Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 Mar;30(3):557–560. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.3.557-560.1992

Comparison of sensitivities of three commercial MRC-5 cell lines grown in shell vials to cytomegalovirus and responses to enhancing agents.

P G West 1, R A Hartwig 1, W W Baker 1
PMCID: PMC265108  PMID: 1313044

Abstract

MRC-5 cells grown in shell vials from three suppliers (Whittaker Bioproducts, Bartels, and ViroMed) were evaluated for sensitivity to human cytomegalovirus. Previous studies done in our laboratory showed that treatment of the cells with dexamethasone (DEX) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or these agents plus calcium improved the sensitivity of cells from Whittaker. In this study, we compared the response of the Whittaker cells with those of the cells from Bartels and ViroMed, both treated and untreated, when tested with strain AD169, a strain of wild-type virus, and 41 clinical specimens from various sources. A progressive improvement in sensitivity to AD169 and the wild-type virus was seen for all cell lines with DEX-DSMO and DEX-DMSO-calcium treatments, although even untreated, the Whittaker cells were much more sensitive. Detection of most of the positive clinical specimens was enhanced by both treatments with the Whittaker cells. DEX-DMSO had little or no effect on Bartels or ViroMed cells, while DEX-DMSO-calcium usually effected some increase in the number of inclusions. Six specimens were recovered only on Whittaker cells. Protein studies were done on all groups to determine the effect, if any, of the treatments on the metabolism of the cells.

Full text

PDF
557

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fedorko D. P., Ilstrup D. M., Smith T. F. Effect of treatment of shell vial cell cultures with dimethyl sulfoxide and dexamethasone and age of MRC-5 monolayers for detection of cytomegalovirus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jan-Feb;13(1):41–44. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90052-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gleaves C. A., Smith T. F., Shuster E. A., Pearson G. R. Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):217–221. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.217-221.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gleaves C. A., Smith T. F., Shuster E. A., Pearson G. R. Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in MRC-5 cells inoculated with urine specimens by using low-speed centrifugation and monoclonal antibody to an early antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):917–919. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.917-919.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thiele G. M., Woods G. L. The effect of dexamethasone on the detection of cytomegalovirus in tissue culture and by immunofluorescence. J Virol Methods. 1988 Dec;22(2-3):319–328. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(88)90114-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. West P. G., Aldrich B., Hartwig R., Haller G. J. Enhanced detection of cytomegalovirus in confluent MRC-5 cells treated with dexamethasone and dimethyl sulfoxide. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Dec;26(12):2510–2514. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2510-2514.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. West P. G., Baker W. W. Enhancement by calcium of the detection of cytomegalovirus in cells treated with dexamethasone and dimethyl sulfoxide. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Aug;28(8):1708–1710. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.8.1708-1710.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES