Abstract
Salivary glands express multiple isoforms of P2X and P2Y nucleotide receptors, but their in vivo physiological roles are unclear. P2 receptor agonists induced salivation in an ex vivo submandibular gland preparation. The nucleotide selectivity sequence of the secretion response was BzATP ≫ ATP > ADP ≫ UTP, and removal of external Ca2+ dramatically suppressed the initial ATP-induced fluid secretion (∼85%). Together, these results suggested that P2X receptors are the major purinergic receptor subfamily involved in the fluid secretion process. Mice with targeted disruption of the P2X7 gene were used to evaluate the role of the P2X7 receptor in nucleotide-evoked fluid secretion. P2X7 receptor protein and BzATP-activated inward cation currents were absent, and importantly, purinergic receptor agonist-stimulated salivation was suppressed by more than 70% in submandibular glands from P2X7-null mice. Consistent with these observations, the ATP-induced increases in [Ca2+]i were nearly abolished in P2X7–/– submandibular acinar and duct cells. ATP appeared to also act through the P2X7 receptor to inhibit muscarinic-induced fluid secretion. These results demonstrate that the ATP-sensitive P2X7 receptor regulates fluid secretion in the mouse submandibular gland.
Salivation is a Ca2+-dependent process (1, 2) primarily associated with the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and acetylcholine, release of which stimulates α-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors, respectively. Both types of receptors are coupled to G proteins that activate phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) during salivary gland stimulation. PLCβ activation cleaves phosphatidylinositol 1,4-bisphosphate resulting in diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) production. Activation of Ca2+-selective InsP3 receptor channels localized to the endoplasmic reticulum of salivary acinar cells increases the intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i).4 Depletion of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pool triggers extracellular Ca2+ influx and a sustained elevation in [Ca2+]i. This increase in [Ca2+]i activates Ca2+-dependent K+ and Cl– channels promoting Cl– secretion across the apical membrane and a lumen negative, electrochemical gradient that supports Na+ efflux into the lumen. The accumulation of NaCl creates an osmotic gradient which drives water movement into the lumen, thus generating isotonic primary saliva. This primary fluid is then modified by the ductal system, which reabsorbs NaCl and secretes KHCO3 producing a final saliva that is hypotonic (1, 2).
Salivation also has a non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic component, the origin of which is unclear (3). In addition to muscarinic and α-adrenergic receptors, salivary acinar cells express other receptors that are coupled to an increase in [Ca2+]i such as purinergic P2 and substance P receptors. Like muscarinic and α-adrenergic receptors, P2 receptor activation leads to a sustained increase in [Ca2+]i in salivary acinar cells (4). In contrast, substance P receptor activation rapidly desensitizes and therefore generates only a relatively transient increase in [Ca2+]i (5) that is unlikely to appreciably contribute to fluid secretion. The purinergic P2 receptor family is comprised of G protein-coupled P2Y and ionotropic P2X receptors activated by extracellular di- and triphosphate nucleotides. Activation of both subfamilies of P2 receptors causes an increase in [Ca2+]i. P2Y receptors increase [Ca2+]i via InsP3-induced Ca2+ mobilization from intracellular stores (similar to α-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors) while P2X receptors act as ligand-gated, non-selective cation channels that mediate extracellular Ca2+ influx (6). Salivary gland tissues express at least four isoforms of P2X (P2X4 and P2X7) and P2Y (P2Y1 and P2Y2) subtypes; however, their in vivo physiological significance has yet to be characterized (7–11).
Our results revealed that ATP acts in isolation to stimulate fluid secretion from the mouse submandibular gland, but secretion is inhibited when ATP is simultaneously presented with a muscarinic receptor agonist. Ablation of the P2X7 gene had no effect on the salivary flow rate evoked by muscarinic receptor activation, but markedly reduced ATP-mediated fluid secretion and rescued the inhibitory effects of ATP on muscarinic receptor activation. Submandibular gland acinar cells from P2X7–/– animals had dramatically impaired ATP-activated Ca2+ signaling, consistent with this being the mechanism responsible for the reduction in ATP-mediated fluid secretion in these mice. Together, these results demonstrated that ATP regulates salivation, acting mainly through the P2X7 receptor. Activation of the P2X7 receptor may play a major role in non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic stimulated fluid secretion.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
General Methods—Mice were housed in microisolator cages with ad libitum access to laboratory chow and water during 12-hour light/dark cycles. An equal number of gender- and age-matched (2–6-month-old) animals were utilized. Black Swiss/129 SvJ hybrid (Rochester colony) and C57BL/6 strain mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME), while P2X7–/– C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Pfizer (Benton, CT) and used as indicated. All experimental protocols were approved by the University of Rochester Animal Resources Committee. Reagents were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise specified.
Ex Vivo Submandibular Gland (SMG) Perfusion—Ex vivo SMG perfusion was performed as previously reported (12, 13). In brief, mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg body weight). Following ligation of all branches of the common carotid artery except the SMG artery, the SMG was removed, cannulated, and perfused. The ex vivo perfusion solution contained (in mm): 4.3 KCl, 120 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 5 glucose, 10 HEPES, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, pH 7.4. Extracellular Ca2+-free solutions were made by removing CaCl2. Solutions maintained at 37 °C were gassed with 95% O2, 5% CO2, and perfused at 0.8 ml/min using a peristaltic pump. When stimulating with only purinergic receptor agonists, muscarinic and β-adrenergic receptor antagonists were included (0.5 μm atropine and 20 μm propranolol, respectively).
Once the gland began to secrete fluid (defined as time 0), stimulation was continued for an additional 10 min. Saliva was collected in pre-calibrated capillary tubes (Sigma-Aldrich), and volumes were recorded every 0.5 or 1 min to calculate the flow rate (μl/min). Following saliva collection, the gland was blot dried and weighed. Saliva samples were stored at –86 °C until further analysis. Na+ and K+ concentrations were analyzed by atomic absorption using a Perkin-Elmer 3030 spectrophotometer. The Cl– concentration was analyzed with an Expandable Ion Analyzer EA 940 (Orion Research), and the pH and the osmolality were measured with a pH-sensitive electrode (Thermo Scientific, Beverly, MA) and a Wescor 5500 Vapor Pressure Osmometer (Logan, Utah), respectively.
In Vitro [Ca2+]i Measurement—SMG ductal and acinar cells were prepared by enzyme digestion as previously reported (14). In brief, mice were euthanized by 100% CO2 exposure followed by cardiac puncture. Acinar cells were dispersed in Minimum Essential Medium (SMEM, Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.17 mg/ml Liberase-RI (Roche Applied Science), and 2 mm l-glutamine, whereas duct cells were dispersed in Minimum Essential Medium (SMEM, Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% BSA, 0.012% trypsin, 0.05 mm EDTA, and 2 mm l-glutamine. Trypsin digestion was stopped with 2 mg/ml of soybean trypsin inhibitor. Duct cells were further dispersed by additional digestion in Minimum Essential Medium (SMEM) supplemented with 1% BSA, 0.15 units/ml Liberase-RI, and 2 mm l-glutamine. Following digestion, acinar and duct cells were rinsed in Basal Medium Eagle (BME, Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% BSA.
The fluorescent dye Fura-2 was used for [Ca2+]i measurement. Cells were loaded by incubation with 2 μm Fura-2 AM (Invitrogen) for 20 min at room temperature. Imaging was performed using an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot 200) equipped with an imaging system (Till Photonics, Pleasanton, CA). Images from Fura-2-loaded cells were acquired at a rate of 1 Hz by alternate excitation of light at 340 nm and 380 nm, and emission was captured at 510 nm using a high speed digital camera (Till Photonics). Chamber volume was maintained at ∼400 μl. Cells were superfused at a rate of 4 ml/min with the ex vivo perfusion solution (37 °C). The fluorescence ratio of 340 nm over 380 nm was calculated, and all data are presented as the change in ratio units.
Enrichment of Biotinylated Plasma Membrane Proteins—Isolated SMG acinar cells (14) were biotinylated according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce), and the plasma membrane proteins enriched as previously described (15). In brief, biotinylated cells were collected by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 45 s, and the pellet homogenized twice in ice-cold homogenizing buffer containing: 250 mm sucrose, 10 mm triethanolamine, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, and 0.1 mg/ml phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. Unbroken cells and nuclei were pelleted at 4,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and discarded. The supernatants were centrifuged at 22,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was resuspended in homogenization buffer, centrifuged at 46,000 × g (Beckman SW28 rotor) for 30 min at 4 °C, and the crude pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of hypotonic buffer (100 mm NH4HCO3, pH 7.5, 5 mm MgCl2) followed by incubation overnight with 200 μl of Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin (Invitrogen Dynal AS; Carlsbad, CA) at 4 °C. Beads were collected with a magnetic plate and washed with hypotonic buffer. Streptavidin beads carrying the enriched plasma membrane fractions were suspended in 100 mm dithiothreitol for 2 h, centrifuged at 10,600 × g for 3 min, and the supernatants collected and used for immunoblotting.
Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis—Protein samples (30 μg) were boiled for 5 min prior to separation in a 10% SDS-PAGE Tris-glycine mini-gel (Bio-Rad). Protein was transferred overnight at 4 °C onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Invitrogen) as described previously (15). Membranes were blocked overnight at 4 °C with 5% nonfat dry milk in 25 mm Tris pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl (TBS) and then incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibody raised against the 576–595 C terminus of the rat P2X7 receptor (Millipore-Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA) at a dilution of 1:300 in a 2.5% nonfat dry milk solution. After washing with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Pierce) at a dilution of 1:2,500 in TBS-T/2.5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (GE-Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
Electrophysiological Recordings—Single SMG acinar cells were prepared by enzymatic digestion (13). In brief, SMG acinar cells were digested for 15 min in SMEM containing 0.02% trypsin (Invitrogen), then centrifuged and resuspended in medium containing soybean trypsin inhibitor (Type 1-S, Sigma), followed by 2 sequential digestions for 25 min each in 0.17 mg/ml Liberase RI Enzyme (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). The cell suspension was gently centrifuged and the supernatant filtrated through a 53-μm nylon mesh. Finally, the suspension was centrifuged, and the cell pellet was resuspended in BME supplemented with 2 mm l-glutamine (Invitrogen). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator until use.
Electrophysiological data were acquired at room temperature using a PC-501A amplifier (Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT) or an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Voltage pulses were generated with Clampex 9 software through a Digidata 1320A interface (Molecular Devices), which also served to acquire the currents. Voltage clamp experiments were performed using the standard whole-cell configuration of the patch clamp technique. Glass pipettes (Warner Instrument) were pulled to give a resistance of 2–3 MΩ in the solutions described below. The external solution contained (in mm): 150 NaCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 20 sucrose, pH 7.4. The internal pipette solution contained (in mm): 130 Cs glutamate (130 CsOH + 130 glutamic acid), 10 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 1.5 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH 7.3. Single mouse SMG acinar cells were voltage clamped at ECl (–63.8 mV). Liquid junction potential was calculated to be 17.3 mV, and the correction was applied to the voltage.
Statistical Analysis—Results are presented as the mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test or ANOVA analysis, followed by a Bonferroni's test for multiple comparisons with Origin 7.0 Software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All experiments were performed using three or more separate preparations.
RESULTS
Purinergic Receptor Agonists Evoke Fluid Secretion from the ex Vivo SMG—Salivary glands express several types of purinergic receptors which belong to both the P2X (P2X4 and P2X7) and P2Y (P2Y1 and P2Y2) receptor subfamilies (10, 11). Given that activation of P2X and P2Y receptors evokes an increase in [Ca2+]i in salivary gland cells, purinergic stimulation of either subfamily might be expected to result in fluid secretion (2). However, purinergic receptor activation has not been previously performed in the intact gland. To test this hypothesis we employed an ex vivo, perfused mouse SMG organ system. This ex vivo technique allows for precise control of the content of the vascular perfusate and ameliorates the rapid degradation of purinergic receptor agonists observed in vivo.
Most G protein-coupled P2Y receptors are sensitive to UTP whereas the ionotropic P2X receptors are not, while both classes of P2 receptors are generally activated by ATP and ADP (6). To determine if purinergic receptor activation produced saliva secretion in the ex vivo SMG preparation we initially utilized the ubiquitous P2 receptor activator ATP. Fig. 1A shows that the time course of the secretion generated by stimulation of the ex vivo SMG by ATP (1 mm) was best described as having an initial peak during the first 2 min followed over the next 8 min by a gradual decline to a relatively sustained fluid secretion rate (Fig. 1A, black squares). A relatively rapid loss of secretion was observed after the removal of ATP from the perfusate. To further characterize which P2 receptor was likely involved we also tested the ability of ADP and UTP to stimulate secretion. ADP (1 mm) produced a similar pattern as observed during ATP stimulation (Fig. 1A, gray squares), but the total amount of saliva produced during a 10-min stimulation was significantly less (Fig. 1B, ADP; 15.2 ± 2.8 μl/10 min versus ATP; 43.7 ± 3.5 μl/10 min, p < 0.001). Stimulation with UTP (1 mm) produced a transient flow (Fig. 1A, white squares) which generated markedly less fluid, ∼6% of the saliva secreted with an identical concentration of ATP (Fig. 1B, UTP; 2.7 ± 0.7 μl/10 min versus ATP; 43.7 ± 3.5 μl/10 min, p < 0.001).
Extracellular Ca2+ Depletion Suppresses ATP-induced Salivation by the ex Vivo SMG—UTP does not activate P2X receptors (6). Accordingly, because UTP caused minimal fluid secretion (Fig. 1), it appeared that P2Y receptors do not play a major role in the purinergic-induced production of saliva. Therefore, we next evaluated the role of P2X receptors in ATP-mediated, Ca2+-dependent fluid secretion. Although both couple to an increase in [Ca2+]i, one fundamental difference between P2Y and P2X receptors is that P2X receptors mediate extracellular Ca2+ entry, whereas P2Y receptors initially trigger intracellular Ca2+ release. Consequently, acute removal of extracellular Ca2+ effectively eliminates Ca2+ influx via P2X channels, but the intracellular Ca2+ release mediated by P2Y receptors is resistant to this maneuver.
Using the muscarinic agonist carbachol (CCh), which activates an identical Ca2+ release GPCR pathway as P2Y receptors, we show that initial secretion by the ex vivo SMG was not significantly affected by acute removal of extracellular Ca2+. CCh-evoked (0.3 μm) SMG fluid secretion in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (black squares) was similar to secretion in Ca2+-containing experiments (gray squares) during the first minute of stimulation (Fig. 2A). However, without extracellular Ca2+ influx to replenish the rapidly depleted intracellular Ca2+ stores, the flow rate was eventually reduced to near zero (Fig. 2A, black trace at 4-min stimulation). Replacing extracellular Ca2+ after 5 min of CCh stimulation restored the flow rate to control values (Fig. 2A, black trace at 6–10 min stimulation). Secretion rapidly returned to basal levels upon removal of CCh from the perfusate. Using the same paradigm, the ATP-evoked (1 mm) fluid secretion was nearly abolished except for a very small volume secreted during the first minute of stimulation (Fig. 2B, black trace; ∼85% decrease). Re-addition of extracellular Ca2+ resulted in a modest recovery of the fluid secretion flow rate (Fig. 2B, black versus gray trace at 6–10-min stimulation). Because UTP stimulated little secretion and because the initial ATP-mediated saliva secretion was dependent upon extracellular Ca2+, our results suggested that ATP activated a member of the P2X family of channels. To determine which P2X isoform was involved, both pharmacological and genetic approaches were utilized in the following experiments.
The P2X7 Receptor-selective Activator BzATP Stimulates Fluid Secretion—Salivary glands have been shown to express both P2X4 and P2X7 receptors (10). To differentiate between potential activation of P2X4 or P2X7 receptors in our ex vivo SMG fluid secretion experiments we utilized the ATP-derivative BzATP. P2X7 receptors are activated preferentially by BzATP over ATP (16); thus, BzATP has served as a classical tool to evaluate P2X7 receptor function. Concentrations of ATP and BzATP were selected to avoid maximum flow rates. Fluid secretion was often detectable at agonist concentrations as low as 0.1 mm for ATP (data not shown); however, fluid secretion was always observed at agonist concentrations of 0.25 mm and higher. Fig. 3 shows that either BzATP (black squares) or ATP (gray squares) can induce SMG fluid secretion; however at the submaximal concentration tested, BzATP was much more effective (>6-fold at 0.25 mm). In addition, the ATP response was not typically sustained at this concentration of agonist; i.e. the majority of the glands quit secreting after 5 min of stimulation, whereas secretion was sustained with BzATP (Fig. 3A). Fig. 3B shows that the volume of BzATP-evoked SMG fluid secretion was significantly greater than the volume secreted by an equal concentration of ATP (0.25 mm BzATP; 54.2 ± 6.6 μl/10 min versus 0.25 mm ATP; 8.4 ± 1.0 μl/10 min, p < 0.001). Higher concentrations of ATP (1 mm) resembled the results using a lower BzATP concentration (compare Figs. 1A and 3A), suggesting that ATP-stimulated fluid secretion is mediated by the BzATP-sensitive, P2X7 purinergic receptor.
Loss of the BzATP-induced Cation Current in P2X7 Receptor-null Mice—Collectively, the observations that extracellular Ca2+ was required for fluid secretion (Fig. 2) and BzATP was the most potent agonist (Fig. 3) implied that P2X7 receptor activation was primarily responsible for the sustained ATP-mediated fluid secretion. One caveat of pharmacological inhibitors of purinergic P2 receptors is that they are not selective and may affect other channels and transporters required for fluid secretion (16). Thus, to confirm the critical role of P2X7 receptor activation in stimulating fluid secretion we utilized P2X gene-disrupted mice.
Western blot analysis using a P2X7 receptor-specific antibody demonstrated that plasma membrane proteins isolated from P2X7–/– mice lacked P2X7 receptor protein expression in SMG, parotid (PG), and sublingual (SLG) salivary glands (Fig. 4A, see arrow). As an additional positive control and to confirm protein size, the cell lysate from HEK-293 cells transiently overexpressing the P2X7 receptor was included in the analysis (Fig. 4A, lane 7). Fig. 4 also shows that the large BzATP-induced inward cation current present in SMG acinar cells from wild-type mice was absent in P2X7–/– SMG acinar cells (Fig. 4, B and C; P2X7+/+; –349.8 ± 88.5 pA versus P2X7–/–; –2.2 ± 2.3 pA, p < 0.01). Together, these data demonstrated that disruption of the P2X7 gene results in loss of both P2X7 receptor protein expression and nucleotide-gated channel activity.
P2X7 Receptor Disruption Has No Effect on CCh-evoked Fluid Secretion and [Ca2+]i Signals—We next determined if disruption of P2X7 receptors in the SMG had nonspecific effects on the fluid secretion machinery. To evaluate this we utilized the muscarinic receptor agonist CCh, the response to which should be unaffected in P2X7-null mice. Fig. 5A shows that the ex vivo salivary flow rates in P2X7+/+ (black squares) and P2X7–/– (gray squares) SMG were effectively identical in response to CCh stimulation. There were only subtle differences in the total volumes secreted in 10 min (P2X7+/+; 135 ± 5 μl/10 min versus P2X7–/–; 144 ± 6 μl/10 min, p = 0.25), saliva ion compositions (Table 1), or osmolalities (P2X7+/+; 183.9 ± 4.5 mOsm versus P2X7–/–; 186.0 ± 3.3 mOsm, p = 0.74). The lack of effect of P2X7 receptor ablation on the CCh-stimulated response demonstrated that ion channels and transporters responsible for fluid secretion in SMG are not affected when the P2X7 gene is disrupted.
TABLE 1.
P2X7+/+
|
P2X7-/-
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCh | CCh + ATP | CCh | CCh + ATP | |
Na | 37.4 ± 2.6 (20) | 44.1 ± 3.3 (21) | 39.9 ± 4.6 (17) | 47.9 ± 5.8 (10) |
K | 50.4 ± 3.3 (20) | 59.6 ± 2.2a (21) | 47.7 ± 2.8b (17) | 53.8 ± 3.9 (10) |
Cl | 89.2 ± 4.6 (20) | 85.2 ± 1.7 (21) | 82.9 ± 4.3a (17) | 100.9 ± 3.3b (10) |
pH | 7.85 ± 0.07 (8) | 7.99 ± 0.09a (8) | 7.71 ± 0.03b (9) | 7.71 ± 0.06b (10) |
μl | 135 ± 5a (20) | 90 ± 7b (21) | 144 ± 6a (17) | 130 ± 6a (10) |
Values are different from those labeled b by at least p < 0.03.
Given that salivary gland fluid secretion is dependent on an elevation of [Ca2+]i, we expected that disruption of P2X7 receptors would also have no effect on CCh-evoked Ca2+ signals in SMG acinar cells. To confirm this, SMG acini were isolated and loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2. In support of the fluid secretion data, Fig. 5B shows that the CCh-induced Ca2+ signals in P2X7+/+ (black trace) and P2X7–/– (gray trace) isolated SMG acinar cells were essentially identical. Analysis of the data showed that the average peak value over baseline of the CCh-induced Ca2+ signal for P2X7+/+ cells was not significantly different from that for P2X7–/– cells (Fig. 5B, P2X7+/+; 0.30 ± 0.02 ratio units versus P2X7–/–; 0.33 ± 0.03 ratio units, p = 0.41). In addition, the average plateau value over baseline (taken at 1.5 min into the 3-min stimulation) of the CCh-induced Ca2+ signal for P2X7+/+ cells was also similar to that for P2X7–/– cells (P2X7+/+; 0.17 ± 0.01 ratio units versus P2X7–/–; 0.21 ± 0.02 ratio units, p = 0.07). Thus, disruption of P2X7 receptors had no significant effect on either CCh-mediated fluid secretion or Ca2+ signaling.
Disruption of P2X7 Receptors Decreases ATP-evoked Fluid Secretion and [Ca2+]i Signals—We next determined if loss of P2X7 receptor expression had an effect on purinergic receptor agonist-evoked fluid secretion. Fig. 6 shows that the secretion response to the purinergic receptor agonist ATP was markedly reduced in the P2X7–/– SMG (gray squares). The total volume of saliva collected over a 10-min period from the P2X7–/– SMG was reduced 71% when stimulated with 1 mm ATP (Fig. 6A, P2X7+/+; 28.9 ± 4.3 μl/10 min versus P2X7–/–; 8.4 ± 1.5 μl/10 min, p < 0.001). A similar result was obtained when stimulating with the P2X7-selective purinergic receptor agonist BzATP. Fluid secretion evoked by 0.25 mm BzATP decreased by 75% in P2X7–/– glands (P2X7+/+; 50.8 ± 3.5 μl/10 min versus P2X7–/–; 12.6 ± 1.1 μl/10 min, p < 0.001). Because of the low volume of saliva secreted by either ATP or BzATP in P2X7–/– animals, further analyses were not performed.
The most likely mechanism for the dramatic reduction in purinergic receptor agonist-evoked fluid secretion in P2X7–/– SMG is impaired P2X7 receptor-mediated Ca2+ signaling. Consistent with this hypothesis, stimulation of Fura-2 loaded P2X7+/+ SMG acinar cells with 1 mm ATP for 3 min resulted in an increase in [Ca2+]i, which peaked in less than 30 s and then remained at an elevated plateau (Fig. 6B, black trace). Following ATP removal, the [Ca2+]i slowly decreased. In contrast, 1 mm ATP stimulation in P2X7–/– SMG acinar cells resulted in a transient elevation of [Ca2+]i, which returned to near basal levels in less than 30 s (Fig. 6B, gray trace). Analysis of the data showed that the average peak value over baseline of the ATP-induced Ca2+ signal for P2X7+/+ cells was significantly larger than that for P2X7–/– cells (Fig. 6B, P2X7+/+; 0.50 ± 0.04 ratio units versus P2X7–/–; 0.21 ± 0.02 ratio units, p < 0.001). In addition, the average plateau value over baseline (taken at 1.5 min into the 3-min stimulation) of the ATP-induced Ca2+ signal for P2X7+/+ cells was also significantly larger than the average plateau value over baseline for P2X7–/– cells (Fig. 6B, P2X7+/+; 0.38 ± 0.03 ratio units versus P2X7–/–; 0.04 ± 0.01 ratio units, p < 0.001). In fact, the average plateau value (without baseline subtraction) for P2X7–/– cells was not significantly different from the initial value prior to ATP addition (Fig. 6B, P2X7–/– plateau; 0.43 ± 0.05 ratio units versus P2X7–/– baseline; 0.39 ± 0.03 ratio units, p = 0.5).
As previously described (7, 17), we also found that ATP stimulated an increase in [Ca2+]i in SMG granular duct cells (Fig. 6C). This [Ca2+]i increase peaked in less than 30 s in duct cells and remained elevated (Fig. 6C, black trace). The kinetics of the ATP-induced [Ca2+]i increase in granular duct cells were comparable to that observed in acinar cells (i.e. there was a rapid [Ca2+]i increase after exposure to ATP), although the magnitude of the [Ca2+]i peak and plateau values were about an order of magnitude less in duct cells. ATP stimulation in P2X7–/– SMG duct cells resulted in a very small, transient elevation of [Ca2+]i, (Fig. 6C, gray trace). This suggested that P2X7 receptor activation plays a role in ATP regulation of duct cell [Ca2+]i signaling and possibly ion transport function.
ATP Modulates the Flow Rate of Muscarinic Receptor-stimulated Saliva—It is unlikely that ATP acts in vivo independently of other neurotransmitters like acetylcholine. Therefore, we tested the effects of co-stimulation of the ex vivo gland with ATP and CCh on saliva production and ion composition. We found that ATP inhibited CCh-induced secretion by >30% in P2X7+/+ glands (Fig. 7, A and B, compare black squares and bar to dotted trace and bar). In contrast, ATP failed to inhibit CCh-stimulated secretion in P2X7–/– glands (Fig. 7, A and B, gray squares and bar, respectively), suggesting that P2X7 receptor activation likely mediates the ATP-induced inhibition of the muscarinic receptor response.
The primary, plasma-like saliva generated by acinar cells is modified as it passes through the ducts, which reabsorb NaCl and secrete KHCO3 (1, 2). ATP stimulated a very modest increase in [Ca2+]i in SMG granular duct cells (Fig. 6C) suggesting that ATP has little influence on duct cell function. Indeed, in P2X7+/+ mice, ATP did not significantly alter the Na+ or Cl– concentration of the saliva induced by CCh stimulation (Table 1); while the pH and the K+ concentration of saliva increased slightly. Consistent with these observations, ATP induced only modest changes in the ion composition of saliva from P2X7–/– submandibular glands. Taken together, these results suggested that the ATP-stimulated increase in [Ca2+]i in SMG duct cells is unlikely to play a major role in the regulation of ductal function.
DISCUSSION
Salivary tissues express multiple types of purinergic P2 receptors. Activation of these receptors increases [Ca2+]i suggesting a possible role for P2 receptors in fluid secretion (4, 7, 8, 10, 18, 19), although this has never been directly tested. Here we show that purinergic stimulation results in a sustained, extracellular Ca2+-dependent secretion of saliva in an intact mouse submandibular salivary gland preparation. The sensitivity of this response to different purinergic agonists was consistent with P2X7 receptor activation (BzATP ≫ ATP > ADP ≫ UTP). Indeed, a >70% decrease was observed in BzATP- and ATP-evoked fluid secretions from the SMG in P2X7-null animals. These results demonstrate that P2X7 receptors are essential for ATP-mediated saliva production in the mouse submandibular gland.
Our results highlight the significant contribution purinergic receptors may have on the regulation of salivary gland fluid secretion. Earlier reports describe a non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic mediated fluid secretion (3, 20–24). In sheep, electrical stimulation of the parotid parasympathetic nerve in the presence of atropine produced a significant increase in the flow rate (25). The authors concluded that the flow rate was produced by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) release (25), however this seems unlikely since VIP receptor activation is linked to an increase in cAMP, not [Ca2+]i. Indeed, Ekstrom et al. (26) reported that VIP treatment caused little to no fluid secretion in feline parotid glands. Interestingly, the electrically evoked “atropine-resistant” fluid secretion was ∼30% of the response prior to muscarinic receptor inhibition in the ferret submandibular gland (3). This observation is essentially identical to our results; i.e. the maximal volume of ATP-induced fluid secretion was about 30% of that produced by muscarinic receptor stimulation (Fig. 1 versus Fig. 5). Thus, our results are consistent with ATP-mediated fluid secretion playing a physiological role in non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic mediated salivation.
Although both P2X4 and P2X7 receptors are expressed in salivary glands, the greater secretion induced by BzATP (Fig. 3) and the severe impairment of secretion in P2X7-null mice (Fig. 6) implied that the P2X7 receptor channel contributes most to salivation. Adding to P2X receptor signaling complexity, functional P2X receptors form heteromeric channels comprised of three P2X subunits (16, 27, 28). Until recently P2X7 receptors were the only P2X isoform thought not to form a heteromeric channel. However, recent reports have identified P2X4/P2X7 heteromeric channels (29, 30). These latter observations suggest that salivary gland cells might contain both P2X4 and P2X7 homotrimers, as well as P2X4/P2X7 heterotrimers. The functional significance of P2X4/P2X7 heterotrimer formation is unclear, but genetic disruption of P2X7 receptors might also interfere with P2X4 targeting and/or overall function. Nevertheless, while a P2X4/P2X7 heterotrimer is possible, there is no evidence of P2X4/P2X7 heterotrimer formation in native tissue. Future studies should be directed to determine the relationship, if any, between P2X4 and P2X7 homo- and heterotrimers in salivary gland function.
P2X7 receptors have been previously localized to the apical membrane of mouse parotid acinar and duct cells (8). P2X7 receptor immunostaining was also noted in mouse SMG duct cells, which suggests that this ligand-gated channel may participate in modification of the electrolyte content (31). Li et al. (8) proposed that preassembled P2X7 receptors in duct cells sense upstream secretion by acinar cells (via ATP release) and respond by augmenting HCO–3 secretion. In agreement with this model, we found that ATP produced a modest increase in the pH of CCh-induced secretions, suggesting an increase in the [HCO–3], and this effect disappeared in P2X7-null mice (Table 1). Given that ATP is not likely to be released independent of other agonists in vivo, ATP might be expected to modulate the response of salivary glands to muscarinic receptor stimulation. Indeed, we also found that the volume of fluid secreted during muscarinic receptor activation was decreased by co-stimulation with ATP and CCh in the ex vivo SMG. These results are consistent with the previous observation that ATP inhibits muscarinic receptor induced Ca2+ mobilization in rat parotid and submandibular gland acinar cells (32–34). The inhibition of the CCh-induced response by ATP was absent in P2X7-null mice (Fig. 7). Additional studies will be required to confirm the mechanism(s) responsible for these observations. Regardless of the mechanism, our results suggest that ATP can stimulate secretion on its own, and when co-released with a muscarinic agonist, ATP likely modulates the muscarinic receptor-stimulated response of salivary glands. Moreover, the in vivo physiologically relevant source of ATP release is unknown. It is well known that ATP is co-released from nerve terminals with acetylcholine and other neurotransmitters (35). Alternatively, ATP is also released from the secretory granules of exocrine acinar cells in response to agonists that stimulate granule fusion (36). The release of ATP from these two distinct sites is likely to have very different functional consequences.
In summary, our results demonstrate that ATP regulates fluid secretion in the mouse submandibular gland. This mechanism is extracellular Ca2+-dependent, sensitive to BzATP, and insensitive to UTP, suggesting activation of a P2X receptor family member. Indeed, ablation of the P2X7 gene resulted in a dramatic reduction in the amount of fluid secreted during ATP exposure. These new findings contribute to our understanding of the role of purinergic P2 receptors in salivary glands and provide insight into future studies. ATP-mediated fluid secretion is likely an important mechanism for “tuning” the resultant fluid secretion under different physiological conditions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Laurie Koek, Jennifer Scantlin, Yasna Jaramillo, and Mark Wagner for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants DE09692 and DE08921 (to J. E. M.) and NIDCR Training Grant T32-DE07202 (to D. A. B. and M. G.-B.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Footnotes
The abbreviations used are: [Ca2+]i, intracellular free calcium concentration; BzATP, 2′,3′-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)adenosine 5′-triphosphate; SMG, submandibular gland(s); CCh, carbachol; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; SLG, sublingual; PG, parotid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
References
- 1.Cook, D. I., Van Lennep, E. W., Roberts, M. L., and Young, J. A. (1994) Secretion by the Major Salivary Glands, 3rd Ed., Raven Press, New York
- 2.Melvin, J. E., Yule, D., Shuttleworth, T., and Begenisich, T. (2005) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67 445–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ekstrom, J., Mansson, B., Olgart, L., and Tobin, G. (1988) Quart. J. Exp. Physiol. 73 163–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soltoff, S. P., McMillian, M. K., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., Cantley, L. C., and Talamo, B. R. (1990) J. Gen. Physiol. 95 319–346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Merritt, J. E., and Rink, T. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262 14912–14916 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burnstock, G. (2007) Physiol. Rev. 87 659–797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee, M. G., Zeng, W., and Muallem, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 32951–32955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li, Q., Luo, X., Zeng, W., and Muallem, S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 47554–47561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brown, D. A., Bruce, J. I., Straub, S. V., and Yule, D. I. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279 39485–39494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Turner, J. T., Landon, L. A., Gibbons, S. J., and Talamo, B. R. (1999) Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 10 210–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Novak, I. (2003) News Physiol. Sci. 18 12–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nakamoto, T., Romanenko, V. G., Takahashi, A., Begenisich, T., and Melvin, J. E. (2008) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 294 C810–C819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Romanenko, V. G., Nakamoto, T., Srivastava, A., Begenisich, T., and Melvin, J. E. (2007) J. Physiol. 581 801–817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Romanenko, V., Nakamoto, T., Srivastava, A., Melvin, J. E., and Begenisich, T. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281 27964–27972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gonzalez-Begne, M., Nakamoto, T., Nguyen, H. V., Stewart, A. K., Alper, S. L., and Melvin, J. E. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282 35125–35132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.North, R. A. (2002) Physiol. Rev. 82 1013–1067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pochet, S., Garcia-Marcos, M., Seil, M., Otto, A., Marino, A., and Dehaye, J. P. (2007) Cell Signal. 19 2155–2164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gallacher, D. V. (1982) Nature 296 83–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Soltoff, S. P., McMillian, M. K., Lechleiter, J. D., Cantley, L. C., and Talamo, B. R. (1990) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 603 76–90; discussion 91–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Asztely, A., Tobin, G., and Ekstrom, J. (1994) Acta Physiol. Scand. 151 373–376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ekstrom, J. (1998) Exp. Physiol. 83 697–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ekstrom, J. (2001) Exp. Physiol. 86 475–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ekstrom, J., Asztely, A., and Tobin, G. (1998) Eur. J. Morphol. 36, (suppl.), 208–212 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ekstrom, J., Helander, H. F., and Tobin, G. (1993) J. Physiol. 472 233–244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Reid, A. M., and Titchen, D. A. (1988) Q J. Exp. Physiol. 73 413–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ekstrom, J., Asztely, A., Helander, H. F., and Tobin, G. (1994) Acta Physiol. Scand. 150 83–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nicke, A., Baumert, H. G., Rettinger, J., Eichele, A., Lambrecht, G., Mutschler, E., and Schmalzing, G. (1998) EMBO J. 17 3016–3028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Torres, G. E., Egan, T. M., and Voigt, M. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274 6653–6659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dubyak, G. R. (2007) Mol. Pharmacol. 72 1402–1405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guo, C., Masin, M., Qureshi, O. S., and Murrell-Lagnado, R. D. (2007) Mol. Pharmacol. 72 1447–1456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sim, J. A., Young, M. T., Sung, H. Y., North, R. A., and Surprenant, A. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24 6307–6314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fukushi, Y. (1999) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 364 55–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jorgensen, T. D., Gromada, J., Tritsaris, K., Nauntofte, B., and Dissing, S. (1995) Biochem. J. 312 457–464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Metioui, M., Amsallem, H., Alzola, E., Chaib, N., Elyamani, A., Moran, A., Marino, A., and Dehaye, J. P. (1996) J. Cell Physiol. 168 462–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Richardson, P. J., and Brown, S. J. (1987) J. Neurochem. 48 622–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sorensen, C. E., and Novak, I. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 32925–32932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]