Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
. 1992 May;84(5):403–407.

Ethnic differences in patient requests for pregnancy testing.

D Bluestein 1, J S Levin 1
PMCID: PMC2637705  PMID: 1495112

Abstract

This study identifies a black-white difference in pregnancy test requests and in factors predicting such requests among 324 women tested at an academic family practice in 1986. Data were obtained from encounter sheets filled out by clinicians at the time tests were ordered. Analysis of variance revealed that blacks requested fewer pregnancy tests than whites, and that this finding remained significant (P less than .01) after controlling for the effects of gestational status and other clinical and sociodemographic factors. Blacks were less likely to be married or possess health insurance, but more likely to have been pregnant before. Logistic regressions indicated that factors predicting test requests differed by ethnicity, with symptoms and age predicting test requests among whites, and pregnancy the only significant predictor among blacks. Explanations consistent with these findings include possible ethnic differences in reactions to symptoms and economic factors. Further refinement of these hypotheses and consideration of other alternatives will advance understanding of ethnicity as a factor in test-requesting behavior, and enable clinicians to communicate with and care for black women more effectively.

Full text

PDF
403

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R. M., Mullner R. M., Cornelius L. J. Black-white differences in health status: methods or substance? Milbank Q. 1987;65 (Suppl 1):72–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baquet C., Ringen K. Health policy: gaps in access, delivery, and utilization of the Pap smear in the United States. Milbank Q. 1987;65 (Suppl 2):322–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bluestein D., Levin J. S. Symptom reporting in wanted and unwanted pregnancies. Fam Med. 1991 May-Jun;23(4):271–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bluestein D. Should I trust office pregnancy tests? Postgrad Med. 1990 May 1;87(6):57-8, 61, 64, passim. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1990.11716330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bluestein D. The unanticipated pregnancy: a preliminary study. Fam Pract Res J. 1990 Spring-Summer;9(2):105–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown S. S. Drawing women into prenatal care. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Mar-Apr;21(2):73–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burr W. A., Schulz K. F. Delayed abortion in an area of easy accessibility. JAMA. 1980 Jul 4;244(1):44–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Infant mortality by marital status of mother--United States, 1983. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990 Aug 3;39(30):521–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis K., Lillie-Blanton M., Lyons B., Mullan F., Powe N., Rowland D. Health care for black Americans: the public sector role. Milbank Q. 1987;65 (Suppl 1):213–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joyce T. J., Grossman M. Pregnancy wantedness and the early initiation of prenatal care. Demography. 1990 Feb;27(1):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ku L. Factors influencing early prenatal enrollment in the WIC program. Public Health Rep. 1989 May-Jun;104(3):301–306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Petitti D., Coleman C., Binsacca D., Allen B. Early prenatal care in urban black and white women. Birth. 1990 Mar;17(1):1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1990.tb00001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Robinson E. T., Barber J. H. Early diagnosis of pregnancy in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jun;27(179):335–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlesinger M. Paying the price: medical care, minorities, and the newly competitive health care system. Milbank Q. 1987;65 (Suppl 2):270–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wenneker M. B., Epstein A. M. Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts. JAMA. 1989 Jan 13;261(2):253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES