Skip to main content
Journal of Chiropractic Medicine logoLink to Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
. 2003;2(4):137–141. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60077-9

Strength gains through lumbar lordosis restoration

Mark W Morningstar a,*
PMCID: PMC2646974  PMID: 19674610

Abstract

Objective

To test the hypothesis that restoring the lumbar lordosis will increase a patient's voluntary muscular strength and decrease back pain symptoms.

Clinical Features

A patient was diagnosed with mechanical low back pain. The initial radiographic study revealed a loss of the lumbar lordosis. The patient determined his maximum bench press prior to the treatment program. The treatment outcome was based upon post-intervention radiographs, a Borg pain scale, and the patient's post-intervention maximum bench press.

Intervention and Outcome

The treatment program consisted of warm-up exercises, spinal manipulation, rehabilitative exercises, neuromuscular re-education, and prescribed home care. The treatment period consisted of 12 visits in the first 4 weeks, followed by once weekly for another 12 weeks, for a total of 24 visits in 4 months. In the first month, the Borg scale decreased from 5/10 to 0/10, and after 4 months the lumbar lordosis was increased from 2° to 31°. The sacral base angle (Ferguson's angle) increased from 18° to 31°. The patient's maximum bench press also increased from 245 pounds to 305 pounds.

Conclusion

Restoration of the lumbar lordosis appears to have a positive effect on muscular strength. This study supports the previous premise that a lumbar lordosis provides an inherent mechanical advantage for strength and stability.

Key Indexing Terms: Lumbar Spine, Biomechanics, Lordosis, Chiropractic Manipulation

References

  • 1.Svard L, Ericksson B, Petterson L. Anthropometric characteristics, passive hip flexion, and spinal mobility in relation to back pain in athletes. Spine. 1990;15:376–382. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199005000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cyriax J. Textbook of orthopedic medicine Vol 1. Diagnosis of soft tissue lesions. 7th ed. London Balliere Tindall; 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McKenzie RA. The lumbar spine: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Spinal Publications; Waikanae, New Zealand: 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hultman G, Saraste H, Ohlsen H. Anthropometry, spinal canal width, and flexibility of the spine and hamstring muscles in 45 55-year-old men with and without low back pain. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5:245–253. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199209000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gracovetsky S. Function of the spine. J Biomed Eng. 1986;8:217–223. doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(86)90087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morningstar M. Cervical curve restoration and forward head posture reduction for the treatment of mechanical thoracic pain using the pettibon corrective and rehabilitative procedures. J Chiropr Med. 2002;1:113–115. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60013-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morningstar MW, Strauchman MN, Weeks DA. Spinal manipulation and anterior headweighting for the correction of forward head posture and cervical hypolordosis: A pilot study. J Chiropr Med. 2003 doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60042-1. (accepted for publication) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Testing and function. 4th ed. Wilkins & Wilkins; Baltimore, MD: 1993. p. 282. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jackson BL, Barker WF, Pettibon BR, Woggon D, Bentz J, Hamilton D, Wiegand M, Hester R. Reliability of the Pettibon Patient Positioning System for Radiographic Production. J Vertebral Sublux Res. 2000;4:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE. Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord. 1997;10:380–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints, vol III: The Trunk and Vertebral Column
  • 12.Lin RM, Jou IM, Yu CY. Lumbar lordosis: Normal adults. J Formos Med Assoc. 1992;91:329–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Holland B. Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain patients. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:430–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Murrie VL, Dixon AK, Hollingsworth W, Wilson H, Doyle TA. Lumbar lordosis: Study of patients with and without low back pain. Clin Anat. 2003;16:144–147. doi: 10.1002/ca.10114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ng JK, Richardson CA, Kippers V, Parnianpour M. Comparison of lumbar range of movement and lumbar lordosis in back pain patients and matched controls. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:109–113. doi: 10.1080/165019702753714129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsuji T, Matsuyama Y, Sato K, Hasegawa Y, Yimin Y, Iwata H. Epidemiology of low back pain in the elderly: Correlation with lumbar lordosis. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:307–311. doi: 10.1007/s007760100023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hansson T, Bigos S, Beecher P, Wortley M. The lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low-back pain. Spine. 1985;10:154–155. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198503000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nourbaksh MR, Moussavi SJ, Salavati M. Effects of lifestyle and workrelated physical activity on the degree of lumbar lordosis and chronic low back pain in a Middle East population. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14:283–292. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200108000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seaman DR, Winterstein JF. Dysafferentation: a novel term to describe the neuropathophysiological effects of joint complex dysfunction. A look at likely mechanisms of symptom generation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:267–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gurevich M, Kohn PM, Davis C. Exercise-induced analgesia and the role of reactivity in pain sensitivity. J Sports Sci. 1994;12:549–559. doi: 10.1080/02640419408732205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cailliet R. Soft tissue pain and disability. F.A. Davis and Company; Philadelphia, PA: 1988. pp. 122–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gracovetsky S, Farfan HF, Lamy C. The mechanism of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1981;6:249–262. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198105000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Farfan HF. Muscular mechanism of the lumbar spine and the position of power and efficiency. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6:135–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Farfan HF. The biomechanical advantage of lordosis and hip extension for upright activity. Spine. 1978;3:336–342. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197812000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Porter RW. Management of back pain. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 1986. pp. 18–19. 170. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Chiropractic Medicine are provided here courtesy of National University of Health Sciences

RESOURCES