonuclease inhibitor binds to a ligand of 13 kDa [35]. MDP can nonetheless activate the pathway, since when added to macrophages in culture it induces nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB and changes in gene expression [33]. These effects were abolished in the presence of the polymorphisms associated with Crohn's disease.
Although the discovery of NOD2 attracted a lot of attention, it was not clear how the wild-type protein and the polymorphisms might be functioning. On the one hand, initial experiments suggested that stimulation of cells containing wild-type NOD2 with MDP led to induction of pro-inflammatory interleukin-1β (IL-1β) expression [33]. This was attenuated in the presence of the polymorphisms. On the other hand, since Crohn's disease was thought to arise from an excessive inflammatory response, it was proposed that the normal function of NOD2 might be to damp inflammation down. Evidence in favour of this position included the observations that prolonged stimulation of macrophages with MDP led to secretion of anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 [36], that MDP down-regulated Toll-like Receptor-2 (TLR2) pathway signalling [37], and that different mutations in NOD2 give rise to the Blau syndrome, consisting of inflammatory arthritis, uveitis and skin lesions [38]. However, it should be noted that many pro-inflammatory stimuli will initiate negative feedback mechanisms after extended activation to limit their duration [39] and that the interaction with the TLR2 system has not been universally replicated [40,41]. Alternatively, NOD2 has been demonstrated within enterocytes and Paneth cells [32], in which the polymorphisms are associated with diminished production of anti-bacterial α-defensins [42]. This might be predicted to lead to bacterial overgrowth and subsequent infection and chronic inflammation; however, no such phenotype has been observed in mice lacking these molecules [43]. Finally, a toxic gain of function was implied by transgenic mice engineered to carry a nonsense mutation thought to be homologous to one of the human polymorphisms [44]. These mice demonstrated enhanced NF-κB activation and IL-1β processing, consistent with a pro-inflammatory phenotype, but contrasting with in vitro and animal data examining the naturalistic genetic variants. The explanation for this discrepancy has not been forthcoming, but it might relate to the background strain of mouse, or to the fact that that the effects of the engineered mutations on protein structure do not correspond to those of the human polymorphism as closely as predicted.
It is very important to realize that, despite the flurry of activity that followed the first clear description of a concrete genetic risk factor for this disease, the genes so far identified only play a very minor role in the pathogenesis of the disease. For example, the CARD15 gene has the strongest association with Crohn's. Polymorphisms occur predominantly in patients with small bowel disease, and then are restricted to certain racial groups. Second, they are of low penetrance. Although their carriage greatly enhances the relative risk of developing Crohn's disease, the absolute increase is far less dramatic. Based on the known epidemiology of this disease, we can calculate that for every affected patient carrying a single polymorphism there must be approximately 500 individuals with the same polymorphism that do not develop the disease. Even with patients possessing two polymorphisms there should be about 25 people with the same genotype who are entirely healthy. Finally, cells from mice in which the homologous gene has been knocked out demonstrate identical signalling abnormalities to those in cells from human patients with CARD15 mutations, but do not spontaneously develop intestinal pathology [40,45,46]. Therefore, some other factors must be in play.
Defective acute inflammation in Crohn's disease
Granulomatous inflammation is the hallmark of failure of the cellular inflammatory response to remove foreign material [47]. This may result because it is indigestible (as illustrated by berylliosis or silicosis) because an infective agent evades immune eradication (as seen in tuberculosis), or in cases in which the digestive function of neutrophils is defective. The latter include congenital genetic disorders, such as chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) [48] and glycogen storage disease-Ib (GSD-Ib) [49], in which molecular lesions impair the ability of neutrophils, not only to kill bacteria but also to digest phagocytosed contents. In all the above examples, the exogenous agents are subsequently enveloped and contained within macrophages, which progress to form giant cells and granulomata.
These observations generated the suggestion that the chronic granulomatous inflammation that characterizes Crohn's disease, which as described above depends upon the presence of fecal contents, could result from the failure of clearance of this material after it gains access to the bowel wall. This led to an assessment of the adequacy of the processes normally associated with clearance of such material, namely the acute inflammatory response and recruitment of neutrophils; the latter engulf, digest and expel such material from the body. Subsequent investigation of neutrophils at newly traumatized sites in the skin did reveal a major defect of their accumulation [50], which was due not to an inherent defect in neutrophil motility but to a general failure of the acute inflammatory response [51]. Although this finding was replicated [52], it was later dismissed, based largely on the identification of a serum factor that inhibited neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro [53]. This inhibitory factor effect was, however, found in serum from patients with both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and correlated with disease activity. In contrast, the impaired neutrophil migration into skin windows in vivo was exclusively seen in Crohn's patients, including those in complete remission.
This issue was recently readdressed by Marks et al [54]. In view of the absence of an accurate animal model of Crohn's disease, all these experiments were performed on human subjects. The majority of patients were in complete remission and were not receiving medication.
Profound and consistent abnormalities of acute inflammation were found in all patients with Crohn's disease. These consisted of a failure of neutrophil accumulation and interleukin-8 (IL-8) production at sites of trauma in the bowel, and in the skin. These findings were not present in healthy subjects or patients with other chronic inflammatory conditions, including ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis. This diminished recruitment of neutrophils into traumatized skin was not due to inherent abnormalities in their motility, as it could be reversed by the application of exogenous IL-8 or MDP directly onto the skin window. As expected, MDP was ineffective in the presence of Crohn's-associated mutations in CARD15. The basic problem with neutrophil accumulation in Crohn's was shown to be due to the reduced secretion of IL-8 by macrophages, an effect that was replicated in vitro by placing monocyte-derived macrophages into culture and exposing them to acute wound fluid.
To test the hypothesis that there was a major defect in the handling of bowel flora in Crohn's disease in the body, heat-killed Escherichia coli were injected directly into the subcutaneous tissue of the forearm. Once again, Crohn's patients showed a consistent failure of the resulting acute inflammation. Whereas blood flow increased approximately nine-fold by 24 h in healthy controls, the increase was only four-fold in Crohn's patients with small bowel disease and two-fold in those with large bowel disease. Importantly, there was no overlap in the magnitude of the responses between any of the 13 healthy controls and 12 Crohn's patients studied.
Despite the apparently muted response to the bacteria in the Crohn's tissues, other immunological events were occurring. The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and of acute phase proteins in the blood of these patients rose much higher than in healthy subjects. This suggests that the bacteria were taken up instead by macrophages, which produce IL-6 [55], a cytokine that induces acute phase protein production by the liver. These cytokine and acute phase protein changes consequent upon bacterial injection accurately mirror those observed in Crohn's patients in relapse, providing additional support for the concept that this condition results from failed clearance of bacteria and other foreign material from the tissues.
The cause of impaired acute inflammation in Crohn's disease
The acute inflammatory response resulting in the generation of IL-8 and the accumulation of neutrophils is likely to be regulated by a large number of genes. The fact that the strongest genetic linkage in Crohn's disease was to the CARD15 gene, for which penetrance is so low, indicates that the much stronger phenotype observed by Marks et al. [54] must be controlled by the compound effect of a large number of different genes. These are likely to each possess low penetrance or great variability amongst the general population.
The suggestion is that the impaired inflammation is simply a consequence of the Normal distribution of any biological phenotype that shows a bell-shaped Gaussian distribution. Any individual falling into the extreme lower tail of the response will be strongly predisposed to the development of Crohn's disease (Figure 1). This is exemplified by the syndromes of CGD [56] and GSD-1b [49], in which there is a failure of neutrophil killing and also digestion, where the incidence of non-infectious granulomatous inflammation of the bowel is in the region of 30%.
Figure 1.

It is proposed that the extent of the acute inflammatory response follows a Normal Gaussian distribution in the population and that those individuals at the extreme lower end of the response are susceptible to Crohn's disease. Inflammation can be enhanced, and the curve shifted to the right, taking those liable to Crohn's disease into a resistant phenotype, by secondary compensatory systems that react to stimulation by agonists from the gut content. These include MDP, signalling through NOD2
The action of NOD2 can be integrated into this mechanism by suggesting that it, and other molecules, can react to bacteria or their products by amplifying the inflammatory response. This could therefore shift the inflammatory response to the ‘right’ and out of the at-risk population into the normal range (Figure 1). Thus, the development of Crohn's lesions would require a ‘two-hit’ pathogenesis, the first being an inherently impaired acute inflammatory response and the second a defect in one or other compensatory pathways (Figure 2). NOD2 provides one example of an agonist of such a pathway. Crohn's lesions associated with mutations in CARD15 principally affect the small bowel, where the contents are fluid and small diffusible bacterial products, such as MDP, are present at high concentrations [57]. In the large bowel other agonists, including bacteria themselves, possibly acting through Toll-like-receptors (TLRs), might be important activating mechanisms.
Figure 2.

Schematic representation of mechanisms outlined in the legend to Figure 1
Relationship between impaired inflammation and other associations with Crohn's disease
The immunodeficiency hypothesis of Crohn's disease is consistent with many of the established epidemiological risk factors. It fits in well with the ‘hygiene hypothesis’, under which the increased incidence of the disease in the developed world has been attributed to enhanced sanitation [58]. In situations in which individuals have chronic intestinal inflammation due to repeated gastrointestinal infections and infestations, including therapeutic infestations with helminths [59], the mucosal immune system would be primed and capable of mounting a much more effective acute inflammatory response to a secondary insult.
Smoking also clearly predisposes to the development of Crohn's lesions [60]. This is both directly immunosuppressive, reducing concentrations of IL-8 within the intestinal mucosa [61], and vasoconstrictive, diminishing mucosal blood flow [62]. Both IL-8 and blood flow are closely correlated to rates of neutrophil emigration into the tissues [63]. Finally, the failure of clearance under the mechanism proposed is consistent with a number of otherwise unexplained observations from Crohn's tissues. These include the unusually low levels of IL-8 production in healing bowel following intestinal resection that preceded anastomotic recurrence [64], and the demonstration of bacterial DNA within Crohn's granulomata [65].
Implications for other granulomatous diseases
The proposed model of the development of disease through defective removal of exogenous material might well also apply to other granulomatous disorders of unknown aetiology. These could include sarcoidosis [66], where the predilection to respiratory involvement might indicate impaired clearance of a foreign (possibly inhaled) antigen, as well as granulomatous hepatitis, giant cell arteritis and Wegener's granulomatosis.
Therapeutic implications
Current effective treatments of Crohn's disease, and many potential future therapies, revolve around the use of drugs or biological agents that suppress the immune system [67]. Under the immunodeficiency hypothesis, these damp down the symptoms and signs of the chronic immune response to foreign material retained in the bowel in the secondary phase of the disease, whilst possibly exacerbating the underlying abnormality. This view is indirectly supported by the poor efficacy of corticosteroids in maintaining disease remission [68] and by the surprising potency of elemental diets [17]. There are some positive data from the use of granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an immunostimulant [69], although this was trialled in active disease rather than for maintenance of remission, where the greatest benefits might be expected. The apparent efficacy of helminth infestation might also relate to the ability of these worms to provoke an immune response, in conjunction with their effects on T lymphocyte phenotype [59].
Alternative approaches might be to redress the failure of chemotactic cytokine production locally in the gastrointestinal tract [54]. This could be achieved by topical application of IL-8 or other agonists that stimulate its endogenous production, either directly or by use of bacteria genetically modified to secrete the appropriate mediator [70]. Such agents would be expected to penetrate the mucosa maximally at sites of developing or established ulceration, thereby limiting systemic absorption and resultant side-effects. The vasculature provides another potential target. Although the failure of blood vessel responses identified experimentally [54] may represent a marker of the underlying pathogenic process, as opposed to a primary abnormality, it could theoretically compound the problem, as leukocyte delivery depends on blood flow to the region [63]. The normal response to bacteria had a nitric oxide-mediated component, which acts through cyclic GMP (cGMP). In Crohn's patients, blood flow was transiently normalized by treatment with oral sildenafil citrate, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that augments cGMP concentrations [54]. Drugs of this class might therefore also prove useful in healing or preventing lesions.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Wellcome Trust and Mr Milton Levine for their support. We thank Professor D Rampton for his helpful comments on this manuscript.
Footnotes
No conflicts of interest were declared.
Teaching materials
Power Point slides of the figures from this Review may be found at the web address http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0022-3417/suppmat/path.2291.html
References
- 1.Shanahan F. Crohn's disease. Lancet. 2002;359(9300):62–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07284-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(6):417–429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chiodini RJ, Van Kruiningen HJ, Thayer WR, Coutu JA. Sphero-plastic phase of mycobacteria isolated from patients with Crohn's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24(3):357–363. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.357-363.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Belsheim MR, Darwish RZ, Watson WC, Schieven B. Bacterial L-form isolation from inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology. 1983;85(2):364–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Y, Van Kruiningen HJ, West AB, Cartun RW, Cortot A, Colombel JF. Immunocytochemical evidence of Listeria, Escherichia coli, and Streptococcus antigens in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(5):1396–1404. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90687-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wakefield AJ, Pittilo RM, Sim R, Cosby SL, Stephenson JR, Dhillon AP, et al. Evidence of persistent measles virus infection in Crohn's disease. J Med Virol. 1993;39(4):345–353. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890390415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marks DJ, Mitchison NA, Segal AW, Sieper J. Can unresolved infection precipitate autoimmune disease? Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;305:105–125. doi: 10.1007/3-540-29714-6_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roche JK, Fiocchi C, Youngman K. Sensitization to epithelial antigens in chronic mucosal inflammatory disease. Characterization of human intestinal mucosa-derived mononuclear cells reactive with purified epithelial cell-associated components in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1985;75(2):522–530. doi: 10.1172/JCI111728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bossuyt X. Serologic markers in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Chem. 2006;52(2):171–181. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.058560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Strober W, Fuss IJ, Blumberg RS. The immunology of mucosal models of inflammation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:495–549. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Winslet MC, Allan A, Poxon V, Youngs D, Keighley MR. Fecal diversion for Crohn's colitis: a model to study the role of the fecal stream in the inflammatory process. Gut. 1994;35(2):236–242. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.2.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rutgeerts P, Goboes K, Peeters M, Hiele M, Penninckx F, Aerts R, et al. Effect of fecal stream diversion on recurrence of Crohn's disease in the neoterminal ileum. Lancet. 1991;338(8770):771–774. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90663-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.D'Haens GR, Geboes K, Peeters M, Baert F, Penninckx F, Rutgeerts P. Early lesions of recurrent Crohn's disease caused by infusion of intestinal contents in excluded ileum. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(2):262–267. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70476-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Olaison G, Smedh K, Sjodahl R. Natural course of Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection: endoscopically visualized ileal ulcers preceding symptoms. Gut. 1992;33(3):331–335. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sartor RB. Therapeutic manipulation of the enteric microflora in inflammatory bowel diseases: antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(6):1620–1633. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.O'Morain C, Segal AW, Levi AJ. Elemental diet as primary treatment of acute Crohn's disease: a controlled trial. Br Med J. 1984;288(6434):1859–1862. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6434.1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Saverymuttu S, Hodgson HJ, Chadwick VS. Controlled trial comparing prednisolone with an elemental diet plus non-absorbable antibiotics in active Crohn's disease. Gut. 1985;26(10):994–998. doi: 10.1136/gut.26.10.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gaya DR, Russell RK, Nimmo ER, Satsangi J. New genes in inflammatory bowel disease: lessons for complex diseases? Lancet. 2006;367(9518):1271–1284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68345-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cezard JP, Belaiche J, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411(6837):599–603. doi: 10.1038/35079107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ogura Y, Bonen DK, Inohara N, Nicolae DL, Chen FF, Ramos R, et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411(6837):603–606. doi: 10.1038/35079114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hampe J, Cuthbert A, Croucher PJ, Mirza MM, Mascheretti S, Fisher S, et al. Association between insertion mutation in NOD2 gene and Crohn's disease in German and British populations. Lancet. 2001;357(9272):1925–1928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McGovern DP, Hysi P, Ahmad T, van Heel DA, Moffatt MF, Carey A, et al. Association between a complex insertion/deletion polymorphism in NOD1 (CARD4) and susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(10):1245–1250. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brand S, Staudinger T, Schnitzler F, Pfennig S, Hofbauer K, Dambacher J, et al. The role of Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms and CARD15/NOD2 mutations in the susceptibility and phenotype of Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11(7):645–652. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000168372.94907.d2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peltekova VD, Wintle RF, Rubin LA, Amos CI, Huang Q, Gu X, et al. Functional variants of OCTN cation transporter genes are associated with Crohn disease. Nat Genet. 2004;36(5):471–475. doi: 10.1038/ng1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, Daly MJ, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene. Science. 2006;314(5804):1461–1463. doi: 10.1126/science.1135245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hampe J, Franke A, Rosenstiel P, Till A, Teuber M, Huse K, et al. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet. 2007;39:207–211. doi: 10.1038/ng1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leong RW, Armuzzi A, Ahmad T, Wong ML, Tse P, Jewell DP, et al. NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms and Crohn's disease in the Chinese population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(12):1465–1470. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yamazaki K, Takazoe M, Tanaka T, Kazumori T, Nakamura Y. Absence of mutation in the NOD2/CARD15 gene among 483 Japanese patients with Crohn's disease. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(9):469–472. doi: 10.1007/s100380200067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cuthbert AP, Fisher SA, Mirza MM, King K, Hampe J, Croucher PJ, et al. The contribution of NOD2 gene mutations to the risk and site of disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(4):867–874. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.32415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ogura Y, Inohara N, Benito A, Chen FF, Yamaoka S, Nunez G. Nod2, a Nod1/Apaf-1 family member that is restricted to monocytes and activates NF-κB. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(7):4812–4818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008072200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gutierrez O, Pipaon C, Inohara N, Fontalba A, Ogura Y, Prosper F, et al. Induction of Nod2 in myelomonocytic and intestinal epithelial cells via nuclear factor-κB activation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):41701–41705. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206473200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lala S, Ogura Y, Osborne C, Hor SY, Bromfield A, Davies S, et al. Crohn's disease and the NOD2 gene: a role for Paneth cells. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00661-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Inohara N, Ogura Y, Fontalba A, Gutierrez O, Pons F, Crespo J, et al. Host recognition of bacterial muramyl dipeptide mediated through NOD2. Implications for Crohn's disease. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(8):5509–5512. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200673200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Girardin SE, Boneca IG, Viala J, Chamaillard M, Labigne A, Thomas G, et al. Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(11):8869–8872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200651200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. Mechanism of ribonuclease inhibition by ribonuclease inhibitor protein based on the crystal structure of its complex with ribonuclease A. J. Mol Biol. 1996;264:1028–1043. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Netea MG, Kullberg BJ, de Jong DJ, Franke B, Sprong T, Naber TH, et al. NOD2 mediates anti-inflammatory signals induced by TLR2 ligands: implications for Crohn's disease. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(7):2052–2059. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Watanabe T, Kitani A, Murray PJ, Strober W. NOD2 is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 2-mediated T helper type 1 responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(8):800–808. doi: 10.1038/ni1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miceli-Richard C, Lesage S, Rybojad M, Prieur AM, Manouvrier-Hanu S, Hafner R, et al. CARD15 mutations in Blau syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001;29(1):19–20. doi: 10.1038/ng720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shnyra A, Brewington R, Alipio A, Amura C, Morrison DC. Reprogramming of lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages is controlled by a counterbalanced production of IL-10 and IL-12. J Immunol. 1998;160(8):3729–3736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kobayashi KS, Chamaillard M, Ogura Y, Henegariu O, Inohara N, Nunez G, et al. Nod2-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Science. 2005;307(5710):731–734. doi: 10.1126/science.1104911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Watanabe T, Kitani A, Murray PJ, Wakatsuki Y, Fuss IJ, Strober W. Nucleotide binding oligomerization domain 2 deficiency leads to dysregulated TLR2 signalling and induction of antigen-specific colitis. Immunity. 2006;25(3):473–485. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wehkamp J, Harder J, Weichenthal M, Schwab M, Schaffeler E, Schlee M, et al. NOD2 (CARD15) mutations in Crohn's disease are associated with diminished mucosal α-defensin expression. Gut. 2004;53(11):1658–1664. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.032805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wilson CL, Ouellette AJ, Satchell DP, Ayabe T, Lopez-Boado YS, Stratman JL, et al. Regulation of intestinal α-defensin activation by the metalloproteinase matrilysin in innate host defense. Science. 1999;286(5437):113–117. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maeda S, Hsu LC, Liu H, Bankston LA, Iimura M, Kagnoff MF, et al. Nod2 mutation in Crohn's disease potentiates NF-κB activity and IL-1β processing. Science. 2005;307(5710):734–738. doi: 10.1126/science.1103685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ogura Y, Saab L, Chen FF, Benito A, Inohara N, Nunez G. Genetic variation and activity of mouse Nod2, a susceptibility gene for Crohn's disease. Genomics. 2003;81(4):369–377. doi: 10.1016/s0888-7543(03)00027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pauleau AL, Murray PJ. Role of nod2 in the response of macrophages to Toll-like receptor agonists. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(21):7531–7539. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.21.7531-7539.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.James DG. A clinicopathological classification of granulomatous disorders. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(898):457–465. doi: 10.1136/pmj.76.898.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thrasher AJ, Keep NH, Wientjes F, Segal AW. Chronic granulomatous disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1227(1–2):1–24. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(94)90100-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dieckgraefe BK, Korzenik JR, Husain A, Dieruf L. Association of glycogen storage disease 1b and Crohn disease: results of a North American survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161(suppl 1):S88–92. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1011-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Segal AW, Loewi G. Neutrophil dysfunction in Crohn's disease. Lancet. 1976;2(7979):219–221. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morain CO, Segal AA, Walker D, Levi AJ. Abnormalities of neutrophil function do not cause the migration defect in Crohn's disease. Gut. 1981;22(10):817–822. doi: 10.1136/gut.22.10.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wandall JH, Binder V. Leukocyte function in Crohn's disease. Studies on mobilization using a quantitative skin window technique and on the function of circulating polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro. Gut. 1982;23(3):173–180. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.3.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rhodes JM, Potter BJ, Brown DJ, Jewell DP. Serum inhibitors of leukocyte chemotaxis in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1982;82(6):1327–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Marks DJ, Harbord MW, MacAllister R, Rahman FZ, Young J, Al-Lazikani B, et al. Defective acute inflammation in Crohn's disease: a clinical investigation. Lancet. 2006;367(9511):668–678. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68265-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kishimoto T. Interleukin-6: from basic science to medicine — 40 years in immunology. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Winkelstein JA, Marino MC, Johnston RB, Jr, Boyle J, Curnutte J, Gallin JI, et al. Chronic granulomatous disease. Report on a national registry of 368 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79(3):155–169. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200005000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vavricka SR, Musch MW, Chang JE, Nakagawa Y, Phanvijhitsiri K, Waypa TS, et al. hPepT1 transports muramyl dipeptide, activating NF-κB and stimulating IL-8 secretion in human colonic Caco2/bbe cells. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5):1401–1409. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hugot JP, Alberti C, Berrebi D, Bingen E, Cezard JP. Crohn's disease: the cold chain hypothesis. Lancet. 2003;362(9400):2012–2015. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Summers RW, Elliott DE, Urban JF, Jr, Thompson R, Weinstock JV. Trichuris suis therapy in Crohn's disease. Gut. 2005;54(1):87–90. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.041749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sutherland LR, Ramcharan S, Bryant H, Fick G. Effect of cigarette smoking on recurrence of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(5, pt 1):1123–1128. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90324-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sher ME, Bank S, Greenberg R, Sardinha TC, Weissman S, Bailey B, et al. The influence of cigarette smoking on cytokine levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5(2):73–78. doi: 10.1097/00054725-199905000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Emmanuel AV, Kamm MA. Laser Doppler measurement of rectal mucosal blood flow. Gut. 1999;45(1):64–69. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Issekutz AC. Vascular responses during acute neutrophilic inflammation. Their relationship to in vivo neutrophil emigration. Lab Invest. 1981;45(5):435–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Brandt E, Colombel JF, Ectors N, Gambiez L, Emilie D, Geboes K, et al. Enhanced production of IL-8 in chronic but not in early ileal lesions of Crohn's disease (CD) Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;122(2):180–185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01364.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ryan P, Kelly RG, Lee G, Collins JK, O'Sullivan GC, O'Connell J, et al. Bacterial DNA within granulomas of patients with Crohn's disease — detection by laser capture microdissection and PCR. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(8):1539–1543. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40103.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Baughman RP, Lower EE, du Bois RM. Sarcoidosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9363):1111–1118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12888-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Korzenik JR, Podolsky DK. Evolving knowledge and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(3):197–209. doi: 10.1038/nrd1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rutgeerts PJ. Review article: the limitations of corticosteroid therapy in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15(10):1515–1525. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Korzenik JR, Dieckgraefe BK, Valentine JF, Hausman DF, Gilbert MJ. Sargramostim for active Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(21):2193–2201. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Steidler L, Neirynck S, Huyghebaert N, Snoeck V, Vermeire A, Goddeeris B, et al. Biological containment of genetically modified Lactococcus lactis for intestinal delivery of human interleukin 10. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(7):785–789. doi: 10.1038/nbt840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
