Abstract
Characteristic pathologic changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include an increased fractional volume of bronchiolar epithelial cells, fibrous thickening of the airway wall, and luminal inflammatory mucus exudates, which are positively correlated with airflow limitation and disease severity. The mechanisms driving general epithelial expansion, mucous secretory cell hyperplasia, and mucus accumulation must relate to the effects of initial toxic exposures on patterns of epithelial stem and progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation, eventually resulting in a self-perpetuating, and difficult to reverse, cycle of injury and repair. In this review, current concepts in stem cell biology and progenitor–progeny relationships related to COPD are discussed, focusing on the factors, pathways, and mechanisms leading to mucous secretory cell hyperplasia and mucus accumulation in the airways. A better understanding of alterations in airway epithelial phenotype in COPD will provide a logical basis for novel therapeutic approaches.
Keywords: epithelium, hyperplasia, metaplasia, mucus hypersecretion, stem cells
The human and societal toll of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considerable, and there is a clear need for better prevention and early detection/intervention, including more specific and effective therapies for all stages of the disease. COPD is characterized by, and defined as, sustained and largely irreversible airflow limitation on forced exhalation, associated with known risk factors and excluding other specific causes (1, 2). The key pathologic changes underlying the physiologic hallmarks are loss of lung elasticity and small airway tethers due to emphysema, thickening of the small airway wall to reduce caliber, and luminal obstruction with inflammatory mucoid secretions (3–5). The airway epithelium is a primary interface with the outside world and is a target of the toxic particles and gases from tobacco smoke and other environmental agents that are the main cause of COPD. As indicated by changes in gene expression, airway epithelial cells respond dynamically to the inciting stimuli (6) and are the focus of viral (7) and bacterial (8–10) infections that exacerbate COPD and accelerate deterioration of lung function. The characteristic pathologic changes in the airway epithelium (Figures 1 and 2) are integral to the initiation and progression of COPD. Generalized epithelial hyperplasia, mucous secretory cell hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, and mucus accumulation must result from disruptions in normal cell and tissue dynamics caused by both the initial stimuli and the spiral of infectious complications. Locations of stem cells, patterns of cell migration/differentiation, and the regulatory mechanisms governing tissue dynamics are relatively well understood in some organs, but not in the lungs. However, some progress has been made in recent years. The main goal of this article is to concisely review current concepts in stem cell biology applicable to our understanding of progenitor–progeny relationships in the airway epithelium, focusing on cellular mechanisms leading to mucous secretory cell hyperplasia and mucus accumulation. Additional specific issues in lung stem cell biology highly relevant to COPD, but not necessarily focused on the airway epithelium, are also addressed. Of interest, the proceedings of a joint NHLBI/Cystic Fibrosis Foundation workshop on adult lung stem cells (11) and an incisive and comprehensive review of lung epithelial stem cells (12) have been published recently.
Figure 1.
Representative images of normal and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) bronchial epithelia. Note the characteristic marked expansion of mucous secretory cells in the COPD bronchus (blue-stained material in the center panels). Patchy conversion to a stratified squamous epithelium devoid of mucous secretory cells is also commonly observed (right panels). All photomicrographs are at the same magnification (originally 400×). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded section. AB-PAS = alcian blue–periodic acid Schiff's stain; H&E = hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 2.
Representative images of normal and COPD bronchiolar epithelia. Note the absence of stored mucosubstances in the normal bronchiole (left panels). Emphysematous parenchyma, prominent accumulation of luminal mucus (blue-stained material) and lymphoid nodules are visible in the COPD specimen (center panels). Higher magnification reveals blue-stained, metaplastic mucous secretory cells adjacent to the mucus plug in the COPD bronchiolar epithelium (lower right panel). Photomicrograph original magnification as indicated. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded section.
MODELS OF CELL REPLACEMENT AND APPLICABILITY TO THE LUNGS
Historically, the short-term administration of the radioactive DNA precursor 3H thymidine to experimental animals followed by autoradiography of tissue sections (“pulse labeling” to mark actively dividing cells) revealed three major categories of organs with different levels of cell proliferation in the mature adult (13). Bone marrow, skin, and gut proliferated continuously, whereas organs such as the liver and kidney had slower, but inducible, levels of cell growth after injury, and the central nervous system was viewed as static. In the 1960s, Blenkinsopp examined the available data in lung and also performed experiments in rats, indicating a relatively slow epithelial cell turnover, estimated to be approximately 100 d in the normal rodent tracheobronchial tree (14). Numerous studies since then have confirmed relatively slow rates of cell turnover in normal lungs, but proliferation was highly induced after injury (15–20).
Our understanding of a stem cell hierarchy derives mainly from studies of continuously proliferating tissues. Many of the studies constituting the knowledge base of mammalian stem cell biology were performed in mice, and it is widely assumed that fundamental properties will be similar in humans. However, the cell type composition of the epithelium is dissimilar at certain airway levels in mice and humans (21), and there are likely important distinctions between the two species. In the classical model, adult stem cells reside in specialized niches from which they are minimally recruited to maintain tissue homeostasis, a strategy to conserve stem cells for the life of the organism. A “transiently amplifying” downstream progenitor compartment is responsible for the bulk of tissue proliferation. The property of infrequent cycling serves as the basis for detection of stem cells. In this technique, DNA precursors are administered for long periods to label stem cells, followed by a chase to “flush the label” out of the transient amplifying cells. The remaining “label-retaining cells” are believed to represent the stem cell compartment. Differentiated cells with minimal growth potential are ultimately generated from stem and transient amplifying cells through a series of tightly regulated temporal and spatial commitment steps. An overview of this model, with its applicability to lung and implications for repair after injury, has been given previously (21). The molecular regulation of stem cell fate decisions has historically been investigated in model invertebrate species, but considerable advances in recent years have revealed key mechanisms governing stem cell dynamics in mammalian blood, gut, and skin (recently reviewed in Reference 22). The Wnt, bone morphogenetic protein, and Notch signaling pathways, and their downstream effectors, are key regulators of the stem cell niche.
As opposed to well-accepted stem cell hierarchies in continuously proliferating tissues, progenitor–progeny relationships in complex organs such as the breast, kidney, liver, pancreas, prostate, and lung, which normally have low, but conditionally active, rates of cell turnover, remain less certain. It is not clear whether these organs have analogous hierarchic cell lineage systems that are quiescent until injury or if they operate by other paradigms. The distinction is critical for regenerative medicine. For example, adult tissue stem cells may serve as a “guilt free” source of therapeutic progenitors, avoiding the controversies inherent to embryonic stem cells. To address this issue in the endocrine pancreas, a prime target for cell therapy, Dor and colleagues applied modern cell lineage tracing techniques involving permanent, heritable labeling of specific cell types (23). The results strongly suggest that adult pancreatic beta cells are maintained by “simple duplication” of a large number of equipotent, differentiated beta cells rather than a small stem cell reserve. Thus, adult beta cells likely originate from other differentiated beta cells, which are destroyed in patients with type I diabetes. Supplies of transplantable cadaveric organ donor beta cells are limited, and allografts require harmful immunosuppression. Thus, beta cells generated from embryonic stem cells created by somatic cell nuclear transfer (24) will likely be the best option for cell therapy of type I diabetes (25). A more comprehensive understanding of cell lineage characteristics and dynamics in the airway and alveolar epithelium and in the mesenchymal cellular compartments of the lung will provide a logical basis for pharmacotherapy directed at the characteristic airway and parenchymal changes in COPD and for regenerative therapy of emphysema.
STEM CELL AGING AND COPD
Decreased lung elastic recoil, reduced indices of forced expiration, and emphysema-like lung histology inevitably occur during aging, even in nonsmokers (26), and cellular aging may contribute to the development and progression of COPD. It is widely assumed that aging may limit the ability of tissues to repair, or conversely, that deficits in mechanisms controlling cell proliferation may underlie the increased incidence of cancer in the elderly (reviewed in Reference 27). Cell autonomous changes in hematopoietic stem cells in old mice are likely associated with immune decline and the development of leukemia (28), and non–cell autonomous effects of the aging environment surrounding progenitor cells determines the ability of muscle to repair (29). Fibroblasts explanted from emphysematous lungs exhibit markers of cellular senescence and do not grow as well as fibroblasts from normal lungs (30, 31). It is important to determine if there are similar age-related changes in lung alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells because apoptosis in these compartments is likely critical in development of emphysema (32). Furthermore, polymorphisms in genes related to cellular aging may contribute to COPD susceptibility.
Somatic mutations induced by tobacco smoke carcinogens and methylation-induced silencing of tumor suppressor genes cause lung cancer, a significant comorbid risk in COPD. During aging, the gene hypermethylated in cancer (HIC1) becomes methylated and silenced, which results in up-regulation of the stress-controlling protein SIRT1, in turn attenuating p53 function and allowing damaged cells to resist apoptosis (33). This is one example of a molecular mechanism that the organism may use to preserve aging cells, but which may also promote cancer. A greater appreciation of cell dynamics in young versus old lungs and mechanisms controlling altered behavior of aging lung cells may help to identify cells at greatest risk for transformation; assist in the detection, monitoring, and treatment of lung cancer; and will likely improve our understanding of the mechanisms causing emphysema-like changes in the aging lung.
REVOLUTIONS IN STEM CELL BIOLOGY
There have been significant advances and controversies in stem cell biology in recent years, some of which are highly relevant to COPD. The ability of circulating progenitors to home to the lung and adopt parenchymal cell fates is highly controversial and has been reviewed in detail previously (21) and updated more recently (34). There is hope that bone marrow–derived cells can be harvested, perhaps expanded and/or manipulated ex vivo, and delivered to the lung to rebuild missing or destroyed lung tissue. However, the conversion of bone marrow–derived cells to airway and alveolar epithelium appears to occur rarely, and significant increases in efficiency will be necessary for this approach to cell therapy to be relevant to the epithelium. The formation of gastrointestinal tract epithelial cancers by bone marrow–derived cells (35) is even more controversial, and it is unknown if a similar phenomenon is relevant to lung. Nevertheless, inflammation and stromal cells play critical roles in the cellular cross-talk that generates and regulates epithelial cancers (reviewed in Reference 36), which is one example of the contribution of circulating cells to lung tissue reactions important in COPD; two others are discussed below.
The discovery of putative circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) (37) has revised concepts of postnatal vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis and has suggested novel cellular therapies for cardiovascular diseases (reviewed in References 38 and 39). Failure to increase numbers of circulating EPCs in pneumonia (40) and acute lung injury (41) portends a poor outcome, and circulating EPC numbers appear to be reduced in people with severe restrictive or obstructive lung disease (42). There are many questions regarding EPCs in COPD: Do reduced circulating EPCs play a role in the loss of capillaries and the development of pulmonary hypertension in emphysema, and can administration of EPCs help to remodel the vascular bed toward normalcy? The airway microvasculature plays a key role in asthmatic airway wall remodeling (reviewed in Reference 43), and one can envision EPCs similarly contributing to the thickening of the small airway wall that is characteristic of COPD. Postnatal vascular remodeling is much more complex than just recruitment of EPCs (see References 44 and 45). Recent compelling studies show that hematopoietic, non-EPC mononuclear cells attracted by vascular endothelial growth factor and then kept in place by stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) are critical to support the growth of local vascular cells during angiogenesis, and that signals generated by ephrin-B2 are key to the positioning of mural vascular cells, such as pericytes and smooth muscle cells (46–48). Thus, coordinated interactions among EPCs, non-EPC circulating mononuclear cells, and local vascular progenitors regulate normal vascular homeostasis and remodeling events that are undoubtedly important in the development and progression of COPD.
Fibrocytes are another type of circulating CD45+ mononuclear cell, which homes to diseased lungs where it appears to interact with local cells, express collagen, and contribute to fibrosis (49–51) (recently reviewed in Reference 52). Distinctions between fibrocytes and the non-EPC bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells that contribute to angiogenesis, as discussed above, are not totally clear and require further study. Analogous to EPCs and the microvasculature in the asthmatic airway, fibrocytes likely contribute to small airway wall thickening in COPD and may also support the paradoxical patchy parenchymal fibrosis sometimes seen in emphysema. The potential therapeutic use of exogenous stem cells illustrates a potential two-edged sword in lung regenerative medicine. The notion that circulating cells can home to and protect the lung suggests the potential future use of fibrocytes, or other progenitors, to rebuild emphysematous lung parenchyma. However, devising a strategy to accurately reconstruct the complex cell and matrix architecture of alveolar septae, while avoiding deleterious fibrosis, is a major challenge to the field.
ADULT LUNG EPITHELIAL STEM CELLS
The subject of lung epithelial stem cells has been comprehensively reviewed elsewhere (12, 21, 34), and is only reiterated here, focusing on newer data related to mechanisms of goblet cell hyperplasia and metaplasia. A depiction of putative lung epithelial stem cell compartments is given in Figure 3. There is likely strong evolutionary pressure to preserve a patent airway by efficiently repairing denuding epithelial injuries. Basbaum and Jany introduced the concept of plasticity in the airway epithelium, meaning that cells can adopt alternative fates after injury (53). The term “transdifferentiation” was coined to describe the generation of one differentiated cell from another without intervening cell division. This term is also used to connote the formation of organ-specific cell types by stem cells from another organ—for example, airway epithelium from bone marrow (http://www.isscr.org/glossary/index.htm#Transdifferentiation). DNA metabolic pulse-labeling studies showed that both basal and columnar secretory cell types in the pseudostratified airway epithelium divide (15, 17). In vivo and in vitro studies show that epithelial repair is rapid and dynamic, involving epithelial dedifferentiation, cytoskeletal rearrangement, migration, and redifferentiation (e.g., see References 54–56). Indeed, both basal and columnar cell types reconstituted a complete epithelium in an in vivo model of rat tracheas denuded of their own cells and implanted in immune compatible hosts (57, 58). However, colony formation on plastic dishes (59) and lineage tracing studies (60), as well as more recent analysis of clonal growth (61) and genetic lineage mapping (62, 63), suggest that mouse tracheal basal cells have enhanced ability to form large differentiated epithelial colonies. Furthermore, mouse tracheal basal cells are the majority of “label-retaining cells” produced by long-term DNA labeling followed by a chase period, which, as discussed above, is believed to represent the infrequent cycling property of stem cells (64). Thus, the current consensus is that many cells can contribute to repair of injury, but that basal cells likely represent a stem cell compartment in the adult pseudostratified epithelium.
Figure 3.
A graphic representation of putative stem cell niches in the airway epithelium. (1) Basal cells in the gland duct; (2) surface basal cells typically present in the intercartilaginous zone; (3) variant Clara cells associated with pulmonary neuroendocrine cell (PNEC) bodies; (4) variant Clara cells present at the bronchiolar–alveolar duct junction. See text for further explanation.
The precise location depends on the species, but as one proceeds distally down the airways, basal cells disappear and the pseudostratifed epithelium transitions to a simple columnar, and then cuboidal, morphology, composed of Clara, ciliated, and neuroendocrine cells (65, 66). Secretoglobin (SCGB) 1a1, also known as CC10 or CCSP, is a member of the SCGB family that has been widely used as a marker for Clara cells. Several different SCGBs are also expressed in the airway epithelium (67). SCGB1a1 is expressed in human upper airway secretory cells that do not appear to proliferate (68). There have been many studies of SCGB1a1 expression in relationship to cell lineage in mice, and the definition of the Clara cell has become confusing. If Clara cells are defined as domed, nonciliated cells of the simple bronchiolar epithelium as originally described, then SCGB1a1-expressing secretory cells in the pseudostratified portions of the airway are distinct from bronchiolar Clara cells. However, Clara cells are commonly defined based on SCGB1a1 expression, in which case they likely represent a spectrum of cells, present in different airway levels, with different potentials and behaviors.
After injury by oxidant gases that damage ciliated cells, surviving bronchiolar Clara cells proliferate to restore the bronchiolar epithelium (18, 69), but this observation, in itself, does not provide evidence for a stem cell hierarchy within the Clara cell population. When naphthalene is administered to mice, almost all Clara cells are killed due to selective metabolic activation of the toxin. Ciliated cells shed their cilia and cover the denuded bronchiolar basement membrane, and the few surviving Clara cells then proliferate (70). The naphthalene-resistant progenitor cells represent a subset of Clara cells residing within neuroepithelial bodies, and label retention studies suggest that this unit constitutes a stem cell niche (71). After naphthalene injury, pulmonary neuroendocrine cells proliferate (72), but they are apparently a distinct lineage system not requiring nor generating Clara cells (73). A second epithelial stem cell niche has been identified in the zone where airways terminate and form alveoli (74, 75). Specific cells in this zone coexpressed SCGBa1a, the type II cell marker surfactant protein (SP)-C, cluster of differentiation (CD)34, and stem cell antigen-1 (Sca-1) (75). The putative “mouse bronchioalveolar stem cells” proliferated in response to naphthalene or bleomycin injury, and when purified cells were cultured appropriately, they demonstrated a high clonal growth capacity and differentiation potential to form both Clara cells and distal lung epithelium composed of cells expressing type I or type II cell markers (75). Furthermore, the cells expanded when an active K-ras oncogene was induced in vitro and appeared to generate adenocarcinoma when expressing an active K-ras oncogene in vivo (75). It is important to determine if a similar multipotential cell exists in the human bronchiolar–alveolar duct junction zone. These advances point the way for additional studies needed to elucidate steady-state and repairing cell lineages and the regulation of cell dynamics in both the airway and alveolar epithelium in mice and humans.
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR MECHANISMS DRIVING MUCOUS SECRETORY CELL HYPERPLASIA/METAPLASIA
The molecular mechanisms controlling the initial establishment and maintenance of cell type distributions at different levels in the normal adult airway epithelium are undoubtedly complex and not well understood. However, it is well known that diverse stimuli increase the numbers of mucous secretory cells in locations where they normally exist (hyperplasia) or induce them in locations where they are normally absent (metaplasia). Gland hypertrophy, mucous secretory cell hyperplasia in the bronchi, and metaplasia in the bronchioles are prominent features of COPD (76). The stimuli increasing the numbers of mucous secretory cells include allergic sensitization, bacterial products, chemical irritants, chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, oxidants, the protein kinase C (PKC) activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), proteases, and viral infection, variably operating through the Jak/Stat, mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor-κB, and PI3 kinase/Akt, transforming growth factor-β pathways, among others (for reviews, see References 77–80). Differentiation of mucous secretory cells likely represents a complex series of coordinated events. Per cell increases in mucin mRNA result from transcriptional activation of mucin genes and/or message stabilization, whereas mucin glycoprotein production requires creation of the characteristic synthetic and secretory apparatus. Once differentiated, mucous secretory cells with few granules can divide, whereas cells with large numbers of granules appear to divide infrequently (16). The life cycle of mucous secretory cells is not fully appreciated and it is unclear if engorged secretory cells degranulate, divide, and then reaccumulate granules. Increased percentages of secretory cells may result from selective suppression of apoptosis (81). Finally, the regulation of mucin glycoprotein flux through the synthetic and secretory apparatus will determine mucin production. Differences in these processes likely exist in airway zones where increases represent either hyperplasia or metaplasia; thus, the generation of mucous secretory cells in the pseudostratified epithelium may be different than in the simple bronchiolar epithelium. A better understanding of each step in the mucous secretory cell life cycle in different airway zones theoretically provides an opportunity to intervene to decrease mucin production.
Colony-forming (60, 61, 63) and label retention (64) studies suggest a general hierarchy for the pseudostratified epithelium as illustrated in Figure 4. However, as discussed above, wound repair (55) and cell isolation studies (57) indicate that all cell types can be generated from columnar cells of the pseudostratified epithelium via an intermediate, poorly differentiated cell type (downward pointing, red arrows in Figure 4). Whether “dedifferentiated” transiently amplifying progenitors can achieve “stemness” equivalent to the normal putative basal stem cell subpopulation requires further study.
Figure 4.
A graphic representation of the theoretical stem cell hierarchy in the pseudostratified airway epithelium. In this model, a subset of basal cells within defined niches represents a stem cell compartment that gives rise to transiently amplifying cells with basal, parabasal, and intermediate cell morphologies that generate differentiated cells (straight black arrows). The thickness and size of the circular arrows are representative of growth capacity. The red arrows indicate the presence of plasticity in the airway epithelium. Differentiated cells are capable of “dedifferentiation” (downward-pointing arrows) and “redifferentiation” during injury and repair. Also, phenotypic conversion (SCGB1a1-expressing to mucous secretory) and “transdifferentiation” (ciliated to mucous secretory) may occur under appropriate stimuli.
As illustrated in Figure 5, the hierarchy in the simple epithelium of the bronchioles includes an apparently independent cycle among the pulmonary neuroendocrine cell population, likely involving the hedgehog signaling pathway (82). It is not clear at this time if there is a small population of stem or progenitor neuroendocrine cells or if they are maintained by larger numbers of differentiated cells, as reported for beta cells in pancreatic islets (23). Variant Clara cells in the bronchioles are likely the progenitors of other Clara and ciliated cells (71) and the SCGB1a1/SP-C/Sca-1/CD34-expressing cell of the bronchiolar–alveolar junction appears to regenerate both the bronchiole and the proximal alveolar region (74, 75). In the distal alveoli, there is evidence for subpopulations of type II cells with different growth potentials (83) (see Reference 84), but again, it is also possible that a model similar to the pancreatic islets applies, and that a broad population of differentiated cells may maintain the distal lung epithelium.
Figure 5.
A graphic representation of the theoretical stem cell hierarchy in the bronchiolar epithelium. The thickness and size of the circular arrows are representative of growth capacity and differentiation potential. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNEC) are believed to represent a lineage independent of other epithelial cell types in the adult. Variant Clara cells associated with PNEC bodies can multiply and regenerate ciliated and Clara cells of the bronchiolar epithelium and variant Clara cells present near the bronchiolar–alveolar junction appear to be able to generate both bronchiolar and alveolar epithelium, as well as adenocarcinoma (not illustrated).
Mucous secretory cell hyperplasia in the upper airway and metaplasia in the bronchioles can be generated by at least two cellular mechanisms. In the allergen-challenged mouse, mucous secretory cells in the trachea and upper generations of the bronchi appear to derive mainly from Clara cells (85, 86), whereas in the airways of mice exposed to Sendai virus, ciliated cells can transdifferentiate into mucous secretory cells (87) by a two-step process regulated by activation of epidermal growth factor receptor family members and interleukin 13 (88). The relative importance of conversion of SCGB1a1-positive cells to mucous secretory cells versus transdifferentiation of ciliated cells to mucous secretory cells in the human large and small airways in relationship to COPD remains to be determined.
DEFECTIVE MUCUS TRANSPORT AND LUMINAL OCCLUSION
Luminal accumulation of mucus likely contributes to airflow obstruction and serves as a nidus for chronic bacterial infection in later stages of COPD. The amount of mucus in the airway must represent the balance among the number of mucous secretory cells, their synthetic and secretory activity, and the ability to clear the airway of secretions. Although routine formalin-fixed histologic sections of the airway usually demonstrate “splitting” between the luminal mucus plugs and the epithelial surface, this is likely to be an artifact due to variable shrinkage of the mucus and the airway wall during processing and sectioning. Frozen sections of the COPD airway avoid this artifact and frequently demonstrate mucus adhesion to the airway wall (Figure 6). The efficiency of mucociliary and cough clearance is likely influenced by many factors in COPD, including the mass of secreted mucous, altered content of DNA and actin as well as other molecules, altered airflow due to loss of elasticity, physical distortion of the airway wall due to loss of tethers, abnormal ciliated cell activity, and changes in ion and water transport resulting in relative surface dehydration (reviewed in Reference 89). Therapies directed at improving mucus clearance may slow the progression of COPD by decreasing the frequency and impact of acute exacerbations.
Figure 6.
Representative images of COPD bronchiolar epithelia and luminal mucus in frozen sections. Note the abundance of mucous secretory cells and that luminal mucus is closely apposed to the apical epithelial surface (blue areas in the lower image). The epithelial basement membrane appears as a bright pink line in both the upper and lower panels. Both photomicrographs are at the same magnification (originally 400×).
CONCLUSIONS
Airway wall thickening due to fibrosis, epithelial hyperplasia, and luminal obstruction with inflammatory mucus exudates are correlated with the severity of COPD. An improved understanding of airway stem cell biology, including progenitor–progeny relationships and molecular regulation of cell dynamics leading to mucous secretory cell hyperplasia/metaplasia and airway wall fibrosis, will provide a logical basis for novel therapies directed the characteristic underlying pathology. As well as physically obstructing airflow, luminal mucus likely contributes to chronic bacterial infection associated with more advanced disease, and strategies to improve mucus clearance may also be beneficial.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Lisa Brown for outstanding graphics, editorial, and production assistance.
Supported by NIH HL058345 and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation grants to S.H.R.
Conflict of Interest Statement: S.H.R. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) global strategy for the diagnosis. management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI/WHO workshop report. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.com (updated September 2005). NIH Publication No. 2701.
- 2.Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1256–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnes PJ. Small airways in COPD. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2635–2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hogg JC. Pathophysiology of airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 2004;364:709–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, Cherniack RM, Rogers RM, Sciurba FC, Coxson HO, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2645–2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shah V, Sridhar S, Beane J, Brody JS, Spira A. SIEGE: Smoking Induced Epithelial Gene Expression Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33: D573–D579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wedzicha JA. Role of viruses in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2004;1:115–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eldika N, Sethi S. Role of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in exacerbations and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2006;12:118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murphy TF. The role of bacteria in airway inflammation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006; 19:225–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sethi S. Bacteria in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: phenomenon or epiphenomenon? Proc Am Thorac Soc 2004; 1:109–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weiss DJ, Berberich MA, Borok Z, Gail DB, Kolls JK, Penland C, Prockop DJ. Adult stem cells, lung biology, and lung disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:193–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rawlins EL, Hogan BLM. Epithelial stem cells of the lung: privileged few or opportunities for many? Development 2006;133:2455–2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Messier B, Leblond CP. Cell proliferation and migration as revealed by radioautography after injection of thymidine-H3 into male rats and mice. Am J Anat 1960;106:247–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blenkinsopp WK. Proliferation of respiratory tract epithelium in the rat. Exp Cell Res 1967;46:144–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Breuer R, Zajicek G, Christensen TG, Lucey EC, Snider GL. Cell kinetics of normal adult hamster bronchial epithelium in the steady state. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1990;2:51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Breuer R, Christensen TG, Wax Y, Bolbochan G, Lucey EC, Stone PJ, Snider GL. Relationship of secretory granule content and proliferative intensity in the secretory compartment of the hamster bronchial epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1993;8:480–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Donnelly GM, Haack DG, Heird CS. Tracheal epithelium: cell kinetics and differentiation in normal rat tissue. Cell Tissue Kinet 1982;15:119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Evans MJ, Johnson LV, Stephens RJ, Freeman G. Renewal of the terminal bronchiolar epithelium in the rat following exposure to NO2 or O3. Lab Invest 1976;35:246–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kauffman SL. Cell proliferation in the mammalian lung. Int Rev Exp Pathol 1980;22:131–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marshall HE III, Keenan KP, McDowell EM. The stathmokinetic and morphological response of the hamster respiratory epithelium to intralaryngeal instillations of saline and ferric oxide in saline. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1987;9:705–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neuringer IP, Randell SH. Stem cells and repair of lung injuries. Respir Res 2004;5:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moore KA, Lemischka IR. Stem cells and their niches. Science 2006; 311:1880–1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dor Y, Brown J, Martinez OI, Melton DA. Adult pancreatic beta-cells are formed by self-duplication rather than stem-cell differentiation. Nature 2004;429:41–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilmut I, Paterson L. Somatic cell nuclear transfer. Oncol Res 2003;13: 303–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dor Y, Melton DA. How important are adult stem cells for tissue maintenance? Cell Cycle 2004;3:1104–1106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Janssens JP, Pache JC, Nicod LP. Physiological changes in respiratory function associated with ageing. Eur Respir J 1999;13:197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bell DR, Van Zant G. Stem cells, aging, and cancer: inevitabilities and outcomes. Oncogene 2004;23:7290–7296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rossi DJ, Bryder D, Zahn JM, Ahlenius H, Sonu R, Wagers AJ, Weissman IL. Cell intrinsic alterations underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:9194–9199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Wagers AJ, Girma ER, Weissman IL, Rando TA. Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature 2005;433:760–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Holz O, Zuhlke I, Jaksztat E, Muller KC, Welker L, Nakashima M, Diemel KD, Branscheid D, Magnussen H, Jorres RA. Lung fibroblasts from patients with emphysema show a reduced proliferation rate in culture. Eur Respir J 2004;24:575–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muller KC, Welker L, Paasch K, Feindt B, Erpenbeck VJ, Hohlfeld JM, Krug N, Nakashima M, Branscheid D, Magnussen H, et al. Lung fibroblasts from patients with emphysema show markers of senescence in vitro. Respir Res 2006;7:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Demedts IK, Demoor T, Bracke KR, Joos GF, Brusselle GG. Role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of COPD and pulmonary emphysema. Respir Res 2006;7:53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen WY, Wang DH, Yen RC, Luo J, Gu W, Baylin SB. Tumor suppressor HIC1 directly regulates SIRT1 to modulate p53-dependent DNA-damage responses. Cell 2005;123:437–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neuringer IP, Randell SH. Stem cell update: promise and controversy. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2006;65:47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li HC, Stoicov C, Rogers AB, Houghton J. Stem cells and cancer: evidence for bone marrow stem cells in epithelial cancers. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:363–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beacham DA, Cukierman E. Stromagenesis: the changing face of fibroblastic microenvironments during tumor progression. Semin Cell Biol 2005;15:329–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M. van der ZR, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 1997;275:964–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liew A, Barry F, O'Brien T. Endothelial progenitor cells: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Bioessays 2006;28:261–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Losordo DW, Dimmeler S. Therapeutic angiogenesis and vasculogenesis for ischemic disease: part II: cell-based therapies. Circulation 2004;109: 2692–2697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yamada M, Kubo H, Ishizawa K, Kobayashi S, Shinkawa M, Sasaki H. Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with bacterial pneumonia: evidence that bone marrow derived cells contribute to lung repair. Thorax 2005;60:410–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Burnham EL, Taylor WR, Quyyumi AA, Rojas M, Brigham KL, Moss M. Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells are associated with survival in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:854–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fadini GP, Schiavon M, Cantini M, Baesso I, Facco M, Miorin M, Tassinato M, Kreutzenberg SV, Avogaro A, Agostini C. Circulating progenitor cells are reduced in patients with severe lung disease. Stem Cells 2006;24:1806–1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wilson JW, Hii S. The importance of the airway microvasculature in asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;6:51–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stenmark KR, Davie NJ, Reeves JT, Frid MG. Hypoxia, leukocytes, and the pulmonary circulation. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:715–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stenmark KR, Davie N, Frid M, Gerasimovskaya E, Das M. Role of the adventitia in pulmonary vascular remodeling. Physiology (Bethesda) 2006;21:134–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ruiz DA, Luttun A, Carmeliet P. An SDF-1 trap for myeloid cells stimulates angiogenesis. Cell 2006;124:18–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Foo SS, Turner CJ, Adams S, Compagni A, Aubyn D, Kogata N, Lindblom P, Shani M, Zicha D, Adams RH. Ephrin-B2 controls cell motility and adhesion during blood-vessel-wall assembly. Cell 2006; 124:161–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Grunewald M, Avraham I, Dor Y, Bachar-Lustig E, Itin A, Yung S, Chimenti S, Landsman L, Abramovitch R, Keshet E. VEGF-induced adult neovascularization: recruitment, retention, and role of accessory cells. Cell 2006;124:175–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hashimoto N, Jin H, Liu T, Chensue SW, Phan SH. Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2004;113:243–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmidt M, Sun G, Stacey MA, Mori L, Mattoli S. Identification of circulating fibrocytes as precursors of bronchial myofibroblasts in asthma. J Immunol 2003;170:380–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Phillips RJ, Burdick MD, Hong K, Lutz MA, Murray LA, Xue YY, Belperio JA, Keane MP, Strieter RM. Circulating fibrocytes traffic to the lungs in response to CXCL12 and mediate fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2004;114:438–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lama VN, Phan SH. The extrapulmonary origin of fibroblasts. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Basbaum C, Jany B. Plasticity in the airway epithelium. Am J Physiol 1990;259:L38–L46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Desai LP, Aryal AM, Ceacareanu B, Hassid A, Waters CM. RhoA and Rac1 are both required for efficient wound closure of airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 2004;287:L1134–L1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shimizu T, Nishihara M, Kawaguchi S, Sakakura Y. Expression of phenotypic markers during regeneration of rat tracheal epithelium following mechanical injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1994;11:85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Erjefalt JS, Persson CG. Airway epithelial repair: breathtakingly quick and multipotentially pathogenic. Thorax 1997;52:1010–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu JY, Nettesheim P, Randell SH. Growth and differentiation of tracheal epithelial progenitor cells. Am J Physiol 1994;266:L296–L307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Avril-Delplanque A, Casal I, Castillon N, Hinnrasky J, Puchelle E, Peault B. Aquaporin-3 expression in human fetal airway epithelial progenitor cells. Stem Cells 2005;23:992–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Randell SH, Comment CE, Ramaekers FCS, Nettesheim P. Properties of rat tracheal epithelial cells separated based on expression of cell surface alpha-galactosyl end groups. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1991;4: 544–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Engelhardt JF, Schlossberg H, Yankaskas JR, Dudus L. Progenitor cells of the adult human airway involved in submucosal gland development. Development 1995;121:2031–2046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schoch KG, Lori A, Burns KA, Eldred T, Olsen JC, Randell SH. A subset of mouse tracheal epithelial basal cells generates large colonies in vitro. Am J Physiol 2004;286:L631–L642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hong KU, Reynolds SD, Watkins S, Fuchs E, Stripp BR. Basal cells are a multipotent progenitor capable of renewing the bronchial epithelium. Am J Pathol 2004;164:577–588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hong KU, Reynolds SD, Watkins S, Fuchs E, Stripp BR. In vivo differentiation potential of tracheal basal cells: evidence for multipotent and unipotent subpopulations. Am J Physiol 2004;286:L643–L649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Borthwick DW, Shahbazian M, Todd KQ, Dorin JR, Randell SH. Evidence for stem-cell niches in the tracheal epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:662–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Boers JE, Ambergen AW, Thunnissen FB. Number and proliferation of Clara cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1585–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Boers JE, Ambergen AW, Thunnissen FB. Number and proliferation of basal and parabasal cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:2000–2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Reynolds SD, Reynolds PR, Pryhuber GS, Finder JD, Stripp BR. Secretoglobins SCGB3A1 and SCGB3A2 define secretory cell subsets in mouse and human airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166: 1498–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Barth PJ, Koch S, Muller B, Unterstab F, von Wichert P, Moll R. Proliferation and number of Clara cell 10-kDa protein (CC10)-reactive epithelial cells and basal cells in normal, hyperplastic and metaplastic bronchial mucosa. Virchows Arch 2000;437:648–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Evans MJ, Shami SG, Cabral-Anderson LJ, Dekker NP. Role of nonciliated cells in renewal of the bronchial epithelium of rats exposed to NO2. Am J Pathol 1986;123:126–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Van Winkle LS, Buckpitt AR, Nishio SJ, Isaac JM, Plopper CG. Cellular response in naphthalene-induced Clara cell injury and bronchiolar epithelial repair in mice. Am J Physiol 1995;269:L800–L818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hong KU, Reynolds SD, Giangreco A, Hurley CM, Stripp BR. Clara cell secretory protein-expressing cells of the airway neuroepithelial body microenvironment include a label-retaining subset and are critical for epithelial renewal after progenitor cell depletion. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:671–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stripp BR, Maxson K, Mera R, Singh G. Plasticity of airway cell proliferation and gene expression after acute naphthalene injury. Am J Physiol 1995;269:L791–L799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Reynolds SD, Hong KU, Giangreco A, Mango GW, Guron C, Morimoto Y, Stripp BR. Conditional Clara cell ablation reveals a self-renewing progenitor function of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells. Am J Physiol 2000;278:L1256–L1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Giangreco A, Reynolds SD, Stripp BR. Terminal bronchioles harbor a unique airway stem cell population that localizes to the bronchoalveolar duct junction. Am J Pathol 2002;161:173–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, Vogel S, Crowley D, Bronson RT, Jacks T. Identification of bronchoalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 2005;121:823–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Szilasi M, Dolinay T, Nemes Z, Strausz J. Pathology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pathol Oncol Res 2006;12:52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Voynow JA, Gendler SJ, Rose MC. Regulation of mucin genes in chronic inflammatory airway diseases. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34: 661–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rose MC, Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2006;86:245–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Williams OW, Sharafkhaneh A, Kim V, Dickey BF, Evans CM. Airway mucus: from production to secretion. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006; 34:527–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Holtzman MJ, Battaile JT, Patel AC. Immunogenetic programs for viral induction of mucous cell metaplasia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006; 35:29–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tesfaigzi Y. Roles of apoptosis in airway epithelia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34:537–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Watkins DN, Berman DM, Burkholder SG, Wang B, Beachy PA, Baylin SB. Hedgehog signalling within airway epithelial progenitors and in small-cell lung cancer. Nature 2003;422:313–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Reddy R, Buckley S, Doerken M, Barsky L, Weinberg K, Anderson KD, Warburton D, Driscoll B. Isolation of a putative progenitor subpopulation of alveolar epithelial type 2 cells. Am J Physiol 2004;286:L658–L667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Griffiths MJ, Bonnet D, Janes SM. Stem cells of the alveolar epithelium. Lancet 2005;366:249–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Reader JR, Tepper JS, Schelegle ES, Aldrich MC, Putney LF, Pfeiffer JW, Hyde DM. Pathogenesis of mucous cell metaplasia in a murine asthma model. Am J Pathol 2003;162:2069–2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Evans CM, Williams OW, Tuvim MJ, Nigam R, Mixides GP, Blackburn MR, DeMayo FJ, Burns AR, Smith C, Reynolds SD, et al. Mucin is produced by Clara cells in the proximal airways of antigen-challenged mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2004;31:382–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Park KS, Wells JM, Zorn AM, Wert SE, Laubach VE, Fernandez LG, Whitsett JA. Transdifferentiation of ciliated cells during repair of the respiratory epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34:151–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tyner JW, Kim EY, Ide K, Pelletier MR, Roswit WT, Morton JD, Battaile JT, Patel AC, Patterson GA, Castro M, et al. Blocking airway mucous cell metaplasia by inhibiting EGFR antiapoptosis and IL-13 transdifferentiation signals. J Clin Invest 2006;116:309–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Randell SH, Boucher RC, for the University of North Carolina Virtual Lung Group. Effective mucus clearance is essential for respiratory health. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;35:20–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






