Mouse models of Huntington disease: variations on a theme

Abstract

An accepted prerequisite for clinical trials of a compound in humans is the successful alleviation of the disease in animal models. For some diseases, however, successful translation of drug effects from mouse models to the bedside has been limited. One question is whether the current models accurately reproduce the human disease. Here, we examine the mouse models that are available for therapeutic testing in Huntington disease (HD), a late-onset neurodegenerative disorder for which there is no effective treatment. The current mouse models show different degrees of similarity to the human condition. Significant phenotypic differences are seen in mouse models that express either truncated or full-length human, or full-length mouse, mutant huntingtin (mHTT). These differences in phenotypic expression may be attributable to the influences of protein context, mouse strain and a difference in regulatory sequences between the mouse Htt and human HTT genes.

The vision: from mechanisms in mice to therapies in humans

The most important rationale for modelling human disorders in a non-human organism is the identification of fundamental pathogenic mechanisms that lead to novel therapeutic targets, and the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of potential new drugs. Historically, mice have been used to model human disease because of their physiological, anatomical and genomic similarities to humans. For neurodegenerative diseases, the mammalian neuronal physiology and the human-like brain anatomy makes mouse models especially useful. Nevertheless, their short life span of approximately 2 years is a serious limitation for late-onset neurodegenerative disease and the nervous system of humans is significantly more similar to that of primates. However, the costs and logistics of performing large-scale therapeutic trials in non-human primates are prohibitive. The question therefore remains about whether any positive outcome from therapeutic trials in mice is sufficient evidence to proceed with studies in humans. An alternative question is whether human trials should commence when a drug against a compelling target has been identified that did not show efficacy in mice.

The reality: the predictive value of therapeutic trials in mice

For amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the most widely used mouse model has proven to be of poor predictive value: approximately 3% of all cases of ALS are caused by point mutations in the superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene, and the most commonly used ALS mouse model expresses human mutant SOD1 (G93A) as a transgene (Gurney et al., 1994). A recent review summarized 78 individual and 12 combination compound trials that have been conducted using this mouse model (Benatar, 2007), which subsequently led to 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in humans, all of which failed (Vincent et al., 2008). Even compounds such as creatine, minocycline or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors that were most promising in mouse trials (Klivenyi et al., 1999; Drachman et al., 2002; Zhu et al., 2002) have not yet been shown to be beneficial in human clinical trials (Groeneveld et al., 2003; Shefner et al., 2004; Cudkowicz et al., 2006; Gordon et al., 2007). Riluzole remains the only FDA approved drug for ALS (Miller et al., 2003).

The SOD1 mouse model more closely resembles familial than sporadic ALS and the possibility of biologically relevant differences between these forms of the disorder might limit the usefulness of the model. In addition, treatment in mice is commonly started before the onset of symptoms; this cannot be replicated in predominantly sporadic human diseases, such as ALS. These serious limitations apply to all diseases where familial and sporadic forms exist, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

Therapeutic trials for Huntington disease (HD), however, have significant advantages: the expansion of a polyglutamine tract in the huntingtin HTT protein has been determined as the single cause of the disease (The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group, 1993). Therefore, it should be easier to generate an accurate mouse model of HD than for other conditions with multiple, often unknown, causes. Furthermore, predictive testing is available to accurately predict whether, and when, a person will be affected (Tibben, 2007), making presymptomatic treatment in humans a feasible option. To assess the efficacy of potential therapeutics in the HD mouse model, multiple endpoints have been established that allow the monitoring of neuropathological and behavioural changes in the YAC128 HD mouse model (Table 1) (Slow et al., 2003; Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005a; Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005b).

Table 1.

Neuropathological and behavioural endpoints for evaluation of therapeutic candidates in the YAC128 HD mouse model

Primary endpoints
Neuropathological	Behavioural Motor function
Striatal volume loss	Rotarod abnormalities*
Striatal neuronal loss

Secondary endpoints
Pathological		Behavioural
Neuropathology	Peripheral pathology	Motor function	Cognitive function
Reduction in average volume of striatal neurons	Testicular degeneration	Open-field activity	Pre-pulse inhibition
Brain weight loss
Cortical volume loss
Nuclear translocation of mutant HTT
Caspase-6 activation

^*Deficits on the fixed and accelerating rotarod. References: Slow et al., 2003; Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005a; Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005b.

HD mouse models: too much choice?

HD is characterised by the progressive deterioration of cognitive and motor functions, and the selective loss of GABAergic medium spiny striatal neurons, as well as glutamatergic cortical neurons that project to the striatum (Albin et al., 1990). Aberrant proteolysis of mutant HTT (mHTT) has been proposed to play a role in HD (Wellington et al., 2000; Gafni et al., 2004; Graham et al., 2006), leading to the accumulation of N-terminal mHTT fragments in intracellular inclusions (DiFiglia et al., 1997).

Huntingtin fragment mouse models

HD is characterised by its late onset, therefore reproducing the human HD phenotype within the life span of a mouse represents a major challenge. Different approaches have been taken to increase the severity of the disease phenotype in various models. The R6/2 and N-171 mouse models use the fact that the expression of N-terminal mHTT fragments causes acute neuronal toxicity, by expressing truncated human mHTT consisting of either the first of 67 exons (Mangiarini et al., 1996) or the N-terminal 171 amino acids (Schilling et al., 1999). The drawbacks of these models are the loss of the natural genomic and protein context of the polyglutamine expansion, which could lead to altered regulation and a loss of potential disease-modifying post-translational modifications and protein interactions. Additionally, it has been shown that mHTT fragments generated by intracellular cleavage have a different subcellular localisation than truncated mHTT (Warby et al., 2008). It is therefore possible that the process of mHTT cleavage is in itself relevant to the pathogenesis of HD. In other words, although certain truncated fragments may cause neuronal toxicity, this might not necessarily recapitulate the disease.

The R6/2 fragment mouse model (Mangiarini et al., 1996) has been used in a number of therapeutic trials, and many compounds that have been effective in R6/2 mice have proceeded to clinical trials, with mixed results. Riluzole, remacemide and CoQ10 have successfully ameliorated the disease phenotype in R6/2 mice (Schilling et al., 2001; Ferrante et al., 2002; Schiefer et al., 2002), but were not beneficial for patients in the corresponding clinical trials (Huntington Study Group, 2001; Landwehrmeyer et al., 2007). The clinical trial of CoQ10 showed a trend towards a slowing in the decline of functional capacity, although it was not statistically significant (Huntington Study Group, 2001).

Full-length huntingtin mouse models

Murine models expressing full-length human mHTT were first reported in 1999 with the generation of the YAC46 and YAC72 models (Hodgson et al., 1999). In an effort to create a mouse model with more robust and earlier behavioural abnormalities that would be better suited for therapeutic trials, an additional YAC transgenic mouse was established in which the mHTT contained 128 glutamines (Slow et al., 2003). These mice show a uniform phenotype with age-dependent striatal and subsequent cortical neurodegeneration (Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005a), and have progressive motor and cognitive deficits (Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005b). A progressive deficit on the rotarod is observed in this line starting at 2–4 months of age, which correlates highly with neuronal loss in the striatum (Slow et al., 2003).

Trials of several candidate therapeutic compounds have been performed in the YAC128 mice: ethyl-EPA showed a modest rescue of the behavioural deficits (Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005d), whereas a trial of cystamine demonstrated protection from neuronal loss but no effect on the motor phenotype (Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005c). In human patients, ethyl-EPA led to a slight improvement of motor dysfunction as well as a reduction in cerebral atrophy in the caudate and thalamus (Puri et al., 2005), which was not seen in the YAC128 mice. Tetrabenazine had positive effects on the behavioural phenotype in mice (Tang et al., 2007), which is in agreement with the results from a clinical trial (Huntington Study Group, 2006). However, the true predictive value of this mouse model will only be established when additional compounds are tested and proceed to clinical trials.

Recently, a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) mouse expressing full-length human mHTT was established (BACHD mice) (Gray et al., 2008). The BACHD mice exhibit progressive motor deficits and late-onset selective neurodegeneration in the cortex and striatum, consistent with the findings in the YAC128 animals. Similar to the YAC model, the BACHD mice are also inherently well suited for therapeutic trials.

The knock-in mouse model of HD expresses mHTT in the most appropriate genomic and protein context, since it has a polyQ sequence inserted into the endogenous mouse Htt gene (Shelbourne et al., 1999). These mice display a very late-onset phenotype, which is strongest in the 150 CAG homozygotes (Heng et al., 2007). A rotarod deficit was reported at ~25 months of age and occurs in parallel with a reduction in striatal neuron counts and striatal volume (Heng et al., 2007), representing a protracted time course compared with the behavioural phenotypes observed in the YAC128 and BACHD animals (Fig. 1). mHTT expression levels cannot explain this striking difference in age of onset since the YAC128 mice express mHTT at similar levels to the endogenous mouse protein (Slow et al., 2003). However, a patch/matrix pattern of HTT immunoreactivity, as seen in the human striatum (Ferrante et al., 1997), has not been observed in the mouse (Bhide et al., 1996), which could point to differences in expression patterns between the human and mouse proteins. A lingering question is whether inherent differences between the human and mouse HTT protein-coding or regulatory sequences could result in the earlier and more profound changes in transgenic HD mouse models compared with the knock-in HD mouse models.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of phenotypes between transgenic and knock-in mouse models of HD and human patients. Transgenic YAC mice express human mHTT with its regulatory sequences and exhibit an earlier and more severe phenotype than knock-in mice, which express the CAG expansion in the context of the mouse Htt gene. References: *Graham et al., 2006; ^†Slow et al., 2003; ^#Van Raamsdonk et al., 2005b; ^§Lerch et al., 2008; **Heng et al., 2007; ^††Pouladi et al., 2009; ^##Tang et al., 2007.

Can we attribute the phenotypic differences in full-length transgenic and knock-in models to species-specific sequence differences in huntingtin between mice and humans?

The human HTT protein (NP_002102) is 3144 amino acids long and the mouse protein (NP_034544) contains 3120 amino acids. Excluding the differences in their polyglutamine and polyproline tracts, the human and mouse proteins are 91% identical and 95% similar.

The majority of the functional elements in human and mouse HTT do not differ or have only the most conservative amino acid substitutions and are thus unlikely to account for differences in the disease phenotypes of YAC128 and knock-in mouse models. Conserved functional elements include caspase, calpain and aspartyl protease cleavage sites; palmitoylation, phosphorylation, sumoylation and ubiquitylation sites; nucleocytoplasmic shuttling signals; the HTT membrane-associated domain; and a proteasome-targeting sequence (Table 2). One apparent exception is the calpain cleavage site at residues 468–470 that contributes to the toxicity of mHTT when cleaved (Gafni et al., 2004). The human sequence at this site is Leu-Thr-Ala; in the mouse it is Phe-Ala-Ala. This is consistent with the human site being a more favourable cleavage site than that in the mouse (Tompa et al., 2004), which might be significant in light of the increased calpain activity in caudate tissue from human HD patients (Gafni and Ellerby, 2002).

Table 2.

Protein sequence elements that do not differ between human and mouse HTT

Functional site	Location*	References
Caspase-6 cleavage	IVLD 586	Wellington et al., 2000
Caspase-2/3 cleavage	DLND 552	Hermel et al., 2004
Caspase-3 cleavage	DVSD 513	Wellington et al., 2000
Palmitoylation	C214	Yanai et al., 2006
Phosphorylation	S421	Warby et al., 2005
Calpain cleavage	VLS 438	Gafni and Ellerby, 2002
	SSS 537
Aspartyl protease cleavage	HCLT…NIVA 104–114	Lunkes et al., 2002
	RMVA…LLPC 146–214
Sumoylation, ubiquitylation	K6, K9, R15	Steffan et al., 2004
Proteasome-targeting sequences	FQKLL 127	Chandra et al., 2008
Nuclear export signal	IIIS…RLPL 2397–2406†	Xia et al., 2003
Putative nuclear localisation signal	PIRR…KEKE 1182–1191	Bessert et al., 1995
Membrane-associated domain/cytoplasmic retention signal	MATL…LKSF 1–17	Steffan et al., 2004; Truant et al., 2006

^*Motif sequence and position of the last residue in the motif in human HTT NP_002102, or sequence range for motifs >6 residues.

^†The nuclear export signal has two conservative Ile to Val changes between the human and mouse.

The genomic organisation of the human HTT gene is well conserved in the mouse. This large gene consists of 67 exons that comprise about 170 kb of the human genome and 150 kb of the mouse genome. Both organisms have two mRNAs that are generated by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation of the primary transcript, producing a long and a short 3′ untranslated region (UTR) that differ by 3 kb (Lin et al., 1993; Lin et al., 1994). In both organisms, the long-UTR transcript is predominantly expressed in the brain, whereas the short-UTR transcript is more widely expressed (Lin et al., 1993). Separate from the alternative 3′UTRs, two HTT/Htt transcripts that differ by ~1.4 kb are seen in both the human and mouse brain (Lin et al., 1994). Although there is experimental evidence for this second pair of transcripts in both the mouse and human, Ensembl predictions only support their existence in the mouse genome, with one transcript missing ~480 amino acids from exons 36 to 43 (see ENSMUSG00000029104 at http://www.ensembl.org) (Hubbard et al., 2007). The corresponding human genomic data do not support this alternative splicing event (ENSG00000197386), which could influence phenotypes in mouse models.

Differences in human and mouse huntingtin regulatory sequences

Transcription factor binding sites

YAC128 mice contain ~308 kb of the human HTT region including ~24 kb upstream of the coding sequence (M.R.H. and R. Devon, unpublished) (Bates et al., 1992; Hodgson et al., 1996; Slow et al., 2003). Human-mouse conservation of this region is characterised by a few segments of high nucleotide sequence identity (>80%) interrupted by long regions of very dissimilar sequences, precluding alignment. Since HTT in YAC mice includes all the local conserved regions and CpG islands that are expected to influence HTT regulation (based on ‘Mammal Cons’ and ‘CpG islands’ tracks in the UCSC genome browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu/, March 2006 genome assembly) (Kent et al., 2002), we would expect that it is regulated in the mouse as it is in humans, defined by its native promoter and internal regulatory elements. The inclusion of ~24 kb upstream of the HTT transcription start site plus ~116 kb downstream of the gene makes it highly likely that even distant regulatory elements have been included in the YAC mouse model. BACHD mice are expected to retain a similar range of crucial elements since their human transgene includes ~20 kb upstream and ~50 kb downstream of the HTT gene (Gray et al., 2008). Regulatory elements that are farther than 20 kb from a gene’s transcription start site are less common. However, they cannot be excluded as a possibility for the HD gene and would not be present in either the BACHD or YAC mouse models.

Some experimentally validated sites of transcription factor binding show differences between the mouse and human. For example, human HTT is bound by the transcription factor NRSF/REST (neuron-restrictive silencer factor/repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor) (Johnson et al., 2008), which represses the expression of neuronal genes in non-neuronal cells (Schoenherr and Anderson, 1995). This site is not conserved in the mouse and the relevant Htt region shares no alignable sequence with human HTT in this intronic region. Differences between mouse Htt and human HTT targeting by NRSF might influence pathology.

Putative microRNA targets

Human HTT and mouse Htt may also be differentially regulated by microRNA (miRNA) families that function in both humans and mice, which could provide another basis for the differences between mice expressing the mouse gene versus the human gene. There is a precedent for miRNA modulation of cytotoxicity in the polyglutamine-expansion disorder spinocerebellar ataxia 1: several miRNAs co-regulate ataxin 1 at both the RNA and protein levels and influence cyotoxicity of the polyglutamine-expanded protein (Lee et al., 2008). Using TargetScan 4.2, we identified sites that, owing to sequence differences, would be targeted exclusively in the long 3′ UTRs in either the human or mouse. Context scores in TargetScan can be used to predict site performance (Lewis et al., 2003; Grimson et al., 2007), and we selected only miRNA targets that are likely to be significantly correlated with protein downregulation (Baek et al., 2008). Human HTT is predicted to be targeted by ten miRNAs that are conserved in humans and mice, but whose seed sequences are not conserved in the homologous site in the mouse 3′UTR (Table 3). Conversely, TargetScan predicts that mouse Htt is targeted by 12 miRNAs that are conserved in humans and mice but whose seed sequences are not conserved in the homologous site in the human 3′UTR (Table 3). miRNAs from both columns of Table 3, miR-133, miR-204, miR-30-5p and miR-195, have been implicated in HD pathology and related processes (Kim et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2008; Mellios et al., 2008), pointing to a complex network of dysregulation. The binding of miRNAs can be strongly influenced by single nucleotide differences in their seed regions (Grimson et al., 2007), so unidentified differences between the HTT/Htt 3′UTRs in different mouse models could exacerbate phenotypic differences. Although YAC and knock-in mouse models express mHTT proteins at similar levels in different tissues (Slow et al., 2003), the potential for differential miRNA regulation suggests that there could be important differences in cell type-specific regulation of HTT. Clearly, further studies are needed to explore whether these might form the basis for different phenotypic manifestations of the mouse Htt and the human HTT gene.

Table 3.

Human HTT or mouse Htt sequence-specific targeting by miRNAs^*

Human sequence-specific miRNAs	Mouse sequence-specific miRNAs
miR-23	miR-15/miR-16/miR-195/miR-424/miR-497†
miR-24	miR-22
miR-30-5p†	miR-24
miR-103/miR-107	miR-30-3p
miR-128	miR-31
miR-148/miR-152	miR-133†
miR-181	miR-223
miR-204†/miR-211	miR-224
miR-214	miR-331
miR-370	miR-342
	miR-378
	miR-491

^*These miRNAs function in both humans and mice but are strongly predicted to target either the human HTT or mouse Htt 3′UTR, where that site sequence is not conserved in both organisms.

^†miRNAs implicated in HD pathology.

Strain differences between knock-in and YAC or BAC mouse models

Another important issue when comparing different mouse models is the respective background strain of mouse used. Breeding of a mouse model onto another strain can lead to changes in phenotypic severity. An Alzheimer’s disease mouse model expressing mutant amyloid precursor protein is lethal on pure FVB/N or C57BL/6J backgrounds but has a milder phenotype on outbred mouse strains (Carlson et al., 1997). A similar phenomenon was observed in caspase-3 knockout mice, which show perinatal lethality on a 129/B6F1 background, whereas backcrossing to the strain C57BL/6J dramatically improved the survival rate (Zheng et al., 1999; Houde et al., 2004).

The transgenic full-length YAC128 and BACHD models are on a pure FVB/N background, whereas most mHTT fragment and knock-in models are on a C57BL/6 mixed background (Table 4) (Mangiarini et al., 1996; Shelbourne et al., 1999; Slow et al., 2003; Gray et al., 2008). Neuronal toxicity mediated by the activation of glutamate receptors (excitotoxicity) contributes to the selective neurodegeneration observed in HD (Pouladi et al., 2006). Mounting evidence reveals that there is a strong genetic component influencing the susceptibility to excitotoxicity; the C57BL/6 strain background confers more resistance to most of the excitotoxins examined when compared with the FVB/N background (Schauwecker, 2005). This difference in susceptibility to excitotoxic neuronal death might underlie the differences in severity of the HD phenotype that were observed between the full-length YAC and BAC HD models compared with the knock-in mouse models.

Table 4.

Strain differences between HD mouse models

Mouse HD model	CAG size	Strain	References
R6/2 model	115–150 CAG	CBA C57BL/6 mixed background	Mangiarini et al., 1996
N-171 model	18, 44, 82 CAG	C3H/HEJ C57BL/6JF1 mixed background	Schilling et al., 1999
YAC models	18, 46, 72, 128 CAG	FVB/N	Hodgson et al., 1999; Slow et al., 2003
BACHD model	97 CAG	FVB/NJ	Gray et al., 2008
Knock-in models	72–80 CAG	129/Svx C57BL/6 mixed background	Shelbourne et al., 1999
		129/Svx FVB/N mixed background
	50, 92, 111 CAG	129/CD1 mixed background	Wheeler et al., 2000
	94, 140 CAG	129/Sv C57BL/6 mixed background	Menalled et al., 2002; Menalled et al., 2003
	150 CAG	129/Ola C57BL/6J mixed background	Lin et al., 2001

Conclusion

The use of genetically modified mice has led to great strides in advancing our understanding of disease owing to their physiological similarity to humans. However, over the last decade, the use of murine models of neurodegenerative diseases in preclinical testing shows that therapeutic success in animal models is not always paralleled by clinical success in patients. The experience with HD mouse models is instructive in this regard, showing that introduction of the polyQ expansion sequence into the mouse Htt gene leads to a less severe phenotype and a more protracted time course when compared with that seen with transgenic expression of the full-length mutant human HTT gene. Furthermore, mouse models expressing a truncated form of mHTT that have been used extensively for preclinical testing had very limited predictive value for therapeutic success in patients, suggesting that success in more than one mouse model should be a prerequisite for embarking on clinical trials. However, for those drugs with appropriate ADME (adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and safety profiles against a compelling disease-relevant target, human trials could commence as soon as the compound becomes available. This approach could lead to expeditious and parallel preclinical trials that target verified disease-relevant pathways, and could provide hope for HD patients who currently have no therapy to influence the course of the illness, while raising the bar for drugs with less well-defined mechanisms of action.