Skip to main content
Current Genomics logoLink to Current Genomics
. 2007 Nov;8(7):423–428. doi: 10.2174/138920207783591726

Role of Insulin and Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Signaling in Lifespan Extension: Rodent Longevity Models for Studying Aging and Calorie Restriction

T Chiba 1,*, H Yamaza 1, I Shimokawa 1
PMCID: PMC2647154  PMID: 19412415

Abstract

Insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) pathways are recognized as critical signaling pathways involved in the control of lifespans in lower organisms to mammals. Caloric restriction (CR) reduces plasma concentration of insulin, growth hormone (GH), and IGF-I. CR retards various age-dependent disorders such as nuerodegenerative diseases and extends lifespan in laboratory rodents. These beneficial effects of CR are partly mimicked in spontaneous or genetically engineered rodent models of reduced insulin and GH/IGF-I axis. Most of these long-living rodents show increased insulin sensitivity; however, recent study has revealed that some other rodents show normal or reduced insulin sensitivity. Thus, increased insulin sensitivity might be not prerequisite for lifespan extension in insulin/GH/IGF-I altered longevity rodent models. These results highlighted that, for lifespan extension, the intracellular signaling molecules of insulin/GH/IGF-I pathways might be more important than actual peripheral or systemic insulin action.

Key Words: Insulin, GH, IGF-I, calorie restriction.

INTRODUCTION

Compared to animals allowed to access food freely, moderate restriction of food intake, but not malnutrition, reduces morbidity and mortality in laboratory animals [1]. This effect, often noted as the anti-aging effects of caloric restriction (CR), has been recognized as a result from the restriction of calorie intake, but not from the restriction of a specific food component and not from a reduction of the toxic contaminants in food [2,3]. From an evolutionary viewpoint, the effect of CR appears to be explained by organisms having evolved adaptation mechanisms in their neuroendocrine systems to maximize survival during periods of food shortage [4]. Thus, it is believed that CR can, at least in part, regulate the aging processes through its effects on endocrine and/or neural regulatory systems [2]. The underlying molecular mechanism of regulation of the neuroendocrine system by CR remains to be fully elucidated; however, insulin, the GH/IGF-I axis, and leptin have been proposed as potential molecular mediators of the adaptive response to CR [5-8].

In many rodents, spontaneously or targeted gene modifications of insulin and the GH/IGF-I axis results in lifespan extension (see review [9-12]). Thus CR and these rodent insulin/GH/IGF-I models share, at least in part, a molecular mechanism of longevity. However, CR has been shown to also extend lifespan in GH-deficient long-lived Ames dwarf mice [13]. Furthermore, we found that CR significantly extended the lifespan of pituitary specific GH-antisense transgenic (TG) rats, which have reduced plasma levels of insulin and IGF-I [14,15]. These findings suggest that there might be different pathways in lifespan extension by GH/IGF-I suppression and CR; although it is possible that they share some of the same regulatory molecules in the insulin/GH/IGF-I pathway.

In lower organisms, long-lived mutants in C. elegans have provided a body of evidence about molecular mechanisms underlying longevity [16]. The C. elegans neurosecretory signaling system regulates whether animals enter the reproductive life cycle or have an arrest in development at the long-lived dauer diapause stage. The daf-2 gene encodes an insulin/IGF-I like receptor, a critical gene in the genetic pathway that mediates this endocrine signaling in C. elegans [17]. The age-1 gene [18] acts in the same signaling pathway as daf-2, and is closely related to a family of mammalian phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) p110 catalytic subunits under the insulin/IGF-I signaling pathway [19]. It has been also reported that mutations in the Drosophila equivalents of daf-2 (InR), and chico, a fruit fly insulin receptor substrate (IRS), indicate that these genes have roles in body and organ size determination as well as in lifespan [20,21]. Reduction of function in InR mutants and the null mutation of chico increased the mean lifespan in female flies. These findings suggest that insulin/IGF-I signaling is a highly conserved longevity signal from lower to higher organisms.

In this brief review, we first discuss longevity rodent models that have modified insulin/GH/IGF-I pathways. These include spontaneous dwarf mutations and genetically altered rodents with increased lifespan. Later, we speculate the involvement of WD-repeat protein 6 (WDR6) as a candidate for the regulator of insulin/IGF-I signaling, which controls metabolism and longevity in the brain [22].

Insulin and GH/IGF-I Axis in Rodent Longevity Models

Table 1 shows rodent longevity models with modified insulin/GH/IGF-I signals. In mammals, the production of IGF-I is stimulated by pituitary GH. Prop-1 (Ames mice) and pit-1 (Snell mice) mutant dwarf mice live longer than controls, with defects of transcription factors controlling differentiation of the anterior pituitary during fetal development [23]. These mice are also prolactin (PRL) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) deficient. However, it is thought that inhibition of the GH/IGF-I axis is the primary effector on lifespan extension of these mice because GH overexpression mice show resemble an accelerated aging phenotype, with a shorter lifespan and earlier loss of fertility [24]. Both Ames and Snell mice show increased insulin sensitivity [25,26].

Table 1.

Rodent Longevity Models of Modified Insulin/GH/IGF-I Signaling

Rodent Models Responsive Gene Effecta Lifespanb Body Weightc IGF-I Insulin Sensitivity
Ames mice Prop-1 Pituitary ♂49%,♀68% 33% Decreased Increased
Snell mice Pit-1 Pituitary ♂26%,♀42% 33% Decreased Increased
Ghrhrlit/litmice Ghrhr Pituitary ♂23%,♀25% 67% Decreased Unchanged
GH-antisense TG rats GH-antisense Pituitary ♂10% 66% Decreased Increased
GHR/BP-/- mice GHR/BP Receptor ♂55%,♀38% 40-41% Decreased Increased
Igf1r+/-mice Igf1r Receptor ♀33% 92-94% Increased Increased
FIRKO mice IR (fat-specific) Receptor ♂+♀18% 75-85% Unchanged Increased
p66shc-/-mice p66shc Intracellular ♂+♀30% 100% Unknown Unknown
Irs1-/-mice Irs1 Intracellular ♀32% 60-65% Unchanged Decreased
bIrs2+/-mice Irs2 (brain-specific) Intracellular ♂18% 95-100% Unknown Decreased
a

Site of primary effect of the mutation.

b

% increase of lifespan in mutants compared to control animals.

c

% of body weight compared to control animals (6 to 10 months old).

Another pituitary mutation that causes dwarfism was found in lit/lit mice. The responsive gene in these mice is the GH-releasing hormone receptor (Ghrhr) [27]. Ghrhrlit/lit mice have low levels of GH, IGF-I with prolonged lifespan [28]. Data from the Ghrhrlit/lit mice also suggest that changes in the GH/IGF-I axis could be sufficient to extend lifespan of dwarf mice, because these mice have normal PRL, TSH and thyroid hormone levels. Ghrhrlit/lit mice appear to have normal insulin responses compared to wild type mice [29]. However, double mutant mice of Ghrhr and PRL-receptor showed decreased insulin sensitivity in old age because of increased adiposity [29]. This contrasts with the results of the GH- and PRL-deficient Ames and Snell mice described above.

Pituitary specific GH-antisense TG rats show increase lifespan with lower serum insulin, IGF-I compared to Wistar rats, which have same genetic background [14,15]. These rats have increased insulin action to reduce blood glucose; however, insulin-independent glucose-lowering effects have also been suggested [30,31]. These rats show a moderate reduction of the GH/IGF-I axis compared to Ames or Snell dwarf mice whose GH/IGF-I axis is almost completely suppressed. Similar to these dwarf mice, CR upon GH-antisense TG rats have an extended lifespan with further reduction of insulin/IGF-I levels [14].

The murine equivalents to human Laron syndrome are GH receptor/binding protein homozygous knockout mice (GHR/BP-/-) [32]. The human and murine GHR/BP gene encodes for two proteins; GH receptor and GH receptor binding protein, a truncated form of a receptor. GHR/BP KO mice have a longer lifespan compared to control wild type mice [33]. These mice have a markedly reduced plasma concentration of IGF-I, and a dwarf phenotype with increased insulin sensitivity [33,34]. GHR/BP deficiency impairs the beneficial effects of CR on lifespan extension and increases insulin sensitivity [35]. As well, CR increases insulin sensitivity in control mice, but does not further increase insulin sensitivity in GHR/BP-/- mice [35].

In the knockout mice heterozygous for the IGF-I receptor (Igf1r+/-), significant lifespan extension was observed in female mice, whereas homozygous knockout mice died at birth, probably as a result of respiratory failure [36]. The body size of these mice is almost normal and they have no detectable alterations in reproductive development and function. Male Igf1r+/- mice show reduced insulin sensitivity, whereas females showed increased insulin sensitivity [36]. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from Igf1r+/- mice show reduced IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling in response to IGF-I addition compared to MEFs from wild type mice [36]. Namely, tyrosine phosphorylation levels of IGF-IR, IRS-1, and p66shc proteins are decreased in MEFs from Igf1r+/- mice. Moreover, it has been documented that brain specific heterozygous IGF-IR knockout mice have an increased lifespan and a significant decrease in mortality rate [37]. This is interesting because importance of brain insulin/IGF-I signaling is also suggested in C. elegans and Drosophila [37].

Fat specific insulin receptor knock out mice (FIRKO mice) show increased lifespan without reduction of the plasma IGF-I levels [38,39]. These mice show reduced body fat content, body mass index, and resistant to age-related and hyperphagia-induced insulin resistance. In adipose tissue, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was reduced in FIRKO mice, indicating that insulin signaling is markedly decreased in the adipose tissue of these mice. However, whole body insulin sensitivity is increased in FIRKO mice probably as a result of the increased plasma adiponectin levels, especially in aged mice [38,39]. Recent study has revealed that FIRKO mice maintain high mitochondrial capacity and metabolic rates in adipose tissue [40]. These increased mitochondrial functions may be important for the lifespan extension seen in the FIRKO mouse.

Proto-oncogene Shc, an adaptor protein of receptor tyrosine kinase, is phosphorylated by the activation of growth factor receptors such as IGF-IR and insulin receptor (IR); a knock out mouse strain of the p66 isoform of Shc, p66shc showed a prolonged lifespan and increased oxidative stress resistance [41]. The mammalian Shc locus encodes three protein isoforms; p46shc, p54shc, and p66shc [42]. MEFs from p66shc knock out mice show more resistance to hydrogen peroxide treatment or UV radiation compared to MEFs from wild type mice [41]. This effect partly is mediated the induction of FoxO3a, a mammalian homologue of the C. elegans forkhead transcription factor daf-16 [43]. This is interesting because daf-16 is essential for lifespan extension in the daf-2 mutant [44]. No information is yet available about the insulin sensitivity of p66shc-/- mice.

IRS-1 knock out (Irs1-/-) female mice show increased lifespan despite moderate insulin resistance [45]. Same as Igf1r+/- mice, Irs1-/-mice lifespan extension is predominantly seen in females. The body weight of these mice is lower than that of wild type; however, serum IGF-I levels are not different. These mice show reduced adiposity similar to CR and FIRKO mice; however, Irs1-/- mice show moderate insulin resistance. Thus, the improvement in insulin sensitivity associated with reduced fat mass is not a prerequisite for the lifespan extension of Irs-/- mice [45]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 enhances insulin sensitivity, whereas serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 by S6 kinase induces insulin resistance [46]. Therefore, IRS-1 has both negative and positive effects on insulin/IGF-I signaling. Lack of IRS-1 might cause predominately favorable intracellular signaling situations for cell survival causing lifespan extension through the activation of the FoxO1 protein, a forkhead transcription factor important for oxidative stress response.

IRS-2 heterozygous knock out mice, specifically in brain (bIrs2+/-), showed increased lifespan [47]. Interestingly, while systemic heterozygous IRS-2 deficiency improved insulin sensitivity, brain-specific IRS-2 knock out led to insulin resistance. Although the mechanism responsible for this discrepancy is unknown, these results also support that insulin sensitivity by itself is not a prerequisite for lifespan extension in insulin/GH/IGF-I signal modified longevity rodents. Similar to IRS-1, tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 by IR or IGF-IR is the first event in the activation of the intracellular insulin/IGF-I signal transduction pathway. IRS-1 and IRS-2 are the major IRS leading to glucose homeostasis, and have distinct and overlapping roles in diverse organs [48]. Lifespan extension in bIrs2+/- mice might be related to the FoxO1 protein levels maintained in the brain that lead to the expression of antioxidant protein SOD2 [47]. These results of lifespan extension of bIrs2+/- as well as Irs1-/- mice might suggest that the mutation of particular molecules of intracellular insulin/IGF-I signaling is sufficient to induce longevity. Therefore, a reduced GH/IGF-I axis in dwarf animals and long-lived insulin/GH/IGF-I receptor modified mice might eventually change the activation of these intracellular substrate molecules including p66shc and their downstream targets for lifespan extension. Hence, reduced body size and increased insulin sensitivity might not be important and so could be separated from factors responsible for lifespan extension in such animals.

In summary, the above mentioned models suggest that decreased body weight and increased insulin sensitivity might be not prerequisites for lifespan extension in insulin/GH/IGF-I modified longevity rodents. Although there a significant effect on body weight and insulin sensitivity were seen depending on the particular factors in the breeding environments used in the study, such as diet composition, the results presented highlight that the importance of the intracellular signaling molecules of the insulin/GH/IGF-I signal rather than the upstream hormonal signals. Fig. (1) shows the sites of mutations in rodent longevity models. Pituitary GH and insulin/GH/IGF-I receptor mutations might cause favorable situations for intracellular signaling molecules, such as reduction of function IRS-1, -2 and p66shc, because knock out of these intracellular molecules extends lifespan. Recently, we isolated WDR6, a novel candidate for the intracellular insulin/IGF-I signaling molecule. Next we discuss the potential involvement of WDR6 in lifespan regulation.

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Mammalian GH and insulin/IGF-I signaling pathways. Longevity related genes shown in Table 1 and discussed in text are shown in outlined characters on a gray background. Pituitary mutations cause GH/IGF-I-deficiency results in dwarf phenotypes, and increased insulin sensitivity in most cases. Mutations of receptors and intracellular signaling molecules are not necessary to increase insulin sensitivity for lifespan extension. These intracellular molecules could be points of intervention for therapies with the potential to delay the aging process.

WDR6 as a New Candidate for an Insulin/GH/IGF-I Signaling Molecule Related to Lifespan Regulation

We recently isolated and identified WDR6 as a novel molecule involved in hypothalamic insulin/IGF-I signaling with interacting IRS-4 by cDNA subrtaction method [22, 49]. IRS-1 and IRS-2 are ubiquitously expressed, while IRS-3 and IRS-4 are tissue specific, detected in significant amounts in fat and brain tissue, respectively [50]. IRS-4 is expressed abundantly in the arcuate nucleus, an important hypothalamic nucleus for regulation of energy and metabolism [51]. We found that the expression of WDR6 was decreased in vivo upon CR as well as with suppression of the GH/IGF-I axis; both treatments cause reductions of plasma insulin/IGF-I concentrations. Our in vitro study indicated that the addition of insulin or IGF-I caused increased gene expression of WDR6 in GT1-7 cells, a mouse hypothalamus derived cell line [22,52]. These results suggested the presence of a feedback loop for insulin/IGF-I-mediated expression of WDR6.

WD repeats are conserved domains of approximately 40 to 60 amino acids that contain a tryptophan-aspartic acid (WD) dipeptide at their C-terminus, and have a conserved core sequence [53,54]. WDR6 was first cloned by Li et al, [55]. They showed that human WDR6 has 11 WD-repeat domains and shows relatively ubiquitous expression. However, we isolated the WDR6 gene in brain as a hypothalamus enriched gene [22] by using a cDNA subtraction method [49,56,57]. This expression pattern of WDR6 is consistent with another report that used a DNA microarray analysis [58]. WD repeat domains are involved in mediating protein-protein interactions [59,60], and WD repeat-containing proteins have a central role in many signal transduction cascades by coordinating the interaction of key signaling molecules.

We found that IRS-4 interacts with WDR6 in vivo. Our results suggested that WDR6 might regulate phosphorylation levels of the interacting protein, IRS-4 [22]. Interestingly, it was suggested that WDR6 and IRS-4 might also be involved in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling [61]. Stimulation with FGF2 induced a 3-fold increase in tyrosine phosphorylated proteins, as assessed by mass spectrometry [61]. It has been suggested that FGF2 has an inhibitory effect on food intake and locomotor activity in rats [62]. Taken together, these results suggest that WDR6 may be involved in feeding and physical activities through its interaction in the brain with IRS-4.

Mice lacking IRS-4 show mild defects in growth, reproduction and glucose homeostasis [63]. These mice show slightly impaired responses on the oral glucose tolerance test. The insulin tolerance testing also showed these mice slightly less responsive to insulin compared to wild type; however, the effect was statistically insignificant. It was suggested that loss-of-function of IRS-4 in the brain might cause these phenotypes, because IRS-4 is predominantly expressed in the brain [63]. These phenotypes are somewhat similar to long-lived Irs1-/- and bIrs2+/- mice. Study is needed to find out whether WDR6 also interacts with IRS-1 and IRS-2.

It has recently been shown that WDR6 interacts with LKB1, a tumor suppressor gene encoding a serine/threonine kinase that phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and regulates p27Kip1 induction [64]. AMPK is a critical component in a protein kinase cascade that have a crucial role in the regulation of energy balance, particularly in the brain [65,66]. LKB1 gene expression is enriched in the hypothalamus, similar to the WDR6 gene in the brain [58]. The LKB1-AMPK-p27 pathway is also involved in the autophagic response, a bulk misfolded protein degradative system [67]. In C. elegans, autophagy genes are essential for dauer development and for lifespan extension in the daf-2 mutant [68]. Moreover, autophagy mediates lifespan extension of C. elegans upon CR [69]. Autophagy is also reported to be important in lifespan extension in Drosophila [70]. In mammals, the induction of autophagy is a protective response against neurodegenerative diseases [71,72]. Moreover, CR prevents the age-dependent decline of autophagic proteolysis in liver cells [73]. Thus, it is interesting to speculate that WDR6 also regulates autophagy responses by modulating the LKB1-AMPK pathway in the brain. Further studies using genetically modified mice such as conditional knock out varieties, should help gain an understanding of the precise mechanism of WDR6 involvement in AMPK signaling as well as in insulin/IGF-I signaling in longevity.

In conclusion, increased insulin sensitivity might not be a prerequisite for lifespan extension in insulin/GH/IGF-I modified rodent longevity models. Although it is possible that different tissues show different insulin sensitivity in these longevity models, there could be more important intracellular signaling molecules in insulin/GH/IGF-I signaling, such as IRS-1, -2, and p66shc, and possibly WDR6, for lifespan extension. These molecules could be points of intervention for therapies with potential to delay the pathogenesis of age-related diseases and even the aging process. Further study is needed to reveal the importance, if any, of these molecules through identification of target transcription factors critical for lifespan extension.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported in part by The Japan Health Foundation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Weindruch R., Wolford R.L. The retardation of aging and disease by dietary restriction. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 1988. p. 436. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masoro E.J. Food restriction in rodents an evaluation of its role in the study of aging. J. Gerontol. 1988;43:B59–64. doi: 10.1093/geronj/43.3.b59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Masoro E.J. Caloric restriction and aging: an update. Exp. Gerontol. 2000;35:299–305. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Holliday R. Food reproduction and longevity: is the extended lifespan of calorie-restricted animals an evolutionary adaptation? Bioessays. 1989;10:125–127. doi: 10.1002/bies.950100408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barzilai N., Gupta G. Revisiting the role of fat mass in the life extension induced by caloric restriction. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 1999;54:B89–96. doi: 10.1093/gerona/54.3.b89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chiba T., Yamaza H., Higami Y., Shimokawa I. Anti-aging effects of caloric restriction: Involvement of neuroendocrine adaptation by peripheral signaling. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2002;59:317–324. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katic M., Kahn C.R. The role of insulin and IGF-1 signaling in longevity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005;62:320–343. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4297-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shimokawa I., Higami Y. A role for leptin in the antiaging action of dietary restriction: a hypothesis. Aging (Milano) 1999;11:380–382. doi: 10.1007/BF03339816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bartke A. Minireview: role of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor system in mammalian aging. Endocrinology. 2005;146:3718–3723. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kloting N., Bluher M. Extended longevity and insulin signaling in adipose tissue. Exp. Gerontol. 2005;40:878–883. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang H., Masoro E.J., Nelson J.F., Strong R., McMahan C.A., Richardson A. Genetic mouse models of extended lifespan. Exp. Gerontol. 2003;38:1353–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2003.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang J., Anzo M., Cohen P. Control of aging and longevity by IGF-I signaling. Exp. Gerontol. 2005;40:867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bartke A., Wright J.C., Mattison J.A., Ingram D.K., Miller R.A., Roth G.S. Extending the lifespan of long-lived mice. Nature. 2001;414:412. doi: 10.1038/35106646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shimokawa I., Higami Y., Tsuchiya T., Otani H., Komatsu T., Chiba T., Yamaza H. Life span extension by reduction of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-1 axis: relation to caloric restriction. FASEB J. 2003;17:1108–1109. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0819fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shimokawa I., Higami Y., Utsuyama M., Tuchiya T., Komatsu T., Chiba T., Yamaza H. Life span extension by reduction in growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-1 axis in a transgenic rat model. Am. J. Pathol. 2002;160:2259–2265. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61173-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hekimi S., Burgess J., Bussiere F., Meng Y., Benard C. Genetics of lifespan in C. elegans: molecular diversity physiological complexity mechanistic simplicity. Trends Genet. 2001;17:712–718. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02523-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sze J.Y., Victor M., Loer C., Shi Y., Ruvkun G. Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature. 2000;403:560–564. doi: 10.1038/35000609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friedman D.B., Johnson T.E. A mutation in the age-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility. Genetics. 1988;118:75–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morris J.Z., Tissenbaum H.A., Ruvkun G. A phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase family member regulating longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1996;382:536–539. doi: 10.1038/382536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clancy D.J., Gems D., Harshman L.G., Oldham S., Stocker H., Hafen E., Leevers S.J., Partridge L. Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science. 2001;292:104–106. doi: 10.1126/science.1057991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tatar M., Kopelman A., Epstein D., Tu M.P., Yin C.M., Garofalo R.S. A mutant Drosophila insulin receptor homolog that extends life-span and impairs neuroendocrine function. Science. 2001;292:107–110. doi: 10.1126/science.1057987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiba T., Inoue D., Mizuno A., Komatsu T., Fujita S., Kubota H., Luisa Tagliaro M., Park S., Trindade L.S., Hayashida T., Hayashi H., Yamaza H., Higami Y., Shimokawa I. Identification and characterization of an insulin receptor substrate 4-interacting protein in rat brain: Implications for longevity. Neurobiol. Aging. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.008. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging. 2007.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown-Borg H.M., Borg K.E., Meliska C.J., Bartke A. Dwarf mice and the ageing process. Nature. 1996;384:33. doi: 10.1038/384033a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steger R.W., Bartke A., Cecim M. Premature ageing in transgenic mice expressing different growth hormone genes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1993;46(Suppl):61–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dominici F.P., Hauck S., Argentino D.P., Bartke A., Turyn D. Increased insulin sensitivity and upregulation of insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in liver of Ames dwarf mice. J. Endocrinol. 2002;173:81–94. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1730081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Flurkey K., Papaconstantinou J., Harrison D.E. The Snell dwarf mutation Pit1dw can increase life span in mice. Mech. Ageing. Dev. 2002;123:121–130. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00339-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Godfrey P., Rahal J.O., Beamer W.G., Copeland N.G., Jenkins N.A., Mayo K.E. GHRH receptor of little mice contains a missense mutation in the extracellular domain that disrupts receptor function. Nat. Genet. 1993;4:227–232. doi: 10.1038/ng0793-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Flurkey K., Papaconstantinou J., Miller R.A., Harrison D.E. Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:6736–6741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111158898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fleenor D., Oden J., Kelly P.A., Mohan S., Alliouachene S., Pende M., Wentz S., Kerr J., Freemark M. Roles of the lactogens and somatogens in perinatal and postnatal metabolism and growth: studies of a novel mouse model combining lactogen resistance and growth hormone deficiency. Endocrinology. 2005;146:103–112. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamaza H., Komatsu T., Chiba T., Toyama H., To K., Higami Y., Shimokawa I. A transgenic dwarf rat model as a tool for the study of calorie restriction and aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2004;39:269–272. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamaza H., Komatsu T., To K., Toyama H., Chiba T., Higami Y., Shimokawa I. Involvement of insulin-like growth factor-1 in the effect of caloric restriction regulation of plasma adiponectin and leptin. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007;62:27–33. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou Y., Xu B.C., Maheshwari H.G., He L., Reed M., Lozykowski M., Okada S., Cataldo L., Coschigamo K., Wagner T.E., Baumann G., Kopchick J.J. A mammalian model for Laron syndrome produced by targeted disruption of the mouse growth hormone receptor/binding protein gene (the Laron mouse) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:13215–13220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Coschigano K.T., Clemmons D., Bellush L.L., Kopchick J.J. Assessment of growth parameters and life span of GHR/BP gene-disrupted mice. Endocrinology. 2000;141:2608–2613. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.7.7586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Coschigano K.T., Holland A.N., Riders M.E., List E.O., Flyvbjerg A., Kopchick J.J. Deletion, but not antagonism, of the mouse growth hormone receptor results in severely decreased body weights, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor I levels and increased life span. Endocrinology. 2003;144:3799–3810. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bonkowski M.S., Rocha J.S., Masternak M.M., Al Regaiey K.A., Bartke A. Targeted disruption of growth hormone receptor interferes with the beneficial actions of calorie restriction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:7901–7905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600161103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Holzenberger M., Dupont J., Ducos B., Leneuve P., Geloen A., Even P.C., Cervera P., Le Bouc Y. IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature. 2003;421:182–187. doi: 10.1038/nature01298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Holzenberger M., Kappeler L., De Magalhaes Filho C. IGF-1 signaling and aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2004;39:1761–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bluher M., Kahn B.B., Kahn C.R. Extended longevity in mice lacking the insulin receptor in adipose tissue. Science. 2003;299:572–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1078223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bluher M., Michael M.D., Peroni O.D., Ueki K., Carter N., Kahn B.B., Kahn C.R. Adipose tissue selective insulin receptor knockout protects against obesity and obesity-related glucose intolerance. Dev. Cell. 2002;3:25–38. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Katic M., Kennedy A.R., Leykin I., Norris A., McGettrick A., Gesta S., Russell S.J., Bluher M., Maratos-Flier E., Kahn C.R. Mitochondrial gene expression and increased oxidative metabolism role in increased lifespan of fat-specific insulin receptor knock-out mice. Aging Cell. 2007;6:827–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00346.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Migliaccio E., Giorgio M., Mele S., Pelicci G., Reboldi P., Pandolfi P.P., Lanfrancone L., Pelicci P.G. The p66shc adaptor protein controls oxidative stress response and life span in mammals. Nature. 1999;402:309–313. doi: 10.1038/46311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Migliaccio E., Mele S., Salcini A.E., Pelicci G., Lai K.M., Superti-Furga G., Pawson T., Di Fiore P.P., Lanfrancone L., Pelicci P.G. Opposite effects of the p52shc/p46shc and p66shc splicing isoforms on the EGF receptor-MAP kinase-fos signalling pathway. EMBO J. 1997;16:706–716. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.4.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nemoto S., Finkel T. Redox regulation of forkhead proteins through a p66shc-dependent signaling pathway. Science. 2002;295:2450–2452. doi: 10.1126/science.1069004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lin K., Hsin H., Libina N., Kenyon C. Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans longevity protein DAF-16 by insulin/IGF-1 and germline signaling. Nat. Genet. 2001;28:139–145. doi: 10.1038/88850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Selman C., Lingard S., Choudhury A.I., Batterham R.L., Claret M., Clements M., Ramadani F., Okkenhaug K., Schuster E., Blanc E., Piper M.D., Al-Qassab H., Speakman J.R., Carmignac D., Robinson I.C., Thornton J.M., Gems D.., Partridge L., Withers D.J. Evidence for lifespan extension and delayed age-related biomarkers in insulin receptor substrate 1 null mice. FASEB J. 2007 doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9261com. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9261com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tremblay F., Brûlé S., Hee Um S., Li Y., Masuda K., Roden M., Sun X.J., Krebs M., Polakiewicz R.D., Thomas G., Marette A. Identification of IRS-1 Ser-1101 as a target of S6K1 in nutrient- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14056–14061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706517104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Taguchi A., Wartschow L.M., White M.F. Brain IRS2 signaling coordinates life span and nutrient homeostasis. Science. 2007;317:369–372. doi: 10.1126/science.1142179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thirone A.C., Huang C., Klip A. Tissue-specific roles of IRS proteins in insulin signaling and glucose transport. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;17:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chiba T., Yao J., Higami Y., Shimokawa I., Hosokawa M., Higuchi K. Identification of differentially expressed genes in senescence-accelerated mouse testes by suppression subtractive hybridization analysis. Mamm. Genome. 2007;18:105–112. doi: 10.1007/s00335-006-0119-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goren H.J., Kulkarni R.N., Kahn C.R. Glucose homeostasis and tissue transcript content of insulin signaling intermediates in four inbred strains of mice: C57BL/6, C57BLKS/6, DBA/2, and 129X1. Endocrinology. 2004;145:3307–3323. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Numan S., Russell D.S. Discrete expression of insulin receptor substrate-4 mRNA in adult rat brain. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1999;72:97–102. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(99)00160-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Krsmanovic L.Z., Stojilkovic S.S., Balla T., al-Damluji S., Weiner R.I., Catt K.J. Receptors and neurosecretory actions of endothelin in hypothalamic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:11124–11128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Neer E.J., Schmidt C.J., Nambudripad R., Smith T.F. The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins. Nature. 1994;371:297–300. doi: 10.1038/371297a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smith T.F., Gaitatzes C., Saxena K., Neer E.J. The WD repeat a common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999;24:181–185. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01384-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li D., Burch P., Gonzalez O., Kashork C.D., Shaffer L.G., Bachinski L.L., Roberts R. Molecular cloning, expression analysis, and chromosome mapping of WDR6, a novel human WD-repeat gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;274:117–123. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chiba T., Fujita S., Kubota H., Inoue D., Mizuno A., Komatsu T., Yamaza H., Higami Y., Shimokawa I. Identification of Fasting-induced Genes in the Rat Hypothalamus Relationship with Neuroprotection. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2007;1119:216–226. doi: 10.1196/annals.1404.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Diatchenko L., Lau Y.F., Campbell A.P., Chenchik A., Moqadam F., Huang B., Lukyanov S., Lukyanov K., Gurskaya N., Sverdlov E.D., Siebert P.D. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:6025–6030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chin M.H., Geng A.B., Khan A.H., Qian W.J., Petyuk V.A., Boline J., Levy S., Toga A.W., Smith R.D., Leahy R.M., Smith D.J. A genome-scale map of expression for a mouse brain section obtained using voxelation. Physiol Genomics. 2007;30:313–321. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00287.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Liliental J., Chang D.D. Rack1, a receptor for activated protein kinase C, interacts with integrin beta subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:2379–2383. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.4.2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang P., Sale W.S. The Mr 140,000 intermediate chain of Chlamydomonas flagellar inner arm dynein is a WD-repeat protein implicated in dynein arm anchoring. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998;9:3335–3349. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.12.3335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hinsby A.M., Olsen J.V., Mann M. Tyrosine phosphoproteomics of fibroblast growth factor signaling: a role for insulin receptor substrate-4. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:46438–46447. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404537200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hotta M., Kuriyama H., Arai K., Takano K., Shibasaki T. Fibroblast growth factor inhibits locomotor activity as well as feeding behavior of rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001;416:101–106. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00767-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fantin V.R., Wang Q., Lienhard G.E., Keller S.R. Mice lacking insulin receptor substrate 4 exhibit mild defects in growth, reproduction, and glucose homeostasis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;278:E127–133. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.1.E127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xie X., Wang Z., Chen Y. Association of LKB1 with a WD-repeat protein WDR6 is implicated in cell growth arrest and p27Kip1 induction. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007;301:115–122. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9402-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Carling D. AMP-activated protein kinase: balancing the scales. Biochimie. 2005;87:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Minokoshi Y., Alquier T., Furukawa N., Kim Y.B., Lee A., Xue B., Mu J., Foufelle F., Ferré P., Birnbaum M.J., Stuck B.J., Kahn B.B. AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature. 2004;428:569–574. doi: 10.1038/nature02440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liang J., Shao S.H., Xu Z.X., Hennessy B., Ding Z., Larrea M., Kondo S., Dumont D.J., Gutterman J.U., Walker C.L., Slingerland J.M., Mills G.B. The energy sensing LKB1-AMPK pathway regulates p27kip1 phosphorylation mediating the decision to enter autophagy or apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:218–224. doi: 10.1038/ncb1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Melendez A., Talloczy Z., Seaman M., Eskelinen E.L., Hall D.H., Levine B. Autophagy genes are essential for dauer development and life-span extension C. elegans. Science. 2003;301:1387–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1087782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jia K., Levine B. Autophagy is required for dietary restriction-mediated life span extension C. elegans. Autophagy. 2007;3:597–599. doi: 10.4161/auto.4989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Simonsen A., Cumming R.C., Brech A., Isakson P., Schubert D.R., Finley K.D. Promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system enhances longevity and oxidant resistance in adult Drosophila. Autophagy. 2007;4 doi: 10.4161/auto.5269. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Levine B., Yuan J. Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict? J. Clin. Invest. 2005;115:2679–2688. doi: 10.1172/JCI26390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nixon R.A. Autophagy in neurodegenerative disease: friend, foe or turncoat? Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bergamini E., Cavallini G., Donati A., Gori Z. The role of macroautophagy in the ageing process, anti-ageing intervention and age-associated diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2004;36:2392–2404. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES