Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 Apr;30(4):786–789. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.786-789.1992

Comparison of rapid methods of detection of cytomegalovirus in saliva with virus isolation in tissue culture.

W P Warren 1, K Balcarek 1, R Smith 1, R F Pass 1
PMCID: PMC265162  PMID: 1315334

Abstract

Two rapid methods for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in saliva from congenitally and perinatally infected children were assessed by comparison with traditional virus isolation in tissue culture (TC). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a 300-bp segment of the CMV gB gene which was detected in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. A centrifugation-enhanced microtiter culture method with a monoclonal antibody for the detection of early-antigen fluorescent foci (DEAFF) was also used. Saliva specimens were collected with mouth swabs from children who were between the ages of 1 month and 14 years and who had either prenatal or perinatal CMV infection. One hundred sixty samples were tested by PCR and TC; 65 (40.6%) were found positive by TC, and 58 (36.8%) were found positive by PCR. Although four samples were found positive by PCR and negative by TC, saliva from seronegative and seropositive TC-negative adults were never found positive by PCR. One hundred fifty-two samples were tested by DEAFF and TC; 64 (42.1%) were found positive by TC, and 58 (38.2%) were found positive by DEAFF. With TC results as a standard, the sensitivity and specificity of DEAFF were, respectively, 90.6 and 97.7%. Because of the greater ease of collecting saliva than urine from newborns, both of these rapid methods merit evaluation in screening for congenital infection.

Full text

PDF
786

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andreoni M., Faircloth M., Vugler L., Britt W. J. A rapid microneutralization assay for the measurement of neutralizing antibody reactive with human cytomegalovirus. J Virol Methods. 1989 Feb;23(2):157–167. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(89)90129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Demmler G. J., Buffone G. J., Schimbor C. M., May R. A. Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Infect Dis. 1988 Dec;158(6):1177–1184. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.6.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gleaves C. A., Smith T. F., Shuster E. A., Pearson G. R. Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in MRC-5 cells inoculated with urine specimens by using low-speed centrifugation and monoclonal antibody to an early antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):917–919. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.917-919.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kniess N., Mach M., Fay J., Britt W. J. Distribution of linear antigenic sites on glycoprotein gp55 of human cytomegalovirus. J Virol. 1991 Jan;65(1):138–146. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.1.138-146.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shuster E. A., Beneke J. S., Tegtmeier G. E., Pearson G. R., Gleaves C. A., Wold A. D., Smith T. F. Monoclonal antibody for rapid laboratory detection of cytomegalovirus infections: characterization and diagnostic application. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 Sep;60(9):577–585. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60979-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stagno S., Pass R. F., Reynolds D. W., Moore M. A., Nahmias A. J., Alford C. A. Comparative study of diagnostic procedures for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 1980 Feb;65(2):251–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES