Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
. 2000 Jun;92(6):295–300.

Rupture of a cesarean-scarred uterus: a community hospital experience.

P A Poma 1
PMCID: PMC2640529  PMID: 10918765

Abstract

Concerns that a scarred uterus may rupture during labor have contributed to increased cesarean rates. A previous cesarean has become one of the most common indications for abdominal birth. More women must deliver vaginally after cesarean if we are to reduce cesarean rates. This study evaluates the effect of decreasing cesarean rates and increased vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates on the incidence of uterine rupture in a community hospital. We studied data for women who delivered at our obstetrical unit from 1988 through 1997. During 1994 our department adopted strategies to reduce cesarean rates. Data from women who delivered from 1988 through 1993 (period A, before the policy change) were compared with data for those who delivered from 1994 through 1997 (period B, after the policy change) and evaluated by chi-square analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant. The total cesarean rate decreased from 24.3% (period A) to 17.9% (period B) (p < 0.0001), whereas the primary cesarean rate decreased from 14.9% to 10.3% (p < 0.0001), and the repeat rate decreased from 9.4% to 7.6% (p < 0.0001). The VBAC rate increased from 13.0 to 28.6 (p < 0.0001), whereas the incidence of uterine rupture did not change. During the study period, the cesarean rate decreased while the VBAC rate safely increased. The incidence of uterine rupture remained unchanged.

Full text

PDF
295

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chazotte C., Cohen W. R. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):738–742. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91059-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cowan R. K., Kinch R. A., Ellis B., Anderson R. Trial of labor following cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;83(6):933–936. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eden R. D., Parker R. T., Gall S. A. Rupture of the pregnant uterus: a 53-year review. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;68(5):671–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farmer R. M., Kirschbaum T., Potter D., Strong T. H., Medearis A. L. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):996–1001. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90457-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hemminki E., Meriläinen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1569–1574. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein M., Rosen A., Beck A. Diagnostic potential of cardiotocography (CTG) for silent uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(7):653–656. doi: 10.3109/00016348909013288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leung A. S., Farmer R. M., Leung E. K., Medearis A. L., Paul R. H. Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1358–1363. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90765-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leung A. S., Leung E. K., Paul R. H. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):945–950. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90032-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lynch J. C., Pardy J. P. Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence. A five-year survey. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996 Dec;24(6):699–704. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9602400612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller D. A., Diaz F. G., Paul R. H. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller D. A., Goodwin T. M., Gherman R. B., Paul R. H. Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May;89(5 Pt 1):671–673. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morrison J. J., Rennie J. M., Milton P. J. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Feb;102(2):101–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Phelan J. P., Clark S. L., Diaz F., Paul R. H. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Dec;157(6):1510–1515. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80252-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phelan J. P., Korst L. M., Settles D. K. Uterine activity patterns in uterine rupture: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;92(3):394–397. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00232-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Poma P. A. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):1013–1018. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodriguez M. H., Masaki D. I., Phelan J. P., Diaz F. G. Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pressure catheters useful in the diagnosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Sep;161(3):666–669. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90375-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES