Abstract
Urocortin 3 (Ucn3) is a new member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) peptide family and is considered to be a specific and endogenous ligand for CRF type 2 receptors (CRF2Rs). The presence of CRF2Rs has been reported in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) of the rat. It was hypothesized that the activation of CRF2Rs in the medial NTS (mNTS) may play a role in cardiovascular regulation. This hypothesis was tested in urethane-anesthetized, artificially ventilated, adult male Wistar rats. Microinjections (100 nl) of Ucn3 (0.03, 0.06, 0.12, and 0.25 mM) into the mNTS of anesthetized rats elicited decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP: 5.0 ± 1.0, 21.6 ± 2.6, 20.0 ± 2.8, and 12.7 ± 3.4 mmHg, respectively) and heart rate (HR: 7.8 ± 2.6, 46.2 ± 9.3, 34.5 ± 8.4, and 16.6 ± 4.9 beats/min, respectively). Microinjections of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (100 nl) into the mNTS did not elicit cardiovascular responses. Maximum decreases in MAP and HR were elicited by 0.06 mM concentration of Ucn3. Cardiovascular responses to Ucn3 were similar in unanesthetized midcollicular decerebrate rats. A bilateral vagotomy completely abolished Ucn3-induced bradycardia. The decreases in MAP and HR elicited by Ucn3 (0.06 mM) were completely blocked by astressin (1 mM; nonselective CRFR antagonist) and K41498 (5 mM; selective CRF2R antagonist). Microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS decreased the efferent greater splanchnic nerve activity. After the blockade of CRF2Rs in the mNTS, a Ucn3-induced decrease in the efferent sympathetic nerve discharge was abolished. These results indicate that Ucn3 microinjections into the mNTS exerted excitatory effects on the mNTS neurons via CRF2Rs, leading to depressor and bradycardic responses.
Keywords: blood pressure, corticotropin-releasing factor receptor antagonists, heart rate, sympathetic nerve activity, urocortin, nucleus tractus solitarius
the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF; also known as corticotropin-releasing hormone) is the main mediator of stress responses. Recently, three other peptides have been included in the CRF peptide family. These peptides include urocortin 1 (Ucn1), urocortin 2 (Ucn2), and urocortin 3 (Ucn3). Ucn1, formerly known as urocortin (10, 43), is present in several brain areas including the hypothalamus (16, 20, 27, 45). Intracerebroventricular injections of Ucn1 decrease water and food intake (37), increase anxiogenic behavior (26), and inhibit edema due to thermal injury (40). Ucn2 is also present in the hypothalamus (32); it is sometimes referred to as “stresscopin-related peptide,” which is Ucn2 with a 5-amino acid extension at the NH2-terminal. It has been implicated in the central regulation of appetite and autonomic functions. Ucn3 and stresscopin were discovered independently by two research groups (15, 22) while searching the public human genome databases. The two groups interpreted the posttranslational processing sites differently and arrived at a different amino acid composition of these peptides (15, 22). Ucn3 is sometimes referred to as “stresscopin,” which is Ucn3 with 2-amino acids extended from the NH2-terminal (23, 24). Ucn3-expressing neurons are present predominantly in the medial amygdala, the hypothalamic median preoptic nucleus, and the rostral perifornical area lateral to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (23). Ucn3 fibers are present mainly in the hypothalamus (medial preoptic, paraventricular, and ventromedial nuclei) and limbic structures (lateral septum, posterior region of bed nucleus of stria terminalis, and medial nucleus of amygdala) (23).
Two major subtypes of CRF receptors (CRFRs), CRF receptor types 1 (CRF1R) and 2 (CRF2R), have been identified (8, 11, 14, 31). These plasma membrane receptors are seven-transmembrane domain Gs protein-coupled receptors and stimulate adenylate cyclase activity. In the rat, CRF1Rs are distributed widely in the brain with high densities in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, olfactory bulb, and sensory relay nuclei (5, 8, 42). CRF2Rs are expressed in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, lateral septum, amygdala, hippocampus, olfactory bulb, and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) (5, 8, 42). Ucn1 mediates its actions via both CRF1Rs and CRF2Rs, whereas Ucn2 and Ucn3 mediate their actions via CRF2Rs (14).
Information regarding the cardiovascular effects of Ucn3 is limited. According to one report, intracerebroventricular injections of stresscopin, which has a close structural similarity to Ucn3, elicited an increase in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) (7). Since intracerebroventricular injections reach several brain areas, it is difficult to dissect out the site of cardiovascular actions in specific cardiovascular regulatory brain regions using this route of administration. Therefore, direct microinjections of substances into specific brain regions have been used to elucidate their sites of cardiovascular action. With the use of this technique, microinjections of Ucn1 and Ucn2 into the medial NTS (mNTS) have been reported to elicit depressor and bradycardic responses (46).
There is only one report in which Ucn3-immunoreactive neurons and their projections have been identified (23). According to this report, Ucn1, but not Ucn3, fibers are present in the NTS (23). However, the presence of CRF1Rs in the NTS (34) and CRF2Rs in the NTS and area postrema (21, 42) has been reported. Since Ucn3 is a highly specific agonist for CRF2Rs, it has been suggested that this neuropeptide may be the endogenous ligand for these receptors (15, 22–24). Ucn3 has been implicated as an endogenous anxiolytic brain neuropeptide that attenuates behavioral response to stress (17, 44). Understanding the nature and sites of cardiovascular actions of Ucn3 is important, considering that systemic BP is known to be elevated by persistent stress. In the present article, the cardiovascular actions of microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS were investigated with the eventual aim of unraveling the physiological role of CRF2Rs, if any, in this nucleus. This information is likely to be important, considering that the mNTS is the site where baroreceptor, chemoreceptor, and cardiopulmonary afferents make their first synapse and that it is known to play an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular function (35).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General procedures.
Experiments were done in adult male Wistar rats (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) weighing 300–360 g (n = 52). All animals were housed under controlled conditions with a 12-h:12-h light-dark cycle. Food and water were available to the animals ad libitum. The experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85-23, Revised 1996) and with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of this university.
The general procedures have been described in detail elsewhere (28). Briefly, the rats were anesthetized with an inhalation of isoflurane (2 to 3% in 100% oxygen), the trachea was cannulated with polyethylene tubing (PE-240), and the rats were artificially ventilated using a rodent ventilator (model 683, Harvard Instruments, Holliston, MA). One of the femoral veins was cannulated, and urethane (1.2–1.4 g/kg) was injected intravenously in 12–15 aliquots at 2-min intervals (total volume of the anesthetic solution was 0.55–0.75 ml, injected over a period of about 25–30 min). Isoflurane inhalation was terminated after the administration of 5 to 6 aliquots of urethane. The absence of a pressor response and/or the withdrawal of the limb in response to pinching of a hind paw indicated that the rats were properly anesthetized. One of the femoral arteries was cannulated for monitoring BP. HR was monitored by a tachograph that was triggered by the BP waves. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was derived electronically. The tidal volume and frequency were adjusted on the ventilator to maintain the end tidal CO2 at 3.5–4.5%. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37.0 ± 0.5°C using a temperature controller (model TCAT-2AC, Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ). All the tracings were recorded on a polygraph (model 7D, Grass Instruments, West Warwick, RI).
Decerebration.
This procedure has been described elsewhere (28). Anesthesia was induced and maintained by tracheal administration of isoflurane as described earlier. The external and internal carotid and pterygopalantine arteries were ligated bilaterally to minimize bleeding. The rats were placed in a prone position in a stereotaxic instrument (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA), the parietal bones were removed, the dura was incised, and the brain was transected at the midcollicular level. The portion of the brain rostral to the transection was removed by suction and the cranial cavity was loosely packed with cotton balls. The administration of isoflurane was terminated at this time, and a stabilization period of 50–60 min was allowed after the decerebration.
Vagotomy.
Vagotomy was necessary in experiments designed to investigate the role of parasympathetic innervation to the heart in mediating the bradycardic responses elicited by microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS. In these experiments, silk sutures were placed loosely around the vagus nerves bilaterally for subsequent identification and sectioning of the nerves.
Microinjections.
The details of this technique are described elsewhere (28). Briefly, the rats were placed in a prone position in a stereotaxic instrument with bite bar 18 mm below the interaural line. The microinjections were made using a dorsal approach. Four-barreled glass micropipettes (tip size, 20–40 μm) were mounted on a micromanipulator (model 1460 with an AP slide 1262, David Kopf Instruments), and each barrel was connected via PE tubing to one of the channels on a picospritzer (General Valve Corp, Fairfield, NJ). The barrels contained l-glutamate (l-Glu), artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), Ucn3, and CRFR antagonist. The coordinates for the mNTS were 0.5–0.6 mm rostral and 0.5–0.6 lateral to the calamus scriptorius and 0.5–0.6 mm deep from the dorsal medullary surface. The sites eliciting depressor and bradycardic responses were identified by microinjections of l-Glu (5 mM). The volumes of all microinjections into the mNTS were 100 nl; the selection of these volumes was based on our previous studies in which these volumes of l-Glu elicited maximum responses from the mNTS (18). The volumes were pressure ejected (30–35 psi) and visually confirmed by the displacement of fluid meniscus in the barrel containing the solution using a modified binocular horizontal microscope with a graduated reticule in one eyepiece (model PZMH, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). The duration of microinjection was 5–10 s. Microinjections (100 nl) of aCSF (pH 7.4) into the mNTS were used as controls.
In the microinjection studies, a concentration response was first done in one group of rats to ascertain a maximally effective concentration of Ucn3. In a separate group of rats, this concentration of Ucn3 was then microinjected into the same mNTS site at least four times to test whether repeated microinjections exhibited tachyphylaxis. Actual data for the concentration response and tachyphylaxis experiments are presented in results.
Greater splanchnic nerve recording.
The greater splanchnic nerve (GSN) was exposed using a retroperitoneal approach. A 1.5-cm long incision was made on left side, just caudal to the last rib, parallel to the vertebral column and about 1.5 cm lateral to the midline. The segment of the GSN immediately proximal to the celiac ganglion was identified using an operating microscope, sectioned at its junction with the celiac ganglion, and a few millimeters of the central end of the nerve were desheathed (28). The exposed portion of the nerve was placed on a bipolar electrode made of silver wire. The nerve, along with the tips of the electrode, was embedded in a silicone elastomer (Kwik-Sil, WPI), which was allowed to set for 5–10 min. The electrode was connected to a probe head stage (model Super-Z, CWE, Philadelphia, PA), and the whole nerve discharge was amplified (×20,000–30,000, using model BMA-830 amplifier, CWE) and filtered (100–5,000 Hz). The amplified signals were digitized (22 kHz) using Neuro-Corder (Cygnus Technologies, Delaware Water Gap, PA), visualized on an oscilloscope (model R5103N, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR), and stored together with BP and HR on a video cassette recorder. The whole nerve activity was full-wave rectified, and an integrated signal was obtained (time constant, 100 ms; model MA-821 Integrator, CWE). At the end of the experiment, the GSN was sectioned centrally, and the remaining activity was considered to be the noise level.
Histology.
Typical sites of microinjections in the mNTS were marked by microinjections of diluted India ink. The animals were perfused and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and serial sections of the medulla were cut (40 μm) in a vibratome, mounted on slides, dehydrated, cleared, and stained with cresyl violet. The microinjection sites were identified using a microscope, and the sections were photographed and compared with a standard atlas (30).
Drugs and chemicals.
The following drugs and chemicals were used: astressin (nonselective CRFR antagonist) (13, 21), K41498 (selective antagonist for CRF2R) (21), Ucn3, l-Glu monosodium, l-phenylephrine hydrochloride, isoflurane, and urethane. All of the solutions for the microinjections were freshly prepared in aCSF. The concentrations of different constituents in the aCSF were as follows: (in mM) 152 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.2 CaCl2, 0.8 MgCl2, 3.4 dextrose, and 5 HEPES (298 ± 2 mosmol/kg). Where applicable, the concentration of drugs refers to their salts. The sources of different drugs and chemicals were as follows: astressin and Ucn3 (American Peptide, Sunnyvale, CA), K41498 (Tocris Cookson, Ellisville, MO), and isoflurane (Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Deerfield, IL). All other drugs and chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO).
Statistical analyses.
For comparison of MAP and HR responses, the mean and mean ± SE were calculated for maximum changes in these values in response to microinjections of Ucn3 or l-Glu into the mNTS. In the concentration-response studies, comparisons of the maximum decreases in MAP and HR in different groups of rats were made by using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer's multiple comparison. In experiments testing for tachyphylaxis and the effect of CRFR antagonists, the comparisons of the maximum decreases in MAP and HR elicited by microinjection of Ucn3 into the mNTS were made by using repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer's multiple comparison test. Student's paired t-test was used for comparisons of maximum decreases in MAP and HR elicited by the following: 1) microinjection of Ucn3 into the mNTS before and after the bilateral vagotomy and 2) microinjection of l-Glu into the mNTS before and after the microinjections of astressin or K41498. An unpaired t-test was used for comparisons of the maximum decreases in MAP and HR elicited by microinjection of Ucn3 into the mNTS in anesthetized and decerebrate rats. For the analysis of nerve activity, the control value represented the average amplitude of integrated GSN activity (GSNA) during a 35-s period before the microinjections of Ucn3 or l-Glu. The maximum inhibition in GSNA amplitude, in response to microinjections of l-Glu or Ucn3 into the mNTS, was expressed as a percent decrease from the control value of the GSNA amplitude. The mean values of the integrated nerve signals were compared using Student's paired t-test. In all cases, the differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Baseline values for MAP and HR in urethane-anesthetized rats were 100.2 ± 1.9 mmHg and 395.8 ± 4.2 beats/min, respectively (n = 46). The values for baseline MAP and HR in the decerebrate rats (n = 6) were 102.5 ± 2.8 mmHg and 445.0 ± 27.0 beats/min, respectively. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the baseline values of MAP and HR in urethane-anesthetized and decerebrate rats.
Histology.
The mNTS sites, where microinjections of l-Glu elicited depressor and bradycardic responses, were marked in 10 rats; a typical mNTS site marked with India ink (100 nl) is shown in Fig. 1A. Figure 1, B and C, represents composite diagrams of mNTS sites; the sites were located 0.5–0.6 mm rostral to the calamus scriptorius.
Fig. 1.
Histological identification of microinjection sites. A: a coronal section of the medulla at a level 0.5 mm rostral to the calamus scriptorius (CS), showing a typical medial nucleus tractus solitarius (mNTS) microinjection site marked with India ink (100 nl; arrow). The center of the spot was 0.60 mm lateral to the midline and 0.59 mm deep from the dorsal medullary surface. B: drawings of coronal sections at a level 0.5 mm rostral to the CS showing the mNTS microinjection sites as dark spots; each spot represents a site in one animal. C: drawings of coronal sections at a level 0.6 mm rostral to the CS showing the mNTS microinjection sites. The microinjection sites in B and C were located in the NTS, 0.5–0.6 mm rostral to the CS, 0.50–0.63 mm lateral to the midline, and 0.45–0.61 mm deep from the dorsal medullary surface. Amb, nucleus ambiguus; AP, area postrema; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; Py, pyramids; Sp5, spinal trigeminal tract; 10, dorsal motor nucleus of vagus.
Concentration response of Ucn3.
In this and in other series of experiments, the mNTS was always identified by microinjections of l-Glu (5 mM), which stimulates neurons but not fibers of passage. Microinjections of l-Glu into the mNTS elicited depressor and bradycardic responses. The interval between the microinjections of l-Glu and other agents was at least 5 min. Microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS elicited decreases in MAP and HR. An ANOVA of MAP and HR values was found to be highly significant (Fig. 2, A and B). The maximal decreases in MAP and HR were elicited by a 0.06 mM concentration of Ucn3. The onset and duration of cardiovascular responses to microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) were 2–5 and 60–120 s, respectively. The peak effect was observed at 10–30 s.
Fig. 2.
Cardiovascular effects of urocortin 3 (Ucn3). Concentration response (n = 12) for mean arterial pressure (MAP; A) and heart rate (HR; B). Microinjections (100 nl) of Ucn3 [0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.12, and 0.25 mM; 0 mM concentration refers to artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF)] into the mNTS elicited the following decreases in MAP (0, 5.0 ± 1.0, 21.6 ± 2.6, 20.0 ± 2.8, and 12.7 ± 3.4 mmHg, respectively) and HR [0, 7.8 ± 2.6, 46.2 ± 9.3, 34.5 ± 8.4, and 16.6 ± 4.9 beats/min (bpm), respectively]. An ANOVA of MAP values was found to be highly significant (F = 16.45, degrees of freedom = 4, 46, P < 0.0001). The depressor responses to 0.06 and 0.12 mM concentrations of Ucn3 were significantly greater than those of 0.03 mM concentration (**P < 0.01), and the depressor responses to 0.06, 0.12, and 0.25 mM concentrations of Ucn3 were significantly greater than those of 0 mM concentration (**P < 0.01) (Tukey-Kramer's post hoc multiple comparison test). An ANOVA of HR values was found to be highly significant (F = 8.70, degrees of freedom = 4, 46, P < 0.0001). The decrease in HR elicited by 0.06 mM concentration was significantly greater than that elicited by 0.03 (**P < 0.01) and 0.25 mM (*P < 0.05) concentrations, and the decreases in HR elicited by 0.06 and 0.12 mM concentration were significantly greater than that elicited by 0 mM (**P < 0.01) (Tukey-Kramer's post hoc multiple comparison test). C: the decreases in MAP induced by Ucn3 (0.06 mM) before and after bilateral vagotomy were 21.0 ± 1.8 and 18.0 ± 1.2 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05) (n = 5). D: in the same group of rats, the decrease in HR (31.0 ± 6.7 beats/min) was completely blocked (***) after bilateral vagotomy. The baseline values for MAP before and after bilateral vagotomy were 109.0 ± 3.6 and 109.0 ± 2.9 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05). The baseline values for HR before and after bilateral vagotomy were 408.0 ± 10.6 and 450.0 ± 8.3 beats/min, respectively (P < 0.05).
The diminution of responses to the repeated administration of the same concentration of the agonist (tachyphylaxis) was also tested. The concentration of Ucn3 that elicited maximal cardiovascular responses (0.06 mM) was microinjected into mNTS at least four times at 30-min intervals (n = 7). The decreases in MAP in response to four consecutive microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) were 18.5 ± 1.7, 18.5 ± 2.3, 18.5 ± 2.3, and 17.8 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively, and the decreases in HR were 37.1 ± 11.0, 31.4 ± 6.7, 32.8 ± 2.6, and 29.2 ± 4.9 beats/min, respectively; a repeated-measure ANOVA showed that these values were not statistically different (P > 0.05). Thus no tachyphylaxis of responses was observed with repeated microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) at 30-min intervals. Therefore, the interval between the microinjections of Ucn3 was at least 30 min in all experiments.
Site specificity of Ucn3-induced responses.
The site specificity of Ucn3-induced responses was tested in another group of rats (n = 4). First, the mNTS site was identified by microinjections of l-Glu, and Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was microinjected at the same site to elicit usual depressor and bradycardic responses. The same concentrations of l-Glu and Ucn3 were then microinjected into an adjacent site in the cuneate nucleus (0.5 mm rostral and 1.5 mm lateral to the calamus scriptorius and 0.5 mm ventral to the dorsal surface of the medulla). Neither l-Glu nor Ucn3 elicited any cardiovascular response at this site.
Effect of Ucn3 in decerebrate rats.
The cardiovascular responses elicited by microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS were compared between decerebrate (n = 6) and urethane-anesthetized (n = 30) rats. In the decerebrate and anesthetized rats, the decreases in MAP were 38.3 ± 5.1 and 25.5 ± 2.0 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05), and decreases in HR were 56.6 ± 9.5 and 42.9 ± 4.0 beats/min, respectively (P > 0.05). These results indicated that urethane did not affect the cardiovascular responses to microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS.
Effect of vagotomy on Ucn3-induced bradycardia.
A bilateral vagotomy did not significantly affect the decreases in MAP induced by a microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS (Fig. 2C). In the same group of rats, the Ucn3-induced decrease in HR was completely blocked after bilateral vagotomy (Fig. 2D). The baseline MAP was not significantly altered by bilateral vagotomy. However, the baseline HR after bilateral vagotomy was significantly greater compared with the value before bilateral vagotomy.
Effect of CRFR antagonists on Ucn3-induced response.
The effects of a nonselective CRFR antagonist astressin on the cardiovascular responses to microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS were studied as follows. A site in the mNTS was identified on one side by microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM), and the initial depressor and bradycardic responses to Ucn3 (0.06 mM) were recorded. Within 30 min, astressin (1 mM) was microinjected at the same site. The depressor and bradycardic responses to Ucn3 microinjected 2 min after astressin were almost completely blocked. Sixty minutes after the blockade of CRFRs in the mNTS, the Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR remained significantly reduced (Fig. 3, A and B). In the same group of rats, astressin did not alter the depressor and bradycardic responses to l-Glu (5 mM) microinjected into the same mNTS site within 5 min (Fig. 3, C and D). Microinjections of astressin alone did not elicit any appreciable effects on MAP and HR.
Fig. 3.
Effect of astressin on Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR (n = 5). A and B: the initial decreases in MAP and HR by microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS were 23.0 ± 4.6 mmHg and 28.0 ± 3.7 beats/min, respectively. Two minutes after the microinjection of astressin (1 mM) into the mNTS, the Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR were 2.0 ± 1.2 mmHg and 3.0 ± 3.0 beats/min, respectively (**P < 0.01). Sixty minutes later, the Ucn-induced decreases in MAP and HR were still significantly smaller (4.0 ± 1.8 mmHg and 8.0 ± 3.7 beats/min, respectively, **P < 0.01). C and D: in the same group of rats, the decreases in MAP elicited by microinjections of l-glutamate (l-Glu; 5 mM) into the mNTS before and after the microinjection of astressin were 29.0 ± 4.0 and 30.0 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05). l-Glu-induced HR decreases before and after astressin were 45.0 ± 5.0 and 44.0 ± 4.0 beats/min, respectively (P > 0.05).
Effect of CRF2R antagonist on Ucn3-induced response.
The effect of a selective CRF2R antagonist K41498 was also studied on the cardiovascular responses elicited by microinjections of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS. The mNTS site was identified on one side by a microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM). After the initial microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS, K41498 (5 mM) was microinjected at the same site within 30 min. The microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was repeated at the same site within 2 and 60 min. Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR were almost completely blocked by prior microinjections of K41498 and remained significantly reduced 60 min after the blockade of CRF2Rs in the mNTS (Fig. 4, A and B). In the same group of rats, the depressor and bradycardic responses to microinjections of l-Glu (5 mM) were not significantly altered by K41498 (Fig. 4, C and D). The microinjection of K41498 alone did not exert any effect on MAP and HR.
Fig. 4.
Effect of K41498 on Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR (n = 6). A and B: the initial decreases in MAP and HR by microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS were 25.8 ± 4.3 mmHg and 35.0 ± 5.6 beats/min, respectively. Two minutes after the microinjection of K41498 (5 mM) into the mNTS, the Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP and HR were 0.8 ± 0.8 mmHg and 1.6 ± 1.6 beats/min, respectively (**P < 0.01). Sixty minutes later, the Ucn3-induced decreases in MAP were still significantly smaller (9.1 ± 2.3 mmHg) compared with initial MAP decreases (**P < 0.01). At this time, the Ucn3-induced decreases in HR were also significantly smaller (13.3 ± 4.2 beats/min) compared with initial HR decrease (**P < 0.01), but HR responses showed significant recovery (*P < 0.05) when compared with the response at 2 min after the microinjection of K41498. C and D: in the same group of rats, the decreases in MAP elicited by microinjections of l-Glu (5 mM) into the mNTS before and after the microinjection of K41498 were 28.3 ± 5.2 and 27.5 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively (P > 0.05). l-Glu-induced HR decreases before and after K41498 were 41.6 ± 9.8 and 38.3 ± 9.0 beats/min, respectively (P > 0.05).
A typical tracing showing the effect of K41498 on Ucn3-induced responses is shown in Fig. 5. The mNTS site was identified by a microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM, Fig. 5A). A microinjection of aCSF (100 nl), 2–5 min later, at the same site elicited no responses (Fig. 5B). About 2 min after the microinjection of aCSF, a microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) at the same site elicited decreases in MAP, pulsatile arterial pressure (PAP), and HR (Fig. 5C). Thirty minutes after the microinjection of Ucn3, K41498 (5 mM) was microinjected at the same site; the microinjection of K41498 alone did not elicit any effect on MAP, PAP, and HR (Fig. 5D). Within 2 min, Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was again microinjected at the same site; the responses to Ucn3 were blocked (Fig. 5E). K41498 did not alter the depressor and bradycardic responses to the microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM); the interval between the microinjections of K41498 and l-Glu was 5 min (Fig. 5F).
Fig. 5.
Blockade of Ucn3 responses by K41498. Top: MAP (in mmHg). Middle: pulsatile arterial pressure (PAP, in mmHg). Bottom: HR (in beats/min). A: the mNTS site was identified by a microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM). B: microinjection of aCSF (100 nl), 2–5 min later, at same site elicited no responses. C: 2 min later, microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) at same site elicited decreases in MAP, PAP, and HR. D: 30 min after microinjection of Ucn3, K41498 (5 mM) was microinjected at the same site; no responses in MAP, PAP, and HR were elicited. E: within 2 min, Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was again microinjected at the same site; the responses to Ucn3 were abolished. F: microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM), 5 min later, elicited the usual decreases in MAP, PAP, and HR. The volume of all microinjections was 100 nl.
Effect of Ucn3 on sympathetic nerve activity.
The effect of the microinjections of Ucn3 into mNTS on efferent sympathetic nerve activity was also studied. Tracings of a typical recording are shown in Fig. 6. The efferent discharge was recorded from a segment of the GSN. An intravenous bolus injection of phenylephrine (10 μg/kg) increased MAP, which, in turn, elicited a reflex bradycardia and an inhibition of efferent sympathetic nerve discharge (not shown). About 10 min later, when the effects of phenylephrine subsided, a microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM) into the mNTS elicited an inhibition of the sympathetic nerve discharge, which lasted for 5–10 s (Fig. 6A). After 5 min, a microinjection of aCSF (100 nl) into the same mNTS site did not alter the sympathetic nerve activity (not shown). Within 2 min, Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was microinjected at the same site; a decrease in efferent nerve discharge was elicited, which lasted for 20–100 s (Fig. 6B). After an interval of 30 min, K41498 (5 mM) was microinjected at the same site in the mNTS; a microinjection of K41498 alone did not alter the sympathetic nerve activity (not shown). Within 2 min, Ucn3 (0.06 mM) was again microinjected at the same site in the mNTS; a Ucn3-induced decrease in the efferent nerve discharge was abolished (Fig. 6C).
Fig. 6.
Effect of the microinjection of K41498 into the mNTS on Ucn3-induced sympathetic nerve responses. First trace: MAP (in mmHg). Second trace: PAP (in mmHg). Third trace: HR (in beats/min). Fourth trace: integrated greater splanchnic nerve activity (GSNA, in μV/100 ms). Fifth trace: whole GSNA. Inhibition of GSNA by a pressor response induced by phenylephrine (10 μg/kg iv) indicated that the GSNA was barosensitive (not shown). Microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM; A) and Ucn3 (0.06 mM; B) into the mNTS decreased MAP, PAP, HR, integrated GSNA, and whole GSNA. C: 2 min after the microinjection of K41498 (5 mM) at the same site, the GSNA responses to microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS were blocked.
Group data for this experiment are shown in Fig. 7. Microinjections of l-Glu (5 mM) or Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS elicited significant decreases in the GSNA compared with basal nerve activity. Two minutes after the blockade of CRF2R by a microinjection of K41498 (5 mM) into the mNTS, a microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) did not elicit a significant decrease in the GSNA compared with basal nerve activity.
Fig. 7.
Group data for the effect of Ucn3 on sympathetic nerve activity (n = 7). A and B: microinjection of l-Glu (5 mM) and Ucn3 (0.06 mM) into the mNTS elicited significant (**P < 0.01) decreases in the GSNA (83.2 ± 2.9 and 72.9 ± 5.7%, respectively) compared with basal nerve activity. C: 2 min after the blockade of corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 receptor by microinjection of K41498 (5 mM) into the mNTS, microinjection of Ucn3 (0.06 mM) did not elicit significant (P > 0.05) decrease in the GSNA (1.5 ± 1.5%) compared with basal nerve activity. K41498 did not elicit any response by itself (not shown).
DISCUSSION
The main observation in this study was that microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS elicited depressor and bradycardic responses. This is the first report of the central cardiovascular effects of Ucn3 in the mNTS. Our results are in agreement with an earlier report of Yamazaki et al. (46) in which microinjections of Ucn1 and Ucn2 into the mNTS elicited depressor and bradycardic responses. We extended these observations as follows: 1) a specific and potent agonist of CRF2Rs (Ucn3) was used; 2) using a specific antagonist, we demonstrated that the effects of Ucn3 were mediated via CRF2Rs in the mNTS; 3) we also established that Ucn3-induced depressor responses were mediated via the inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity, and bradycardic responses were mediated via the activation of vagal innervation to the heart; and 4) our experiments in unanesthetized midcollicular rats revealed that urethane anesthesia did not alter the responses to Ucn3 qualitatively or quantitatively and that the neural structures located rostral to the brainstem were not necessary for the observed Ucn3-induced cardiovascular effects in the mNTS.
Microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS showed a nonlinear bell-shaped concentration response. This type of concentration response has been reported for several enzymes, peptides, and hormones (4, 18). It has been explained by homotropic allostery in which the agonist at higher concentrations binds to a modulator site, which is different from the primary binding site, and thereby affects the function of the receptor, resulting in an attenuated responses (1). Another explanation for the reduced responses at higher concentrations of Ucn3 could be that at higher concentrations, this agonist could activate inhibitory interneurons located in the mNTS. For example, the presence of GABAergic neurons and terminals (38) has been reported in the mNTS. The activation of these interneurons could release GABA in the mNTS, which is likely to increase BP and HR (38). Similarly, the presence of catecholaminergic neurons has been demonstrated in the mNTS, and the activation of these neurons may release norepinephrine in the NTS, which has been reported to increase BP (36). The pressor effects of GABA and norepinephrine in the NTS are expected to reduce the depressor and bradycardic responses to Ucn3 at higher concentrations. These possibilities for the reduced cardiovascular responses to higher concentrations of Ucn3 in the mNTS remain to be tested.
The possibility that the Ucn3-induced cardiovascular effects were due to its leakage from the microinjection site into the peripheral circulation was excluded because the doses of Ucn3 that elicited depressor and bradycardic responses when microinjected into the mNTS did not elicit responses when injected intravenously. The site specificity of Ucn3-induced cardiovascular responses was established by the lack of responses to Ucn3 microinjections into the areas located adjacent to mNTS, such as the cuneate nucleus. Consistent with our previous observations (3), the local distortion of brain tissue or any nonspecific effects were not responsible for the Ucn3-induced cardiovascular responses because the microinjections of aCSF into the mNTS did not elicit any responses.
It needs to be mentioned that the affinities of CRFRs are in the nanomolar range (21, 22), whereas the maximally effective concentration of Ucn3 used in this study was in the millimolar range. In view of the high concentration of Ucn3 used and the high affinity of CRFRs, it is possible that Ucn3 may have reached the sites adjacent to the mNTS and contributed to the observed cardiovascular responses. Thus it is possible that Ucn3 may have diffused to the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus, which is located close to the mNTS. Although this nucleus has a minor role in the parasympathetic regulation of the HR and essentially no role in BP regulation, the participation of the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus in Ucn3-induced cardiovascular responses cannot be excluded with certainty.
Based on current knowledge regarding medullospinal cardiovascular regulatory areas (35), the mechanism of the cardiovascular responses elicited by microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS can be explained as follows. Ucn3 may stimulate mNTS neurons, which, in turn, may stimulate a population of GABAergic neurons located in the caudal ventrolateral medullary depressor area (CVLM). As a result, GABA is released in the rostral ventrolateral medullary pressor area (RVLM), causing a decrease in the activity of RVLM neurons. Consequently, the activity of the excitatory input from the RVLM neurons to the sympathetic preganglionic neurons located in the intermediolateral cell column of the thoracolumbar cord (IML) is decreased. Since the output of the sympathetic preganglionic neurons to the arterioles is decreased, the systemic BP decreases. Supporting this explanation is our observation that the sympathetic activity recorded from the central end of the GSN was decreased by microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS.
Although microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS may most likely elicit cardiovascular responses by activating the pathway involving mNTS, CVLM, RVLM, and IML, it is quite possible that other mNTS neurons following a direct pathway involving mNTS, RVLM, and IML may be activated to elicit opposite cardiovascular responses. In this context, it may be noted that microinjections of l-Glu into the mNTS normally elicit depressor and bradycardic responses in anesthetized and decerebrate animals by activating a pathway involving mNTS, CVLM, RVLM, and IML (9). However, when the CVLM is inhibited by microinjections of muscimol, l-Glu microinjections into the mNTS elicit pressor responses via the mNTS, RVLM, and IML pathway (41). If this pressor pathway is activated by Ucn3 microinjections into the mNTS, it may reduce the Ucn3-induced depressor and bradycardic responses elicited via the mNTS/CVLM/RVLM/IML pathway. This possibility remains to be tested.
The bradycardia elicited by a microinjection of Ucn3 into the mNTS was mediated via the activation of the vagal innervation to the heart. This conclusion was based on our observation that a bilateral vagotomy completely abolished Ucn3-induced bradycardic responses. The mechanism of Ucn3-induced bradycardic responses can be explained as follows, based on our current knowledge regarding the vagal control of the heart (25). The microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS may activate mNTS neurons, projecting to the nucleus ambiguus (nAmb). The parasympathetic preganglionic neurons located in the nAmb may be activated via the excitatory projection from the mNTS to the nAmb (29). The stimulation of parasympathetic preganglionic neurons in the nAmb may increase parasympathetic activity to the heart via the vagus nerves and elicit bradycardia.
Astressin has been reported to be a highly potent antagonist at CRF1Rs as well as CRF2Rs (13, 21). On the other hand, K41498 has been reported to be a highly selective CRF2R antagonist (21). The bradycardic and depressor responses induced by microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS were almost completely blocked by a prior microinjection of astressin or K41498 at the same site. A Ucn3-induced decrease in GSNA was also blocked by K41498. These observations indicated that the cardiovascular responses induced by microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS were mediated via CRF2Rs. Astressin and K41498 did not exert any deleterious effects at the site of injection because they did not alter responses to another unrelated agonist, l-Glu.
Microinjections of astressin or K41498 alone into the mNTS did not elicit any cardiovascular responses. This observation suggested that in the mNTS, Ucn3 and CRF2Rs were not involved in the control of cardiovascular function under normal physiological situations. Although the presence of CRF2Rs in the mNTS has been reported (5, 8, 42), immunohistochemical studies on the rat brain have revealed the presence of Ucn1, but not Ucn3, fibers in the mNTS (2, 23). In addition, microinjections of Ucn1 into the mNTS have been reported to elicit depressor and bradycardic responses (46). Based on these reports, it appears that under normal physiological conditions, the endogenous ligand for CRF2Rs in the mNTS in the central regulation of cardiovascular function may be Ucn1 (46). However, Ucn3 may activate CRF2Rs in the mNTS under specific circumstances such as stress. For example, the presence of Ucn3 has been reported in human plasma, raising the possibility that this peptide may play a role as a circulating hormone (39). The source of Ucn3 in plasma is not known. The expression of Ucn3 has been reported in several peripheral tissues and organs, such as the heart, kidney, and different parts of the gastrointestinal tract (15, 22, 39). If the plasma levels of Ucn3 increase in certain situations (e.g., stress), there is a possibility that it may reach the mNTS via the area postrema and cause hypotension and bradycardia. Moreover, the fenestrated capillaries and perivascular spaces present in the NTS may permit a brisk influx of solutes into the neuropil of the mNTS (12). Hypotension caused by systemically infused Ucn2 and other CRF analogs (6, 33) may also be partially mediated via the activation of CRF2Rs in the mNTS because they cross the blood-brain barrier by a unique transport system (19). Acute stress is often associated with increases in BP and HR. Ucn-induced hypotension and bradycardia may be beneficial under these situations.
In conclusion, microinjections of Ucn3 into the mNTS elicited depressor and bradycardic responses that were mediated via CRF2Rs. The depressor responses were mediated by a decrease in sympathetic nerve activity. The bradycardia was mediated via the vagus nerves. Ucn3 and CRF2Rs in the mNTS may be involved in cardiovascular regulation under yet-unidentified circumstances such as stress.
GRANTS
This work was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants HL-024347 and HL-076248 (to H. N. Sapru).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bindslev N A homotropic two-state model and auto-antagonism. BMC Pharmacol 4: 11–22, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bittencourt JC, Vaughan J, Arias C, Rissman RA, Vale WW, Sawchenko PE. Urocortin expression in rat brain: evidence against a pervasive relationship of urocortin-containing projections with targets bearing type 2 CRF receptors. J Comp Neurol 415: 285–312, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown SN, Chitravanshi VC, Sapru HN. Cardiovascular actions of adrenocorticotropin microinjections into the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat. Neuroscience 143: 863–874, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown SN, Chitravanshi VC, Kawabe K, Sapru HN. Microinjections of melanin concentrating hormone into the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat elicit depressor and bradycardic responses. Neuroscience 50: 796–806, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chalmers DT, Lovenberg TW, De Souza EB. Localization of novel corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRF2) mRNA expression to specific subcortical nuclei in rat brain: comparison with CRF1 receptor mRNA expression. J Neurosci 15: 6340–6350, 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen OC, Doong ML, Rivier JE, Tache Y. Intravenous urocortin II decreases blood pressure through CRF(2) receptor in rats. Regul Pept 113: 125–130, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chu CP, Qiu DL, Kato K, Kunitake T, Watanabe S, Yu NS, Nakazato M, Kannan H. Central stresscopin modulates cardiovascular function through the adrenal medulla in conscious rats. Regul Pept 119: 53–59, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dautzenberg FM, Hauger RL. The CRF peptide family and their receptors: yet more partners discovered. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23: 71–77, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dhruva A, Bhatnagar T, Sapru HN. Cardiovascular responses to microinjections of glutamate into the nucleus tractus solitarii of unanesthetized supracollicular decerebrate rats. Brain Research 801: 88–100, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Donaldson CJ, Sutton SW, Perrin MH, Corrigan AZ, Lewis KA, Rivier JE, Vaughan JM, Vale WW. Cloning and characterization of human urocortin. Endocrinology 137: 2167–2170, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Drolet G, Rivest S. Corticotropin-releasing hormone and its receptors; an evaluation at the transcription level in vivo. Peptides 22: 761–767, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gross PM, Wall KM, Pang JJ, Shaver SW, Wainman DS. Microvascular specializations promoting rapid interstitial solute dispersion in nucleus tractus solitarius. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 259: R1131–R1138, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gulyas J, Rivier C, Perrin M, Koerber SC, Sutton S, Corrigan A, Lahrichi SL, Craig AG, Vale WW, Rivier J. Potent, structurally constrained agonists and competitive antagonists of corticotrophin-releasing factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 10575–10579, 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hauger RL, Grigoriadis DE, Dallman MF, Plotsky PM, Vale WW, Dautzenberg FM. International Union of Pharmacology XXXVI. Current status of the nomenclature for receptors for corticotrophin releasing factor and their ligands. Pharmacol Rev 55: 21–26, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hsu SY, Hsueh AJ. Human stresscopin and stresscopin-related peptide are selective ligands for the type 2 corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Nat Med 7: 605–611, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iino K, Sasano H, Oki Y, Andoh N, Shin RW, Kitamoto T, Takahashi K, Suzuki H, Tezuka F, Yoshimi T, Nagura H. Urocortin expression in the human central nervous system. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 50: 107–114, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jamieson PM, Li C, Kukura C, Vaughan J, Vale W. Urocortin 3 modulates the neuroendocrine stress response and is regulated in rat amygdala and hypothalamus by stress and glucocorticoids. Endocrinology 147: 4578–4588, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kasamatsu K, Chitravanshi VC, Sapru HN. Depressor and bradycardic responses to microinjections of endomorphin-2 into the NTS are mediated via ionotropic glutamate receptors. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 287: R715–R728, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kastin AJ, Akerstrom V. Differential interactions of urocortin/corticotropin-releasing hormone peptides with the blood-brain barrier. Neuroendocrinology 75: 367–374, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kozicz T, Yanaihara H, Arimura A. Distribution of urocortin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat. J Comp Neurol 391: 1–10, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lawrence AJ, Krstew EV, Dautzenberg FM, Ruhmann A. The highly selective CRF2 receptor antagonist K41498 binds to presynaptic CRF2 receptors in rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 136: 896–904, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lewis K, Li C, Perrin MH, Blount A, Kunitake K, Donaldson C, Vaughan J, Reyes TM, Gulyas J, Fischer W, Bilezikjian L, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale WW. Identification of urocortin III, an additional member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family with high affinity for the CRF2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 7570–7575, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li C, Vaughan J, Sawchenko PE, Vale WW. Urocortin III-immunoreactive projections in rat brain: partial overlap with sites of type 2 corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor expression. J Neurosci 22: 991–1001, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li C, Chen P, Vaughan J, Blount A, Chen A, Jamieson PM, Rivier J, Smith MS, Vale WW. Urocortin III is expressed in pancreatic beta-cells and stimulates insulin and glucagon secretion. Endocrinology 144: 3216–3224, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mendelowitz D Advances in parasympathetic control of heart rate and cardiac function. News Physiol Sci 14: 155–161, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moreau JL, Kilpatrick G, Jenck F. Urocortin, a novel neuropeptide with anxiogenic-like properties. Neuroreport 8: 1697–1701, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Morin SM, Ling N, Liu XJ, Kahl SD, Gehlert DR. Differential distribution of urocortin- and corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivities in the rat brain. Neuroscience 92: 281–291, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakamura T, Kawabe K, Sapru HN. Cold pressor test in the rat: medullary and spinal pathways and neurotransmitters. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H1780–H1787, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Neff RA, Mihalevich M, Mendelowitz D. Stimulation of NTS activates NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in rat cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus. Brain Res 792: 277–282, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (4th ed.). New York: Academic, 1986.
- 31.Perrin MH, Vale WW. Corticotropin releasing factor receptors and their ligand family. Ann NY Acad Sci 885: 312–328, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reyes TM, Lewis K, Perrin MH, Kunitake KS, Vaughan J, Arias CA, Hogenesch JB, Gulyas J, Rivier J, Vale WW, Sawchenko PE. Urocortin II: a member of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) neuropeptide family that is selectively bound by type 2 CRF receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 2843–2848, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Richter RM, Mulvany MJ. Comparison of hCRF and oCRF effects on cardiovascular responses after central, peripheral, and in vitro application. Peptides 16: 843–849, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sanchez MM, Young LJ, Plotsky PM, Insel TR. Autoradiographic and in situ hybridization localization of corticotropin-releasing factor 1 and 2 receptors in nonhuman primate brain. J Comp Neurol 408: 365–377, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sapru HN Glutamate circuits in selected medullo-spinal areas regulating cardiovascular function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29: 491–496, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Silva de Oliveira LC, Bonagamba LG, Machado BH. Noradrenergic inhibitory modulation in the caudal commissural NTS of the pressor response to chemoreflex activation in awake rats. Auton Neurosci 136: 63–68, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spina M, Merlo-Pich E, Chan RK, Basso AM, Rivier J, Vale WW, Koob GF. Appetite-suppressing effects of urocortin, a CRF-related neuropeptide. Science 273: 1561–1564, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sved AF GABA-mediated neural transmission in mechanisms of cardiovascular control by the NTS. In: Nucleus of the Solitary Tract, edited by Barraco IRA. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994, p. 245–253.
- 39.Takahashi K, Totsune K, Murakami O, Saruta M, Nakabayashi M, Suzuki T, Sasano H, Shibahara S. Expression of urocortin III/stresscopin in human heart and kidney. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 1897–1903, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Turnbull AV, Vale WW, Rivier C. Urocortin, a corticotropin-releasing factor-related mammalian peptide, inhibits edema due to thermal injury in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 303: 213–216, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Urbanski R, Sapru HN. Evidence for a sympathoexcitatory pathway from the nucleus tractus solitarius to the ventrolateral medullary pressor area. J Auton Nerv Syst 23: 161–174, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Van Pett K, Viau V, Bittencourt JC, Chan RK, Li HY, Arias C, Prins GS, Perrin M, Vale W, Sawchenko PE. Distribution of mRNAs encoding CRF receptors in brain and pituitary of rat and mouse. J Comp Neurol 428: 191–212, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vaughan J, Donaldson C, Bittencourt J, Perrin MH, Lewis K, Sutton S, Chan R, Turnbull AV, Lovejoy D, Rivier C, Rivier J, Sawchenko PE, Vale W. Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor. Nature 378: 287–292, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Venihaki M, Sakihara S, Subramanian S, Dikkes P, Weninger SC, Liapakis G, Graf T, Majzoub JA. Urocortin III, a brain neuropeptide of the corticotropin-releasing hormone family: modulation by stress and attenuation of some anxiety-like behaviours. J Neuroendocrinol 16: 411–422, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yamamoto H, Maeda T, Fujimura M, Fujimiya M. Urocortin-like immunoreactivity in the substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area and Edinger-Westphal nucleus of rat. Neurosci Lett 243: 21–24, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yamazaki T, Waki H, Kohsaka A, Nakamura T, Cui H, Yukawa K, Maeda M. Microinjection of urocortin into the rat nucleus tractus solitarii decreases arterial blood pressure. Auton Neurosci 142: 51–54, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]