Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1983 Nov;42(2):747–754. doi: 10.1128/iai.42.2.747-754.1983

Effect of infectious bursal disease on natural killer cell activity and mitogenic response of chicken lymphoid cells: role of adherent cells in cellular immune suppression.

J M Sharma, L F Lee
PMCID: PMC264493  PMID: 6315586

Abstract

A pathogenic isolate of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) caused persistent and extensive lesions in the bursa but mild and transient lesions in the thymuses of chickens of lines 63 and P. The effect of IBDV on two cellular immune functions, namely, natural killer cell cytotoxicity and mitogenic response, was studied. The natural killer cell activity was not consistently influenced, but the virus, during the first 2 weeks of infection, caused transient depression of the blastogenic response of spleen cells to phytohemagglutinin. Studies on mitogenic hyporesponsiveness revealed that the functional impairment was mediated by a suppressor cell that shared several characteristics with macrophages; i.e., the suppressor cell was adherent to plastic, was phagocytic, and resisted treatment with antithymocyte and antibursa cell sera. Removal of suppressor cells from the spleens of virus-infected chickens resulted in restoration of the mitogenic response of cells. Further, in mixing experiments, the suppressor cell isolated from the spleens of virus-infected chickens also inhibited the mitogenic response of normal spleen cells. We concluded that reduced mitogenic response of lymphocytes in IBDV-infected chickens was not due to a lack of functional T-cells, as suggested previously by others, but was due to macrophage-like suppressor cells. The suppressor cells, although present in certain normal chickens, became activated during early stages of IBDV infection.

Full text

PDF
747

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allan W. H., Faragher J. T., Cullen G. A. Immunosuppression by the infectious bursal agent in chickens immunised against Newcastle disease. Vet Rec. 1972 Apr 29;90(18):511–512. doi: 10.1136/vr.90.18.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson W. I., Reid W. M., Lukert P. D., Fletcher O. J., Jr Influence of infectious bursal disease on the development of immunity to Eimeria tenella. Avian Dis. 1977 Oct-Dec;21(4):637–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheville N. F. Studies on the pathogenesis of Gumboro disease in the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus of the chicken. Am J Pathol. 1967 Oct;51(4):527–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Confer A. W., MacWilliams P. S. Correlation of hematological changes and serum and monocyte inhibition with the early suppression of phytohemagglutinin stimulation of lymphocytes in experimental infectious bursal disease. Can J Comp Med. 1982 Apr;46(2):169–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Confer A. W., Springer W. T., Shane S. M., Donovan J. F. Sequential mitogen stimulation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from chickens inoculated with infectious bursal disease virus. Am J Vet Res. 1981 Dec;42(12):2109–2113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fleischer B. Effector cells in avian spontaneous and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol. 1980 Sep;125(3):1161–1166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gelb J., Eidson C. S., Fletcher O. J., Kleven S. H. Studies on interferon induction by infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). II. Interferon production in White Leghorn chickens infected with an attenuated or pathogenic isolant of IBDV. Avian Dis. 1979 Jul-Sep;23(3):634–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giambrone J. J., Donahoe J. P., Dawe D. L., Eidson C. S. Specific suppression of the bursa-dependent immune system of chicks with infectious bursal disease virus. Am J Vet Res. 1977 May;38(5):581–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giambrone J. J., Eidson C. S., Kleven S. H. Effect of infectious bursal disease on the response of chickens to Mycoplasma synoviae, Newcastle disease virus, and infectious bronchitis virus. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Feb;38(2):251–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giambrone J. J., Eidson C. S., Page R. K., Fletcher O. J., Barger B. O., Kleven S. H. Effect of infectious bursal agent on the response of chickens to Newcastle disease and Marek's disease vaccination. Avian Dis. 1976 Jul-Sep;20(3):534–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herberman R. B. Natural killer (NK) cells and their possible roles in resistance against disease. Clin Immunol Rev. 1981;1(1):1–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirai K., Calnek B. W. In vitro replication of infectious bursal disease virus in established lymphoid cell lines and chicken B lymphocytes. Infect Immun. 1979 Sep;25(3):964–970. doi: 10.1128/iai.25.3.964-970.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hirai K., Funakoshi T., Nakai T., Shimakura S. Sequential changes in the number of surface immunoglobulin-bearing B lymphocytes in infectious bursal disease virus-infected chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Apr-Jun;25(2):484–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirai K., Kunihiro K., Shimakura S. Characterization of Immunosuppression in chickens by infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 1979 Oct-Dec;23(4):950–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirai K., Shimakura S., Kawamoto E., Taguchi F., Kim S. T., Chang C. N., Iritani Y. The immunodepressive effect of infectious bursal disease virus in chickens. Avian Dis. 1974 Jan-Mar;18(1):50–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopkins I. G., Edwards K. R., Thornton D. H. Measurement of immunosuppression in chickens caused by infectious bursal disease vaccines using Brucella abortus strain 19. Res Vet Sci. 1979 Sep;27(2):260–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ivanyi J. Immunodeficiency in the chicken. II. Production of monomeric IgM following testosterone treatment or infection with Gumboro disease. Immunology. 1975 Jun;28(6):1015–1021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivanyi J., Morris R. Immunodeficiency in the chicken. IV. An immunological study of infectious bursal disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1976 Jan;23(1):154–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Käufer I., Weiss E. Significance of bursa of Fabricius as target organ in infectious bursal disease of chickens. Infect Immun. 1980 Feb;27(2):364–367. doi: 10.1128/iai.27.2.364-367.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lam K. M., Linna T. J. Transfer of natural resistance to Marek's disease (JMV) with non-immune spleen cells. I. Studies of cell population transferring resistance. Int J Cancer. 1979 Nov 15;24(5):662–667. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910240521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee L. F., Sharma J. M., Nazerian K., Witter R. L. Suppression and enhancement of mitogen response in chickens infected with Marek's disease virus and the herpesvirus of turkeys. Infect Immun. 1978 Aug;21(2):474–479. doi: 10.1128/iai.21.2.474-479.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee L. F., Sharma J. M., Nazerian K., Witter R. L. Suppression of mitogen-induced proliferation of normal spleen cells by macrophages from chickens inoculated with Marek's disease virus. J Immunol. 1978 May;120(5):1554–1559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leibold W., Janotte G., Peter H. H. Spontaneous cell-mediated cytotoxicity (SCMC) in various mammalian species and chickens: selective reaction pattern and different mechanisms. Scand J Immunol. 1980;11(2):203–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1980.tb00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller H., Scholtissek C., Becht H. The genome of infectious bursal disease virus consists of two segments of double-stranded RNA. J Virol. 1979 Sep;31(3):584–589. doi: 10.1128/jvi.31.3.584-589.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Müller R., Käufer I., Reinacher M., Weiss E. Immunofluorescent studies of early virus propagation after oral infection with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1979 Jul;26(5):345–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1979.tb00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Santivatr D., Maheswaran S. K., Newman J. A., Pomeroy B. S. Effect of infectious bursal disease virus infection on the phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by mononuclear phagocytic cells of susceptible and resistant strains of chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Apr-Jun;25(2):303–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharma J. M. Cell-mediated immunity to tumor antigen in Marek's disease: susceptibility of effector cells to antithymocyte serum and enhancement of cytotoxic activity by Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase. Infect Immun. 1977 Oct;18(1):46–51. doi: 10.1128/iai.18.1.46-51.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sharma J. M., Coulson B. D. Presence of natural killer cells in specific-pathogen-free chickens. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Aug;63(2):527–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sharma J. M. In vitro suppression of T-cell mitogenic response and tumor cell proliferation by spleen macrophages from normal chickens. Infect Immun. 1980 Jun;28(3):914–922. doi: 10.1128/iai.28.3.914-922.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharma J. M. Natural killer cell activity in chickens exposed to Marek's disease virus: inhibition of activity in susceptible chickens and enhancement of activity in resistant and vaccinated chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Oct-Dec;25(4):882–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharma J. M., Okazaki W. Natural killer cell activity in chickens: target cell analysis and effect of antithymocyte serum on effector cells. Infect Immun. 1981 Mar;31(3):1078–1085. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.3.1078-1085.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sivanandan V., Maheswaran S. K. Immune profile of infectious bursal disease. III. Effect of infectious bursal disease virus on the lymphocyte responses to phytomitogens and on mixed lymphocyte reaction of chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Jan-Mar;25(1):112–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sivanandan V., Maheswaran S. K. Immune profile of infectious bursal disease: I. Effect of infectious bursal disease virus on peripheral blood T and B lymphocytes of chickens. Avian Dis. 1980 Jul-Sep;24(3):715–725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thornton D. H., Pattison M. Comparison of vaccines against infectious bursal disease. J Comp Pathol. 1975 Oct;85(4):597–610. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(75)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES