Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2008 Oct;3(10):844–845. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.10.5990

Combined effect of boron and salinity on water transport

The role of aquaporins

Maria del Carmen Martínez-Ballesta 1, Elizabeth Bastías 2, Micaela Carvajal 1,
PMCID: PMC2637514  PMID: 19704850

Abstract

Boron toxicity is an important disorder that can limit plant growth on soils of arid and semi arid environments throughout the world. Although there are several reports about the combined effect of salinity and boron toxicity on plant growth and yield, there is no consensus about the experimental results. A general antagonistic relationship between boron excess and salinity has been observed, however the mechanisms for this interaction is not clear and several options can be discussed. In addition, there is no information, concerning the interaction between boron toxicity and salinity with respect to water transport and aquaporins function in the plants. We recently documented in the highly boron- and salt-tolerant the ecotype of Zea mays L. amylacea from Lluta valley in Northern Chile that under salt stress, the activity of specific membrane components can be influenced directly by boron, regulating the water uptake and water transport through the functions of certain aquaporin isoforms.

Key words: aquaporins, boron, salinity, water relations, Zea mays


High concentrations of boron are often associated to saline soils in semi arid and/or arid climates and frequently crops are exposed to both stresses simultaneously.1 As there is no a unique plant response to combination of salinity and boron toxicity, several mechanisms has been proposed to explain the experimental results. Some reports showed no additive effects of boron and salinity on shoot weight of different cultivars suggesting independent of the interaction.25 However, additive effects69 have been also proposed and the interaction of boron and salinity declined the rate of germination and limited growth in maize and sorghum plants.10 No explanation is currently available for these contradictory observations. Recently, the Abbot method has been applied to characterize the combined effect of boron and salinity at toxic levels in pepper plants, observing mainly an antagonistic relationship regarding growth and yield.11 Antagonism between salinity and boron may be the result of decreased toxicity of boron in the presence of NaCl, reduced toxicity of NaCl in the presence of boron, or both together. Letey et al.,12 have reported that increased soil salinity may also reduce boron movement to the broccoli plants and hence result in a reduction of boron toxicity symptoms. Reduction of boron accumulation in leaves in the presence of salinity has been also reported for melon,5 tomato8 jack pine13 and grapesvines14 and could be the result of the reduced rates of transpiration in plants where boron is transported via xylem as consequence of the osmotic effect of the salt. On the other hand, it has been observed that concentration of Na+ in leaves decreased with increasing addition of boron to the soil, probably due to the inhibition in root growth and reduction in root density caused by the boron treatment.15 Grieve and Poss7 found in wheat plants that the Cl content in the leaves was reduced when boron was increased. Similar results were reported in pepper plants suggesting that boron could reduce Cl toxicity.11 Also, in our recent report although a nutrient imbalance resulted from the effect of salinity or boron alone, a general optimisation was observed when both treatments were applied together.16

Under saline conditions, an optimal water balance is important in order to maintain the plant homeostasis and aquaporins may be one of the mechanisms involved under environmental and developmental changes.1719 However, there is no information concerning plant water uptake and transport in response to combined excess boron and salinity.

It has been reported that, at high external B concentrations, considerable B transport occurs through the plasma membrane aquaporins, and a specific membrane intrinsic protein (MIP) has been described.20 Thus boron uptake across the plasma membrane, by permeation through the lipid membrane and aquaporins, may be greatly influenced by the plant tolerance to salinity, through the associated changes in root hydraulic conductivity. Wimmer et al.,21 showed that salinity could interact with boron toxicity by a combined effect on boron and water uptake. In addition, we reported that the reduction of aquaporin functionality in NaCl-exposed plants could induce the reduction of plant boron concentration, producing a beneficial effect.22

Recently, we showed in a tolerant ecotype of maize a different pattern for PIP1 and PIP2 protein content under the application of excess of boron in combination with salinity, suggesting a differential aquaporin response in this cultivar and pointed out the complexity of the interaction.16 These results were in consonance with the previous observation that different aquaporin isoforms may represent a response to environmental changes.18,19,23 Thus, we concluded that the activity of specific membrane components can be influenced by boron under salt stress regulating the functions of certain aquaporin isoforms as possible components of the salinity tolerance mechanism. However, although a fine water transport control through the aquaporins could be necessary in order to reduce the accumulation of toxic boron levels in the tissues, the contribution of each isoform to water transport through the plasma membrane under boron-salinity combination must be elucidated.

Acknowledgements

Funding provided by UTA-MECESUP2 DE N.2252.

Addendum to: Martinez-Ballesta Mdel C, Bastías E, Zhu C, Schäffner AR, González-Moro B, González-Murua C, Carvajal M. Boric acid and salinity effects on maize roots. Response of aquaporins ZmPIP1 and ZmPIP2, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase, in relation to water and nutrient uptake. Physiol Plant. 2008;132:479–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01045.x.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/5990

References

  • 1.Gupta UC, Jame YW, Campbell CA, Leyshon AJ, Nicholaichuk W. Boron toxicity and deficiency: a review. Can J Soil Sci. 1985;65:381–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bingham FT, Strong JE, Rhoades JD, Keren R. Effects of salinity and varying boron concentrations on boron uptake and growth of wheat. Plant Soil. 1987;97:345–351. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grattan SR, Shannon MC, Grieve CM, Poss JA, Suares D, Leland F. Interaction effects of salinity and boron on the performance and water use Eucalyptus. Acta Hort. 1997;449:607–613. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mikkelsen RL, Haghnia GH, Page AL, Bingham FT. The influence of selenium, salinity, and boron on alfalfa tissue composition and yield. J Environ Qual. 1998;17:85–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Edelstein M, Ben Hur M, Cohen R, Burger Y, Ravina I. Boron and salinity effects in grafed and non-grafted melon plants. Plant Soil. 2005;269:273–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shani U, Hanks RJ. Model of integrated effects of boron, inert salt, and water flow on crop yield. Agronomy J. 1993;85:713–717. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grieve CM, Poss JA. Wheat response to interactive effects of boron and salinity. J Plant Nutr. 2000;23:1217–1226. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alpaslan M, Gunes A. Interactive effects of boron and salinity stress on the growth, membrane permeability and mineral composition of tomato and cucumber plants. Plant Soil. 2001;236:123–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ben Gal A, Shani U. Yield, transpiration and growth of tomatoes under combined excess boron and salinity stress. Plant Soil. 2002;247:211–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ismail AM. Response of maize and sorghum to excess boron and salinity. Biol Plant. 2003;47:313–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yermiyahu U, Ben Gal A, Keren R, Reid RJ. Combined effect of salinity and excess boron on plant growth and yield. Plant Soil. 2008;304:73–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Letey J, Grattan S, Oster JD, Birkle JE. Findings and recommendations to develop the six year activity plan for the department's drainage reduction and reuse program. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Water Resources; 2001. Final Rep. Task Order No 5, Contract No 98-7200-B80933. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Apostol K, Zwiazek JJ, MacKinnon MD. NaCl and Na2SO4 alter responses of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seedlings to boron. Plant Soil. 2002;240:321–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yermiyahu U, Sarig P, Ben Gal A. Boron toxicity in conjunction with salinity and rootstock in grapevine. J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2007;82:547–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Holloway RE, Alston M. The effects of salt and boron on growth of wheat. Aust J Agric Res. 1992;43:987–1001. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baiges I, Schäffner AR, Affenzeller MJ, Mas A. Plant aquaporins. Physiol Plant. 2002;115:175–182. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tyerman Sd, Niemietz CM, Brameley H. Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:173–194. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luu DT, Maurel C. Aquaporins in a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant Cell Environm. 2005;28:85–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dordas C, Brown PH. Evidence for channel mediated transport of boric acid in squash (Cucurbita pepo) Plant Soil. 2001;235:95–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wimmer MA, Muhling KH, Lauchli A, Brown PH, Goldbach HE. The interaction between salinity and B toxicity affects the subcellular distribution of ions and proteins in wheat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1267–1274. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bastías E, Fernández García N, Carvajal M. Aquaporin functionality in rotos of Zea mays in relation to the interactive effects of boron and salinity. Plant Biol. 2004;5:415–421. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schäffner AR. Aquaporin function, structure, and expression: are there more surprises to surface in water relations? Planta. 1998;204:131–139. doi: 10.1007/s004250050239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES