Abstract
Objective
To demonstrate the benefits of reducing forward head posture and restoring the cervical lordosis as a novel approach to treating a patient with mechanical thoracic pain.
Clinical Features
The patient had thoracolumbar junction pain bilaterally that failed to respond to previous sessions of spinal manipulative therapy. Treatment included both manipulative and rehabilitative procedures designed to correct the forward head posture and cervical kyphosis. Treatment progress was quantified on pre and post lateral cervical radio-graphs.
Intervention and Outcome
The treatment plan was 30 sessions over an 8-week period that included spinal manipulative therapy, used in concert with a new headweight device applied immediately after the manipulation was performed at each session. The patient was also instructed on the performance of certain rehabilitative procedures to be performed in the home setting. The patient experienced significant symptomatic relief after the 3rd week of care. The cervical lordosis was restored by 144% and the forward head posture was decreased by 56% at the end of the trial period.
Conclusion
Restoration of the cervical curve and reduction of forward head posture appears to have beneficial effects beyond the cervical spine. The addition of active rehabilitative procedures seems to enhance the effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy in the correction of forward head posture and cervical kyphosis.
Key Indexing Terms: Cervical Lordosis, Kyphosis, Headweight, Rehabilitation
References
- 1.Harrison DE, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DD. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:398–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ. A normal spinal position: its time to accept the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:44–623. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.110941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bagnall KM, Harris PF, Jones PRM. A radiographic study of the human fetal spine. J Anat. 1977;124:791–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hallgren RC, McPartland JM, Brodeur RR. Chronic neck pain, standing balance, and suboccipital muscle atrophy: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:9–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K, Oatis CA. Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic Regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phys Ther. 1992;72:31–425. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.6.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bogduk N. The anatomical basis for cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Steiman I, Hagino C, Vernon H. Cervicogenic dysfunction in muscle contraction headache and migraine: a descriptive study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:29–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cailliet R, Gross L. The rejuvenation strategy. Doubleday & Company, Inc.; 1987. pp. 52–60. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Refshauge KM, Goodsell M, Lee M. The relationship between surface contour and vertebral body measures of upper spine curvature. Spine. 1994;19:85–2180. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199410000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johnson GM. The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae. Spine. 1998;23:27–921. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804150-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pettibon BR. Introduction to spinal biomechanics. Pettibon Biomechanics Institute; 1989. pp. 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kapandji IA. volume 3: the trunk and vertebral column. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1974. The physiology of the joints; pp. 36–235. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cailliet R. Neck and arm pain. 2nd ed. FA Davis Company; 1981. pp. 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Littrell, T. Palmer College of Chiropractic radiology report 8/3/01
- 15.Woggon D. The science of pettibon spinal biomechanics system adjusting 2001. Pettibon Biomechanics Institute 2000. pg 45–101.
- 16.Pettibon BR. Posture correction and spinal rehabilitation: seminar session #1. Pettibon Biomechanics Institute 2001. pg 46–76.
- 17.Littrell, T. Palmer College of Chiropractic radiology report 10/16/01.
- 18.Kandel E, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2000. pp. 23–717. 802–27. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pompeiano O, Allum JHJ. Vestibulospinal control of posture and locomotion; progress in brain research. Vol. 76. Elsevier Science Publishers; 1988. pp. 5–16. 45–96, 137–80, 253–62, 291–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seaman DR, Winterstein JF. Dysafferentation: a novel term to describe the neuropathophysiological effects of joint complex dysfunction. A look at likely mechanisms of symptom generation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:80–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mergner T, Hlavacka F. Proceedings ofan International Symposium on Sensory Interaction in Posture and Movement Control. Plenary Press; 1995. Multisensory control of posture; pp. 1–14. 69–94, 131–38, 237–42, 269–88. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Conn PM. Neuroscience in medicine. JB Lippincott Company; 1995. pp. 34–214. 369–400, 505–7. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nicholas SC, Doxey-Gasway DD, Paloski WH. A link-segment model of upright human posture for analysis of head-trunk coordination. J Vestib Res. 1998;8:187–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Enoka RM. Muscle strength and its development: new perspectives. Sports Med. 1988;6:68–146. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198806030-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20:135–145. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198810001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harrison DD, Jackson BL, Troyanovich SJ, Robertson G, DeGeorge D, Barker WF. The efficacy of cervical extension-compression traction combined with diversified manipulation and drop table adjustments in the rehabilitation of cervical lordosis: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:64–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]