Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 Mar;30(3):540–544. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.3.540-544.1992

Rapid detection of respiratory viruses by shell vial culture and direct staining by using pooled and individual monoclonal antibodies.

S Matthey 1, D Nicholson 1, S Ruhs 1, B Alden 1, M Knock 1, K Schultz 1, A Schmuecker 1
PMCID: PMC265105  PMID: 1372616

Abstract

The Bartels respiratory virus panel detection kit is an indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) method that uses pooled and individual antisera for tissue culture confirmation of seven respiratory viruses. We evaluated these reagents for detecting viral antigen in shell vial cultures and by direct staining of cells from respiratory specimens. The isolation from 254 specimens of respiratory viruses in shell vial cultures compared with standard tube cultures was highly sensitive (94%) and specific (97.3%). The numbers of viral isolates detected in three consecutive years of testing with shell vial cultures were 68 of 254 (26.8%), 101 of 381 (26.5%), and 122 of 430 (28.4%). IFA direct staining of all 1,065 specimens resulted in 183 (17.2) being uninterpretable because of inadequate numbers of cells or interfering fluorescence. The sensitivity and specificity of the interpretable IFA direct stains in comparison with shell vial cultures were 85.9 and 87.1%, respectively. For detection of 881 adequate specimens, Bartels respiratory syncytial virus IFA direct staining compared with an Ortho Diagnostics Systems direct fluorescent-antibody test for respiratory syncytial virus RSV was highly sensitive (95.5%) and specific (97%). Shell vial cultures combined with Bartels IFA reagents are a rapid alternative to standard tube cultures. Bartels IFA direct staining with individual antisera provides useful same-day screening of respiratory specimens, but the antiserum pool was not effective in screening for positive specimens because of excessive amounts of nonspecific fluorescence.

Full text

PDF
540

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartholoma N. Y., Forbes B. A. Successful use of shell vial centrifugation and 16 to 18-hour immunofluorescent staining for the detection of influenza A and B in clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Oct;92(4):487–490. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/92.4.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanding J. G., Hoshiko M. G., Stutman H. R. Routine viral culture for pediatric respiratory specimens submitted for direct immunofluorescence testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1438–1440. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1438-1440.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner P. S., McQuillin J., McGuckin R. The late detection of respiratory syncytial virus in cells of respiratory tract by immunofluorescence. J Hyg (Lond) 1970 Dec;68(4):575–580. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400042509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gleaves C. A., Smith T. F., Shuster E. A., Pearson G. R. Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):217–221. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.217-221.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gleaves C. A., Wilson D. J., Wold A. D., Smith T. F. Detection and serotyping of herpes simplex virus in MRC-5 cells by use of centrifugation and monoclonal antibodies 16 h postinoculation. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):29–32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.29-32.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Halstead D. C., Todd S., Fritch G. Evaluation of five methods for respiratory syncytial virus detection. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 May;28(5):1021–1025. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.1021-1025.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hughes J. H., Mann D. R., Hamparian V. V. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus in clinical specimens by viral culture, direct and indirect immunofluorescence, and enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Mar;26(3):588–591. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.3.588-591.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston S. L., Siegel C. S. Evaluation of direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, centrifugation culture, and conventional culture for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2394–2397. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2394-2397.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ray C. G., Minnich L. L. Efficiency of immunofluorescence for rapid detection of common respiratory viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):355–357. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.355-357.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith M. C., Creutz C., Huang Y. T. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal secretions by shell vial technique. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):463–465. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.463-465.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stout C., Murphy M. D., Lawrence S., Julian S. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody pool for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viral infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Mar;27(3):448–452. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.3.448-452.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sullivan C. J., Jordan M. C. Diagnosis of viral pneumonia. Semin Respir Infect. 1988 Jun;3(2):148–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Welliver R. C. Detection, pathogenesis, and therapy of respiratory syncytial virus infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):27–39. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES