Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2008 May 1;128(10):2541–2544. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.112

Regulated Osteopontin Expression by Dendritic Cells Decisively Affects their Migratory Capacity

Guido Schulz 1,3, Andreas C Renkl 1,3, Anne Seier 1, L Liaw 2, Johannes M Weiss 1
PMCID: PMC2643044  NIHMSID: NIHMS83148  PMID: 18449212

TO THE EDITOR

Osteopontin is a secreted arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD)-containing phosphoglycoprotein that interacts with different cell-surface receptors, including αvβ3, αvβ5, α4β1, α9β1, and certain CD44 isoforms (Denhardt et al., 2001; Sodek et al., 2006; Scatena et al., 2007). Osteopontin (OPN) has been implicated to have important cytokine and chemokine functions in Th1/Tc1-mediated immunity against viral and bacterial pathogens and in type-1-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune encephalitis, and granuloma formation (Ashkar et al., 2000; Diao et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2004; Shinohara et al., 2005; Hur et al., 2007). We demonstrated that OPN-null mice are impaired in their capacity to mount allergic contact hypersensitivity against trinitro-chlorobenzene (TNCB) (Weiss et al., 2001). The initiation of Th1-mediated immunity depends upon the function of antigen-presenting myeoloid dendritic cells (DCs) (Banchereau et al., 2000; Kapsenberg 2003). Contact hypersensitivity is a Th1-mediated immune response that is elicited once a hapten has been recognized during the initial sensitization phase. DCs are central to the sensitization process, as they recognize and transport the allergen into skin draining lymph nodes for presentation to naive T cells (Romani et al., 2006). OPN is likely to influence contact hypersensitivity response because it activates DCs and induces their maturation toward an IL-12 secreting, Th1-polarizing phenotype (Renkl et al., 2005). We previously described that OPN is chemotactic for DCs and OPN-null mice are impaired in their capacity to attract DCs to skin draining lymph nodes (Weiss et al., 2001). As we and others found that myeloid DCs produce OPN when differentiating from monocytes, we went on to investigate the role of autocrine effects of OPN produced by DCs themselves (Kawamura et al., 2005; Renkl et al., 2005). As convincing evidence exists that the migratory phenotype of macrophages, endothelial cells, and various types of tumour cells is associated with a high OPN-expressing phenotype, we determined which factors regulate OPN expression during murine DC maturation and investigated the role of DC-expressed OPN for their migratory abilities (Bruemmer et al., 2003; Rangaswami et al., 2006; Sodek et al., 2006; Nystrom et al., 2007).

In murine bone marrow cultures, we found that under the addition of GM-CSF and IL-4 OPN mRNA and protein secretion increased constantly from day 3 to 7 of DC maturation (Figure 1a and b). When separating CD11c+DC from bone marrow cultures, these were the major OPN-secreting cells as they expressed high levels of OPN mRNA in contrast to the CD11c-depleted fraction (Figure 1c). Our findings demonstrate that OPN expression is strongly upregulated early during DC differentiation from bone marrow precursors. The fact that immature DCs highly express OPN is interesting especially as other immune cells, such as T cells, NK-cells, and monocytes, express OPN only following their activation in an inflammatory context (Shinohara et al., 2005; Sodek et al., 2006; Hur et al., 2007).

Figure 1. Upregulation of constitutive OPN secretion by TNF-α and IL-1α correlates with the migratory capacity of DCs.

Figure 1

DCs were generated from bone marrow of mice (C57BL/6) in the presence of GM-CSF (40 ng ml-1; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) and IL-4 (10 ng ml-1; Cell Concepts, Umkirch, Germany) for 5 or 6 days as described previously (Weiss et al., 2001). During DC differentiation, supernatants and cells were obtained daily. In all the figures, data representative of at least four independent experiments is shown. (a) OPN concentration in supernatants obtained on the indicated days of culture was measured by OPN specific ELISA (IBL-Japan, Gunma, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. (b) OPN quantitative real-time PCR of cells harvested on the indicated days was performed with a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using the following primers: OPN (108-bp product): sense, 5′-GGTGATAGCTTGGCTTATGGACTG-3′; antisense, 5′-GCTCTTCATGTGAGAGGTGAGGTC-3′; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (147-bp product): sense, 5′-TGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTACC-3′; antisense, 5′-GGTCCTCAGTGTAGCCCAAGATG-3′. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: hold at 95 °C for 15 minutes, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds, 60 °C for 20 seconds, and 72 °C for 10 seconds followed by melting-curve analysis. The relative expression of target gene in different samples was normalized to the endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and was calculated with the 2tΔΔC method (Livak et al., 2001). (c) For further DC enrichment, CD11c+ cells were positively selected by magnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and quantitative real-time PCR was performed for OPN as described above. Unseparated bone marrow DC culture cells were used as control. (d) DCs were harvested from bone marrow cultures on day 5, washed, replated (1 Mio. cells per well) and stimulated with LPS (serotype 0111:B4; Sigma-Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) at the indicated concentrations. Viability was determined by propidium iodide staining by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and did not significantly differ for unstimulated controls and the indicated LPS concentrations (93-95% viability, after 48 hours of culture). (e) DCs were harvested from bone marrow cultures on day 5, washed and cultured with or without GM-CSF (20 ng ml-1) for 48 hours without additional cytokines, GM-CSF or as indicated additional IL-4 (5 ng ml-1), TNF-α (100 U ml-1; Cell Concepts), IL-1α (500 pg ml-1; Cell Concepts) or LPS (1 μg ml-1, serotype 0111:B4; Sigma-Aldrich) at 0.5 Mio. Cells per well. Supernatants were obtained after 48 hours of stimulation to detect OPN concentration by ELISA. To investigate the effect of OPN production on their migratory capacity, DCs were compared in their migratory function towards TNF-α in modified Boyden chamber assays. Cells that had migrated to the filter bottom were quantified counting four ocular grids (×40). Results are expressed as mean number of migrated cells per mm-2 ±SD of six chambers. *Statistically significant compared with GM-CSF control (t-test P<0.001).

Both tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1α induce a highly migratory phenotype in DCs (Cumberbatch et al., 2002). To establish a possible correlation between the migratory phenotype of DCs and their OPN-secreting potential, DCs were stimulated with TNF-α, IL-1α, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). TNF-α and IL1-α induced OPN secretion (Figure 1d and e). Whereas IL-4 only moderately downmodulated OPN expression, LPS that induces terminally activated, non-migratory DCs strongly inhibited their OPN secretion, which was not due to significantly reduced viability (Figure 1d and e). In Boyden chamber assays, we investigated how the level of OPN secretion correlates with the migratory potential of DCs (Figure 1e). Indeed, the highly OPN-secreting, TNF-α- or IL-1α-treated DCs efficiently migrated toward TNF-α (Figure 1e). In contrast, LPS-matured, low OPN secreting DCs were non-migratory (Figure 1e). Similar to our findings with DCs, it was described that LPS suppresses OPN in macrophages (Shinohara et al., 2006), however, not correlating this OPN-low state with migration. We can only speculate that LPS in both cell types may induce a low OPN-expressing less migratory phenotype.

To demonstrate that OPN deficiency is sufficient to influence DC migratory function, DCs generated from wild type and OPN-null mice were compared in their potential to migrate toward TNF-α, OPN, and CCL19. Whereas OPN wild-type DCs showed the previously described migration toward TNF-α, OPN, and CCL19, OPN-deficient DCs were unable to sufficiently migrate toward any of these stimuli (Figure 2a and b). Interestingly, in both monocytes and DCs, the high OPN-expressing state is correlated with high mobility. In vivo, macrophages migrating toward dermally injected N-formyl-met-leu-phe highly express OPN and Nystrom et al. (2007) recently reported that silencing of OPN expression by RNA interference impaired macrophage migration in vitro (Giachelli et al., 1998).

Figure 2. OPN-deficient DCs are impaired in their capacity to migrate in vitro and to enter skin draining lymph nodes in vivo.

Figure 2

DCs were generated from bone marrow of OPN-deficient C57BL/6 mice (-/-) (tenth generation of backcrossing) and wild-type littermates (+/+) for 6 days and used in Boyden chamber migration assays to migrate toward (a) OPN (2.5 μg ml-1, recombinant OPN), (a) TNF-α (50 and 250 U ml-1), or (b) CCL19, R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany (100 or 300 ng ml-1). Hank’s balanced salt solution medium was used as control. Cells that had migrated to the filter bottom were quantified as described above. *Statistically significant compared with corresponding +/+ DCs (t-test P<0.001). Representative data of four independent experiments is shown. (c) In vivo DC migration assays were performed as described previously (Lappin et al., 1999). All animal protocols were approved by the local Committee of Animal Research. DCs were generated from OPN-null (-/-) C57BL/6 mice or wild-type littermates (+/+) and labeled with PKH2-GL (Sigma Immunochemicals, Hamburg, Germany) and injected at 250,000 DCs in 30 μl of phosphate-buffered saline into each quadrant of the abdominal skin of wild-type mice. Twelve wild-type mice were injected with OPN wild-type DCs and 14 mice with OPN-null DCs. Inguinal and axillary lymph nodes were obtained after 48 hours, mechanically disaggregated, pooled, stained with phycoerythrin-labeled antibody against mouse CD11c (clone HL3, hamster IgG; Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany). CD11c, PKH2-GL double positive cells were quantified by a FACS. Using Mann-Whitney rank-sum test the difference between the two groups is statistically significant (P=0.042).

To demonstrate that OPN expression also correlates with DC migratory potential in vivo, fluorescently labeled wild-type DCs or OPN-deficient DCs were injected into the abdominal skin of wild-type mice (Lappin et al., 1999). Quantitative fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of pooled inguinal and axillary lymph nodes revealed that OPN-deficient DCs are significantly limited in their migratory efficiency into skin draining lymph nodes (Figure 2c). These data provide evidence that autocrine OPN production is centrally involved in DC migratory abilities.

The mechanism by which OPN mediates DC migration remains to be elucidated. Chemokine receptors CCR5 and CCR7 are both crucially involved in migration of DCs. We speculated that these receptors are modulated by OPN. However, DC treatment by recombinant OPN revealed that their expression is not influenced by OPN (data not shown). In addition to the secreted form, an intracellular form of OPN may be important for DC migration by modulating CD44 activity, as described for peritoneal macrophages (Zohar et al., 2000; Zhu et al., 2004). Because we have previously shown that CD44 isoforms are involved in DC migration, further investigations on the role of the intracellular form of OPN in DC migration are under way (Weiss et al., 1997).

In conclusion, our work demonstrates that OPN is highly expressed by myeloid DCs and is differentially modulated by DC-stimulating factors. In vivo and in vitro optimal DC migration depends on the expression of OPN.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Josef Schlick for expert technical assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG WE 1919/2-4).

Abbreviations

DC

dendritic cell

LPS

lipopolysacharide

OPN

osteopontin

TNF

tumor-necrosis factor

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors state no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashkar S, Weber GF, Panoutsakopoulou V, Sanchirico ME, Jansson M, Zawaideh S, et al. Eta-1 (osteopontin): an early component of type-1 (cell-mediated) immunity. Science. 2000;287:860–4. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, Liu YJ, et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:767–811. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruemmer D, Collins AR, Noh G, Wang W, Territo M, Arias-Magallona S, et al. Angiotensin II-accelerated atherosclerosis and aneurysm formation is attenuated in osteopontin-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1318–31. doi: 10.1172/JCI18141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cumberbatch M, Dearman RJ, Groves RW, Antonopoulos C, Kimber I. Differential regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell migration by interleukins (IL)-1alpha and IL-1beta during irritant- and allergen-induced cutaneous immune responses. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002;182:126–35. doi: 10.1006/taap.2002.9442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Denhardt DT, Noda M, O’Regan AW, Pavlin D, Berman JS. Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1055–61. doi: 10.1172/JCI12980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diao H, Kon S, Iwabuchi K, Kimura C, Morimoto J, Ito D, et al. Osteopontin as a mediator of NKT cell function in T cell-mediated liver diseases. Immunity. 2004;21:539–50. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Giachelli CM, Lombardi D, Johnson RJ, Murry CE, Almeida M. Evidence for a role of osteopontin in macrophage infiltration in response to pathological stimuli in vivo. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:353–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hur EM, Youssef S, Haws ME, Zhang SY, Sobel RA, Steinman L. Osteopontin-induced relapse and progression of autoimmune brain disease through enhanced survival of activated T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:74–83. doi: 10.1038/ni1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kapsenberg ML. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:984–93. doi: 10.1038/nri1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kawamura K, Iyonaga K, Ichiyasu H, Nagano J, Suga M, Sasaki Y. Differentiation, maturation, and survival of dendritic cells by osteopontin regulation. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:206–12. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.206-212.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lappin MB, Weiss JM, Delattre V, Mai B, Dittmar H, Maier C, et al. Analysis of mouse dendritic cell migration in vivo upon subcutaneous and intravenous injection. Immunology. 1999;98:181–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00850.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nystrom T, Duner P, Hultgardh-Nilsson A. A constitutive endogenous osteopontin production is important for macrophage function and differentiation. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:1149–60. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rangaswami H, Bulbule A, Kundu GC. Osteopontin: role in cell signaling and cancer progression. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Renkl AC, Wussler J, Ahrens T, Thoma K, Kon S, Uede T, et al. Osteopontin functionally activates dendritic cells and induces their differentiation towards a Th-1 polarizing phenotype. Blood. 2005;106:946–55. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Romani N, Ebner S, Tripp CH, Flacher V, Koch F, Stoitzner P. Epidermal Langerhans cells—changing views on their function in vivo. Immunol Lett. 2006;106:119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2006.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scatena M, Liaw L, Giachelli CM. Osteopontin: a multifunctional molecule regulating chronic inflammation and vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2302–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.144824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shinohara ML, Jansson M, Hwang ES, Werneck MB, Glimcher LH, Cantor H. T-bet-dependent expression of osteopontin contributes to T cell polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17101–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508666102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shinohara ML, Lu L, Bu J, Werneck MB, Kobayashi KS, Glimcher LH, et al. Osteopontin expression is essential for interferon-alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:498–506. doi: 10.1038/ni1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sodek J, Batista Da Silva AP, Zohar R. Osteopontin and mucosal protection. J Dent Res. 2006;85:404–15. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tanaka K, Morimoto J, Kon S, Kimura C, Inobe M, Diao H, et al. Effect of osteopontin alleles on beta-glucan-induced granuloma formation in the mouse liver. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:567–75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63146-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weiss JM, Renkl AC, Maier CS, Kimmig M, Liaw L, Ahrens T, et al. Osteopontin is involved in the initiation of cutaneous contact hypersensitivity by inducing Langerhans and dendritic cell migration to lymph nodes. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1219–29. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.9.1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weiss JM, Sleeman J, Renkl AC, Dittmar HC, Termeer CT, Taxis S, et al. An essential role for CD44 variant isoforms in epidermal Langerhans cell and blood dendritic cell function. J Cell Biol. 1997;137:1137–47. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.5.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu B, Suzuki K, Goldberg HA, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, McCulloch CA, et al. Osteopontin modulates CD44-dependent chemotaxis of peritoneal macrophages through G-protein-coupled receptors: evidence of a role for an intracellular form of osteopontin. J Cell Physiol. 2004;198:155–67. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zohar R, Suzuki N, Suzuki K, Arora P, Glogauer M, McCulloch CA, et al. Intracellular osteopontin is an integral component of the CD44-ERM complex involved in cell migration. J Cell Physiol. 2000;184:118–30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200007)184:1<118::AID-JCP13>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES