Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1994 Sep;32(9):2305–2306. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2305-2306.1994

Confirmation of human Campylobacter concisus isolates misidentified as Campylobacter mucosalis and suggestions for improved differentiation between the two species.

S L On 1
PMCID: PMC263990  PMID: 7529255

Abstract

A strain from human diarrhea originally identified as Campylobacter mucosalis (NCTC 12408) was examined by using 64 phenotypic characters. The similarity of this strain to 297 isolates of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, Arcobacter, and related taxa was then determined with a computer-supported data analysis program, MVSP. NCTC 12408 showed closest similarity to 20 type, reference, and field isolates of Campylobacter concisus. These strains were clearly separated from those of C. mucosalis in the numerical analysis of phenotypic tests; a table was constructed from the data used to aid in differentiating these two species in the clinical laboratory. The identity of NCTC 12408 was confirmed as C. concisus by visual comparison of its sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel whole-cell protein electrophoregram with those of type strains of C. concisus and C. mucosalis. These data suggest that genuine human infection with C. mucosalis has not yet been reported.

Full text

PDF
2305

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Figura N., Guglielmetti P., Zanchi A., Partini N., Armellini D., Bayeli P. F., Bugnoli M., Verdiani S. Two cases of Campylobacter mucosalis enteritis in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):727–728. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.727-728.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jacob J., Lior H., Feuerpfeil I. Isolation of Arcobacter butzleri from a drinking water reservoir in eastern Germany. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1993 Mar;193(6):557–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lastovica A., Le Roux E., Warren R., Klump H. Clinical isolates of Campylobacter mucosalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2835–2836. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2835-2836.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. On S. L., Holmes B. Assessment of enzyme detection tests useful in identification of campylobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Mar;30(3):746–749. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.3.746-749.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. On S. L., Holmes B. Effect of inoculum size on the phenotypic characterization of Campylobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):923–926. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.923-926.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. On S. L., Holmes B. Reproducibility of tolerance tests that are useful in the identification of campylobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Sep;29(9):1785–1788. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.9.1785-1788.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vandamme P., Falsen E., Pot B., Hoste B., Kersters K., De Ley J. Identification of EF group 22 campylobacters from gastroenteritis cases as Campylobacter concisus. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1775–1781. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1775-1781.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES