Abstract
Outcome measures are helpful in demonstrating patient response to care and therefore an important part of providing best care for our patients. Using paper scoring systems is one way that doctors of chiropractic can document patient progress. This update provides a brief review of the characteristics and applications of the visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain scale (NPS).
References
- 1.Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:22–28. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale. Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13:15–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ogon M, Krismer M, Sollner W, Kantner-Rumplmair W, Lampe A. Chronic low back pain measurement with visual analogue scales in different settings. Pain. 1996;64:425–428. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00208-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scrimshaw SV, Maher C. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:501–504. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.118208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, Calimlim JF, Weis OF, Mehta G. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983;34:234–239. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Joyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975;8:415–420. doi: 10.1007/BF00562315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, Borg E, Gustafsson C, Sandin L. Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:279–283. doi: 10.1080/165019701753236473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mader TJ, Blank FS, Smithline HA, Wolfe JM. How reliable are pain scores? A pilot study of 20 healthy volunteers. J Emerg Nurs. 2003;29:322–325. doi: 10.1067/men.2003.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Von Korff M, Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Barlow W. Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year. Spine. 1993;18:855–862. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR. Evaluation of two timespecific back pain outcome measures. Spine. 1999;24:1104–1112. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199906010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shikiar R, Bresnahan BW, Stone SP, Thompson C, Koo J, Revicki DA. Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:53. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rosi E, Lanini B, Ronchi MC, Romagnoli I, Stendardi L, Bianchi R, Zonefrati R, Duranti R, Scano G. Dyspnea, respiratory function and sputum profile in asthmatic patients during exacerbations. Respir Med. 2002;96:745–750. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woolf GM, Reynolds TB. Failure of rifampin to relieve pruritus in chronic liver disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12:174–177. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199004000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]