Abstract
Objective
To illustrate multifaceted clinical components often present with lumbar disc herniation that require concomitant resolution before optimal conservative case management can be achieved.
Clinical Features
A 33-year-old male with insidious low back pain and a gradual onset of lower extremity symptoms had a declining physical activity lifestyle, diminished fitness level, and weight gain over a 4-year period. Symptoms progressively worsened over a two-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a disc herniation with neurological compromise and surgical intervention was medically recommended.
Intervention and Outcome
Management consisted of patient education, acute inflammation control, closed disc reduction, remedial therapeutic (passive joint movement) care directed at preservation and improvement of joint and soft tissue mobility, low tech physical capacity evaluation and individualized rehabilitation training for home based care exercise. Patient compliance was ultimately achieved with a positive long-term outcome.
Conclusion
This case illustrates common clinical components of care associated with disc herniation case management, the potential of conservative care, and the benefits of combining manual therapy and rehabilitative exercise.
Key Indexing Terms: Low back pain, Intervertebral Disk Displacement, Chiropractic, Rehabilitation
Footnotes
Sources of support: No funds were received for the preparation of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Cox JM. Low back pain: mechanism, diagnosis and treatment. 6th ed. Williams & Wilkins Lippincott; Baltimore: 1999. p. 263. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saunders HD. Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. In: Grieve GP, editor. Lumbar traction. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 1986. p. 789. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine. 2nd Ed. Churchill Livingstone; Melbourne: 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cantu RI. Rehabilitation: for the post-surgical orthopedic patient. In: Magnusson J, Maxley L, editors. Soft tissue healing considerations after surgery. Mosby; St Louis: 2001. pp. 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alaranta H. The clinical application of outcomes assessment. In: Yeomans SG, editor. Strength and endurance testing. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 2000. p. 155. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cassidy JD, Thiel HW, Kirkaldy-Willis KW. Side posture manipulation for lumbar disc herniation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:96–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nwuga VCB. Relative therapeutic efficacy of vertebral manipulation and conventional treatment in back pain management. Am J Phys Med. 1982;6:273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bozzao A, Gallucci M. Lumbar disc herniation: MRI assessment of natural history in patients treated without surgery. Neuroradiol. 1992;185:135–141. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wiesel SW. A study of computer assisted tomography: the incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine J. 1984;9:549–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thelander U, Fagerlund M, Friberg S, Larsson S. Straight leg raising test versus radiological size, shape, and position of lumbar disc hernias. Eur Spine J. 1992;17:395–399. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199204000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McKenzie RA. The lumbar spine; mechanical diagnosis and therapy. New Zealand; Spinal Publications: 1992. Waikanae. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Williams MM, Hawley JA, McKenzie RA, Van Wijmen P. Comparison of the effects of two sitting postures on back and referred pain. Spine J. 1991;16:1185–1191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Green JP, Grenier SG, McGill SM. Low-back stiffness is altered with warm-up and bench rest: implication for athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1076–1081. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Christensen KD. Chiropractic rehabilitation: protocols, vol 1. Publication division of CRA; Ridgefield, WA: 1991. p. 19. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yeoman SG. The clinical application of outcomes assessment. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 2000. pp. 30–291. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mayer T, Polatin P. Principles and practice of chiropractic. In: Haldeman S, editor. Spinal rehabilitation. Appleton and Lange; Stamford, CT: 1992. p. 544. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liebenson C, Oslance J. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Outcomes assessment in the small private practice. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 74. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vasilyeva LF, Lewit K. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Diagnosis of muscular dysfunction by inspection. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 113. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Janda V. Rehabilitation of the spine. In: Liebenson C, editor. Evaluation of muscular imbalance. Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996. p. 97. [Google Scholar]
- 20.O'Sullivan PB. Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilization exercise management. Man Ther. 2000;5:4. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haig A. Prospective evidence for changes in paraspinal muscle activity after HNP. Spine J. 1993;17:926. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hides JA. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with actual subacute low back pain. Spine J. 1994;19:165. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]