Abstract
Measurement of spinal range of motion (ROM) along with strength, endurance, coordination, and sensation are among the essential determinants of musculoskeletal function. These measurements are important to the chiropractic physician concentrating in the fields of impairment rating, disability evaluation and independent medical examination (forensic examiner). An important initial step toward standardizing measurement of joint motion has been undertaken by the American Medical Association with their publication The Practical Guide to Range of Motion Assessment. Their publication is an attempt to provide a detailed and illustrated description of a standardized approach to ROM measurement and recording. The College on Forensic Sciences (CFS) is spear- heading an effort to encourage and provide detailed instruction on measuring range of motion according to this companion book to the AMA Guides. This attempt at providing a systematic format should enable chiropractic (forensic) evaluators to obtain more reliable range of motion measurements/data by using the same standardized protocols, reference tables, and reporting methods.
Key Words: Range of Motion, Chiropractic, Impairment Rating, Disability Evaluation, Independent Medical Examination
References
- 1.Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Appleton & Lange; Norwalk, CT: 1993. pp. 53–67. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cleveland DE. Diagrams for showing limitations of movement through joints. Can Med Assoc J. 1918;8:70–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; Chicago, IL: 1965. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rowe CR. Joint measurement in disability evaluation. Clin Orthop. 1964;32:43–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoppenfeld S. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. Appleton & Lange; Norwalk, CT: 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith DS. Measurement of joint range an overview. Clin Rheum Dis. 1982;8:523–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fox RF. Demonstration of the mensuration apparatus in use at the Red Cross Clinic for the physical treatment of officers. Proc R Soc Med. 1917;10:63. doi: 10.1177/003591571701000116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gifford HC. Instruments for measuring joint movements and deformities in fracture treatment. Am J Surg. 1914:237–238. 28. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moore ML. The measurement of joint motion: Part IB introductory review of the literature. Phys Ther Rev. 1949;29:195–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clark WA. A system of joint measurements. J Orthop Surg. 1920;2:687–700. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fox RF, van Breeman J. Chronic rheumatism: causation, and treatment. Churchill Livingstone; London: 1934. p. 327. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leighton JR. An instrument and technic for the measurement of range of joint motion. Arch Phys Med. 1955;36:571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schenker WW. Improved method of joint motion measurement. NY J Med. 1956;56:539–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Loebl WY. Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movement. Ann Phys Med. 1967;9:103–110. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/9.3.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lea RD, Gerhardt JJ. Current concepts review: range of motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77A:784–798. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 2nd edition. AMA; Chicago, IL: 1987. pp. 52–59. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of lumbar spine ROM a comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;73:98–106. doi: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th edition. AMA; Chicago, IL: 1993. pp. 112–130. [Google Scholar]
- 19.American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th edition. AMA; Chicago, IL: 2000. pp. 398–421. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burdett RG, Brown KE, Fall MP. Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions. Phys Ther. 1996;66:677–684. doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.5.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chiarello CM, Savidge R. Interrater reliability of the Cybex EDI-320 and fluid goniometer in normals and patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:32–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dopf CA, Mandell SS, Geiger DP, Mayor PJ. Analysis of spine motion variability using a computerized goniometer compared to physical examination: A prospective clinical study. Spine. 1994;19:586–595. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelly J, Mayer TG, Cox R, Gatchel RJ, Smith J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function Part 5. Reliability of range of motion measures in the sagittal plane and in vivo torso rotation measurement technique. Spine. 1986;11:31–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mayor RS, Chen IH, Launder SA, Trafirnow JH, Andersson GBJ. Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of morion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. Spine. 1995;20:1489–1493. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199507000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Newton M, Waddell G. Reliability and validity of clinical measurement of the lumbar spine in patients with chronic low back pain. Physiotherapy. 1991;77:796–800. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Portek I, Pearcy MJ, Reader GP, Mowat AQ. Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheum. 1983;22:197–205. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/22.4.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reynolds PMG. Measurement of spinal mobility: A comparison of three methods. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1975;14:180–185. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/14.3.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A, Marciano T, Cholmakjian C. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry: A comparison of three methods. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 1992;71:219–224. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199208000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther. 1993;73:33–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mayer T, Kondraske G, Beals S, Gatchel R. Spinal range of motion: accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine. 1997;22:1976–1984. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199709010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gerhardt JJ, Ripstein JR. Measuring and recording of joint motion: instrumentation and techniques (International SFTR method of measuring and recording joint motion) Hans Huber; Bern, Switzerland: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion: its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine. 1999;24:3–8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00013. 262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lea RD, Gerhardt JJ. Current concepts review range of motion measurement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77:784–798. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199505000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.American Medical Association The Practical Guide to Range of Motion Assessment. 1st edition. American Medical Association; Chicago, IL: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gerhardt JJ. Documentation of joint motion. 4th edition. Isomed; Portland, OR: 1994. [Google Scholar]