Table 1.
Negative controls | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Source | No. of chips | No. of chips flagged |
||
PMVO-raw | PVMO-PC | MDQC-PC | ||
Affy. MAQC | 120 | (34,34,23) | (0,0,0) | (9,3,1) |
Illu. MAQC | 19 | (0,0,0) | (0,0,0) | (3,1,0) |
Digitally contaminated arrays | ||||
Source | No. of chips | Contaminated | Chips flagged |
|
PMVO-PC | MDQC | |||
Affy. spike-in | 12 | – | none | 2,8,10 |
1 | 1 | 1,8 | ||
1,2 | 1,2,8 | 1,2 | ||
1,2,11 | 1,2,8,11 | 8,10 |
For negative controls, table cells give number of arrays flagged at α=0.10, 0.05, 0.01.
For positive controls, cell entries give indices of arrays contaminated or identified by various algorithms. Method labels are: PMVO-raw, for parametric multivariate outlier detection applied to raw QA features; PMVO-PC, for PMVO applied with dimension reduction to first three principal components; MDQC, for Mahalanobis distance-based algorithm of Cohen Freue et al. (2007) with the MCD estimator of covariance, applied to raw QC features; and MDQC-PC, for MDQC with the S-estimator of covariance applied on PC1–PC3 of QC features.