Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1983 Apr;40(1):133–138. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.1.133-138.1983

Differential toxicity of inhaled gram-negative bacteria.

M W Baseler, B Fogelmark, R Burrell
PMCID: PMC264827  PMID: 6339400

Abstract

The toxicity by inhalation of various gram-negative bacteria, isolated from settings associated with inhalation disease, was studied by a variety of means. These microorganisms were not equally toxic. Citrobacter freundii aerosol challenges of rabbits provoked significant (up to fivefold) increases in plasma haptoglobin 24 to 48 h after inhalation. Other strains tested failed to provoke such statistically consistent increases. Measurements of C-reactive protein in these same animals did not lead to as reliable results, due to the variability of the responses. Mice responded differently to inhalation in that haptoglobin responses were either unaffected or depressed. When a strain of mice was used that exhibits more severe inflammatory responses to endotoxin (C3H/HeJ), C. freundii and Escherichia coli aerosols provoked significant haptoglobin increases. Free lung cell analyses demonstrated that the macrophage and neutrophil responses differed depending on the strain of bacteria used. Again, C. freundii induced the greatest responses. When murine B lymphocytes were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide preparations from different gram-negative bacteria, distinctly different dose-response curves were obtained. The types of responses obtained indicate that (i) brief inhalation of bacterial aerosols previously thought to be innocuous may lead to pulmonary inflammation, and (ii) that these bacteria differ in their toxicity, with C. freundii being the most toxic organism of the five studied.

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdelnoor A. M., Chang H. L., Pham P. H., Nowotny A. Lack of relationship between toxicity and bone marrow cell colony stimulating activity of endotoxin preparations. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1980 Jan;163(1):15–18. doi: 10.3181/00379727-163-40714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baseler M. W., Burrell R. Acute-phase reactants in experimental inhalation lung disease. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1981 Oct;168(1):49–55. doi: 10.3181/00379727-168-41233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burrell R., Rylander R. Further studies on inhaled endotoxin-containing bacteria. Environ Res. 1982 Apr;27(2):325–336. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(82)90088-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutkiewicz J. Studies on endotoxin of Erwinia herbicola and their biological activity. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1976 Dec;236(4):487–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fogelmark B., Rylander R., Sjöstrand M., Reininghaus W. Free lung cell phagocytosis and the effect of cigarette smoke exposure. Exp Lung Res. 1980 Jun;1(2):131–138. doi: 10.3109/01902148009069643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galanos C. Physical state and biological activity of lipopolysaccharides. Toxicity and immunogenicity of the lipid A component. Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol. 1975 Jul;149(2-4):214–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Helander I., Salkinoja-Salonen M., Rylander R. Chemical structure and inhalation toxicity of lipopolysaccharides from bacteria on cotton. Infect Immun. 1980 Sep;29(3):859–862. doi: 10.1128/iai.29.3.859-862.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Helander I., Saxén H., Salkinoja-Salonen M., Rylander R. Pulmonary toxicity of endotoxins: comparison of lipopolysaccharides from various bacterial species. Infect Immun. 1982 Feb;35(2):528–532. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.2.528-532.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morrison D. C., Ulevitch R. J. The effects of bacterial endotoxins on host mediation systems. A review. Am J Pathol. 1978 Nov;93(2):526–618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rylander R., Haglind P., Lundholm M., Mattsby I., Stenqvist K. Humidifier fever and endotoxin exposure. Clin Allergy. 1978 Sep;8(5):511–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb01504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rylander R., Snella M. C., Garcia I. Pulmonary cell response patterns after exposure to airborne bacteria. Scand J Respir Dis. 1975;56(4):195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snella M. C. Effects of bacterial endotoxin inhalation. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1981;29(2):209–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sultzer B. M., Goodman G. W. Endotoxin protein: a B-cell mitogen and polyclonal activator of C3H/HeJ lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1976 Sep 1;144(3):821–827. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.3.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Verghese M. W., Snyderman R. Differential anti-inflammatory effects of LPS in susceptible and resistant mouse strains. J Immunol. 1981 Jul;127(1):288–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES