Abstract
A letter to the editor provides a means of communication between the author of an article and the reader of a journal, allowing continued dialog about journal content to take place. Although not original research per se, a letter may provide new insight, make corrections, offer alternate theories, or request clarification about content printed in the journal. By providing additional information, the evidence may be strengthened. This paper provides first time writers some insight into the process of writing a letter to the editor.
Footnotes
Sources of support: no external funding was received for this project.
References
- 1.Mayberry JF. “I read with interest…”. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:559. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.026880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Horton R. Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge. JAMA. 2002;287:2843–2847. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goodman NW. How to write a critical letter and respond to one. Hosp Med. 2001;62:426–427. doi: 10.12968/hosp.2001.62.7.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Winker MA, Fontanarosa PB. Letters: a forum for scientific discourse. JAMA. 1999;281:1543. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.16.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brown CJ. Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157:792–794. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhopal RS, Tonks A. The role of letters in reviewing research. BMJ. 1994;308:1582–1583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6944.1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Johnson C, Green B. Helpful hints: writing effective letters to the editor. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:415–416. [Google Scholar]