Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 Jan;30(1):63–66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.63-66.1992

Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles.

M L Wilson 1, L J Harrell 1, S Mirrett 1, M P Weinstein 1, C W Stratton 1, L B Reller 1
PMCID: PMC264997  PMID: 1734069

Abstract

Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems (Sparks, Md.) recently introduced BACTEC high-volume aerobic and anaerobic bottles that accept up to 10 ml of blood for use on their nonradiometric blood culture instruments. Both bottles contain 25 ml of tryptic soy broth, 0.05% sodium polyanetholesulfonate, and mixed resins. We compared the anaerobic bottle, designated BACTEC PLUS 27 (BP27), with the Roche Septi-Chek (RSC) Columbia broth anaerobic bottle in a collaborative evaluation at three university hospitals. A total of 5,152 adequately filled blood cultures were obtained from adult patients with suspected bacteremia or fungemia. Staphylococcus aureus was recovered significantly more often (P less than 0.03) from BP27 bottles alone; there were no other significant differences in yield. When microorganisms were recovered from both anaerobic bottles, growth was detected earlier in BP27 than it was in RSC (P less than 0.001), especially for S. aureus (P less than 0.001) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (P less than 0.02). We conclude that the yield from BP27 bottles is equivalent to or better (S. aureus) than that from RSC anaerobic bottles with Columbia broth and that speed of detection is superior with BP27 bottles.

Full text

PDF
63

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arpi M., Bentzon M. W., Jensen J., Frederiksen W. Importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):838–842. doi: 10.1007/BF02185857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auckenthaler R., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of recovery of organisms from blood cultures diluted 10% (volume/volume) and 20% (volume/volume). J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):860–864. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.860-864.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorsher C. W., Rosenblatt J. E., Wilson W. R., Ilstrup D. M. Anaerobic bacteremia: decreasing rate over a 15-year period. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jul-Aug;13(4):633–636. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.4.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eykyn S. J., Gransden W. R., Phillips I. The causative organisms of septicaemia and their epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Apr;25 (Suppl 100):41–58. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.suppl_c.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall M. M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Effect of volume of blood cultured on detection of bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jun;3(6):643–645. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.6.643-645.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Plorde J. J., Tenover F. C., Carlson L. G. Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):292–295. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.292-295.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roberts F. J. A review of positive blood cultures: identification and source of microorganisms and patterns of sensitivity to antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1980 May-Jun;2(3):329–339. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.3.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sandven P., Høiby E. A. The importance of blood volume cultured on detection of bacteraemia. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1981 Jun;89(3):149–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1981.tb00168_89b.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tenney J. H., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W. L., Weinstein M. P. Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):558–561. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.558-561.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879–882. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES