Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2007;14(2):284–292. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31802cc7ab

Searching for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Postmenopausal Women: Evidence for a Dose-Effects Association with Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease

Andrew J Krentz 1, Denise von Mühlen 1, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor 1
PMCID: PMC2642654  NIHMSID: NIHMS22993  PMID: 17245231

Abstract

Objective

To test the hypothesis that polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older postmenopausal women.

Design

Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling non-estrogen-using postmenopausal Caucasian women (n=713) mean (± SD) age 73.8 ± 7.9 years, mean body mass index 24.0 ± 3.5 kg/m2 participating in the Rancho Bernardo Study. A putative PCOS phenotype was defined as the presence of ≥3 features: (1) recalled history of irregular menses, (2) symptomatic premenopausal hyperandrogenism or biochemical evidence of current biochemical hyperandrogenism, (3) history of infertility or miscarriage, (4) central obesity, or (5) biochemical insulin resistance. Atherosclerotic CVD was determined from clinical history, electrocardiography, and structured interviews using validated techniques. The analysis was stratified by diabetes status, ascertained from medical history or 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests.

Results

The PCOS phenotype was present in 9.3% of the entire cohort and 5.8% of non-diabetic women. The prevalence of CVD was similar between women with the phenotype compared to non-affected women (27.3%, vs. 24.4%). Among women with intact ovaries and no diabetes there was a stepwise graded association between an increasing number of features of the PCOS phenotype (i.e., 0 – ≥3) and prevalent CVD (p=0.02) and coronary heart disease alone (p=0.03).

Conclusions

– Among non-diabetic postmenopausal women with intact ovaries, prevalent atherosclerotic CVD is associated with features of a putative PCOS phenotype. This finding supports the thesis that PCOS increases the risk of atherosclerotic CVD years after menopause.

Keywords: Polycystic ovary syndrome, menopause, cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is held to be the most prevalent endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age1 2 3 4. The syndrome commonly presents in adolescence or early adulthood as hyperandrogenism often in concert with chronic anovulation and infertility5 6 7. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women with PCOS may be enhanced through associations with insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and other components of the metabolic syndrome8 9 10 11. Clinical practice guidelines stress the importance of identifying modifiable CVD risk factors in younger women with PCOS8 9. However, few data are available concerning the health implications of PCOS for older women12.

Among premenopausal women with PCOS, high prevalence rates of dyslipidemia, central obesity, and diabetes13, 14 15 and evidence of accelerated subclinical atheroma13 16 provide a priori evidence for an increased risk of atherosclerosis17 18. To date, however, no clear evidence of an excess of CVD or death has emerged from epidemiologic studies16 19 20. The reasons for this discrepancy have been extensively debated. Some studies included women who had undergone ovarian surgical intervention that might have obscured any association. No studies to date have tested the hypothesis that CVD may become apparent only after the menopause when atherosclerosis is most prevalent16 21.

In this study we identified individuals with a putative PCOS phenotype from among a cohort of community-dwelling postmenopausal women. Women taking hormone replacement therapy were excluded. A review of the literature prompted us to stratify our analysis to exclude the potential confounding factors of diabetes and prior oophorectomy.

Methods

Study cohort

Between 1984 and 1987 82% of the surviving participants in the Rancho Bernardo Study, a middle-class Caucasian cohort resident in southern California, participated in a clinical study focusing on diabetes. From this cohort, we identified 713 women aged >50 years who were not taking hormone replacement therapy. All the women were at least one year beyond their last menstrual period and all had plasma estradiol concentrations <100 pmol/L. Height, weight, waist girth, and hip girth were measured in participants wearing lightweight clothing without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Diabetes was diagnosed based on medical history or hyperglycemia, according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria (i.e., fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 and/or 2-h glucose ≥11.1 mmol/l after a 75-g oral glucose challenge22). A history of unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy was sought from all women. Medical records were obtained in 228 of 614 women who reported a history of hysterectomy: 96.5% of the women reporting bilateral oophorectomy and 67.5% of women reporting ovarian conservation had confirmatory medical records23.

Laboratory methods

Fasting venous blood samples were obtained and plasma frozen at −70° C. Sex steroid hormones were measured on first-thawed samples between 1992 and 1993 in the Department of Reproductive Medicine Research Laboratory, University of California San Diego, using radioimmunoassay after solvent extraction and celite column chromatography. Steroids are stabile for at least 10 years in frozen plasma24. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was determined by the method of Rosner25, and bioavailable testosterone and estradiol (the non-SHBG-bound fractions) were measured by a method modified from Tremblay and Dube26. The sensitivity and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation have been reported elsewhere27. Plasma glucose was measured using a glucose oxidase assay. Fasting plasma insulin was determined in a substudy of 390 women using a double-antibody radioimmunoassay28. Insulin resistance was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)--fasting glucose (mmol/l) × fasting insulin (mU/l)/22.529 30. Cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic methods with an ABA-200 biochromatic analyzer (Abbott). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was measured by precipitation according to the Lipid Research Clinics protocol31; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated using the formula of Friedewald and colleagues32. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured by immunoassay (Calbiochem) with a coefficient of variation of 7.7% 33.

Ascertainment of prevalent CVD and CHD

The presence of CHD was defined by any of the following: Rose Questionnaire severe angina score34, history of heart disease diagnosed by a physician (validated for 85% of the 30% subset whose hospital records were requested), history of coronary revascularization, or major electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities. A 12-lead resting ECG was performed and coded at the University of Minnesota35. Myocardial infarction was defined by the presence of major ECG Q-wave abnormalities (Minnesota codes 1.1 and 1.2), a history of physician-diagnosed heart attack, or severe chest pain lasting for >30 minutes. Cerebrovascular disease was defined as a history of stroke, transient cerebral ischemic attack, or carotid-intracerebral arterial surgery. Lower extremity arterial disease was identified by claudication using the Rose questionnaire 34. CVD was defined as the sum of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and lower extremity arterial disease.

Definition of the PCOS phenotype

Clinical and biochemical criteria were selected to identify women with features of PCOS in accordance with the literature8, 9, 36. Because these features cluster together in variable associations in individuals, we defined our phenotype as the presence of ≥3 of the following: (1) a history of irregular menses, defined as being ‘too irregular to recall’ between the ages of 20 and 40 years; (2) hirsutism, defined as excessive facial hair on the chin and/or upper lip or androgenic pattern hair loss (i.e., receding hair line or loss of hair over vertex) before the age of 50 years as reported in a structured self-administered questionnaire, or current biochemical evidence of relative hyperandrogenism (i.e., values in the highest quintile for total testosterone or bioavailable testosterone, or the lowest quintile for SHBG; (3) a history of personal infertility (i.e., unable to conceive for reasons not attributable to partner or inability to carry pregnancies to term37); (4) central obesity defined as a waist circumference >88 cm38; or (5) insulin resistance, defined either as a HOMA-IR value in the top quintile for the cohort29, or, in women (n=216) for whom insulin levels were not available, a fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥6.1 was used as a proxy marker of insulin resistance as suggested by the 2001 report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)38.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows® version 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Immunoreactive insulin, HOMA-IR, and sex steroid hormones did not follow a normal distribution. However, because results did not differ between analyses based on untransformed and log-transformed variables, untransformed data are presented. For quintile analysis, the highest or lowest quintile, depending on the variable, was compared with the remaining four quintiles. Unadjusted associations between potential predictors and cardiovascular disease were evaluated using Student’s t test and χ2 tests, as appropriate. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine differences between the means of more than two groups, followed by post hoc tests where appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the effect of covariates on the association between PCOS and prevalent CVD. Since some of the variables that defined the PCOS phenotype are closely associated with diabetes--itself a powerful risk factor for CVD--the analysis was stratified by diabetes status. Data were analyzed before and after exclusion of women with a history of unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy. All P values are two-tailed. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Ethics approval

Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the institutional review board of University of California, San Diego.

Results

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the cohort

The mean (± SD) age of the 713 women was 74 ± 8 years (range: 51–89); mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.0 ± 3.5 kg/m2. Diabetes mellitus was present in 107 women (15% of total). Among the women with diabetes, 29 were already known to have the disorder and the remainder were new cases identified by glucose tolerance tests. Of the women with known diabetes, 16 were being treated with antidiabetic agents at the time of the study. Among the 601 non-diabetic women, 310 (43.5%) had normal glucose tolerance; the remaining women had either impaired glucose tolerance (n=195; 27.3%), or impaired fasting plasma glucose as defined by ADA criteria22; glucose tolerance status was unclassifiable in 5 women (0.7%). A history of single (n=47) or bilateral (n=120) oophorectomy was reported by a total of 167 (23.4%) women. Total testosterone concentration was significantly lower in women with a history of either single or bilateral (p<0.05 for each) oophorectomy compared with intact women (0.35 ± 0.24 vs. 0.54 + 0.47 vs. 0.65 ± 0.46 nmol/l, respectively; F=24.9, p<0.01 between the groups).

Association of PCOS phenotype with cardiovascular risk factors

The prevalence of the putative PCOS phenotype (i.e., ≥3 criteria as defined above) among the entire cohort was 9.3%; among non-diabetic women, the prevalence of the phenotype was lower at 5.8%. Clinical and biochemical data for the PCOS vs. non-affected women are presented in Table 1. As expected from the selection criteria, statistically significant differences were observed between those with versus those without PCOS for waist circumference, bioavailable testosterone, SHBG, and HOMA-R. Plasma total and bioavailable estradiol concentrations were significantly higher in women with the PCOS phenotype compared to unaffected women (p<0.01; Table 1). The proportion of women reporting a history of cigarette smoking or estrogen-progestogen use, current physical activity or exercise three or more times weekly, and single or bilateral oophorectomy did not differ according to the presence or absence of the PCOS phenotype (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of women with a putative PCOS phenotype and non-affected women.

PCOS No PCOS P
n 66 647 -
Age 72 ± 9 74 ± 8 0.034
Body mass index (kg/m2) 28.0 ± 4.8 23.9 ± 3.3 <0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 89.5 ± 12.2 78.5 ± 8.9 <0.001
Total cholesterol* (mmol/l) 6.3 ± 1.0 6.0 ± 1.0 0.01
LDL-cholesterol* (mmol/l) 4.0 ± 1.0 3.7 ± 1.0 0.013
HDL-cholesterol* (mmol/l) 1.5 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.5 <0.001
Triglycerides* (mmol/l) 1.9 ± 1.2 1.3 ± 0.7 <0.001
Total testosterone (nmol/L) 0.66 ± 0.52 0.58 ± 0.42 NS
Bioavailable testosterone (nmol/l) 0.21 ± 0.14 0.15 ± 0.13 <0.001
Total estrogen (pmol/l) 27.37 ± 15.96 20.39 ± 11.67 <0.001
Bioavailable estrogen (pmol/l) 17.10 ± 10.18 10.74 ± 7.43 <0.001
Sex hormone-binding globulin (nmol/l) 3.61 ± 2.17 6.32 ± 2.98 <0.001
DHEAS (μmol/l) 1.52 ± 1.02 1.52 ± 1.11 NS
Androstenedione (nmol/l) 1.21 ± 0.59 1.16 ± 0.55 NS
Plasma glucose* (mmol/l) 6.51 ± 1.51 5.36 ± 0.83 <0.01
Plasma immunoreactive insulin (pmol/l)* 129.2 ± 78.7 83.7 ± 54.2 <0.01
HOMA-IR 5.36 ± 3.88 2.83 ± 2.04 <0.01
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 142 ± 17 145 ± 22 NS
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 76 ± 9 76 ± 10 NS
Exercise (%) # 27.3 23.0 NS
History of cigarette smoking (%) 43.9 52.7 NS
Reported past use of estrogen-progesterone (%) 7.7 12.1 NS

Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

*

Fasting values

LDL, Low-density lipoprotein

HDL, High-density lipoprotein

HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment

#

Current physical activity or exercise three or more times per week

The percentage of affected and non-affected women with each of the main features of the PCOS phenotype is presented in Table 2. Among women with the PCOS phenotype, the frequency of relevant symptoms did not differ by diabetes status (Figure 1). However, high waist circumference, hyperandrogenism, and insulin resistance were more common in diabetic women with the PCOS phenotype than in non-diabetic women with the phenotype (p<0.01 for each; Figure 1).

Table 2.

Prevalence of individual and composite features of a putative PCOS phenotype among affected (i.e., those with ≥3 features) and non-affected women*. See text for details of definitions.

PCOS No PCOS P
Menstrual irregularity 13.6 3.6 <0.01
Biochemical hyperandrogenism 95.5 34.2 <0.01
Infertility or miscarriage 31.8 3.9 <0.01
Central obesity 68.2 12.8 <0.01
Biochemical insulin resistance 75.6 18.4 <0.01
*

All values are percentages.

Figure 1. Prevalence (%) of clinical and biochemical components of the putative polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype stratified by diabetes status.

Figure 1

High waist circumference, hyperandrogenism, and insulin resistance were more common in diabetic women with the PCOS phenotype than in non-diabetic women with the phenotype (p<0.01 for each).

See text for definitions of composite clinical features.

Androgens – Composite of testosterone or bioavailable testosterone in highest quintile or sex hormone-binding globulin in lowest quintile

Insulin resistance – Composite of HOMA value in highest quintile or fasting venous plasma glucose ≥6.1 mmol/l

Relationship of the PCOS phenotype to prevalent CVD

The prevalence of CVD was similar between women with PCOS status and non-affected women (27.3% vs. 24.4%). When the analysis was confined to non-diabetic women with intact ovaries, a significant age-adjusted stepwise graded association was observed between an increasing number of features of the PCOS phenotype (i.e., 0 – ≥3) and prevalent CVD (p=0.02; Table 3). This association was also evident for CHD alone (p=0.03; Table 3).

Table 3.

Binary logistic regression of cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease: association with age and number of components of the PCOS phenotype in non-diabetic non-oophorectomized women (N=601).

Exp (B) 95% confidence interval p
Cardiovascular disease
 Age 1.056 1.021–1.093 <0.01
 PCOS 1.362 1.052–1.762 0.02
Coronary heart disease
 Age 1.050 1.012–1.090 <0.01
 PCOS 1.360 1.030–1.796 0.03

PCOS = Increasing number of components of PCOS (i.e., 0 – ≥3).

Exp (B) = Estimated odds ratio

Discussion

Our objective was to identify major clinical and biochemical features of PCOS among a well-characterized cohort of non-hormone using postmenopausal women and examine the PCOS association with CVD. For non-diabetic women with intact ovaries we observed a stepwise graded association between key features of our putative PCOS phenotype and prevalent CVD. We believe that our study is the first to describe PCOS and CVD in exclusively postmenopausal women, and to provide support for the thesis that PCOS increases the risk of CVD in later life. In addition, prevalent CVD increases as a function of the number of features of the syndrome.

Several retrospective studies have suggested an increased risk of atherosclerotic CVD in women with PCOS39 40. In case-control studies the severity of surrogate markers of atherosclerosis in premenopausal women, including coronary calcification scores17 41, carotid intima media thickness, and adverse electrocardiographic features42 was increased in women with PCOS compared with controls43. However, a higher prevalence of undiagnosed glucose intolerance and/or diabetes in women with PCOS9 might partially explain these findings44. In a small single-center study of women with a mean age of ~60 years undergoing coronary angiography, hirsutism was more commonly reported by women with stenotic coronary disease39. However, assessment of coronary disease by angiography is now recognized to be a relatively poor indicator of the true extent of coronary atherosclerosis 45.

Prospective studies have produced equivocal results. In a UK study of 786 women with PCOS diagnosed on macroscopic or histological criteria, Pierpoint et al46 found no increased risk of CVD compared with national rates. Additional follow-up of this cohort in middle-age15 found no excess of CHD morbidity or mortality, but elevated rates of self-reported cerebrovascular disease and diabetes were observed. Of note, a high proportion (75%) of the women in this cohort had a history of surgical ovarian wedge resection46. We hypothesized that high rates of ovarian surgery in western countries may confound epidemiologic studies of the association between PCOS and CVD. The high rates of oophorectomy in the U.S. provide support for this contention: more than 25% of women have had a hysterectomy before age 6047; this procedure is often accompanied by elective oophorectomy.48 Even wedge resection of the ovaries can reportedly improve menstrual patterns for decades49. However, it is not known whether cardiovascular risk is modified by hysterectomy or oophorectomy50 51. Levels of endogenous androgens may be pertinent to this issue, although testosterone is generally thought to contribute little to the insulin resistance of PCOS52. It has been reported that relative hyperandrogenism may persist into the postmenopausal years among women with PCOS who have intact ovaries53. The association between endogenous androgens and cardiovascular risk remains uncertain54, and it is unclear whether reduced testosterone levels following oophorectomy alter the link between PCOS and CVD20. In a previous report from the Rancho Bernardo study, testosterone levels were about 40% lower in postmenopausal women who had a history of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy compared to intact women55. In the present study testosterone levels were significantly lower in women with unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy, with a dose-effect association.

There is a clear need for further studies. Diagnosing PCOS retrospectively in oophorectomized women is clearly fraught with theoretical and practical difficulties. Other steroid hormones may be relevant to CVD risk. Adrenal androgen production is reportedly increased in some women with PCOS56. It has been suggested that higher levels of DHEAS might protect women with PCOS against atherosclerosis57. We found no increase in DHEAS levels in women with the PCOS phenotype, as we defined it. Total and bioavailable estradiol levels were significantly higher in the women with the PCOS phenotype, a difference that possibly reflects the presence of greater adiposity or diabetes 58.

Among premenopausal women, the absence of universally agreed-on diagnostic criteria for PCOS and the paucity of long-term follow-up studies have contributed to uncertainty about the long-term risk of CVD16 59 60. Although the diagnosis of PCOS may be more reliable in premenopausal than postmenopausal women, the absolute CVD risk in this age group is intrinsically low4. The risk of CVD is higher after the menopause yet the diagnosis of PCOS in postmenopausal women presents investigators with additional challenges. Using current knowledge we aimed to identify a phenotype that incorporated the major clinico-pathologic features associated with PCOS, particularly those likely to be associated with CVD risk.

Recent studies have suggested that self-reported symptoms of oligomenorrhea and hirsutism can identify women at elevated risk of CVD61. Longitudinal cohort studies have shown that a history of irregular menses predicts the development of both CVD62 and diabetes63. A recent cross-sectional study from Finland reported that premenopausal women with oligomenorrhea and/or hirsutism were more likely to have adverse cardiovascular risk profiles than asymptomatic women.64 A recent U.S. study found that menstrual irregularity identified mothers of women with PCOS who also have features of the syndrome12. An association between irregular periods and insulin resistance has been reported65, which suggests a potential mechanism by which menstrual irregularity might affect CVD risk. Accordingly, we found an unfavorable plasma lipid profile among the women with the putative PCOS phenotype16, 19: fasting triglycerides were elevated while mean HDL-cholesterol concentrations were reduced; these changes were independent of diabetes status. Other studies have shown that reduced HDL-cholesterol levels are associated with obesity, insulin resistance,66 and low concentrations of SHBG in women with PCOS67.

It is well-recognized that central adiposity may be present even in the absence of generalized obesity in women with PCOS68 69. We used a waist girth of >88 cm as a proxy measure of abdominal obesity, as recommended in the 2001 NCEP Adult Treatment Panel38 and subsequently adopted by the 2003 Rotterdam Consensus Conference on PCOS8. Abdominal obesity is associated with activation of the innate immune system, a defect implicated in atherogenesis70 71. However, we found no increase in CRP levels in women with the PCOS phenotype compared to non-affected women (data not shown).

The prevalence of the PCOS phenotype in our study was 5.8% among non-diabetic women. This figure is very similar to prevalence rates reported in the literature1 2, 4, although women in the Rancho Bernardo Study are almost exclusively Caucasian and leaner than a representative sample of white U.S. women72. Azziz and colleagues reported a cumulative prevalence of 6.6% in a mixed-race sample of U.S. women3, while Diamanti-Kandarakis and colleagues73 and Ascunion and colleagues74 found prevalence rates of 6.8% and 6.5% among premenopausal Greek and Spanish women, respectively.

Previous studies that examined the association between PCOS and CVD have not always rigorously excluded women with undiagnosed diabetes. This is important because several components of the PCOS phenotype, i.e., menstrual irregularity63, hyperandrogenism5, 58, central obesity75, and insulin resistance9 76, are associated with diabetes. The prevalence of PCOS in our cohort increased to 9.3% when women with diabetes were included4, 5. The majority of women with diabetes in our study were identified using oral glucose tolerance tests, currently the most sensitive diagnostic method22.

We acknowledge several limitations of our study. First, ovarian imaging and a medical record of physician-confirmed PCOS were not available. However, appearances on pelvic ultrasonography do not necessarily correlate well with clinical and biochemical features, and ovarian imaging is not required to make a diagnosis of PCOS8, 77. In fact, up to 25% of apparently healthy women with regular menstrual cycles have polycystic ovary morphology9 accompanied by degrees of insulin resistance78. Second, the reported premenopausal clinical history (hirsutism, oligomenorrhea) may not have been correctly recalled by older women. While we were also unable to exclude alternative causes of oligomenorrhea or hyperandrogenism, clinical practice suggests that these are likely to have been uncommon among community-dwelling women79. Similarly, reported infertility or inability to take a pregnancy to term may have had causes other than PCOS. Third, we included clinical and subclinical CVD in our analysis when it is acknowledged that the diagnosis of CHD can be problematic in women80. To reduce the non-specificity of chest pain in women, we included only those individuals with severe angina scores on the Rose questionnaire34. We used HOMA-IR in place of the gold standard euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique81 to measure insulin resistance82. HOMA-IR appears to be a valid marker of insulin resistance and is generally regarded as a practical alternative to the clamp technique in epidemiologic studies83. However, there are some reservations about the reliability of HOMA-IR in the presence of hyperglycemia. The cross-sectional design of our study cannot exclude selective cardiovascular mortality in more severely affected women. Such a survivor effect would reduce the ability to identify an association between PCOS and CVD. Perhaps the most challenging issue is that of defining a PCOS phenotype in older women. Since no gold standard diagnostic criteria exist, of necessity we have had to base our definition on current views of the pathophysiology of PCOS. Because there is overlap between PCOS and the broader metabolic syndrome of cardiovascular risk11 9, our study should be regarded as an exploratory attempt to identify PCOS in postmenopausal women. Strengths of our study include the well–characterized cohort, exclusion of women taking hormone replacement therapy, accurate ascertainment of diabetes status, and the validated history of oophorectomy.

In summary, we found a stepwise graded association between components of a PCOS phenotype and prevalent atherosclerotic CVD in a cohort of non-estrogen using postmenopausal women. This association was evident only in non-diabetic women and was obscured by a history of oophorectomy. The latter observation suggests that oophorectomy may be a confounding factor in studies of the association between PCOS and CVD. In conclusion, we believe our findings provide support for the thesis that PCOS increases the risk of CVD in postmenopausal women.

Acknowledgments

Jaclyn Bergstrom and Rikki Bettencourt provided expert assistance with aspects of data management. Financial support: AJK is a British Heart Foundation International Research Fellow. This research was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, grant DK31801, and the National Institute on Aging, grant AG07181. Competing interests: None.

References

  • 1.Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 28;333(13):853–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509283331307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunaif A, Thomas A. Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Annu Rev Med. 2001;52:401–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun;89(6):2745–2749. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:1223–1236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guzick DS. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):181–193. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000104485.44999.C6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Talbott EO, Zborowskii JV, Boudraux MY. Do women with polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease? Review of the evidence. Minerva Ginecol. 2004 Feb;56(1):27–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kousta E, Tolis G, Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Revised diagnostic criteria and long-term health consequences. Hormones (Athens) 2005 Jul–Sep;4(3):133–147. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.11151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004 Jan;81(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Corbin RHFW, Nestler JE, Reaven GM, Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Redmond GP, Thatcher SS. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists position statement on metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome. [Accessed 11-01-2004]; doi: 10.4158/EP.11.2.125. www.aace.com/clin/guidelines. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Steinbaum SR. The metabolic syndrome: an emerging health epidemic in women. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2004 Jan–Feb;46(4):321–336. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2003.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sam S, Dunaif A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: syndrome XX? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Oct;14(8):365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sam S, Legro RS, Essah PA, Apridonidze T, Dunaif A. Evidence for metabolic and reproductive phenotypes in mothers of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):7030–7035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602025103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wild RA. Polycystic ovary syndrome: a risk for coronary artery disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;186(1):35–43. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.119180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Apridonidze T, Essah PA, Iuorno MJ, Nestler JE. Prevalence and Characteristics of the Metabolic Syndrome in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Dec 28; doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wild S, Pierpoint T, McKeigue P, Jacobs H. Cardiovascular disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome at long-term follow-up: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000 May;52(5):595–600. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Legro RS. Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiovascular disease: a premature association? Endocr Rev. 2003 Jun;24(3):302–312. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Christian RC, Dumesic DA, Behrenbeck T, Oberg AL, Sheedy PF, 2nd, Fitzpatrick LA. Prevalence and predictors of coronary artery calcification in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jun;88(6):2562–2568. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lakhani K, Hardiman P, Seifalian AM. Intima-media thickness of elastic and muscular arteries of young women with polycystic ovaries. Atherosclerosis. 2004 Aug;175(2):353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsilchorozidou T, Overton C, Conway GS. The pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2004 Jan;60(1):1–17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guzick DS. Cardiovascular risk in PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Aug;89(8):3694–3695. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences. Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1583–1587. doi: 10.1126/science.1112062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl):S5–S10. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kritz-Silverstein D, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. Hysterectomy status and life satisfaction in older women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Mar;11(2):181–190. doi: 10.1089/152460902753645326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kley HK, Schlaghecke R, Kruskemper HL. Stability of steroids in plasma over a 10-year period. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Dec;23(12):875–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosner W. A simplified method for the quantitative determination of testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin activity in human plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972 Jun;34(6):983–988. doi: 10.1210/jcem-34-6-983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tremblay RR, Dube JY. Plasma concentrations of free and non-TeBG bound testosterone in women on oral contraceptives. Contraception. 1974 Dec;10(6):599–605. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(74)90099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goodman-Gruen D, Barrett-Connor E. Sex differences in the association of endogenous sex hormone levels and glucose tolerance status in older men and women. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):912–918. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hales CN, Randle PJ. Immunoassay of insulin with insulin-antibody precipitate. Biochem J. 1963 Jul;88:137–146. doi: 10.1042/bj0880137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985 Jul;28(7):412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004 Jun;27(6):1487–1495. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lipid Research Clinics Program (US), Laboratory Methods Committee. Bethesda, Md: National Heart and Lung Institute, National Institutes of Heath. 1974 (DHEW Publication No 75–628); 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Macy EM, Hayes TE, Tracy RP. Variability in the measurement of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: implications for reference intervals and epidemiological applications. Clin Chem. 1997 Jan;43(1):52–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rose G. The diagnosis of ischemic heart pain and claudication in field survey. Bull WHO. 1962;27:645–658. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rose GABH, Gillum RF, et al. Monograph Serial No.56. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fraser IS, Kovacs G. Current recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation and follow-up of patients presenting with symptomatic polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;18(5):813–823. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van der Spuy ZM, Dyer SJ. The pathogenesis of infertility and early pregnancy loss in polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;18(5):755–771. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2486–2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wild RA, Grubb B, Hartz A, Van Nort JJ, Bachman W, Bartholomew M. Clinical signs of androgen excess as risk factors for coronary artery disease. Fertil Steril. 1990 Aug;54(2):255–259. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53699-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Birdsall MA, Farquhar CM, White HD. Association between polycystic ovaries and extent of coronary artery disease in women having cardiac catheterization. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jan 1;126(1):32–35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-1-199701010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Talbott EO, Zborowski JV, Rager JR, Boudreaux MY, Edmundowicz DA, Guzick DS. Evidence for an association between metabolic cardiovascular syndrome and coronary and aortic calcification among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Nov;89(11):5454–5461. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Orio F, Jr, Palomba S, Spinelli L, et al. The cardiovascular risk of young women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an observational, analytical, prospective case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Aug;89(8):3696–3701. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Talbott EO, Guzick DS, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Evidence for association between polycystic ovary syndrome and premature carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000 Nov;20(11):2414–2421. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.11.2414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Barrett-Connor E, Giardina EG, Gitt AK, Gudat U, Steinberg HO, Tschoepe D. Women and heart disease: the role of diabetes and hyperglycemia. Arch Intern Med. 2004 May 10;164(9):934–942. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.9.934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nissen SE. Application of intravascular ultrasound to characterize coronary artery disease and assess the progression or regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Feb 21;89(4A):24B–31B. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pierpoint T, McKeigue PM, Isaacs AJ, Wild SH, Jacobs HS. Mortality of women with polycystic ovary syndrome at long-term follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):581–586. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reich H. Issues surrounding surgical menopause. Indications and procedures. J Reprod Med. 2001 Mar;46(3 Suppl):297–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lewis CE, Groff JY, Herman CJ, McKeown RE, Wilcox LS. Overview of women’s decision making regarding elective hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and hormone replacement therapy. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(Suppl 2):S5–14. doi: 10.1089/152460900318722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lunde O, Djoseland O, Grottum P. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: a follow-up study on fertility and menstrual pattern in 149 patients 15–25 years after ovarian wedge resection. Hum Reprod. 2001 Jul;16(7):1479–1485. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dahlgren E, Janson PO, Johansson S, Lapidus L, Oden A. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992 Dec;71(8):599–604. doi: 10.3109/00016349209006227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Edozien LC. Hysterectomy for benign conditions. Bmj. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1457–1458. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arner P. Effects of testosterone on fat cell lipolysis. Species differences and possible role in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Biochimie. 2005 Jan;87(1):39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Winters SJ, Talbott E, Guzick DS, Zborowski J, McHugh KP. Serum testosterone levels decrease in middle age in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000 Apr;73(4):724–729. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00641-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu FC, von Eckardstein A. Androgens and coronary artery disease. Endocr Rev. 2003 Apr;24(2):183–217. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Laughlin GA, Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D, von Muhlen D. Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sex hormone levels in older women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Feb;85(2):645–651. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.2.6405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moran C, Azziz R. The role of the adrenal cortex in polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;28(1):63–75. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70185-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vryonidou A, Papatheodorou A, Tavridou A, et al. Association Of Hyperandrogenemic And Metabolic Phenotype With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness In Young Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Mar 1; doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S. Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1288–1299. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Azziz R. PCOS: a diagnostic challenge. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Jun;8(6):644–648. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61644-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hart R, Hickey M, Franks S. Definitions, prevalence and symptoms of polycystic ovaries and polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;18(5):671–683. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jaffe RB. Editorial comment. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:37–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Solomon CG, Hu FB, Dunaif A, et al. Menstrual cycle irregularity and risk for future cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 May;87(5):2013–2017. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.5.8471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Solomon CG, Hu FB, Dunaif A, et al. Long or highly irregular menstrual cycles as a marker for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001 Nov 21;286(19):2421–2426. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.19.2421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Taponen S, Ahonkallio S, Martikainen H, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovaries in women with self-reported symptoms of oligomenorrhoea and/or hirsutism: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study. Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1083–1088. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Goodarzi MO, Quinones MJ, Azziz R, Rotter JI, Hsueh WA, Yang H. Polycystic ovary syndrome in Mexican-Americans: prevalence and association with the severity of insulin resistance. Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):766–769. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005 Apr;365(9468):1415–1428. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66378-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chen MJ, Yang WS, Yang JH, Hsiao CK, Yang YS, Ho HN. Low sex hormone-binding globulin is associated with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and metabolic syndrome in women with PCOS. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jun 6; doi: 10.1093/humrep/del175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lord J, Wilkin T. Polycystic ovary syndrome and fat distribution: the central issue? Hum Fertil (Camb) 2002 May;5(2):67–71. doi: 10.1080/1464727022000198952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Salehi M, Bravo-Vera R, Sheikh A, Gouller A, Poretsky L. Pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome: what is the role of obesity? Metabolism. 2004 Mar;53(3):358–376. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Grundy SM. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun;89(6):2595–2600. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Taponen S, Martikainen H, Jarvelin MR, et al. Metabolic cardiovascular disease risk factors in women with self-reported symptoms of oligomenorrhea and/or hirsutism: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 May;89(5):2114–2118. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Barrett-Connor E. Factors associated with the distribution of fasting plasma glucose in an adult community. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):518–523. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kouli CR, Bergiele AT, et al. A survey of the polycystic ovary syndrome in the Greek island of Lesbos: hormonal and metabolic profile. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Nov;84(11):4006–4011. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.11.6148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Escobar-Morreale HF. A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jul;85(7):2434–2438. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gambineri A, Pelusi C, Vicennati V, Pagotto U, Pasquali R. Obesity and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Jul;26(7):883–896. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gambineri A, Pelusi C, Manicardi E, et al. Glucose intolerance in a large cohort of mediterranean women with polycystic ovary syndrome: phenotype and associated factors. Diabetes. 2004 Sep;53(9):2353–2358. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.9.2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Consensus s. Fertil Ster. Vol. 81. Rotterdam: 2003. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS consensus workshop. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome; pp. 19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Adams JM, Taylor AE, Crowley WF, Jr, Hall JE. Polycystic ovarian morphology with regular ovulatory cycles: insights into the pathophysiology of polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Sep;89(9):4343–4350. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kaltsas GA, Isidori AM, Besser GM, Grossman AB. Secondary forms of polycystic ovary syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jul;15(5):204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jacobs AK, Eckel RH. Evaluating and managing cardiovascular disease in women: understanding a woman’s heart. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):383–384. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155289.62829.0F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dunaif A, Segal KR, Futterweit W, Dobrjansky A. Profound peripheral insulin resistance, independent of obesity, in polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes. 1989 Sep;38(9):1165–1174. doi: 10.2337/diab.38.9.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Matsuda MDR. In vivo measurement of insulin sensitivity in humans. In: Draznin BRR, editor. Clinical research in diabetes and obesity. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1997. pp. 23–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jan;23(1):57–63. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES