Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1983 Oct;42(1):362–367. doi: 10.1128/iai.42.1.362-367.1983

In vivo microscopic observations of the responses of Kupffer cells and the hepatic microcirculation to Mycobacterium bovis BCG alone and in combination with endotoxin.

R S McCuskey, R Urbaschek, P A McCuskey, B Urbaschek
PMCID: PMC264566  PMID: 6352499

Abstract

Kupffer cell function and hepatic microvascular hemodynamics were studied by in vivo microscopy in Mycobacterium bovis BCG-infected NMRI mice before and after treatment with minute (0.01 mu mg) tolerance-producing doses and doses causing 70% lethality (0.5 micrograms) of Escherichia coli 0111:B5 endotoxin alone and in combination. BCG-induced granulomas distorted the hepatic microvasculature and impeded blood flow in many sinusoids; flow also was altered further by leukocytes adhering to the sinusoidal walls and by enlarged Kupffer cells that bulged into the lumen. Nevertheless, in BCG-infected mice, the ratio of Kupffer cells which phagocytosed latex to sinusoids containing blood flow and capable of delivering these particulates to Kupffer cells was significantly greater than that in uninfected mice. The phagocytosis of single latex particles by individual Kupffer cells also was more rapid. This indicated an expansion of the numbers and activation of Kupffer cells. In this hyperreactive state, the tolerance-inducing dose of endotoxin produced no change in the rate of phagocytosis after 2 h. In contrast, the 70% lethal dose reduced the rate by 123%, unless tolerance was induced, in which case there was no reduction in the rate of phagocytosis. Twenty-four hours after injection of the tolerance-inducing dose, however, the rate of phagocytosis was accelerated slightly (17%). This suggested that the Kupffer cells had been activated and perhaps were more effective in clearing subsequent endotoxin from the blood but without sufficient release of toxic substances to be lethal. That some mediators were released, however, was suggested by the microvascular alterations that accompanied the above phagocytic responses. These results further support the concept of a central role for Kupffer cells in endotoxin-mediated, nonspecific host defense mechanisms.

Full text

PDF
362

Images in this article

364Image
on p.364

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berry L. J. Bacterial toxins. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol. 1977 Nov;5(3):239–318. doi: 10.3109/10408447709082601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhatnagar R., Schirmer R., Ernst M., Decker K. Superoxide release by zymosan-stimulated rat Kupffer cells in vitro. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Sep;119(1):171–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DUBOS R. J., SCHAEDLER R. W. Effects of cellular constituents of mycobacteria on the resistance of mice to heterologous infections I. Protective effects. J Exp Med. 1957 Nov 1;106(5):703–717. doi: 10.1084/jem.106.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HOWARD J. G., BIOZZI G., HALPERN B. N., STIFFEL C., MOUTON D. The effect of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (BCG) infection on the resistance of mice to bacterial endotoxin and Salmonella enteritidis infection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1959 Jun;40(3):281–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maier R. V., Ulevitch R. J. The response of isolated rabbit hepatic macrophages (H-M macrophage) to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Circ Shock. 1981;8(2):165–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mathison J. C., Ulevitch R. J. The clearance, tissue distribution, and cellular localization of intravenously injected lipopolysaccharide in rabbits. J Immunol. 1979 Nov;123(5):2133–2143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCuskey R. S. In vivo microscopy of internal organs. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1981;59B:79–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCuskey R. S., Reilly F. D., McCuskey P. A., Dimlich R. V. In vivo microscopy of the hepatic microvascular system. Bibl Anat. 1979;(18):73–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCuskey R. S., Urbaschek R., McCuskey P. A., Urbaschek B. In vivo microscopic studies of the responses of the liver to endotoxin. Klin Wochenschr. 1982 Jul 15;60(14):749–751. doi: 10.1007/BF01716570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Munford R. S. Endotoxin(s) and the liver. Gastroenterology. 1978 Sep;75(3):532–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nolan J. P. Endotoxin, reticuloendothelial function, and liver injury. Hepatology. 1981 Sep-Oct;1(5):458–465. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840010516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parant M. A., Parant F. J., Chedid L. A. Enhancement of resistance to infections by endotoxin-induced serum factor from Mycobacterium bovis BCG-infected mice. Infect Immun. 1980 Jun;28(3):654–659. doi: 10.1128/iai.28.3.654-659.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ruiter D. J., van der Meulen J., Brouwer A., Hummel M. J., Mauw B. J., van der Ploeg J. C., Wisse E. Uptake by liver cells of endotoxin following its intravenous injection. Lab Invest. 1981 Jul;45(1):38–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SUTER E., KIRSANOW E. M. Hyperreactivity to endotoxin in mice infected with mycobacteria. Induction and elicitation of the reactions. Immunology. 1961 Oct;4:354–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Urbaschek B., Nowotny A. Endotoxin tolerance induced by detoxified endotoxin (endotoxoid). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Feb;127(2):650–652. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Urbaschek R., Urbaschek B. Ability of Post-endotoxin serum from BCG-infected mice to induce nonspecific resistance and stimulation of granulopoiesis. Infect Immun. 1983 Mar;39(3):1488–1490. doi: 10.1128/iai.39.3.1488-1490.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Urbaschek R., Urbaschek B. Aspects of beneficial endotoxin-mediated effects. Klin Wochenschr. 1982 Jul 15;60(14):746–748. doi: 10.1007/BF01716569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES