Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1994 Dec;32(12):2889–2892. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.2889-2892.1994

Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.

D P Dooley, M L Beckius, B S Jeffrey
PMCID: PMC264196  PMID: 7883873

Abstract

The Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card (YBC) is widely used as a rapid identification (RI) (within 48 h) system for clinical yeast isolates. We compared the RI results obtained by the YBC technique with matched results obtained with the API 20C system. The RI of germ tube-negative yeasts isolated from 222 clinical specimens was performed with the YBC system, and the results were compared with those of standard identifications obtained by using the API 20C system and morphology, with additional biochemical reactions performed as required. Commonly isolated yeasts (Candida albicans [n = 29], Candida tropicalis [n = 40], Torulopsis [Candida] glabrata [n = 28], Candida parapsilosis [n = 12], and Cryptococcus neoformans [n = 14]) were generally well identified (115 of 123 [93%] identified correctly, with only C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans mis- or unidentified more than once). The RI of less commonly isolated yeasts included in the YBC database, however, was less successful (54 of 99 [55%] correct). The YBC card failed to identify 42% (10 of 24) of Candida krusei isolates, 80% (4 of 5) of Candida lambica isolates, 88% (7 of 8) of Trichosporon beigelii isolates, and 83% (10 of 12) of Cryptococcus isolates (non-C. neoformans species). For most identification failures (79%; 42 of 53) there was no identification by the end of 48 h; the other identification failures (21%; 11 of 53) gave definite but incorrect identifications. Of eight rare clinical yeast isolates not included in the Vitek database, six were correctly, not identified, while two (25%) were falsely assigned a definite RI (one Hansenula fabianii isolate was identified as Rhodotorula glutinis, and one Hansenula isolate [non-Hansenula anomala] was identified as Hansenula anomala). While the Vitek YBC rapidly and adequately identifies common yeast isolates, it fails in the RI of more unusual organisms.

Full text

PDF
2889

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Gavan T. L., Badal R. E., Telenson M. J. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582–588. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blinkhorn R. J., Adelstein D., Spagnuolo P. J. Emergence of a new opportunistic pathogen, Candida lusitaniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Feb;27(2):236–240. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.236-240.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowman P. I., Ahearn D. G. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):49–53. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.49-53.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards J. E., Jr Invasive candida infections--evolution of a fungal pathogen. N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 11;324(15):1060–1062. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104113241511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fenn J. P., Segal H., Barland B., Denton D., Whisenant J., Chun H., Christofferson K., Hamilton L., Carroll K. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184–1187. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldman M., Pottage J. C., Jr, Weaver D. C. Candida krusei fungemia. Report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1993 May;72(3):143–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoy J., Hsu K. C., Rolston K., Hopfer R. L., Luna M., Bodey G. P. Trichosporon beigelii infection: a review. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8(6):959–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Land G. A., Harrison B. A., Hulme K. L., Cooper B. H., Byrd J. C. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Sep;10(3):357–364. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.3.357-364.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Land G., Stotler R., Land K., Staneck J. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):649–652. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.649-652.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meunier F., Aoun M., Bitar N. Candidemia in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;14 (Suppl 1):S120–S125. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_1.s120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfaller M. A., Preston T., Bale M., Koontz F. P., Body B. A. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Oct;26(10):2054–2058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.2054-2058.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfaller M., Wenzel R. Impact of the changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the 1990s. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Apr;11(4):287–291. doi: 10.1007/BF01962067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Salkin I. F., Land G. A., Hurd N. J., Goldson P. R., McGinnis M. R. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Apr;25(4):624–627. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.4.624-627.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Walsh T. J., Newman K. R., Moody M., Wharton R. C., Wade J. C. Trichosporonosis in patients with neoplastic disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 1986 Jul;65(4):268–279. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198607000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wingard J. R., Merz W. G., Rinaldi M. G., Johnson T. R., Karp J. E., Saral R. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 31;325(18):1274–1277. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110313251803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. el-Zaatari M., Pasarell L., McGinnis M. R., Buckner J., Land G. A., Salkin I. F. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1938–1941. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1938-1941.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES