Abstract
The threat of bioterrorism, long ignored and denied, has heightened over the past few years. Recent events in Iraq, Japan, and Russia cast an ominous shadow. Two candidate agents are of special concern--smallpox and anthrax. The magnitude of the problems and the gravity of the scenarios associated with release of these organisms have been vividly portrayed by two epidemics of smallpox in Europe during the 1970s and by an accidental release of aerosolized anthrax from a Russian bioweapons facility in 1979. Efforts in the United States to deal with possible incidents involving bioweapons in the civilian sector have only recently begun and have made only limited progress. Only with substantial additional resources at the federal, state, and local levels can a credible and meaningful response be mounted. For longer-term solutions, the medical community must educate both the public and policy makers about bioterrorism and build a global consensus condemning its use.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (218.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Danzig R., Berkowsky P. B. Why should we be concerned about biological warfare? JAMA. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):431–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meselson M., Guillemin J., Hugh-Jones M., Langmuir A., Popova I., Shelokov A., Yampolskaya O. The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. Science. 1994 Nov 18;266(5188):1202–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.7973702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker J. B. National health and medical services response to incidents of chemical and biological terrorism. JAMA. 1997 Aug 6;278(5):362–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wehrle P. F., Posch J., Richter K. H., Henderson D. A. An airborne outbreak of smallpox in a German hospital and its significance with respect to other recent outbreaks in Europe. Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(5):669–679. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
