Abstract
Functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may be defined as a systematic, comprehensive, and objective measurement of an individual's maximum abilities (ADL or work). The effect of the examinee's impairment on his or her ability to perform purposeful tasks is the focus of functional and/or work capacity evaluation (FCE/WCE). The common thread that connects all FCEs is the need for an evaluation of an individual with an unresolved residual. The forensic examiner must be able to determine the most suitable process from the 5 different types of evaluation processes involving functional capacity evaluations. The College on Forensic Sciences (CFS) has identified that most FCE administrators are not sufficiently grounded in science, case law and forensic issues. Examples may include misquoting standard journal articles and texts, making false statements, providing “junk science” opinions and interpretation, and deliberately omitting important facts and knowledge. In this day and age of managed care, cost containment of workers’ compensation (fee schedules) claims, and economic incentives can change the position of the test administrators, therapists or providers. Through specialized training to better understand the requirements and needs of the courts, the forensic examiner can become a valuable tool in providing an “evidenced-based” opinion regarding FCE/WCE questions. This training should prepare the provider in FCE/WCE methods, forensic analysis and principles that have a reliable evidence-based reasoning and methodology that is scientifically valid.
Key Words: Functional Capacity, Work Capacity, Impairment, Disability Evaluation, Activities of Daily Living, Americans with Disability Act, Forensics, Reliability
References
- 1.Fraser TM. Fitness for work. Taylor and Francis; London: 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Isernhagen SJ. In: Functional capacity evaluation. Work injury: Management and prevention. Isernhagen SJ, editor. Aspen Publishers, Inc.; Rockville, MD: 1988. pp. 139–194. [Google Scholar]
- 3.North Carolina Industrial Commission Rating Guide. www.comp.stat.nc.us
- 4.A Technical Assistant Manual on the Employment Provisions (Title 1) of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, Superintendent of Documents, Pittsburgh, PA: 1992. p. 15250–7954
- 5.Matheson LN. Functional goal setting, foundation of the therapeutic relationship. Am Pain Soc J. 1994;3:111–114. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abdel-Moty E. Functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. CL J Pain. 1993;9:168–173. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mooney V, Matheson L. Soft tissue injury quantification, feasibility study examiner's manual. Employment and rehabilitation Institute of California; Santa Ana, CA: 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hart DL. Work injury management: The comprehensive spectrum. In: Isernhagen SJ, editor. Test and measurements in returning injured workers to work. Aspen Publishers, Inc.; Rockville, MD: 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 9.U.S. Department of Labor: Dictionary of Occupational Titles, 4th edition Washington, DC; 1991
- 10.Hanson M, Matheson L, Borman W. The O*NET Occupational Information System. In: Bolton B, editor. Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Aspen; Gaithersburg, MD: 2001. pp. 281–309. [Google Scholar]
- 11.BNA's Americans with Disability Act Manual. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.; N.W. Washington, DC: 1992. pp. 20037–21197. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brown C, McDaniel R, Couch R, McClanahan M. Vocational Evaluation Systems and Software: A consumer's guide. Materials Development Center, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, School of Education and Human Services University of Wisconsin-Stout; Menomonie, WI: 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matheson L. Work Capacity Evaluation for Occupational Therapists. Rehabilitation Institute of Southern California; Trabuco Canyon, CA: 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ogden-Niemeyer L, Jacobs K. Work hardening: State of the art. Slack; Thorofare, NJ: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Newton M, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with Iso-machines, Part 1: Review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine. 1993;18:801–811. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gaudino E, Mael F, Matheson L. A literature review: Functional assessment and related construct taxonomies. American Institute for Research; Washington, DC: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gaudino E, Mael F, Matheson L. Synthesis of research and development of prototypes for a new disability determination methodology: A literature review of the functional assessment and related construct taxonomies. American Institute for Research; Washington, DC: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gaudino E, Matheson L, Mael F. Development of the functional assessment taxonomy. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11:155–175. doi: 10.1023/a:1013022410767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matheson L, Kaskutas V, McCowan S. Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11:177–199. doi: 10.1023/a:1013074527605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.American Psychological Association, Association AER, Education NcoMi: Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Washington, DC; 1999
- 21.Rothstein J, Campbell S, Echternach J. Appendix: Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. In: Rothstein J, Echternach J, editors. Primer on Measurement. American Physical Therapy Association; Alexandria, VA: 1993. pp. 3–47. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johnston M, Keith R, Hinderer S. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:S3–S23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.American College of Sports Medicine: Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 4th ed. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, PA: 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 24.EEOC: Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures Federal Register July. 1993, 1978;1:212–239. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blackmun J. Daubert v Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals. United States Supreme Court; Washington, DC: 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 26.U.S. Department of Justice CRD, Office of the Americans With Disabilities Act: The Americans With Disabilities Act: Title II Technical Assistance Manual. Washington, DC; 1992
- 27.Ziporyn T. Disability Evaluation: A fledgling science? JAMA. 1983;250:873–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]