Skip to main content
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica logoLink to Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
. 2005 Jun;25(3):179–181.

Current role of chemotherapy in exclusive and integrated treatment of malignant tumours of salivary glands

Attuale ruolo della chemioterapia nei trattamenti esclusivi ed integrati dei tumori maligni delle ghiandole salivari

G Cortesina 1, M Airoldi 1, F Palonta 1
PMCID: PMC2639862  PMID: 16450774

Summary

In the management of salivary glands carcinomas, surgery is the treatment of choice. Post-operative radiotherapy is indicated in cases with high risk of loco-regional relapse. Radiotherapy is also standard treatment in cases that are inoperable at onset. Chemotherapy plays a palliative role. Today, the integration between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which provides increased local control, represents a significant step forward. This integration is important since 5-year survival in tumours with high grade histology is approximately 50%. Overall incidence of metastases is approximately 25%. Primary locations of metastases are lungs, liver, bone, central nervous system and other organs. In cases of metastatic disease, chemotherapy plays only a palliative role.

Keywords: Chemotherapy, Salivary glands, Malignant tumours, Treatment

Palliative chemotherapy

In advanced stage or metastatic carcinomas of the salivary glands, there are few reports of cases being treated with a single chemotherapeutic agent 1. Cisplatin is considered the most active drug and is the “backbone” of polychemotherapeutic regimes. In 1981-1982, an improvement in the response rate to cisplatin was reported, reaching 70%, in a series of study groups with fewer than 15 cases in each 2 3. In 1991, Licitra reported a more realistic response rate of 16% in 25 consecutive cases 4.

In metastatic and relapsed disease, cisplatin, anthracycline, paclitaxel and vinorelbine are the most effective agents. Combinations associating cisplatin + anthracycline/vinorelbine are well tolerated. Combined regimes are, however, more toxic than the individual chemotherapy agents. Mean duration of complete response is between 7 and 18 months. Despite the lack of apparent benefit in terms of survival, decreased pain and control over local disease is often considerable.

The most commonly used regime in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck, cisplatin + fluorouracil, has led to disappointing results in terms of objective response 5. Taxol is effective above all in mucoepidermoid carcinomas and in adenocarcinomas 6. Among the combinations, administration of carboplatin + taxol has, in our experience on 14 patients, resulted in 2 partial responses and 7 cases of stabilised disease 7. The association of cisplatin, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide has a significant effect with a total response rate between 27% and 50% 8. The protocol cisplatin, adriamycin or epirubicin and 5 fluorouracil has shown a total response rate between 37% and 47% 9, comparable to that of the cisplatin + bleomycin + adriamycin/VP-16 combination 10.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine have synergic activity both in vitro and in vivo. In a randomised phase II study, 36 cases were randomised to treatment with vinorelbine alone versus the cisplatin + vinorelbine combination. In the combination group, there were 3 complete responses (19%) and 4 partial responses (25%), whereas with vinorelbine alone, there were only 4 partial responses (20%). Overall, median survival was 11 months in cases submitted to polychemotherapy versus 8.5 months in those undergoing monochemotherapy 11.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve prognosis and increase the possibility of applying conservative treatment, but, in itself, does not appear to improve survival 12. The response to neoadjuvant protocols might be significant in planning subsequent concomitant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy

Triozzi et al. used a polychemotherapy protocol consisting of vincristine + cyclophosphamide + fluorouracil in 14 patients with adenocystic carcinoma, following loco-regional treatment; these authors reported an effective reduction in metastases at follow-up versus a historic control group 13. Other authors have reported that, in SCC of the head and neck, adjuvant chemotherapy remains an experimental approach, and overall survival is not improved 14.

Concomitant chemotherapy/radiotherapy

In locally advanced carcinomas of the head and neck, a recent meta-analysis showed a significant benefit with chemotherapy concomitant to radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone 12.

Two recent randomised trials evaluated the administration of cisplatin plus conventional radiotherapy versus post-operative radiotherapy in patients with high risk of relapse. The clinical evolution was found to be improved in patients in the first group 15 16. Airoldi et al. 17 tested the administration of cisplatin concomitant to conventional radiotherapy, followed by 3 adjuvant cycles with cisplatin + VP-16, in 6 patients with inoperable non-differentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland (T3-4 N0-1). Results using radiotherapy alone are not encouraging. This study reported complete remission in 50%, partial response in 33%, no response in 16%, and a median survival of 18 months 17. These results indicate that chemotherapy may be an effective means to enhance radiotherapy.

New goals

Recent studies have evaluated the expression of molecular targets in carcinoma of the salivary glands. These drugs have achieved response rates between 6% and 20% and stable disease in 25-40% of cases.

C-kit is expressed in carcinomas of the salivary glands. This is a tyrosine kinase receptor which plays an important role in the development of haematopoietic cells, melanocytes and germ cells. Mutations at exons 11 and 17 produce activation of c-kit in some tumours (e.g. in 90% of adenocystic carcinomas) 18. Inhibitors of anomalous c-kit tyrosine kinase have been identified (e.g. imatinib mesylate) and used in phase I and phase II trials in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Evaluation of the clinical impact of imatinib mexilate in adenocystic carcinomas is of great interest, especially as it might be efficacious in the biologically more aggressive forms, with grading 3. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is present in 20-85% of adenocystic carcinomas 19 20. EGF is an important mediator of cell growth, cell differentiation and survival. Among the peptide growth factors, EGF/TGF_ (tumour growth factor alpha) are the chief endogenous ligands that determine EGF-mediated stimulation of tumour growth and progression, angiogenesis, cell survival and the metastatic process. Today, monoclonal antibodies are available that target EGF, and likewise potent inhibitors of specific EGF tyrosine kinase. P53 is an oncosuppressor gene involved in the carcinogenesis of the salivary glands. Its expression is associated with adenocarcinomas, pleomorphic adenomas, duct carcinomas, tumours at an advanced stage. Clinical trials are under way to study gene therapy using adenovirus-p53; through this viral vector, it is now possible to restore the “wild type” gene 53, obtaining an objective response in carcinomas of the head and neck.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy including cisplatin can enhance radiotherapy. The goal is to integrate radiotherapy and medical therapy in the treatment of inoperable tumours and in post-operative adjuvant therapy. Palliative therapy might benefit from the new biological drugs, to be used in association one with another or with traditional chemotherapy.

On account of the rarity of this disease, it is very difficult to perform randomised studies on large series; it is, therefore, very important to monitor phase II studies with particular care in order to determine the best treatment options and consolidate results.

References

  • 1.Spiro RH, Dubner S. Salivary gland tumours. Curr Opin Oncol 1990;2:589-95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Suen JY, Johns ME. Chemotherapy for salivary gland cancer. Laryngoscope 1982;92:235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schramm VL, Srodes C, Myers EN. Cisplatin therapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:739-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Licitra L, Marchini S, Spinazzè S, Rossi A, Rocca A, Grandi C, et al. Cisplatin in advanced salivary gland carcinoma. Cancer 1991;68:1874-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hill ME, Constenla DO, A’Hern RP. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for symptom control in advanced salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oral Oncol 1997;33:275-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jennings T, Li Y, Pinto H. A phase II trial of paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic salivary gland malignancies: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:236. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Airoldi M, Fornari G, Pedani F. Paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent salivary gland malignancies. Anticancer Res 2000;20:3781-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Licitra L, Bonfante V, Spinazzè S. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for advanced salivary gland carcinomas. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1991;10:204. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Airoldi M, Bumma C, Bertetto O, Gabriele P, Succo G, Pedani F. Vinorelbine treatment of recurrent salivary gland carcinomas. Bull Cancer 1998;85:892-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Creagan ET, Woods JE, Schutt AJ. Cyclophosphamide, adriamicin, and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) in the treatment of advanced nonsquamous cell head and neck cancer. Cancer 1983;52:2007-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Airoldi M, Pedani F, Succo G. Phase II randomized trial comparing vinorelbine versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent salivary gland malignancies. Cancer 2001;91:541-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C, Designe L. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Three meta-analyses of updated individual data. Lancet 2000;355:949-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Triozzi PL, Brantley A, Fisher S, Cole TB, Crocker I, Huang AT. 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 1987;59:887-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Agarwala SS. Adjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1999;13:743-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernier J, van Glabbeke M, Domenge C, Wibault P, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, et al. Results of EORTC phase III trial 22931 comparing, postoperatively, radiotherapy to concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with high dose cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 6):S267. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Saxman SB, Kish JA, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy in high-risk SCCA of the head and neck: initial report of RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21:226. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Airoldi M, Gabriele AM, Gabriele P, Pedani F, Marchionatti S, Succo G, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in parotid gland undifferentiated carcinoma. Tumori 2001;87:14-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jeng YM, Lin CY, Hsu HC. Expression of the c-kit protein is associated with certain subtypes of salivary gland carcinoma. Cancer Letters 2000;154:107-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vered M, Braunstein E, Buchner A. Immunohistochemical study of epidermal growth factor receptor in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Head Neck 2002;24:632-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamada K, Iwai K, Okada Y, Mori M. Immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in salivary gland tumours. Virchows Arch A 1989;415:523-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES